On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Alan Runyan <runy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> - Have a canonical namespace which denotes quality, proven,
> and widely used packages.
> Packages should never be in this
> namespace unless the package can meet some quality level.
Mixing meta data into names is a bad idea. You don't want to change
the name of something just because some of its meta data changes.
> The namespace could be, zodb.
No it can't. ZODB isn't a namespace package and can't be one without
breaking backward compatibility.
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:
ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org