Dieter Maurer wrote:
Jens Vagelpohl wrote at 2005-7-12 18:46 +0100:
Due to the nastiness Refresh has to perform under the cover even
Shane has to admit that it simply is not some "make development
Shane might (perhaps) admit it but I do not :-)
There is not much "nastiness" that "Refresh" does:
(Manual) refresh has only a single problem:
it does not refresh dependent products automatically.
It also doesn't handle global data properly.
It tries to do something that Python modules were never
designed to support, which is to load them more than once.
When it fails, it does so in subtle ways that cause people
to lose lots of time.
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714 http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:
ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org