Having more than 20+ links on both manufactures here is my input: SAF Pluses Great UI Interface, simultaneous link config changes from 1 end/polarity indicator Lightweight Low Power consumption Great mount No Feature keys 5 years warranty
SAF Minuses Lower Tx power Custom Antenna - ODU interface No full poe Fiber interface is optional - not field changeable from SM,MM No OBM port Trango Pluses More Tx Power Remec ODU Interface Built in Surge Suppression / POE Field replaceable modem OBM Port Copper/Fiber Interfaces Trango Minuses Heavy UI interface not great, some changes require reboot Higher power consumption Feature keys required for more BW and extra power Gino A. Villarini [email protected] Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 787.273.4143 -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bill Gaylord Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 8:20 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] SAF vs Trango Can anyone help me out? We are in the process of deciding which company to use for 6 licensed links. Both are similar in price/performance. Trango has more tx power and rx sensitivity, thus their antennas are smaller, which is a plus. I would like to know if anyone has any experiences with either company and their products. I met both in Vegas, but there is only so much real info you can get from Salespeople. Please send any comments off list as not to pollute the list with opinions on products. If anyone would like to also learn what I learn from the list, drop me an e-mail and I will be happy to forward the opinions I get on to you as well. Thank you. Bill Gaylord, President COLI Inc. _______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless _______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
