Roald de Wit wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > On Thu, 2007-11-22 at 15:25 +0100, Andreas Hocevar wrote: > > >> Ok, to sum up: after testing you get a +1 from me for adding your >> changes in the 1_5 branch, but I want the opinion of others on how to >> handle Web Map Context (Context.js), where @id is not part of the >> specification. >> > > No one has responded yet. Is that to be interpreted as an approval? ;-) > > I can easily take the id generating bit out of Context.js, but you'd > rather see any reference to layerId removed in that one, i guess? > I'm not that big on standards and I know that using layernames does lead to errors every now and then. So I'm in favor of using IDs in WMC as well. I don't think an extra attribute breaks compatibility with other apps, but I'm no expert on this.
Regards, Steven ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4 _______________________________________________ mapbuilder-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mapbuilder-devel
