Previously Jens Vagelpohl wrote: > > On Feb 29, 2008, at 10:00 , Andreas Jung wrote: > > > > > > >--On 29. Februar 2008 08:39:05 +0000 Martin Aspeli > ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> > >>Of course, we should also provide a way to get an interface or > >>something > >>else describing the configuration for introspection purposes. > >>Waiting one > >>or two Zope versions for that to get a non-purging GS import > >>handler when > >>there's a works-90%-of-the-time solution (falling back on current > >>behaviour) would be a shame though. > >> > > > >You don't have to wait for for new Zope versions. Defining the > >interface > >officially in Zope 2.10, 2.11 and trunk will raise no problems. I > >have no problems with putting this into the official release > >branches - or? > > My personal opinion: I'd rather see the interface-based solution in a > few weeks or a couple months (the next Zope release) than the, umh, > less-than-professional solution that will stick around forever. As > such solutions have a tendency to do. "It works now" absolves everyone > from the task to come back later and improve the solution, so no one > does.
Amen to that. Wichert. -- Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> It is simple to make things. http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple. _______________________________________________ Zope-CMF maillist - [email protected] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests
