Hi Andreas, On Thu, 2007-11-22 at 15:25 +0100, Andreas Hocevar wrote:
> Ok, to sum up: after testing you get a +1 from me for adding your > changes in the 1_5 branch, but I want the opinion of others on how to > handle Web Map Context (Context.js), where @id is not part of the > specification. No one has responded yet. Is that to be interpreted as an approval? ;-) I can easily take the id generating bit out of Context.js, but you'd rather see any reference to layerId removed in that one, i guess? Regards, Roald -- Roald de Wit Software Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Commercial Support for Open Source GIS Software http://lisasoft.com/LISAsoft/SupportedProducts/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4 _______________________________________________ mapbuilder-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mapbuilder-devel
