> On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 05:03:36AM +0000, Ian Munsie wrote: > On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 11:35 AM Roger <[1]rogerx....@gmail.com> wrote: > > >Back in 2006 someone made a port of Gqview to windows. It died pretty > quickly. > >Was this because: > > > ... > >c) Windows users are happy with what they have, and would not bother > >with Geeqie > > My bets are on option "c) Windows users are happy with what they have." > They're happy with the default Windows' image viewer.** The default > viewer is > extremely easy and apparently light in resource usage. > > How about option d) Windows users have never experienced a decent image > viewer and don't know what they are missing ;-p
Ah. I always forget to factor in the parents' percpective into the scenario! -- Roger http://rogerx.freeshell.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________ Geeqie-devel mailing list Geeqie-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geeqie-devel
