On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 06:29:26PM +0200, Stefan Tibus wrote: > On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 05:51:34PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > > What about simply combining 'swap' and 'move' into one action > > (which could be still called swap)? Such an action creates > > columns on the attempt to swap with a non-existent column at > > boundaries. E.g. if only 1 columns exists with 2 clients, a swap > > east would create a new column and move the focused client > > there. > So swap to non-existing column would be a move and swap to > existing columns a swap. You still need an explicit move between > existing columns then... Or did I misunderstand "combining"?
The idea is that there is no explicit move between columns - but it might be bad, dunno. -- Anselm R. Garbe ><>< www.ebrag.de ><>< GPG key: 0D73F361 _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://wmii.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wmii
