On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 10:45:53AM +0200, Sander van Dijk wrote: > On 5/5/06, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Well, after this whole discussion I can live with following > >compromise: > This discussion isn't over yet :-) > > >- keeping a horizontal swap for the price to remove the > > shortcuts of vertical swap at least > >- improving mouse-base move > This should indeed be done, regardless of what happers to swapping. > > >Conceptually I'd also keep the up/down swapping in swap > >internally, although it might be bound to move-shortcuts, > >because it is nothing else than a swap from keyboard POV. > Right. On the other hand, it can be seen as a move too (since keyboard > up/down moving can only be done one client up/down at a time, it is > effectively the same as swapping, but from the mouse point of view, > moving up/down is different from swapping). > > >I believe that people will ask for removal of swap in a few > >months, because they will drop using it like me or Sander, > >after a while of settlement with column layout. > Yes, and that's why I think swapping should be dumped before wmii-3. > The usage of swapping is in my eyes a result of misusage of the > column(modes) approach. We already dropped bardrag-moving and > border-resizing because that points people in the right > usage-direction, I think we should do the same with swapping. > This is not suppusod to be a "like the others"-wm, but a "done the > right way"-wm.
Hehe, I agree on that ;) Though I'll decide after I finished 'taggi' today... Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe ><>< www.ebrag.de ><>< GPG key: 0D73F361 _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://wmii.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wmii
