On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 05:16:33PM +0200, Lars Noschinski wrote: > * Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-04 16:14]: > >I agree with Sander, that it might be a good idea to remove > >swapping completely (vertical swapping can be achieved through > >moving afterwards anyways). And since the LarsWM discussion > >proved, that people don't use swapping at all, I think it is a > >good idea to get rid of this complexity (I actually only used > >swapping within columns, otherwise always moving). > > Given the current design, no swapping would be a big loss for me, as it > is the only possibility to keep the current column sizes. And given the > small resolution of my display (it's fixed, as it's a laptop), it's the > fastest way to get a window to the big frame. > > (How do you move in a columnt? I thought only swapping works there?)
I got another idea, maybe it will increase the dynamic approach of wmii ;) What about simply combining 'swap' and 'move' into one action (which could be still called swap)? Such an action creates columns on the attempt to swap with a non-existent column at boundaries. E.g. if only 1 columns exists with 2 clients, a swap east would create a new column and move the focused client there. Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe ><>< www.ebrag.de ><>< GPG key: 0D73F361 _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://wmii.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wmii
