Re: [leaf-devel] /etc/module content in initrd

Am Mittwoch, 16. Dezember 2015, 18:28:18 schrieb Erich Titl: > Hi KP > > Am 16.12.2015 um 16:18 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: > > Am Mittwoch, 16. Dezember 2015, 16:03:44 schrieb Erich Titl: > >> Hi Folks > >> > >> I believe this is inhere

Re: [leaf-devel] /etc/module content in initrd

Am Mittwoch, 16. Dezember 2015, 16:03:44 schrieb Erich Titl: > Hi Folks > > I believe this is inherently wrong > > ./iscsi/buildtool.mk > echo $(ESCKEY) "isofs\nvfat" > $(INITRD_TARGET_DIR)/boot/etc/modules > echo $(ESCKEY) "ext4" >> $(INITRD_TARGET_DIR)/boot/etc/modules > > This gets

Re: [leaf-devel] libsmartcols.lrp

Am Montag, 14. Dezember 2015, 15:59:38 schrieb Erich Titl: > Hi Folks > > I am trying to understand a dependency of hdsupp to libsmartcols. I see > the libsmartcols package in the repository, but it does not appear to be > present in the sources. > > mega@leafbuilder:~/leaf/devel/bering-uclibc$

[leaf-devel] problems with upcoming kernel 4.4

Hi; I've made a full build with the upcoming kernel 4.4 and the "usual suspects" fail to build: ipt_netflow accel-ppp perf Maybe someone can have a look into those. kp --

[leaf-devel] iperf/iperf3

Andrew; any reason we still provide iperf(2) additionally to iperf3? kp -- ___ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net

Re: [leaf-devel] [leaf:bering-uclibc] New commit by kapeka

Am Samstag, 12. Dezember 2015, 12:06:26 schrieb Erich Titl: > Am 12.12.2015 um 01:59 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: > > Am Samstag, 12. Dezember 2015, 01:17:30 schrieb Erich Titl: > >> Am 11.12.2015 um 21:16 schrieb Andrew: > >>> I'm not sure that configs are cha

Re: [leaf-devel] [leaf:bering-uclibc] New commit by kapeka

Am Samstag, 12. Dezember 2015, 01:17:30 schrieb Erich Titl: > Am 11.12.2015 um 21:16 schrieb Andrew: > > I'm not sure that configs are changed... > > Yes, I know, but the config headers for sure, if they were built with > 'make oldconfig'. And I don't know if there were any new options >

Re: [leaf-user] Unable to upgrade from LEAF Bering-uClibc 5.2 to 5.2.1

Hi Timothy, hi all; Am Montag, 23. November 2015, 19:11:54 schrieb Timothy Wegner: > I have tested both the x86x64 and 486 versions of 5.2.2 that came out > yesterday on, respectively, Soekris net6501 (router with dmz) and net4801 > (tiny web server) boxen and this time both worked fine. (For

Re: [leaf-devel] Fwd: [leaf:bering-uclibc] New commit by kapeka

Am Sonntag, 22. November 2015, 00:53:48 schrieb Erich Titl: > Hi KP > > Weitergeleitete Nachricht > Betreff: [leaf:bering-uclibc] New commit by kapeka > Datum:Sat, 21 Nov 2015 19:26:39 + > Von: LEAF Linux Embedded Appliance Framework Git repository >

Re: [leaf-user] Unable to upgrade from LEAF Bering-uClibc 5.2 to 5.2.1

Hi Timothy; Am Mittwoch, 18. November 2015, 22:59:41 schrieb Timothy Wegner: > Andrew or anyone, > > I am also having a problem upgrading from LEAF Bering-uClibc 5.2 to 5.2.1 > on a Soekris net4801. Boot fails immediately with the message: > > "This kernel requires the following features not

Re: [leaf-devel] wpasupplicant

Hi Erich; Am Mittwoch, 28. Oktober 2015, 14:40:50 schrieb Erich Titl: > Hi KP > > You lifted wpasupplicant to 2.5 now it does not appear to compile. > > Could you tell me the rationale for > > .source: > - zcat $(SOURCE_TARBALL) | tar -xvf - > + $(BT_SETUP_BUILDDIR) -v

Re: [leaf-devel] ipt-ratelimit fails to build

I'll re-check it. > > 14.10.2015 21:02, kp kirchdoerfer пишет: > > Hi Andrew; > > > > rebuilding from scratch fails with an error > > > > libxt_ratelimit.c:28:21: fatal error: xtables.h: file not found > > > > #include > > > > A pr

Re: [leaf-devel] apkg -u, the deception?

