> Mixing meta data into names is a bad idea. You don't want to change
> the name of something just because some of its meta data changes.
Your right. It's just that sometimes people may have a package name
that is not agreeable to the broader community.
>> The namespace could be, zodb.
> No it can't. ZODB isn't a namespace package and can't be one without
> breaking backward compatibility.
Should it be a namespace package over the long term?
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:
ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org