> So I will ask yet again: why Iraq specifically and not Pakistan? Pakistan is a > far greater threat.
You have got to admire Marc for his tenacity. I vote for some kind of award for him for this constant call to examine just who needs to be pounded. John is beating the same drum with slightly different drumsticks. Both of them should get awards. But maybe not until they get answers. No one has yet aswered either of them. Everytime Marc says "Why not get Pakistan?", the reply is "Iraq is so bad" and everytime John says "The Book of Mormon is always about defense, never offense," we get, "The Nephites attacked so and so," completely ignoring the fact that the example used precisely supports John's argument. I'm just happy to see that neither Marc nor John is tired. You have to admire their energy. ========= Mark Gregson [EMAIL PROTECTED] ========= -- __________________________________________________________ Download the FREE Opera browser at www.opera.com/download/ Free OperaMail at http://www.operamail.com/ Powered by Outblaze ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// /// ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at /// /// http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html /// ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ==^================================================================ This email was sent to: email@example.com EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================