Edgar,

No, I don't think so.

It's kind of like the discussion Merle and I were having about having a map and 
being lost.  Something is only 'useful' if you have an intention, a purpose to 
fulfill, much like having destination.  An example is a hammer is useful for 
pounding in a nail, but its not useful for screwing in a screw.

If you have no intentions, no purpose - then 'useful' doesn't really have much 
meaning.

...Bill!

--- In [email protected], Edgar Owen <edgarowen@...> wrote:
>
> Bill,
> 
> Yes, that's what reality is!
> 
> Edgar
> 
> 
> 
> On Jul 4, 2013, at 6:59 AM, Bill! wrote:
> 
> > Edgar,
> > 
> > No, 'usefulness' only means something gives you the results you want.
> > 
> > ...Bill!
> > 
> > --- In [email protected], Edgar Owen <edgarowen@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Bill,
> > > 
> > > Usefulness is a criterion that something IS real. Usefulness means it's 
> > > in synch with the actual logic of the world of forms and thus IS 
> > > accurately part of reality...
> > > 
> > > Edgar
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On Jul 3, 2013, at 8:10 PM, Bill! wrote:
> > > 
> > > > PBS,
> > > > 
> > > > Math, logic, reason like all delusions should come with the caveat 
> > > > 'suitable for everyday use'. As a universal human language to 
> > > > communicate our logical concepts it's very useful, but it should never 
> > > > be mistaken for reality.
> > > > 
> > > > ...Bill!
> > > > 
> > > > --- In [email protected], <pandabananasock@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Bill!:
> > > > > You're gonna ignore the math? I thought you said you were looking for 
> > > > > an impersonal language a couple posts ago... :D
> > > > > 
> > > > > The thing about using math that way is that eventually it leads you 
> > > > > back to the beginning. We use mathematics as an expression of the 
> > > > > model, then we use the model as an expression of the math. Then we 
> > > > > realize that both are models of each other and the same, and 
> > > > > experience encompasses all -- no need for anything else. Rivers and 
> > > > > mountains become rivers and mountains again!
> > > > > ~PeeBeeEss 
> > > > > 
> > > > > --------------------------------------------
> > > > > On Wed, 7/3/13, Bill! <BillSmart@> wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > Subject: Re: [Zen] Say Bye-Bye to the Delusion of Cause-and-Effect 
> > > > > and Karma
> > > > > To: [email protected]
> > > > > Date: Wednesday, July 3, 2013, 8:56 AM
> > > > > 
> > > > > PBS (That's going to be my TLA (Three
> > > > > Letter Acronym) for Pandabananasock from now on)...
> > > > > 
> > > > > I'll ignore all the math but do agree that JUST IF there is
> > > > > such a think that could be called 'karma' it's not so much a
> > > > > moralistic cause-and-effect as it is an intrinsic quality of
> > > > > the act itself.
> > > > > 
> > > > > But, I'll continue to poo-poo all claims of karma.
> > > > > 
> > > > > ...Bill!
> > > > > 
> > > > > --- In [email protected],
> > > > > pandabananasock@ wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Most people think of "1+1=2" as procedural, that is,
> > > > > that there is 1, THEN we add 1 to it, THEN it becomes
> > > > > 2. They would regard "2=1+1" and "2=2" to be different
> > > > > equations, but they are not in the least bit
> > > > > different. The equal-sign is the present.
> > > > > > "1+1" is already 2! And the effect IS the
> > > > > cause. Your karmic punishment for doing something
> > > > > "bad" is you doing that "bad" thing. Your karmic
> > > > > reward for doing something "good" is you doing that "good"
> > > > > thing. Forget the come-back-to-bite-you BS!
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > > > On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 4:58 AM EDT Bill! wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >...Bill!
> > > > > >
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > ------------------------------------
> > > > > 
> > > > > Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have
> > > > > read or are reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups
> > > > > Links
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > [email protected]
> > > > >
> > > > 
> > > >
> > >
> > 
> >
>



------------------------------------

Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to