On Tuesday 22 December 2009, Austin, Alex wrote: > Read-modify-erase-write on per-sector basis?
That's more work than I want to do for now, but it would be a more general solution. My conclusion from looking at that code is that the intelligence of the auto-erase code is ... a lot less than I've applied when sorting these things out "by hand". Not also that the auto-unprotect doesn't include auto-reprotect. > > I'm going to sort through the messages here and come up with > > a solution that's not broken-by-design. Looks like the simplest fix for now is to update the existing padding code in write_image to just pad to end-of-last-sector. That code is kind of rude -- its notion of "padding" includes arbitrary numbers of sectors between sections -- but can be easily tweaked to handle the two "last section unaligned" cases reported here. - Dave _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
