Am 28.06.2010, 08:21 Uhr, schrieb Thomas Lotze <tho...@thomas-lotze.de>:
> Nitro wrote:
>> packaging: I don't plan to create a package for this as I don't see much
>> point in adding yet another package to the clutter of packages
> Just a quick remark: Without being available as a package, your code will
> be far less useful (if not outright useless) to a lot of potential users
> because installing packages in one way or another is what people do in
> order to be able to use code, in particular in the Zope and ZODB world.
> fact, reading your message through the Gmane interface to the list, I
> didn't even receive the attachment to your message. (I know I can dig it
> up from the list archives, but compare this to being able to declare the
> dependency on your package in my code and have it installed automatically
> by my build system.) I also don't see how creating another package could
> do any harm, in particular as it brings original new functionality.
I do not like the current packaging approach as I discussed in length in a
recent message to this list . Until this changes I am not going to
spend time creating random packages.
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:
ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org