Hi all, I'll chime in here to clarify the point regarding TX Power.
Trango offers high power as a standard feature, and even higher power as
an optional key.  The "Extra" high power feature and I should also point
out that we also now support adaptive power control, meaning that as ACM
kicks in to downshift the modulation, it will simultaneously upshift the
TX Power.

11 Ghz
Trango:   256QAM   +21 dBm (standard) /   +24 dBm with optional key
QPSK +26 dBm
SAF:      256QAM   +12 dBm (standard) / +18 dBm (HP Model)
4QAM +19 (standard) / +25 (HP)

18 & 23 GHz
Trango: 256QAM +19 dBm / +21 dBm with optional key    QPSK +25 dBm
SAF:    256QAM +12 dBm  (no high power option)          4QAM +19 dBm

Trango receive sensitivity is also considerably higher than SAF, so when
you combine TX Power and RX Sensitivity, the Trango System gain is 10 dB
better (or more) in some cases.

John Seaman
Trango Systems, Inc.
858-248-4006


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Gino Villarini
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 6:38 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] SAF vs Trango

I beg to differ, they have a new higher power option that requires a
license key.  Its only compatible with latest apex plus radios....

Gino A. Villarini
[email protected]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 9:29 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] SAF vs Trango

Feature key is NOT required on Trango for more power. All the radios are
at full power regardless of the license key.

Travis

On 11/2/2012 6:53 AM, Gino Villarini wrote:
> Having more than 20+ links on both manufactures here is my input:
>
> SAF Pluses
> Great UI Interface, simultaneous link config changes from 1
> end/polarity indicator Lightweight Low Power consumption Great mount
> No Feature keys
> 5 years warranty
>
> SAF Minuses
> Lower Tx power
> Custom Antenna - ODU interface
> No full poe
> Fiber interface is optional - not field changeable from SM,MM No OBM
> port
>
> Trango Pluses
> More Tx Power
> Remec ODU Interface
> Built in Surge Suppression / POE
> Field replaceable modem
> OBM Port
> Copper/Fiber Interfaces
>
> Trango Minuses
> Heavy
> UI interface not great, some changes require reboot Higher power
> consumption Feature keys required for more BW and extra power
>
> Gino A. Villarini
> [email protected]
> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
> 787.273.4143
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> On Behalf Of Bill Gaylord
> Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 8:20 AM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: [WISPA] SAF vs Trango
>
> Can anyone help me out?  We are in the process of deciding which company
to use for 6 licensed links.  Both are similar in price/performance.
> Trango has more tx power and rx sensitivity, thus their antennas are
smaller, which is a plus.  I would like to know if anyone has any
experiences with either company and their products.  I met both in Vegas,
but there is only so much real info you can get from Salespeople.  Please
send any comments off list as not to pollute the list with opinions on
products.  If anyone would like to also learn what I learn from the list,
drop me an e-mail and I will be happy to forward the opinions I get on to
you as well. Thank you.
>
> Bill Gaylord, President
> COLI Inc.
> _______________________________________________
> Wireless mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> _______________________________________________
> Wireless mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>

_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to