On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 10:15:27AM +0200, Stefan Tibus wrote: > On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 08:47:31PM +0200, Denis Grelich wrote: > > On the other hand, the current scheme makes me think a lot and > > distracts me much from the work I'm doing, As I swap and move > > a lot while working (what I think is »dynamic«), and having > > to think whether I have to swap or to move now really makes my > > little head hurt. > ...I'd very much like a "do-what-I-want"-mode for my PC since years > ;-) > > Move and swap are (as I already explained in some posting these > days) very distinct actions. If people feel better calling the > swap up/down a move, then they may just do so. However I like > to keep the swap left/right for the sake of working speed and > efficiency. It is NOT redundant.
Well, after this whole discussion I can live with following compromise: - keeping a horizontal swap for the price to remove the shortcuts of vertical swap at least - improving mouse-base move Conceptually I'd also keep the up/down swapping in swap internally, although it might be bound to move-shortcuts, because it is nothing else than a swap from keyboard POV. I believe that people will ask for removal of swap in a few months, because they will drop using it like me or Sander, after a while of settlement with column layout. At least I will re-discuss this again. Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe ><>< www.ebrag.de ><>< GPG key: 0D73F361 _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://wmii.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wmii