Hi Erich; Am Donnerstag, 15. Oktober 2015, 08:27:56 schrieb Erich Titl: > Hi KP > > > I also _believe_ , that integration of apkg -u into the upgrade script > > will be easier to accomplish the then smaller changes and more helpful, > > than reinvent apkg and configdb. > > I have been thinking

[leaf-devel] ipt-ratelimit fails to build

Hi Andrew; rebuilding from scratch fails with an error libxt_ratelimit.c:28:21: fatal error: xtables.h: file not found #include A problem in kernel configs? Can you pls doublecheck? ths kp --

Re: [leaf-devel] 5.2 & ezipupd will not work with legacy config file

Am Dienstag, 13. Oktober 2015, 16:49:04 schrieb Erich Titl: > Am 13.10.2015 um 16:25 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: > > Hi Erich; > > ... > > > So it has been stable from 2002 until 2012, and again three years since > > last change. Or it has there has been only one ch

Re: [leaf-devel] 5.2 & ezipupd will not work with legacy config file

Hi Erich; Am Dienstag, 13. Oktober 2015, 14:26:14 schrieb Erich Titl: > Hi Folks > > What is the reason for the introduction of the /etc/ez-ipupd directory? The change has been made in 2012 (somewhere in 4.3.x AFAIK) and for the purpose to "allow ezipupd to manage multiple configurations in

Re: [leaf-devel] pty allocation failure (solved)

HI Erich; Am Samstag, 10. Oktober 2015, 13:08:17 schrieb Erich Titl: > Hi KP > > Am 10.10.2015 um 03:20 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: > > Hi Erich; > > ... > > > This does not happen, if one adds a new etc.lrp with "apkg -u", where > > changes betwee

Re: [leaf-devel] pty allocation failure (solved)

Hi Erich; Am Mittwoch, 7. Oktober 2015, 17:05:09 schrieb Erich Titl: > Hi > > Bad Karma, but I found the reason myself :-( Sorry for late response, have been on holidays last week :) > Am 07.10.2015 um 15:01 schrieb Erich Titl: > > Hi KP > > > > you apparently had the same failure about 2

Re: [leaf-devel] maint

Hi Erich; Am Sonntag, 4. Oktober 2015, 22:23:12 schrieb Erich Titl: > Hi Folks > > I am a bit puzzled how I should proceed with stuff I am doing in maint. > I would like to have my contributions going into it, but I am constantly > being thrown out of sync by what I would call intrusive changes

Re: [leaf-devel] regdb patch for atheros

Am Mittwoch, 30. September 2015, 17:32:40 schrieb Erich Titl: > Hi KP > > Am 30.09.2015 um 16:40 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: > > Hi Erich; > > > > Am Dienstag, 29. September 2015, 20:30:42 schrieb Erich Titl: > >> Hi Folks > >> > >> I looked at

Re: [leaf-devel] regdb patch for atheros

Am Mittwoch, 30. September 2015, 18:56:15 schrieb Erich Titl: > Am 30.09.2015 um 18:30 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: > > Am Mittwoch, 30. September 2015, 17:32:40 schrieb Erich Titl: > >> Hi KP > >> > >> Am 30.09.2015 um 16:40 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: > >

Re: [leaf-devel] shorewall

Am Mittwoch, 30. September 2015, 08:58:17 schrieb Erich Titl: > Hi Tom > > Am 30.09.2015 um 03:36 schrieb Tom Eastep: > > On 9/29/2015 3:59 PM, Erich Titl wrote: > >> Hi Tom > >> > >> Am 30.09.2015 um 00:34 schrieb Tom Eastep: > >> ... > >> > >>> AUTOHELPERS=Yes doesn't cause helpers to be

Re: [leaf-devel] Fwd: [leaf:packages] New commit by kapeka

Am Montag, 28. September 2015, 19:08:32 schrieb Erich Titl: > Am 28.09.2015 um 17:48 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: > > Hello Erich; > > > > Am Sonntag, 27. September 2015, 13:55:34 schrieb Erich Titl: > >> Hi KP > >> I checked the contents of the 5_2 director

Re: [leaf-devel] regdb patch for atheros

Hi Erich; Am Dienstag, 29. September 2015, 20:30:42 schrieb Erich Titl: > Hi Folks > > I looked at ma newly installed system and it looks like the patch I > wrote to fully enable atheros wireless chips was not applied to the > kernel modules. > > Please advise Lokks like it has been lost

Re: [leaf-devel] regdb patch for atheros

Am Mittwoch, 30. September 2015, 17:32:40 schrieb Erich Titl: > Hi KP > > Am 30.09.2015 um 16:40 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: > > Hi Erich; > > > > Am Dienstag, 29. September 2015, 20:30:42 schrieb Erich Titl: > >> Hi Folks > >> > >> I looked at

Re: [leaf-devel] save modules despite module.sqfs

Hi Erich; Am Dienstag, 29. September 2015, 17:21:12 schrieb Erich Titl: > Hi Andrew > > How do I override the module save lock in 5.2. This is just a bloody PIA Should be default, but could be that you have some leftover from beta versions...?? You may add to leaf.cfg # SaveModules

Re: [leaf-devel] Notes after 5.2 release

Hi Erich; Am Montag, 28. September 2015, 18:51:33 schrieb Erich Titl: > Hi KP > > Am 28.09.2015 um 16:16 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: > > HI Erich; > > ... > > > Yes; files are identical with he released images as you requested. > > Please do. > > > &g

Re: [leaf-devel] Notes after 5.2 release

HI Erich; Am Montag, 28. September 2015, 11:21:10 schrieb Erich Titl: > Hi KP > > Am 26.09.2015 um 18:57 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: > > Hi Erich; > > > > Am Samstag, 26. September 2015, 17:05:56 schrieb Erich Titl: > >> Hi KP > >> > >> Am

Re: [leaf-devel] Fwd: [leaf:packages] New commit by kapeka

Hello Erich; Am Sonntag, 27. September 2015, 13:55:34 schrieb Erich Titl: > Hi KP > I checked the contents of the 5_2 directory this morning using > build_upgrade > > running build_upgrade with parameters 5.2.x 5_2 while this is fine for testing, we'll need more work for a comprehensive

Re: [leaf-devel] 5_2 stable??

Am Samstag, 26. September 2015, 16:31:21 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: > Am Samstag, 26. September 2015, 16:23:12 schrieb Erich Titl: > > Hi KP > > > I installed a system with the files published at 5_2, here a few things: > Too bad, mails crossed BTW: Do you have subscribed to l

Re: [leaf-devel] Notes after 5.2 release

Hi Erich; Am Donnerstag, 24. September 2015, 13:08:14 schrieb Erich Titl: > Hi KP > > Am 22.09.2015 um 18:27 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: > > In 5.2 a major target will be to finally get Erich's update mimic up and > > running > > A few questions > > - What is

Re: [leaf-devel] 5_2 stable??

Am Samstag, 26. September 2015, 16:23:12 schrieb Erich Titl: > Hi KP > > I installed a system with the files published at 5_2, here a few things: Too bad, mails crossed kp --

Re: [leaf-devel] Notes after 5.2 release

Hi Erich; Am Samstag, 26. September 2015, 17:05:56 schrieb Erich Titl: > Hi KP > > Am 26.09.2015 um 16:30 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: > > Hi Erich; > > > > Am Donnerstag, 24. September 2015, 13:08:14 schrieb Erich Titl: > >> Hi KP > >> > &

