You have to give toast though to Net entities like Wikipedia, I'd dare say
one of humankind's greatest achievements. Then eventually over a few years
it'll be available as a plug-in, as a virtual trepan thus reducing the
effort of subsuming all that. And then maybe structural intelligence add-ins
Wikipedia doesn't allow original research Understandable, but that excludes
people who don't have time to waste on getting established. Abstract concepts
can't be learned by conditioning, only the practically useful ones. Structural
intelligence add-ins? Those will obsolete your brain, no need
Here is an example of superimposed images where you have to have a
predisposed perception -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V1m0kCdC7co
John
From: deepakjnath [mailto:deepakjn...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, July 24, 2010 11:03 PM
To: agi
Subject: [agi] Clues to the Mind: Illusions /
I believe that trans-infinite would mean that there is no recursively
enumerable algorithm that could 'reach' every possible item in the
trans-infinite group.
Since each program in Solomonoff Induction, written for a Universal Turing
Machine could be written on a single role of tape, that means
No, I might have been wrong about the feasibility of writing an algorithm
that can produce all the possible combinations of items when I wrote my last
message. It is because the word combination is associated with more than
one mathematical method. I am skeptical of the possibility that there is
I came across this, thinking it was going to be an example of maths fantasy,
but actually it has a rather nice idea about the mathematics of creativity.
The Math Behind Creativity
By Chuck Scott on June 15, 2010
The Science of Creativity is based on the following
David Jones wrote:
Arthur,
Thanks. I appreciate that. I would be happy to aggregate some of those
things. I am sometimes not good at maintaining the website because I get
bored of maintaining or updating it very quickly :)
Dave
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 10:02 AM, A. T. Murray menti...@scn.org
I found proof of my interpretation in the following paper also. It concludes
that we can only keep track of 3 or 4 objects in detail at a time.(something
like that)
http://www.pni.princeton.edu/conte/pdfs/project2/Proj2Pub8anne.pdf
It says:
For explicit visual working memory, object tokens are
Don't fret; your main site's got good uptime.
http://www.nothingisreal.com/mentifex_faq.html
-Chris
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 9:42 AM, A. T. Murray menti...@scn.org wrote:
David Jones wrote:
Arthur,
Thanks. I appreciate that. I would be happy to aggregate some of those
things. I am
I got confused with the two kinds of combinations that I was thinking about.
Sorry. However, while the reordering of the partial accumulation of a
finite number of probabilities, where each probability is taken just once,
can be done with a re algorithm, there is no re algorithm that can consider
Not sure how that is useful, or even how it relates to creativity if
considered as an informal description?
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Mike Tintner tint...@blueyonder.co.ukwrote:
I came across this, thinking it was going to be an example of maths
fantasy, but actually it has a rather
I think it's v. useful - although I was really extending his idea.
Correct me - but almost no matter what you guys do, (or anyone in AI does) ,
you think in terms of spaces, or frames. Spaces of options. Whether you're
doing logic, maths, or programs, spaces in one form or other are
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Mike Tintner tint...@blueyonder.co.ukwrote:
I think it's v. useful - although I was really extending his idea.
Correct me - but almost no matter what you guys do, (or anyone in AI does)
, you think in terms of spaces, or frames. Spaces of options. Whether
I wasn't trying for a detailed model of creative thinking with explanatory
power - merely one dimension (and indeed a foundation) of it.
In contrast to rational, deterministically programmed computers and robots wh.
can only operate in closed spaces externally, (artificial environments) and
On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 23:38 +0100, Mike Tintner wrote:
Michael:but those things do have patterns.. A mushroom (A) is like a cloud
mushroom (B).
if ( (input_source_A == An_image) AND ( input_source_B == An_image ))
One pattern is that they both came from an image source, and I just used
15 matches
Mail list logo
