Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Martin Aspeli wrote:
>> Wichert Akkerman wrote:
>>> To stir things up: I would like to suggest renumbering the next Zope 2
>>> release to Zope 4. That reflects the large refactoring that is being
>>> done to clean up the codebase and fully eggify Zope. There are enough
>>> changes to warrant a new major version bump.
>> -100 again. We need to stop confusing people!
>> The only way we could do this would be if we definitely, 100%, 
>> with-an-axe killed off any notion of Zope 3 as an app server or 
>> application development framework and told everyone "the thing you need 
>> to be using if you like Zope, is this Zope thing that's basically Zope 
>> 2.14).
>> We won't do that.
> Actually, we have already done that.

Well, except that Grok runs on "Zope 3 the app server" or at least "Zope 
3 the platform".

I just think we need to stop playing with names and numbers. I have 
absolutely no problem with Zope 2 version numbers reaching 2.20 or whatever.


Author of `Professional Plone Development`, a book for developers who
want to work with Plone. See http://martinaspeli.net/plone-book

Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to