Hi, Jim Fulton wrote: > I think package-includes or something like an "egg basket" could be > useful for an application, like plone, that wants to support extension > by non-developers. But for developers, I think direct zcml includes > is better.
Ok, I've been starting to transform this in our project to this approach, and for that to work the instance recipe needs to be able to somehow involve the custom ZCML in the instance. You said you didn't like the package-includes, but IIRC you don't like skeletons either. Am I missing something? (I've stripped everything down to a single package-include for now, so it keeps working for us.) Christian -- gocept gmbh & co. kg - forsterstraße 29 - 06112 halle/saale - germany www.gocept.com - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - phone +49 345 122 9889 7 - fax +49 345 122 9889 1 - zope and plone consulting and development
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
