> On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 05:03:36AM +0000, Ian Munsie wrote:
>   On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 11:35 AM Roger <[1]rogerx....@gmail.com> wrote:
>     >Back in 2006 someone made a port of Gqview to windows. It died pretty
>     quickly.
>     >Was this because:
>     >
>     ...
>     >c) Windows users are happy with what they have, and would not bother
>     >with Geeqie
>     My bets are on option "c) Windows users are happy with what they have."
>     They're happy with the default Windows' image viewer.** The default
>     viewer is
>     extremely easy and apparently light in resource usage.
>   How about option d) Windows users have never experienced a decent image
>   viewer and don't know what they are missing ;-p

Ah. I always forget to factor in the parents' percpective into the scenario!


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
Geeqie-devel mailing list

Reply via email to