On 20:47 Thu 04 May     , Denis Grelich wrote:
> On Thu, 4 May 2006 20:17:01 +0300
> "Alexandru E. Ungur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > The idea is that there is no explicit move between columns - but
> > > it might be bad, dunno.
> > Yep, it might introduce more complexity instead of reducing it...
> > If swap is swap and move is move all is clear, but if swap is move or
> > swap depending on the context... it may be less typing (less shortcuts)
> > but it also will be more thinking before making a move...
> > Not good. Right now I don't have to think :D and I'd like to keep
> > it that way... ;)
> 
> On the other hand, the current scheme makes me think a lot and distracts me 
> much from the work I'm doing, As I swap and move a lot while working (what I 
> think is ??dynamic??), and having to think whether I have to swap or to move 
> now really makes my little head hurt.
> 
> Greetings,
> Denis

Firstly thanks for a great project folks.

I like moving and swapping just the way they are in rc2-slavutich!  I use both 
and it doesn't bother me that they are the same when moving/swaping vertically.
> _______________________________________________
> [email protected] mailing list
> http://wmii.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wmii

_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://wmii.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wmii

Reply via email to