|
Actually,
My Outlook Express does the same thing when I
reply. I hate it. But I do not know how to turn it off.
Does any one know how to turn off the feature that
includes the bar on the left, when I reply myself?
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless
Broadband
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 10:07
PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] WCA Weighs In
Against Net Neutrality
>why do you do it?
I'm a top poster. I hate having to
essentially re-read the previous email to find the added reply comments
(especially when it's a long email and you ultimately just find an added "yeah
me too" way down at the bottom). I find that incredibly annoying.
I prefer replies where you pick-out what you're replying to and copy it to the
top along with your reply. Concise. The originals are all there
below for reference if you want them, but you don't have to scroll down to
find the reply. You can more clearly see the chain of replies
too (when each reply edits the same body, it quickly becomes
impossible).
I know it's a religious preference / argument and
there's no right or wrong, only a preference ... but you wanted to
know "why", so ...
peace
Rich
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 8:17
PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] WCA Weighs In
Against Net Neutrality
You guys that post using this incredibly
annoying bar at the left... why do you do it? It makes c
onversational email impossible...
Read on below. comments are
prefaced with >>>>>
North East Oregon Fastnet, LLC 509-593-4061
personal correspondence
to: mark at neofast dot net
sales inquiries to: purchasing at
neofast dot net
Fast Internet, NO
WIRES!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 1:37
PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] WCA Weighs In
Against Net Neutrality
I respectfully disagree and think that WCA's
position of less regulation and allowing network operators operate their
networks how they want is the right approach. Net neutrality
legislation opens the door for content companies and your subscribers to
force open and equal access to all content on the Internet.
>>>> I don't see the
problem with content companies and subscribers having equal access to each
other. That, after all... IS WHAT I PROVIDE!
How many WISPs on this list are limiting
P2P traffic separate from other traffic? I'll bite... I
am.
>>>> Me too, but this has
little to do with net neutrality, since peer to peer sharing involves
HOSTING, and that I specifically don't generally allow. Terms
of Service has covered hosting forever - since long before Napster was
someone's dream.
How many WISPs on this list are prioritizing
VoIP traffic separate from other traffic? I'll bite. I
am. And I only prioritize VoIP traffic to and from my own VoIP
servers and not VoIP traffic from Vonage or anyone else.
>>>>> I will eventually,
and I will be entirely neutral as to whose servers it goes to...after
all, if I can't serve my customer's needs, then what the heck am
I? A fraud?
How many WISPs on this list are filtering
NetBIOS, RPC, and other traffic deemed malicious? I'll bite... I am
again.
>>>>> Yeah.
Me too. Again, this has nothing whatsoever to do with limiting
access to content.
Now the last one, I can't imagine being sued
over, but I hope you see my point.
These controls are important for me to manage
my network and ensure a quality of service my customers
expect.
Net neutrality takes these controls
away.
>>>> I seriously doubt
that.
Dave
989-837-3790 x 151
989-837-3780 fax
129 Ashman St, Midland, MI 48640
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 3:56
PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] WCA Weighs In
Against Net Neutrality
The WCA is showing its true colors.. the WCA stands
for the interests of
Verizon, AT&T Wireless, Sprint, and the
other big Cell Carriers (many of
which incidentally are owned by
AT&T, Bell South, and Verizon RBOCs). With
statements like
this, I don't believe that the WCA will ever be looking out
for the
interests unlicensed WISPs.
If you think that blocking net
neutrality is the path to "controlling your
own network", you have
missed the entire point. Without effective net
neutrality
legislation, the RBOCs and the CableCos will own the internet and
tariff the hell out of the traffic that flows through it. It
will be one
more nail in the coffin of the mom-n-pop operator that
can't afford to pay
tariffs to get their subscribers access to
"premium" content. It will drive
the customers of small
operators to switch to the RBOCs and CableCos because
those networks
will be the only "fast" networks or the only ones that have
"access"
to everything on the internet.
- Larry Yunker
-----
Original Message -----
From: "Peter R." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA
General List" <[email protected]>
Sent:
Tuesday, June 20, 2006 12:32 PM
Subject: [WISPA] WCA Weighs In
Against Net Neutrality
> WCA Weighs In Against Net
Neutrality
>
> http://www.telecomweb.com/tnd/17310.html
>
<http://ad.doubleclick.net/jump/telecomweb.com/;sz=180x150;ord=021450>
>
>
The *Wireless Communications Association International* (WCA) has come
> down against network-neutrality legislation, joining one of the
pressure
> groups that has been opposing moves in *Congress
> </search/?query=Congress>* on the polarizing issue
(/TelecomWeb news
> break, /June 15).
>
>
Representing about 250 companies in broadband wireless carriage and
> manufacturing, WCA has teamed with the recently formed
>
*NETCompetition.org* group organized by Scott Cleland, president of
> *Precursor LLC*, and which bills itself as an "e-forum" for
debate but
> clearly positions itself among the vocal
anti-net-neutrality factions.WCA
> claims its motive is to
promote growth and innovation in advanced
> communications over
broadband wireless by protecting the business from
>
net-neutrality regulation
>
> "With spectrum a scarce and
expensive resource, it is imperative that
> wireless broadband
providers remain free to manage their own networks,"
> said WCA
President Andrew Kreig in a prepared statement. "Net-neutrality
>
regulation would discourage innovation and investment in more
competitive
> broadband choices to all Americans. Our member
companies are investing
> heavily in WiMAX
</search/?query=WiMAX> or other '4G' types of
>
next-generation broadband competitive alternatives. Our companies are
part
> of the competitive solution, not part of the regulatory
problem."
>
> Other supporters of NETCompetition.org include
the *American Cable
> Association*, *CTIA-The Wireless
Association*, the *National Cable &
> Telecommunications*
*Association*, the *United States Telecommunications
>
Association*, *Advance/Neuhouse Communications*, *Alltel*, *AT&T*,
> *BellSouth*, *Cingular*, *Comcast*, *Qwest
</search/?query=Qwest>
> Communications International*,
*Sprint*, *Time Warner Cable*, *Verizon
>
</search/?query=Verizon> Communications* and *Verizon
Wireless*.
>
> With the WCA's membership, Cleland remarks
that next-generation wireless
> broadband companies are concerned
net neutrality regulation would
> discourage investment, adding,
"More innovation and competition are the
> antidotes for
net-neutrality concerns, not backward-looking government
>
micromanagement."
>
> The development comes after key
*House* committees and a full House floor
> vote passed a new
video-franchise and telecom bills after defeating
> repeated
amendment attempts to codify stronger net-neutrality laws and to
> give the *Federal Communications Commission* greater
powers.
>
> The debate over net neutrality - with many pro
and con pressure groups
> frantically trying to get attention -
now turns to the *Senate *Committee
> on Commerce Science and
Technology, where a massive communications-reform
> bill also
allegedly lacks strong net-neutrality provisos as well as to the
> Senate Judiciary Committee that is considering separate net
neutrality
> bills in an antitrust, anti-monopoly context (/see
related stories in
> today's Telecom Policy
Report/).
>
> The Senate Commerce Committee may mark up its
draft on Thursday (reschuled
> from tomorrow) while Senate
Judiciary's Subcommittee on Antitrust,
> Competition Policy and
Consumer Rights that same afternoon has slated a
> hearing on the
impact of the proposed AT&T/BellSouth merger (in light of
>
consolidating telcos becoming a factor in the net-neutrality
fight).
>
> --
>
>
>
Regards,
>
> Peter
> RAD-INFO, Inc. - NSP
Strategist
> We Help ISPs Connect & Communicate
>
813.963.5884 http://4isps.com/newsletter.htm
>
>
>
--
> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>
>
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
--
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives:
http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
--
WISPA Wireless List:
[email protected]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives:
http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
--
WISPA Wireless List:
[email protected]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives:
http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
--
WISPA Wireless List:
[email protected]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives:
http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
|
