On Thu, 4 May 2006 20:17:01 +0300 "Alexandru E. Ungur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The idea is that there is no explicit move between columns - but > > it might be bad, dunno. > Yep, it might introduce more complexity instead of reducing it... > If swap is swap and move is move all is clear, but if swap is move or > swap depending on the context... it may be less typing (less shortcuts) > but it also will be more thinking before making a move... > Not good. Right now I don't have to think :D and I'd like to keep > it that way... ;)
On the other hand, the current scheme makes me think a lot and distracts me much from the work I'm doing, As I swap and move a lot while working (what I think is »dynamic«), and having to think whether I have to swap or to move now really makes my little head hurt. Greetings, Denis
pgpNos7NXaglO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://wmii.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wmii
