Roald de Wit wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> On Thu, 2007-11-22 at 15:25 +0100, Andreas Hocevar wrote:
>
>   
>> Ok, to sum up: after testing you get a +1 from me for adding your
>> changes in the 1_5 branch, but I want the opinion of others on how to
>> handle Web Map Context (Context.js), where @id is not part of the
>> specification.
>>     
>
> No one has responded yet. Is that to be interpreted as an approval? ;-)
>
> I can easily take the id generating bit out of Context.js, but you'd
> rather see any reference to layerId removed in that one, i guess?
>   
I'm not that big on standards and I know that using layernames does lead 
to errors every now and then. So I'm in favor of using IDs in WMC as 
well. I don't think an extra attribute breaks compatibility with other 
apps, but I'm no expert on this.

Regards,
Steven



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
from Novell.  From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
mainstream.  Let it simplify your IT future.
http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
_______________________________________________
mapbuilder-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mapbuilder-devel

Reply via email to