> Mixing meta data into names is a bad idea.  You don't want to change
> the name of something just because some of its meta data changes.

Your right.  It's just that sometimes people may have a package name
that is not agreeable to the broader community.

>> The namespace could be, zodb.
> No it can't. ZODB isn't a namespace package and can't be one without
> breaking backward compatibility.

Should it be a namespace package over the long term?
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:

ZODB-Dev mailing list  -  ZODB-Dev@zope.org

Reply via email to