Am 28.06.2010, 08:21 Uhr, schrieb Thomas Lotze <tho...@thomas-lotze.de>:
> Nitro wrote: > >> packaging: I don't plan to create a package for this as I don't see much >> point in adding yet another package to the clutter of packages >> surrounding >> zodb. > > Just a quick remark: Without being available as a package, your code will > be far less useful (if not outright useless) to a lot of potential users > because installing packages in one way or another is what people do in > order to be able to use code, in particular in the Zope and ZODB world. > In > fact, reading your message through the Gmane interface to the list, I > didn't even receive the attachment to your message. (I know I can dig it > up from the list archives, but compare this to being able to declare the > dependency on your package in my code and have it installed automatically > by my build system.) I also don't see how creating another package could > do any harm, in particular as it brings original new functionality. I do not like the current packaging approach as I discussed in length in a recent message to this list [1]. Until this changes I am not going to spend time creating random packages. -Matthias [1] http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Mail/Message/zodb/3867973 _______________________________________________ For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki: http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev
