Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hi there,
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 12:58 PM, Christian Theune <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[buildout.org versus buildout.zope.org]
> Agreed, we shouldn't hide ourselves. I think *.python.org is a step
> too far. What I do think is that it's good to let projects that *do*
> stand on their own stand alone in their presentation as well. That's
> not about hiding ourselves, it's about giving the right impression to
> people.
True. Considering that the current zope.org effort hopefully won't die (when
are we going to go live? Is there something like a check list or road map?)
I'm not in charge of the zope.org project, but this is a good
question. I've cc-ed Martin.
As soon as we have content to cover at least the basics of each of our
major projects (Zope 2, Zope 3, CMF, ZODB... and maybe zc.buildout)?
Martin
--
Author of `Professional Plone Development`, a book for developers who
want to work with Plone. See http://martinaspeli.net/plone-book
_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
