On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Freddie Chopin <[email protected]> wrote: > If you're refering to the patches that changed some debug outputs, renamed > files or changed some comments in the places that were affected by one of > your previous changes I also think it's good to have them merged. It would > not be a blocker for me, but I don't mind that being squshed... What's the > value of adding file abc.c and renaming it to def.c 3 changes later? Why not > have def.c from the beginning, with complete history, without any renames?
Simply, because we will erase history that way :-) This is true that at the end everything will look the same, but we will have a history of changes and as an example why I did resigned from the long file names in favor of better directory structure and function/variables naming convention :-) I have been working on this for months, I know this may not look obvious at first glance :-) This is also the reason I think Spen should not put time on my commits modification. Instead this precious time should be put into core development :-) Freddie, you have helped me a lot with the commits to compile when I did not know Gerrit well. I think at the end, soon, code will look the same. Lets move forward and put work into more important issues :-) Best regards :-) Tomek -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnnow-d2d _______________________________________________ OpenOCD-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel
