Hi, On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 01:10:19PM +0200, Martijn Faassen wrote: > I'm on the fence on this one. I think as long as the site *says* it's > affiliated with the Zope project, the Zope community and the > foundation, we're fine. You can argue both directions here: we might > even *help* send the message to people that the Zope community is > actually serious about providing stuff useful to outsiders. > > I propose we let the naming discussion rest for now given the > arguments have been made. The most important thing is the creation of > a website.
Agreed. I still have the feeling we should spend time getting our story straight. For example: Why is "zc.buildout" a "Zope project"? The new site starts talking about the "Zope libraries" which people started getting confused about. When is something "Zope"? Christian -- gocept gmbh & co. kg - forsterstrasse 29 - 06112 halle (saale) - germany www.gocept.com - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - phone +49 345 122 9889 7 - fax +49 345 122 9889 1 - zope and plone consulting and development _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
