jm...

i am keen on chan..
what do you mean by reincarnate?..don't you mean recycle?... 
ashes to ashes dust to dust..hence dust to soup then the cycle begins again...? 
this reincarnation "theory" has me bamboozled...
is it not just another mind game?
how can you be free with spirit soaring when there is so much suffering in the 
world caused by the greed of others?
merle




  
Hi Bill,

Thank you for asking..  Below are my comments for your reference.. 
    I have read this article awhile back..

Chan by definition is One and ALL.  Meaning it is the absolute
    dharma applicable to ALL things - body, mind and spirit.  As well as
    it can answer every question written in the sutra and bible.   In
    other words, with a simplest practice, it can rejuvenate our body,
    clear our mind and let our spirit shine by eliminating all karma. 
    And at the end of it all, our spirit will stop reincarnating.  We
    will be in heaven.

Most of the Chan teachings by an unenlightened master, stops at the
    mind level, because they don't have the spiritual power to help
    people to eliminate their karma.  This article ends at the mind
    level.  For most of the people, if one can achieve ego-less, it
    would already deserve celebration, because the world will be a
    better place.  This is what we call "Chan Living", or everyday Chan.
    Living by fulfilling each moment.  But you still reincarnate.

Most of the Chan teachings does not cover the spiritual practice,
    because it deals with lights, chi and abstract phenomena.  Yet, once
    you experience consistent phenomena with lights and chi, you will
    know they are the actual causes of everything.  The world is really
    run by energy.  In other worlds, the spiritual practice is the
    practice dictating our body and mind.  Fundamental Chan practice is
    a spiritual practice.  If you recall, seven or eight years ago, when
    I first join the forum, I asked, "is there spirituality in Zen?"

BTW, how do we know whether a person is enlightened or not?  The
    proof is in his dead body.  If he dies at his preferred time without
    sickness, and there are relics after he was cremated, then he is
    enlightened.

My Shifu said, "the parents of all my disciple, even though they do
    not practice, they still will have relics when they die."  I have
    witnessed that every time.

In short, I like to suggest to the forum, instead of using your mind
    to judge whether you wanted to try our way of meditation or not,
    just try it diligently for six months, then you shall experience. 
    There is nothing worth any of us to hang on too, or to hold them
    with our life.   Chan is taught beyond words and through
    transmission.

Chan is about direct experience of ALL things.  Using our mind to
    filter or discriminate only narrows our scope resulting in practice
    with our mind and not our spirit.  Let our spirit soar and be free.

Thank you for the opportunity to share,
jm




On 5/22/2013 1:19 AM, Bill! wrote:

  
>Mike and JMJM,
>
>Mike, Thanks for this link. I pulled up the article will
              wait to read it until JMJM says he thinks it's worthwhile
              doing so. I don't want to have 3 or 4 versions of Ch'an
              rolling around in my head. The mix we get here on the Zen
              Forum about zen is confusion enough, and I trust JMJM's
              insight and knowledge on Ch'an.
>
>JMJM, If you would please read the article cited below and
              tell me what you think of it. It's looks pretty thorough.
              It's by Ch'an Master Sheng-yen (1977) if that helps you
              make that determination without reading it.
>
>Thanks...Bill!
>
>--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, uerusuboyo@... wrote:
>>
>> Joe,<br/><br/>http://www.abuddhistlibrary.com/Buddhism/C%20-%20Zen/Modern%20Teachers/Sheng%20Yen/What%20is%20Ch%27an/What%20is%20Ch%27an%20-%20Master%20Sheng-yen.htm<br/><br/>Found
>>  this online and thought you might be interested. It was originally written 
>> as a pamphlet to be handed out, but was then lost. Someone found one of 
>> these old pamphlets and thought it was so good it should be shared. Even if 
>> you've read it before.. Enjoy!<br/><br/>Mike<br/><br/><br/>Sent from Yahoo! 
>> Mail for iPad
>>
>
>

 

Reply via email to