On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 05:51:34PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > What about simply combining 'swap' and 'move' into one action > (which could be still called swap)? Such an action creates > columns on the attempt to swap with a non-existent column at > boundaries. E.g. if only 1 columns exists with 2 clients, a swap > east would create a new column and move the focused client > there. So swap to non-existing column would be a move and swap to existing columns a swap. You still need an explicit move between existing columns then... Or did I misunderstand "combining"?
Regards, Stefan _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://wmii.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wmii