Re: [leaf-user] In BuC v5.1.5 [USB] ez-ipupd.lrp is missing its .conf file

the ez-ipupd package in > the list of packages that have editable config files; specifically the file: > /var/lib/lrpkg/ezipupd.conf > is absent. > > Cheers & thanks again for LEAF! > > On 15/08/10 12:44, kp kirchdoerfer wrote: > > Am Sonntag, 9. August 2015, 04:58:18

Re: [leaf-devel] 2 new commits to Bering-uClibc

Hi Erich; Am Montag, 24. August 2015, 13:36:48 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi KP ... Yes, there are different preferences, and Erich said it'll be easy to remove modules.sqfs and use of moddb.lrp though it'll reuire the new config option in leaf.cfg. I still don't see why. The config

Re: [leaf-devel] 2 new commits to Bering-uClibc

Am Freitag, 21. August 2015, 22:09:48 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi Andrew Am 21.08.2015 um 16:17 schrieb Andrew: 21.08.2015 16:29, Erich Titl пишет: .. Upgrade does this automagically, maybe not in _all_ circumstances but I tested it with a variety of drivers. And then, in reality you only

Re: [leaf-devel] 2 new commits to Bering-uClibc

HI all; maybe we can make a step backwards in this discussion and can think about my proposal to reduce the pain: The whole pb started here AFAIK: Modules that are copied manually, should be saved. Modules that are loaded from squashfs aren't added to moddb.tgz to reduce it's size. Now we

Re: [leaf-devel] 2 new commits to Bering-uClibc

Am Donnerstag, 20. August 2015, 21:25:36 schrieb Andrew: 20.08.2015 20:40, kp kirchdoerfer пишет: HI all; maybe we can make a step backwards in this discussion and can think about my proposal to reduce the pain: The whole pb started here AFAIK: Modules that are copied manually

Re: [leaf-devel] 2 new commits to Bering-uClibc

Am Montag, 17. August 2015, 21:35:07 schrieb Erich Titl: Am 17.08.2015 um 17:57 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: Hi Erich; Am Montag, 17. August 2015, 10:32:29 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi KP Am 16.08.2015 um 18:40 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: Am Sonntag, 16. August 2015, 19:23:07 schrieb Andrew

Re: [leaf-devel] Fwd: [leaf:bering-uclibc] 2 new commits to Bering-uClibc

Am Sonntag, 16. August 2015, 19:23:07 schrieb Andrew: If no option UPDATE_MODDB is in leaf.cfg nor in kernel cmdline - behavior is same as earlier (modules that were probed from squash aren't stored in moddb. Earlier behaviour has been to save to moddb. We should preserve that. Anyway, last

Re: [leaf-user] In BuC v5.1.5 [USB] ez-ipupd.lrp is missing its .conf file

Am Sonntag, 9. August 2015, 04:58:18 schrieb groups, freeman: Seems as well to be the case for 5.1.6. It's missing since about three yrs. The commit message by Yves Bluessaeu says: This allow ezipupd to manage multiple configurations in parallel ez-ipupd-conf has been moved to ez-ipupd.example

Re: [leaf-devel] 5.2.saving modules problem

Hi Erich; Am Donnerstag, 30. Juli 2015, 22:27:35 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi KP Am 30.07.2015 um 19:18 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: As I said above, default should be seamless. How would you do that? Îf there are any parameters needed, they have to be introduced. What about upgrading

Re: [leaf-devel] 5.2.saving modules problem

Hi Erich; Am Mittwoch, 29. Juli 2015, 10:01:42 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi Am 25.07.2015 um 18:15 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: ... Ok, I'll try to add option to init/hwdetect util in some days. I think that by default we shouldn't save probed modules to moddb. What about this one? Do you

Re: [leaf-devel] 5.2.saving modules problem

Am Mittwoch, 29. Juli 2015, 10:06:59 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi KP Am 26.07.2015 um 17:09 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: Hi Andrew; Am Samstag, 25. Juli 2015, 19:32:10 schrieb Andrew: Hi. I'll try to add it at this weekend. I've updated config.lrp and initrd.lrp and it seems to work

Re: [leaf-devel] 5.2.saving modules problem

Hi Erich; Am Donnerstag, 30. Juli 2015, 18:12:34 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi KP Am 30.07.2015 um 15:51 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: Hi Erich; Am Mittwoch, 29. Juli 2015, 10:01:42 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi Am 25.07.2015 um 18:15 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: ... Ok, I'll try to add option

