Brilliant!  How can one argue with that? Everyone may have their own 
perception of reality. That perception itself is the illusion. I 
think you have really topped off your arguement. I have to say 
though, I was preparing a post very similar to this, you just beat 
me to the punch! 


--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, Edgar Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Margie (and Bill),
> What nonsense! That experience suggests there is an objective 
> (the eggplant) and that the cognitive representation of that world 
> illusion. Only if the monk went back again later and it wasn't an  
> eggplant but a squashed frog and kept changing every time he 
> at then we might conclude there was no objective world. The monk  
> accepted that the reality of the objective world was the 
> not the squashed frog illusion in his mind.
> My point again is that what is in the mind and what is in the 
> is the same thing and that it is only one thing, and that the 
> that govern all that are causal and consistent. That includes the  
> phenomenon of errors of the senses and cognition that can be  
> corrected by internal consistency.
> That is true because things are only illusion in the sense that 
> are observer dependent views of reality. Reality itself has no  
> reality independent of any observer. Just as in relativity there 
> no absolute motion, only motion relative to an observer. Every 
> is an 'experience' or observation by an 'observer' even if it is 
> an electron responding to a force. The whole idea of an external  
> reality independent of observers is a construct of the mind and  
> represents the cognitive world view of every organism, each of 
> is different and dependent on the biological and cognitive 
> of that organism.
> And that view is my own cognitive construct in my own mind which  
> depends on my cognitive structure.
> So we go round and round and never get to any observer 
> external reality. Therefore everything is illusion, but only in 
> sense that it is impossible to identify an objective reality 
> everything independent on any observer's direct experience since 
> observer could ever experience it.
> So what is not illusion, at least in my experience, is the 
illusion -  
> that is the contents of direct experience in the ground of the  
> present moment, but known to be illusion since their 
> depends on my structure. And even worse, my supposed structure 
> determines reality is a construct of its own structure! But at 
> in my experience that is consistent and follows causal rules.
> Those are the contents of consciousness. I can however experience  
> experience more directly when all contents fade away and only 
> consciousness remains, that experience is the reality of the 
> moment empty of all, or almost all, content. Or, if I open my 
> the perceptual content reappears but is not categorized by the 
> That categorization, e.g. the separation of the perceptual 
> into discrete things which stand in relationships to each other is 
> construct of the mind and as such is illusion. But it is a 
> illusion ruled by causality.
> And since that is all there is, that illusion must be accepted as  
> reality, but only when recognized to be illusion.
> Edgar
> On Oct 15, 2008, at 10:45 AM, roloro1557 wrote:
> > There was a monk who specialized in the buddhist precepts, and 
> > kept to them all his life. Once when he was walking at night, he
> > stepped on something. It made a squishing sound, and he thought 
he had
> > stepped on an egg-bearing frog. This caused him no end of alarm 
> > regret, in view of the precept against taking life. When he 
> > went to sleep that night he dreamed that hundreds of frogs came 
to him
> > demanding his life.
> >
> > The monk was terribly upset, but when morning came he decided to 
> > and look, and he found that what he had stepped on was an 
> > eggplant. At that moment his feelings suddenly stopped, and for 
> > first time he realized the meaning of the saying that there is no
> > objective world. Then he finally knew how to practice zen.
> >
> > --------------------------------------
> > FROM: Over the hills and far away. . .
> > The way to do is be. Lao Tzu
> > OldWomansZenChronicles.blogspot.com
> >
> >
> >


Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:

Reply via email to