It seems (maybe only to me?) that "will" is what defines the
intersection of memory and imagination? The free-will-less-ness-ers
among us (ala Sopolsky
<https://www.theguardian.com/books/2023/oct/24/determined-life-without-free-will-by-robert-sapolsky-review-the-hard-science-of-decisions>)
may find this an entirely specious thing to consider or discuss (though
without free will, what means "specious" or "discuss" or "consider" sans
free-will?).
I recently discovered Lex Fridman's podcasts
<https://lexfridman.com/podcast/> and was quite surprised by several
things (albeit with very limited sampling... all of his most recent
interview with Musk and a bit of his interview with Isaacson and about
half of the Harari one): I don't significantly disagree with the
general mistrust of Musk in his Autistic-ish style and affect, but I'd
say that Lex brings out the best in him, showing him to be capable of
thoughtful and even empathetic-ish observations. As I understand it
(from my reading of Isaacson's biography of Musk) brother Kimball may
also be a significantly similar "regulating influence" on Elon. Grimes
maybe, maybe not. The other mothers of his children, same-same...
probably each and all of them for a period of time or within certain
frameworks. And again, same with the children... though maybe
projection on my part having been moderately well-regulated in several
modes by my own children during each of their phases (right up to their
current middle-agedness).
As an aside, Fridman's other interviews also all sound potentially
fascinating... though I cringe at the fact/thought of interviews with
Netanyahu, KanYE, Kushner, Rogan... the commentary I've read around
those interviews tends to skew toward "how could you normalize
(amplify?) those A**holes by even giving them the time of the
day???!!!?". Lex's interviews are definitely long-form (1-2 hours)
compared to today's tik-tok/ad-jingle/bumper-sticker/snark-pith
calibrated sound-bitery. I find myself avoiding them for this reason
(not wanting to commit to listening past some of my own prejudices long
enough to hear what they are really about?) but recognize (and have
already begun to practice) that as with long-form written journalism, I
can take it in bits, like I might eat a rich holiday meal... not try to
gulp it down quickly in one sitting like a TV-dinner (for you X-ers,
"Hot-Pocket", and Millenials == "??") for the mind.
My recent fascination with Deacon's "Teleodynamics", Jeff Hawkins' take
on the structure/function of the neocortex and Ian McGilchrist's
updated take on brain bicameralism (Master and Emissary
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Master_and_His_Emissary>) feeds into
this question of the intersection of memory and imagination and the
implications of Transformer Models and other Generative Models in
general. My direct experience with GPT-4 and DALL-E is significant
(many 10s of hours of engagement) but still a drop in the bucket. There
are times when I feel that all I've done is engaged with an incredibly
high-dimensional french-curve/bezier spline and thereby been able to
smoothly interpolate/extrapolate a handful of interesting (to me) data
points into what feels like a powerful elaboration of what is implied by
said curve-fit in the past (unknown knowns?) and future (unknown
unknowns)? When I'm not totally enraptured by the (apparent?) novelty
(relative to my expectations/predictions) of it's responses I'm
generally disappointed at it's limited creativity... and left puzzling
over the question of "novelty vs creativity".
Bumble,
- Steve
On 11/13/23 10:27 AM, Marcus Daniels wrote:
It seems to me that neither Musk and Thiel are interested in the unknown. They
are interested in doing things they can already imagine. For Musk I thought
that was because it is how he raises money. Now I think he is not imagining
consciousness in a, say, a transporter pattern buffer, he imagines life on the
Enterprise bridge in his body. Rockets are comparatively science fictiony for
people that can't imagine transport without a car, so he gets some points for
that.
On Nov 13, 2023, at 10:11 AM, glen<geprope...@gmail.com> wrote:
There's an interesting parallel between the Stross and Gellman pieces: Stross
both laments and implicitly appreciates the bureaucracy of getting a book
published, where Thiel's aggrieved by the bureaucracy of societal evolution.
It reminds me of the engineering-vs-biology dichotomy (yes, false, like all of
them) I came to appreciate after being exposed to enough biomimetics (to kill a
horse). Some of us see the world and think about how to change it, build a
better world ... or perhaps destroy the world, whatever floats your inner
engineer. And some of us see the world and are awestruck, hypnotized, baffled
by its qualities (whether beautiful or horrifying). It's easy to give the
latter a pass and denigrate the former when confronted with, say, butterflies
or the Grand Canyon. And it's easy to give the former a pass when confronted
with poverty and war.
But the next time you're at the DMV or arguing with some poor sucker manning
the phones at the IRS, it can be useful to remember the falseness of the
dichtomy. Similarly, when all you want to do is sleep under the stars and those
damned gnats keep homing into your ears, it can be useful to think like an
engineer.
Policy and science fiction aren't that far apart.
On 11/10/23 13:46, Marcus Daniels wrote:
original.png
Peter Thiel Is Taking a Break From
Democracy<https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2023/11/peter-thiel-2024-election-politics-investing-life-views/675946/?utm_source=copy-link&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=share>
On 11/10/23 11:26, Roger Critchlow wrote:
Text of Charlie Stross' talk to Next Frontiers Applied Fiction Day in Stuttgart
on Friday November 10th, 2023, concerning where the techno-industrial elite
found their horrible philosophies/secular religions.
https://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2023/11/dont-create-the-torment-nexus.html
--
ꙮ Mɥǝu ǝlǝdɥɐuʇs ɟᴉƃɥʇ' ʇɥǝ ƃɹɐss snɟɟǝɹs˙ ꙮ
-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe / Thursdays 9a-12p
Zoomhttps://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribehttp://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIChttp://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives: 5/2017 thru presenthttps://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
1/2003 thru 6/2021http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe / Thursdays 9a-12p
Zoomhttps://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribehttp://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIChttp://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives: 5/2017 thru presenthttps://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
1/2003 thru 6/2021http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe / Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives: 5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
