Hi List, It's not quite sure to me and Cameron whether or not it was agreed in the last meeting to put my layerId changes into the 1.5 branch. Can you please explicitly vote for or against it asap?
Some cons and pros: - new and not tested enough - might break existing apps (if there are bugs) + mayor improvement over handling layers with same name + if we put it in 1.5 before first beta is out: lot of exposure + testing + shouldn't break existing apps since it is designed to be backwards compatible Side note: Our Lisasoft patch for GeoRSS has been committed to the trunk of OL and will be part of OL 2.6. Since MB 1.5 will ship with OL 2.5, is it desirable to have a GeoRSS example and therefore have a patched OL 2.5 with GeoRSS support in it? This is new functionality and might be a little too fresh for 1.5. Please vote for this one as well. Thanks, Roald -- Roald de Wit Software Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Commercial Support for Open Source GIS Software http://lisasoft.com/LISAsoft/SupportedProducts/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ mapbuilder-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mapbuilder-devel
