Well in that case, definitely look up the interview he did with Sara Walker and 
Lee Cronin.

I will not comment further.

Eric



> On Nov 13, 2023, at 5:57 PM, Steve Smith <sasm...@swcp.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 11/13/23 12:06 PM, glen wrote:
>> You might want to check the Gurometer. Lex has an entry: 
>> 
>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Oe-af4_OmzLJavktcSKGfP0wmxCX0ppP8n_Tvi9l_yc/edit?usp=sharing
>>  
>> 
>> While Lex's scores are relatively low compared to some of the wackos on the 
>> list, we are known by association. And many of Lex's guests score relatively 
>> high. 
> Fascinating resource,  thanks!  You are a veritable font (fount) of things 
> like this that I should probably be able to find for myself.
> 
> I had to look a little to find a key to the columns of the  table, I don't 
> know if this is the preferred or only one, but it seemed close enough to be 
> useful for my purposes:
> 
> https://techhenzy.com/gurometer/ 
> <https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2ftechhenzy.com%2fgurometer%2f&c=E,1,-jmX3-GnKvHRZ-U6g3sLfGsk8ntKDTZ0snin2zifY--Hno29Qx92h9fhySz8IXtuihWQCxiEVogT6296DEPPb4qsdNHWD6ZIX5ul4F-34Wihzhuu&typo=1>
> I haven't listened to enough of Lex's podcasts (did I mention 1-2 hours 
> each?!) to be able to evaluate what his "coupling" is with his guests... even 
> without the GuruMeter I felt that theme ("known by association") from the 
> more prominent/recent interviewees he has engaged... but my contingent 
> judgement of the *content* and *style* of the interviews counterbalanced that 
> almost to an extreme.   Which is why I brought it up here.
> 
> Implicit but likely opaque/arcane to your own references to community (self) 
> policing and ?agonism?, I feel (with limited experience so far) that Fridman 
> may well provide a regulating role within some community (of Galaxy-Brain 
> Gurus?)...
> 
> I doubt I will get the 'round t'uits but it seems like there is a tensor 
> product to be explored among these folks and their various interactions with 
> one another...   something interesting might emerge?   Maybe this only occurs 
> to me because Lex is more of a coupling agent than a primary source of any 
> ideas/theories/positions from what I've seen so far.   I haven't investigated 
> the GuruMeter guys enough to understand their methods but I take it for 
> granted they are not unserious in this work.
> 
> 
> 
>> 
>> On 11/13/23 10:08, Steve Smith wrote: 
>>> It seems (maybe only to me?) that "will" is what defines the intersection 
>>> of memory and imagination?   The free-will-less-ness-ers among us (ala 
>>> Sopolsky 
>>> <https://www.theguardian.com/books/2023/oct/24/determined-life-without-free-will-by-robert-sapolsky-review-the-hard-science-of-decisions>
>>>  
>>> <https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fwww.theguardian.com%2fbooks%2f2023%2foct%2f24%2fdetermined-life-without-free-will-by-robert-sapolsky-review-the-hard-science-of-decisions&c=E,1,91wHpfNIkmXC-CnGi3PazdL_hQlw2NlNpCoVT3nJCuot5r9OAZsB0usPuLlH6_6rlBoDorx2bLYVT55_T9jETx_-4wilrXWAjG-3MNgonMWE9w,,&typo=1>)
>>>  may find this an entirely specious thing to consider or discuss (though 
>>> without free will, what means "specious" or "discuss" or "consider" sans 
>>> free-will?). 
>>> 
>>> I recently discovered Lex Fridman's podcasts 
>>> <https://lexfridman.com/podcast/> 
>>> <https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2flexfridman.com%2fpodcast%2f&c=E,1,QWrnSg3KQcihreIAIaA74In11b90OwQV4DbIgelWBXYN4Ud1PK0WvNTlNakcIB0zdfgEMx2X6t8b-1_TPyUhzXpNMlaFz3z4sKIKjXliwZAs&typo=1>
>>>  and was quite surprised by several things (albeit with very limited 
>>> sampling... all of his most recent interview with Musk and a bit of his 
>>> interview with Isaacson and about half of the Harari one):   I don't 
>>> significantly disagree with the general mistrust of Musk in his 
>>> Autistic-ish style and affect, but I'd say that Lex brings out the best in 
>>> him, showing him to be capable of thoughtful and even empathetic-ish 
>>> observations.  As I understand it (from my reading of Isaacson's biography 
>>> of Musk) brother Kimball may also be a significantly similar "regulating 
>>> influence" on Elon.   Grimes maybe, maybe not.  The other mothers of his 
>>> children, same-same... probably each and all of them for a period of time 
>>> or within certain frameworks.   And again, same with the children... though 
>>> maybe projection on my part having been moderately well-regulated in 
>>> several modes by my own children during each of their phases (right up to 
>>> their current middle-agedness). 
>>> 
>>> As an aside, Fridman's other interviews also all sound potentially 
>>> fascinating... though I cringe at the fact/thought of interviews with 
>>> Netanyahu, KanYE, Kushner, Rogan...     the commentary I've read around 
>>> those interviews tends to skew toward "how could you normalize (amplify?) 
>>> those A**holes by even giving them the time of the day???!!!?".   Lex's 
>>> interviews are definitely long-form (1-2 hours) compared to today's 
>>> tik-tok/ad-jingle/bumper-sticker/snark-pith calibrated sound-bitery.    I 
>>> find myself avoiding them for this reason (not wanting to commit to 
>>> listening past some of my own prejudices long enough to hear what they are 
>>> really about?) but recognize (and have already begun to practice) that as 
>>> with long-form written journalism, I can take it in bits, like I might eat 
>>> a rich holiday meal... not try to gulp it down quickly in one sitting like 
>>> a TV-dinner (for you X-ers, "Hot-Pocket", and Millenials == "??") for the 
>>> mind. 
>>> 
>>> My recent fascination with Deacon's "Teleodynamics", Jeff Hawkins' take on 
>>> the structure/function of the neocortex and Ian McGilchrist's updated  take 
>>> on brain bicameralism (Master and Emissary 
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Master_and_His_Emissary> 
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Master_and_His_Emissary>) feeds into 
>>> this question of the intersection of memory and imagination and the 
>>> implications of Transformer Models and other Generative Models in general.  
>>>  My direct experience with GPT-4 and DALL-E is significant (many 10s of 
>>> hours of engagement) but still a drop in the bucket.  There are times when 
>>> I feel that all I've done is engaged with an incredibly high-dimensional 
>>> french-curve/bezier spline and thereby been able to smoothly 
>>> interpolate/extrapolate a handful of interesting (to me) data points into 
>>> what feels like a powerful elaboration of what is implied by said curve-fit 
>>> in the past (unknown knowns?) and future (unknown unknowns)?    When I'm 
>>> not totally enraptured by the (apparent?) novelty (relative to my 
>>> expectations/predictions) of it's responses I'm generally disappointed at 
>>> it's limited creativity...   and left puzzling over the question of 
>>> "novelty vs creativity". 
>>> 
>>> Bumble, 
>>> 
>>>   - Steve 
>>> 
>>> On 11/13/23 10:27 AM, Marcus Daniels wrote: 
>>>> It seems to me that neither Musk and Thiel are interested in the unknown. 
>>>> They are interested in doing things they can already imagine.    For Musk 
>>>> I thought that was because it is how he raises money.   Now I think he is 
>>>> not imagining consciousness in a, say, a transporter pattern buffer, he 
>>>> imagines life on the Enterprise bridge in his body.   Rockets are 
>>>> comparatively science fictiony for people that can't imagine transport 
>>>> without a car, so he gets some points for that. 
>>>>> On Nov 13, 2023, at 10:11 AM, glen<geprope...@gmail.com> 
>>>>> <mailto:geprope...@gmail.com>  wrote: 
>>>>> 
>>>>> There's an interesting parallel between the Stross and Gellman pieces: 
>>>>> Stross both laments and implicitly appreciates the bureaucracy of getting 
>>>>> a book published, where Thiel's aggrieved by the bureaucracy of societal 
>>>>> evolution. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> It reminds me of the engineering-vs-biology dichotomy (yes, false, like 
>>>>> all of them) I came to appreciate after being exposed to enough 
>>>>> biomimetics (to kill a horse). Some of us see the world and think about 
>>>>> how to change it, build a better world ... or perhaps destroy the world, 
>>>>> whatever floats your inner engineer. And some of us see the world and are 
>>>>> awestruck, hypnotized, baffled by its qualities (whether beautiful or 
>>>>> horrifying). It's easy to give the latter a pass and denigrate the former 
>>>>> when confronted with, say, butterflies or the Grand Canyon. And it's easy 
>>>>> to give the former a pass when confronted with poverty and war. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> But the next time you're at the DMV or arguing with some poor sucker 
>>>>> manning the phones at the IRS, it can be useful to remember the falseness 
>>>>> of the dichtomy. Similarly, when all you want to do is sleep under the 
>>>>> stars and those damned gnats keep homing into your ears, it can be useful 
>>>>> to think like an engineer. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Policy and science fiction aren't that far apart. 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 11/10/23 13:46, Marcus Daniels wrote: 
>>>>>> original.png 
>>>>>> Peter Thiel Is Taking a Break From 
>>>>>> Democracy<https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2023/11/peter-thiel-2024-election-politics-investing-life-views/675946/?utm_source=copy-link&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=share>
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> <https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2023/11/peter-thiel-2024-election-politics-investing-life-views/675946/?utm_source=copy-link&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=share>
>>>>>> On 11/10/23 11:26, Roger Critchlow wrote: 
>>>>>> Text of Charlie Stross' talk to Next Frontiers Applied Fiction Day in 
>>>>>> Stuttgart on Friday November 10th, 2023, concerning where the 
>>>>>> techno-industrial elite found their horrible philosophies/secular 
>>>>>> religions. 
>>>>>> https://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2023/11/dont-create-the-torment-nexus.html
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> <https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fwww.antipope.org%2fcharlie%2fblog-static%2f2023%2f11%2fdont-create-the-torment-nexus.html&c=E,1,npJ9AGeEQaUqgDJWMftMsnL-pymj_8pksBePVrbQ_gdF_v3fw88D4pk5N0nHIICGXPhItn57qErQ9u7HSkuvSqtpYRapdSTtpENo508PmwuMPlc7ou5f6pLrIPnj&typo=1>
>>>>>>  
>>>>> -- 
>> 
>> 
> -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
> https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fbit.ly%2fvirtualfriam&c=E,1,VmQPczTgJWLGrCVJ4qHL-qq9paoN4JcTFzVAsuf7IJHbrhkR6zW5pSERobMorZqUAXrgbGUTLps2MR5nCq7ihk3EVVOlqvCGMn8zsvRcQISAkA,,&typo=1
> to (un)subscribe 
> https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fredfish.com%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2ffriam_redfish.com&c=E,1,_VVGsncoh104n2MO0myc4TeEkRiRZ1eP5gKEuB2UmyyIt5GKC6vhFewIohc3YLhwZaJjecNrz3Dv1hsWjtrda7194vP9nHSB50ZluhrazA,,&typo=1
> FRIAM-COMIC 
> https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2ffriam-comic.blogspot.com%2f&c=E,1,RuX5h2dlc249SaoPsQMZ9j6lr5J_vi1hMpTtB_8O4fRpAz82TFTG82YcKMcP6KLlas4FLvS-NbeAwLFcA6TPdLo3C5HIiGURZdx5IPR7&typo=1
> archives:  5/2017 thru present 
> https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fredfish.com%2fpipermail%2ffriam_redfish.com%2f&c=E,1,Y1gUOK-RX9A4j0Pc6ER5S5LQy9gOcmNWmGGj-SGJueksHJKL8hIYWiJhy5Kt62OItFAzFfEGT13LFn-c6_2MffslD5roKdfoJsUFQkmmJw,,&typo=1
>  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Reply via email to