Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On Feb 29, 2008, at 10:00 , Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 29. Februar 2008 08:39:05 +0000 Martin Aspeli
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Of course, we should also provide a way to get an interface or
something
else describing the configuration for introspection purposes.
Waiting one
or two Zope versions for that to get a non-purging GS import
handler when
there's a works-90%-of-the-time solution (falling back on current
behaviour) would be a shame though.
You don't have to wait for for new Zope versions. Defining the
interface
officially in Zope 2.10, 2.11 and trunk will raise no problems. I
have no problems with putting this into the official release
branches - or?
My personal opinion: I'd rather see the interface-based solution in a
few weeks or a couple months (the next Zope release) than the, umh,
less-than-professional solution that will stick around forever. As
such solutions have a tendency to do. "It works now" absolves everyone
from the task to come back later and improve the solution, so no one
does.
I agree in principle, however this has been left unresolved for far too
long. I'm glad things are happening now, though!
Martin
--
Author of `Professional Plone Development`, a book for developers who
want to work with Plone. See http://martinaspeli.net/plone-book
_______________________________________________
Zope-CMF maillist - [email protected]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf
See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests
