I'm too lazy to run a kmeans now.   

Sent from my iPhone

> On Nov 13, 2023, at 12:06 PM, glen <geprope...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> You might want to check the Gurometer. Lex has an entry:
> 
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Oe-af4_OmzLJavktcSKGfP0wmxCX0ppP8n_Tvi9l_yc/edit?usp=sharing
> 
> While Lex's scores are relatively low compared to some of the wackos on the 
> list, we are known by association. And many of Lex's guests score relatively 
> high.
> 
>> On 11/13/23 10:08, Steve Smith wrote:
>> It seems (maybe only to me?) that "will" is what defines the intersection of 
>> memory and imagination?   The free-will-less-ness-ers among us (ala Sopolsky 
>> <https://www.theguardian.com/books/2023/oct/24/determined-life-without-free-will-by-robert-sapolsky-review-the-hard-science-of-decisions>)
>>  may find this an entirely specious thing to consider or discuss (though 
>> without free will, what means "specious" or "discuss" or "consider" sans 
>> free-will?).
>> I recently discovered Lex Fridman's podcasts 
>> <https://lexfridman.com/podcast/> and was quite surprised by several things 
>> (albeit with very limited sampling... all of his most recent interview with 
>> Musk and a bit of his interview with Isaacson and about half of the Harari 
>> one):   I don't significantly disagree with the general mistrust of Musk in 
>> his Autistic-ish style and affect, but I'd say that Lex brings out the best 
>> in him, showing him to be capable of thoughtful and even empathetic-ish 
>> observations.  As I understand it (from my reading of Isaacson's biography 
>> of Musk) brother Kimball may also be a significantly similar "regulating 
>> influence" on Elon.   Grimes maybe, maybe not.  The other mothers of his 
>> children, same-same... probably each and all of them for a period of time or 
>> within certain frameworks.   And again, same with the children... though 
>> maybe projection on my part having been moderately well-regulated in several 
>> modes by my own children during each of their phases (right up to their 
>> current middle-agedness).
>> As an aside, Fridman's other interviews also all sound potentially 
>> fascinating... though I cringe at the fact/thought of interviews with 
>> Netanyahu, KanYE, Kushner, Rogan...     the commentary I've read around 
>> those interviews tends to skew toward "how could you normalize (amplify?) 
>> those A**holes by even giving them the time of the day???!!!?".   Lex's 
>> interviews are definitely long-form (1-2 hours) compared to today's 
>> tik-tok/ad-jingle/bumper-sticker/snark-pith calibrated sound-bitery.    I 
>> find myself avoiding them for this reason (not wanting to commit to 
>> listening past some of my own prejudices long enough to hear what they are 
>> really about?) but recognize (and have already begun to practice) that as 
>> with long-form written journalism, I can take it in bits, like I might eat a 
>> rich holiday meal... not try to gulp it down quickly in one sitting like a 
>> TV-dinner (for you X-ers, "Hot-Pocket", and Millenials == "??") for the mind.
>> My recent fascination with Deacon's "Teleodynamics", Jeff Hawkins' take on 
>> the structure/function of the neocortex and Ian McGilchrist's updated  take 
>> on brain bicameralism (Master and Emissary 
>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Master_and_His_Emissary>) feeds into this 
>> question of the intersection of memory and imagination and the implications 
>> of Transformer Models and other Generative Models in general.   My direct 
>> experience with GPT-4 and DALL-E is significant (many 10s of hours of 
>> engagement) but still a drop in the bucket.  There are times when I feel 
>> that all I've done is engaged with an incredibly high-dimensional 
>> french-curve/bezier spline and thereby been able to smoothly 
>> interpolate/extrapolate a handful of interesting (to me) data points into 
>> what feels like a powerful elaboration of what is implied by said curve-fit 
>> in the past (unknown knowns?) and future (unknown unknowns)?    When I'm not 
>> totally enraptured by the (apparent?) novelty (relative to my 
>> expectations/predictions) of it's responses I'm generally disappointed at 
>> it's limited creativity...   and left puzzling over the question of "novelty 
>> vs creativity".
>> Bumble,
>>  - Steve
>>> On 11/13/23 10:27 AM, Marcus Daniels wrote:
>>> It seems to me that neither Musk and Thiel are interested in the unknown. 
>>> They are interested in doing things they can already imagine.    For Musk I 
>>> thought that was because it is how he raises money.   Now I think he is not 
>>> imagining consciousness in a, say, a transporter pattern buffer, he 
>>> imagines life on the Enterprise bridge in his body.   Rockets are 
>>> comparatively science fictiony for people that can't imagine transport 
>>> without a car, so he gets some points for that.
>>>> On Nov 13, 2023, at 10:11 AM, glen<geprope...@gmail.com>  wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> There's an interesting parallel between the Stross and Gellman pieces: 
>>>> Stross both laments and implicitly appreciates the bureaucracy of getting 
>>>> a book published, where Thiel's aggrieved by the bureaucracy of societal 
>>>> evolution.
>>>> 
>>>> It reminds me of the engineering-vs-biology dichotomy (yes, false, like 
>>>> all of them) I came to appreciate after being exposed to enough 
>>>> biomimetics (to kill a horse). Some of us see the world and think about 
>>>> how to change it, build a better world ... or perhaps destroy the world, 
>>>> whatever floats your inner engineer. And some of us see the world and are 
>>>> awestruck, hypnotized, baffled by its qualities (whether beautiful or 
>>>> horrifying). It's easy to give the latter a pass and denigrate the former 
>>>> when confronted with, say, butterflies or the Grand Canyon. And it's easy 
>>>> to give the former a pass when confronted with poverty and war.
>>>> 
>>>> But the next time you're at the DMV or arguing with some poor sucker 
>>>> manning the phones at the IRS, it can be useful to remember the falseness 
>>>> of the dichtomy. Similarly, when all you want to do is sleep under the 
>>>> stars and those damned gnats keep homing into your ears, it can be useful 
>>>> to think like an engineer.
>>>> 
>>>> Policy and science fiction aren't that far apart.
>>>> 
>>>>> On 11/10/23 13:46, Marcus Daniels wrote:
>>>>> original.png
>>>>> Peter Thiel Is Taking a Break From 
>>>>> Democracy<https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2023/11/peter-thiel-2024-election-politics-investing-life-views/675946/?utm_source=copy-link&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=share>
>>>>> On 11/10/23 11:26, Roger Critchlow wrote:
>>>>> Text of Charlie Stross' talk to Next Frontiers Applied Fiction Day in 
>>>>> Stuttgart on Friday November 10th, 2023, concerning where the 
>>>>> techno-industrial elite found their horrible philosophies/secular 
>>>>> religions.
>>>>> https://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2023/11/dont-create-the-torment-nexus.html
>>>> --
> 
> 
> --
> ꙮ Mɥǝu ǝlǝdɥɐuʇs ɟᴉƃɥʇ' ʇɥǝ ƃɹɐss snɟɟǝɹs˙ ꙮ
> -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
> https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
> to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
> archives:  5/2017 thru present 
> https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
> 1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Reply via email to