Previously Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
> On Feb 29, 2008, at 10:00 , Andreas Jung wrote:
> >--On 29. Februar 2008 08:39:05 +0000 Martin Aspeli
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>Of course, we should also provide a way to get an interface or
> >>else describing the configuration for introspection purposes.
> >>Waiting one
> >>or two Zope versions for that to get a non-purging GS import
> >>handler when
> >>there's a works-90%-of-the-time solution (falling back on current
> >>behaviour) would be a shame though.
> >You don't have to wait for for new Zope versions. Defining the
> >officially in Zope 2.10, 2.11 and trunk will raise no problems. I
> >have no problems with putting this into the official release
> >branches - or?
> My personal opinion: I'd rather see the interface-based solution in a
> few weeks or a couple months (the next Zope release) than the, umh,
> less-than-professional solution that will stick around forever. As
> such solutions have a tendency to do. "It works now" absolves everyone
> from the task to come back later and improve the solution, so no one
Amen to that.
Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple.
Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org
See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests