I've looked into doing traditional TV over IP and wireless networks...  You 
can't obtain a license for traditional TV over wireless networks.

I wouldn't mind coming up with a half assed list of places of good video 
content.


-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



--------------------------------------------------
From: "Clint Ricker" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 7:11 AM
To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net Neutrality

> I am all too aware of the weakness of wireless networks in regards to
> streaming of video.
>
> That said, I cannot see how over the top video is a bad thing for
> independent ISPs, even if wireless technology has to make some progress to
> handle it.  It removes triple play as a competitive advantage for your
> competitors and hurts them a LOT more than it costs the independent ISPs.
> If anything, independent ISPs (especially wireline independent ISPs) 
> should
> be advertising "Internet access, includes 10 million channels for FREE" 
> and
> get people to shift the $1,500-$2,000 a year that they are spending on
> triple play packages over your way.
>
> -Clint Ricker
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 11:06 AM, RickG <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> This is imminent. The questions is: whose network? -RickG
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Robert West <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > One thing you can bank on, it WILL take hold.
>> >
>> > The need for more Bandwidth won't be stopped anytime soon, I believe.
>> > Eventually most if not all communications will run over the same 
>> > network,
>> > which if you think about it, all the communications out there seem to
>> touch
>> > the internet at least in part.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
>> > Behalf Of Clint Ricker
>> > Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 9:21 AM
>> > To: WISPA General List
>> > Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net Neutrality
>> >
>> > For the mainstream ISPs (the big RBOCs and MSOs), their bandwidth costs
>> are
>> > very, very low and are a small fraction of their overall costs. 
>> > However,
>> > that statement does ignore the costs of perpetually upgrading their
>> network
>> > to handle larger volumes of bandwidth.  From a cost perspective, that 
>> > is
>> the
>> > main motivation for the big players to shape traffic.  However, even 
>> > that
>> is
>> > small compared to the potential loss of revenue if "over the top" video
>> > takes hold.
>> >
>> > -Clint
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Matt <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> > It's back....
>> >> >
>> >> > http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,552503,00.html?test=latestnews
>> >>
>> >> I am just waiting for them to say bitcaps are a no no.  When you think
>> >> about it with a bit cap you cannot really use the Internet to
>> >> completely replace the catv or dish service.  Some consumers I am sure
>> >> are going to say that's not fair and some clueless law makers will
>> >> likely believe them.
>> >>
>> >> I have already heard some 'expert' IT people on blogs brag that
>> >> bandwidth costs ISP's virtually nothing and the only reason for
>> >> bitcaps is to prevent competing video services from taking market
>> >> share.
>> >>
>> >> Matt
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > ----
>> >> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> >> http://signup.wispa.org/
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > ----
>> >>
>> >> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>> >>
>> >> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>> >>
>> >> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > ----
>> > WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> > http://signup.wispa.org/
>> >
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > ----
>> >
>> > WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>> >
>> > Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>> >
>> > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> > http://signup.wispa.org/
>> >
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> > WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>> >
>> > Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>> >
>> > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to