Re: [leaf-devel] 5.2.saving modules problem

to moddb.lrp, it seems modules saved in moddb.lrp are not loaded (modules.sqfs has been deleted/removed). In addition we should make shure for updates that modules.sqfs overwrites moddb.lrp - if modules.sqfs is available, do not load moddb.lrp kp 25.07.2015 19:15, kp kirchdoerfer пишет: Hi Andrew

Re: [leaf-devel] 5.2.saving modules problem

Hi Andrew; Am Samstag, 4. Juli 2015, 16:00:24 schrieb Andrew: 04.07.2015 15:45, kp kirchdoerfer пишет: Am Samstag, 4. Juli 2015, 15:31:40 schrieb Andrew: 04.07.2015 15:14, kp kirchdoerfer пишет: Hi; I almost agree with Erich :) Am Samstag, 4. Juli 2015, 14:56:33 schrieb Andrew

Re: [leaf-devel] 5.2-trunk seems to be unstable.

Hi Andrew; Am Mittwoch, 15. Juli 2015, 00:28:20 schrieb Andrew: Hi. I assembled build for 4.1.2 kernel. It works on test box for 2 days, I'll try to update other boxes to 4.1.2 on this week. Did it solve your issues? I've installed 4.1.2 kernel on my router and it works pretty well, and

Re: [leaf-devel] Package repository

Am Donnerstag, 23. Juli 2015, 11:07:57 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi folks Does anyone know the status of our package repository, I still don't have access to it mega@leafbuilder:~/leaf/devel/packages$ git pull --rebase ssh: Could not resolve hostname git.code.sf.net: Name or service not known

Re: [leaf-devel] 5.2-trunk seems to be unstable.

Am Dienstag, 7. Juli 2015, 16:54:40 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi KP Am 07.07.2015 um 16:06 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: ... Hi Andrew; it's definitely annoying to release with a known bug; but before we switch to any newer kernel, have you tested a newer one that works? You must

Re: [leaf-devel] 5.2.saving modules problem

Am Samstag, 4. Juli 2015, 15:31:40 schrieb Andrew: 04.07.2015 15:14, kp kirchdoerfer пишет: Hi; I almost agree with Erich :) Am Samstag, 4. Juli 2015, 14:56:33 schrieb Andrew: 04.07.2015 11:34, Erich Titl пишет: Hi Am 04.07.2015 um 09:50 schrieb Andrew: Hi. In most

Re: [leaf-devel] 5.2.saving modules problem

Hi; I almost agree with Erich :) Am Samstag, 4. Juli 2015, 14:56:33 schrieb Andrew: 04.07.2015 11:34, Erich Titl пишет: Hi Am 04.07.2015 um 09:50 schrieb Andrew: Hi. In most cases probing from squashfs is preferred over loading from moddb - at least, this will not break system

Re: [leaf-devel] Speedtest package

Am Donnerstag, 2. Juli 2015, 22:56:30 schrieb Andrew: Hi. Packages repo should be ok. I think we need just to add '3rd-party' or 'version-independent' dir for such packages. packages/tools is 'version-independent'. kp 02.07.2015 19:47, kp kirchdoerfer пишет: HI Andrew; Am

[leaf-devel] 5.2.saving modules problem

Hi; with the changes to sqfs I ran into a problem when saving modules. Automatic laoding during boot from kmodules.sqfs works pretty well for modules added in /etc/modules like tun.ko.gz and for hardware modules detected like ath*. When trying to save the added modules, it neither saves

Re: [leaf-devel] 5.2.saving modules problem

. It breaks previous behaviour of hwdetect running from the commmandline. kp Maybe it'll be good to run modules probing once before squashfs loading to load updated modules that replace older modules from squash. 03.07.2015 18:26, kp kirchdoerfer пишет: Hi; with the changes to sqfs I ran

