Merle,
If you "understand" Buddhism, then you don't understand Buddhism.
There's a fine Zen story about this. But you already have the essence, from
what I say. And, besides, you "understand"; thus, no need.
Y'on y'own.
Carry on, Montesquieu!
This is not an _ad hominem_.
What's a homonym for hominem?:
cousin,
--Joe
> Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@...> wrote:
>
> mike..i am re sending JM's post...ponder this and then tell me i don't
> understand buddhism...merle
[snippeth]
------------------------------------
Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
[email protected]
[email protected]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
