On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 01:07:49PM +0000, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
> 
> On 28 Nov 2005, at 13:05, Gerhard Schmidt wrote:
> 
> >On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 12:43:44PM +0000, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
> >>
> >>On 28 Nov 2005, at 12:28, Gerhard Schmidt wrote:
> >>>I know there is a way to do just the same with mod_proxy, but
> >>>mod_proxy does
> >>>open new connection for every request while fastcgi uses the same
> >>>connection
> >>>for all requests. The is no problem on low load. But with growing
> >>>load, this
> >>>can become a Problem.
> >>
> >>Well, it's not "a way to do it", it's *the* way.
> >
> >Thats a real good argument. There is no *the* way. Every situation
> >is different and having as mutch possibilities as possible is  
> >allways the
> >best way to do it.
> 
> It's a matter of resources, plain and simple. No one has stepped  
> forward to support it, so it atrophied. If you think it's a great  
> thing to keep, volunteer.

I would if I had the time and the knowlege. But I don't see a Problem 
with the Code right now. As I said i runs here perfectly smooth.

Bye
        Estartu 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gerhard Schmidt    | Nick : estartu      IRC : Estartu  |
Fischbachweg 3     |                                    |  PGP Public Key
86856 Hiltenfingen | EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]          |  on request 
Germany            |                                    |  


Attachment: pgpTIRPlMin9i.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Zope maillist  -  Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
**   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )

Reply via email to