On 10/8/07, David Pratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Dieter. Zope 2 is one application among many dependent upon zope 3. > Zope 3 is different software than zope 2. It has a community of pure > zope 3 developers (that I don't believe the suggestion of folding the > lists together adequately considers).
Again, these lists are about the development of, not development with. There are indeed some people developing only Zope3 but not involved in Zope2. I don't think they are very many. There are none involved in Zope 2 that are not involved in Zope 3. > More so, I get the impression that the unstated > goal here is to assimilate zope 3 into a different notion of 'zope' It's not unstated, although admittedly, it is in my opinion off topic for the discussion. > that would further obfuscate it as a framework Nope. > (under the influence of zope2). Nope. > Zope 3 stands on its own as a framework and I sure hope I am > wrong about how I have been interpreting the dialog. You are indeed, yes. -- Lennart Regebro: Zope and Plone consulting. http://www.colliberty.com/ +33 661 58 14 64 _______________________________________________ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
