According to a knowledgeable source, Ritz Camera averages 10,000 rolls a day
nationwide  going out of date daily.

Bill

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "graywolf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 3:57 AM
Subject: Re: Slide projectors


> Hey Bill, where is all this out of date film? I could use some bargains.
First
> time you mentioned it I jumped on Ebay, surely there would be a lot of
film
> bargains there. Damn all that film must have been sold already.
>
> In fact why don't all you guys who "know" film is dead send my your
useless
> stocks of film. I will take your useless 35mm, 120, and 4x5 film and make
> pictures with it.
>
> Slide projection has been dying for years. Many slide shows in the past 20
years
> have been put on video tape and shown on a TV screen.
>
> --
>
> Bill Owens wrote:
>
> >
> >>>>>>This is not an improvement. I understand that Kodak must transition
to
> >>>
> >>>digital along with everyone else, but some parts of that transition may
> >>>be going to quickly. Was Kodak losing money on slide projectors? It
> >>>seems to me that there will be demand for them for some time, if only
> >>>for luddites like me who want our images actually to look good on a
> >>>screen. Why buy quality gear, quality film, and work on becoming a good
> >>>photographer only to have low quality projection equipment?
> >>>
> >>>Joe >>>
> >
> >
> > Losing money?  In the long haul, probably yes.  As much as it may be
> > distressing to some, these companies are in business to turn a profit.
No
> > profit, no money for future R&D, no R&D, no future products.  With tens
of
> > thousands of rolls of film going out of date daily, film camera sales
> > declining, and the digital handwriting on the wall becoming more legible
> > everyday, why should manufacturers continue to hold on to old technology
> > that's not making money for them.
> >
> > Bill
> >
> >
> >
>
> -- 
> graywolf
> http://graywolfphoto.com
>
> "You might as well accept people as they are,
> you are not going to be able to change them anyway."
>
>
>


Reply via email to