Jim Fulton wrote at 2007-5-31 10:12 -0400: > >In thinking about how we might specify that we want to depend on >major versions but sometimes need to specify minimum versions, the >following occurred to me: > >- Suppose that we always had access to the latest released version, > >- Suppose that, within a major release, all releases were backward >compatible, > >Then I assert that there is no *need* to specify a minimum release >within a major release.
I fear my colleagues responsible to maintain the productive versions would not be happy: They want the system to be as stable as possible. If they need to introduce a new component, they usually prefer to just add this one component. Only if this forces other updates, they reluctantly will make them. The motivation for this behaviour: even if a newer version is supposed to be backward compatible, it often has slightly different behaviour which may trigger bugs in the other parts of a complex system. -- Dieter _______________________________________________ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