Re: [leaf-devel] Spurious merge message

Hi Erich; Am Donnerstag, 2. Juli 2015, 10:08:38 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi Folks I still do not grok the semantics of git. I just made a small patch to a file which nobody looked at for weeks anyway. I am not online all the time, so most of my work is being done offline. My local repository

Re: [leaf-devel] Speedtest package

HI Andrew; Am Samstag, 20. Juni 2015, 17:52:38 schrieb Andrew: Hi all. I created speedtest mini package for LEAF routers using mini_httpd (it was needed just to add upload size calculation cgi script); but placing it into main tree looks not a good idea (it's size is almost 100MB - test

Re: [leaf-user] Missing All 5.1.5 Files

Am Samstag, 27. Juni 2015, 22:38:24 schrieb n22e113: On 6/25/2015 15:23, n22e113 wrote: Thanks! A little busy right now but will test again in due course (may be this weekend). Once again, thanks! Tested with Bering-uClibc_5.1.5_i686_syslinux_vga.tar.gz. Everything seems to work but still

Re: [leaf-user] Missing All 5.1.5 Files

Am Mittwoch, 24. Juni 2015, 16:12:15 schrieb n22e113: Hello, Cannot download any of the v5.1.5 from here: http://sourceforge.net/projects/leaf/files/ Many thanks! Cheers! Kwon Hi Kwon; thx a lot for letting us know this issue. Indeed it didn't work; I've deleted the old files, uploaded

Re: [leaf-devel] packages

Hi Erich; ...sorry for being late. Am Dienstag, 2. Juni 2015, 10:44:39 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi KP I am somewhat online again and I would like to get the upgrade thing running (again). Looking at the packages repo I only see 5_0 and 5_1. I haven't changed anything since your tests. Looking

Re: [leaf-devel] squashfs?

Am Samstag, 16. Mai 2015, 00:23:08 schrieb Andrew: Hi all. I think that it'll be better to generate squashfs by buildtool, like initrd/initmod, instead of buildimage (this will help also to build squashfs-based initrd in future). And rename it to kmod-arch.lrp (like initmod-arch.lrp) Any

Re: [leaf-devel] squashfs?

Am Sonntag, 26. April 2015, 14:47:09 schrieb Mega: Am 25.04.2015 um 18:36 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: Hi Gents; I've uploaded a new beta verson for 5.2 and currently we do have the modules twice - as tgz and as squashfs file. We should finish the move for the rc1. What tasks are open

Re: [leaf-devel] squashfs?

Am Montag, 27. April 2015, 18:28:37 schrieb Andrew: 27.04.2015 17:57, kp kirchdoerfer пишет: Am Sonntag, 26. April 2015, 14:47:09 schrieb Mega: Am 25.04.2015 um 18:36 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: Hi Gents; I've uploaded a new beta verson for 5.2 and currently we do have the modules twice

[leaf-devel] squashfs?

Hi Gents; I've uploaded a new beta verson for 5.2 and currently we do have the modules twice - as tgz and as squashfs file. We should finish the move for the rc1. What tasks are open to accomplish it? from Andrews commit message: initrd: add basic hw autodetect using squashfs initial

Re: [leaf-devel] 5.1.4

Am Samstag, 18. April 2015, 13:13:26 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi KP Hi Erich; I haven't uploaded packages yet; but will add to 5_1; anywhere else so you test with updates? kp I _believe_ I saw an indicetion of 5.1.4 being published. Where did it go? is this now in 5_1 on packages? Thanks

Re: [leaf-devel] kernel config

Hi Erich; Am Donnerstag, 16. April 2015, 10:02:58 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi KP I had a quick look in the kernel config files and came up with a few questions you may be able to answer. All my findings are based on the latest git master version. Bering-3.14.20.config-versatile

Re: [leaf-devel] install.sh is part of maint

Am Dienstag, 14. April 2015, 19:00:07 schrieb Andrew: Hi. For maint it works. For master - it seems like fdisk output changes (new version?). Yes, it has been updated to util-linux-ng 2.25; I didn't mention that in changelog. Thx for clarification kp 14.04.2015 18:56, kp kirchdoerfer

