True. But the context of this thread was whether deprecation made sense
or not. I was agreeing with Chris that the DateTime problems are better
solved by replacement than by patching, but also that there is a large
amount of code that has been made to work using the current DataTime and
that investment needs to be protected.
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005, Andreas Jung wrote:
> --On 25. November 2005 12:22:05 -0800 Dennis Allison
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If I have a vote, +1 on deprecation and replacement with something less
> > buggy.
> You can only deprecate when you have something better. As long as there is
> no useful replacemenet there is nothing to deprecate :-)
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -