True. But the context of this thread was whether deprecation made sense or not. I was agreeing with Chris that the DateTime problems are better solved by replacement than by patching, but also that there is a large amount of code that has been made to work using the current DataTime and that investment needs to be protected.
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005, Andreas Jung wrote: > > > --On 25. November 2005 12:22:05 -0800 Dennis Allison > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > If I have a vote, +1 on deprecation and replacement with something less > > buggy. > > You can only deprecate when you have something better. As long as there is > no useful replacemenet there is nothing to deprecate :-) > > -aj > > -- _______________________________________________ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )