On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 03:23:04PM +0100, Andreas Jung wrote: > > > --On 28. November 2005 13:28:20 +0000 Jens Vagelpohl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > >On 28 Nov 2005, at 13:25, Gerhard Schmidt wrote: > >>>It's a matter of resources, plain and simple. No one has stepped > >>>forward to support it, so it atrophied. If you think it's a great > >>>thing to keep, volunteer. > >> > >>I would if I had the time and the knowlege. But I don't see a Problem > >>with the Code right now. As I said i runs here perfectly smooth. > > > >"It works" and "is supported" are two different things. "Is supported" > >also means there are people who will come forward and help out when the > >code breaks or when people ask questions about it. As you have seen > >yourself, no one does. The answer is (and will remain, unless someone > >volunteers): Use at your own peril. > > I agree. There should be one supported way to achive a goal. In the past we > had at least three methods to run Zope (fortunately we kicked PCGI support > in the past). My suggestion is to deprecate FCGI officially in the docs and > through a deprecation warning and to kick it at some time (not necessarily > after two release cycles). So people can still use but they should know > that they are using a deprecated feature...objections?
Sure I object. Why should perfectly working code be removed. There is no alternativ for heavy loaded sites which need integration of apache and zope. mod_proxy is no alternativ because it raises the load even further. Bye Estartu ------------------------------------------------- Gerhard Schmidt | E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TU-München | WWW & Online Services | Tel: 089/289-25270 | Fax: 089/289-25257 | PGP-Publickey auf Anfrage
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )