Jens Vagelpohl wrote: > On Nov 4, 2008, at 13:59 , Hanno Schlichting wrote: > >> If I'm not mistaken there was something about every release being >> supported two years after its initial release in those discussions. >> >> But time went on, we haven't sticked to a time-based release schedule >> and those policies haven't been written down or been followed. > > 2 years sounds fine to me. > > By that reasoning, we can stop supporting 2.8 (2.8.0 was released June > 11, 2005) and 2.9 (2.9.0 was released January 9, 2006). However, if we > were strict it would also mean EOL for 2.10 (2.10.0 was released > October 4, 2006). But we can be lenient...
+1 to retiring 2.8, 2.9. Of course, if people still want to maintain it, they should be welcome to. I just don't think we should have to merge bugfixes to those branches anymore. Maintaining 2.10, 2.11, trunk seems perfectly acceptable and it's plenty to deal with. _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