[leaf-devel] install.sh is part of maint

Hi Andrew; you've started with commits of the installer in maint branch, I guess the fixes should also go into the maint branch...? install.sh: fix regexp for new fdisk output was committed to master kp -- BPM

Re: [leaf-devel] latest git requires user interaction on linux build

HI Erich; Am Dienstag, 14. April 2015, 00:00:40 schrieb Erich Titl: Am 13.04.2015 um 21:04 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: Hi Erich; ... Make shure you have the Bering-3.14.36-config -xxx.patches, otherwise apllying the patches will fail. This happended to me after your new config

Re: [leaf-devel] latest git requires user interaction on linux build

Hi Erich; Am Montag, 13. April 2015, 08:36:36 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi Folks The latest git state requires user interaction during the linux build, probably while running --oldconfig due to the config file not being of the same release. I tested from ground up and it builds all i386 kernels.

Re: [leaf-devel] Install script

Am Mittwoch, 8. April 2015, 22:04:12 schrieb Andrew: 08.04.2015 17:44, kp kirchdoerfer пишет: Am Dienstag, 7. April 2015, 20:29:19 schrieb Andrew: Can you manually format your storage with '-r 512' option? this the default; it worked with -r 1024 AFAIK by default root dir size

Re: [leaf-devel] buildimage et al.

HI Erich; Am Donnerstag, 9. April 2015, 16:30:16 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi KP you pointed me to buildimage.pl as the tool you use to prepare the images. There does not appear to be code there for placing the files in the packages repository, so you must either do it manually or use something

Re: [leaf-devel] Install script

Am Dienstag, 7. April 2015, 20:29:19 schrieb Andrew: Can you manually format your storage with '-r 512' option? this the default; it worked with -r 1024 And it booted afterwards - nice! Anyway we should think about if we need to add hsdupp for every iso image. Users of the iso image will get

Re: [leaf-devel] Install script

Am Montag, 6. April 2015, 22:34:25 schrieb Andrew: It seems like script is now enough useful, I included it into maint branch (it shouldn't break anything). Tested and it failed with no space left on device while copying packages. df -h shows: unused space of 164M for /dev/sda1 and 8MB for

Re: [leaf-devel] Install script

Am Montag, 6. April 2015, 22:34:25 schrieb Andrew: It seems like script is now enough useful, I included it into maint branch (it shouldn't break anything). It fails to work in my test setup (see previous mail) - can we disabe for maint (just by removing install.sh from config repo)? That way

Re: [leaf-devel] 5.2 branch kernel update

Hi Andrew; Am Dienstag, 7. April 2015, 17:57:53 schrieb Andrew: Hi all. Maybe we should switch on 5.2 brach to 3.18 LTS kernel? I had the same idea, but refused even to test 3.18 because of three reasons. 1) it takes some time (a few weeks) to adjust the main images to a new kernel and to

Re: [leaf-devel] 5.2 branch kernel update

will have a short time to live. kp 07.04.2015 18:31, kp kirchdoerfer пишет: Hi Andrew; Am Dienstag, 7. April 2015, 17:57:53 schrieb Andrew: Hi all. Maybe we should switch on 5.2 brach to 3.18 LTS kernel? I had the same idea, but refused even to test 3.18 because of three reasons

Re: [leaf-devel] Install script

Am Sonntag, 5. April 2015, 20:38:02 schrieb Andrew: 05.04.2015 18:33, kp kirchdoerfer пишет: Am Sonntag, 5. April 2015, 18:18:17 schrieb Andrew: 05.04.2015 18:13, kp kirchdoerfer пишет: Am Sonntag, 5. April 2015, 17:57:47 schrieb Andrew: Wrong partition type :) ok I fixed

Re: [leaf-devel] Install script

Am Sonntag, 5. April 2015, 17:37:28 schrieb Andrew: Hm, strange. What says fdisk -l ? it shows /dev/sda1 not bootable Id 83 and type Linux. kp 05.04.2015 16:48, kp kirchdoerfer пишет: Hi Andrew; just build a VM for testing and, created a partition with fdisk and formatted

Re: [leaf-devel] Install script

mounted while trying to mount /dev/sda1. No surprise I mounted /dev/sr0 to /mnt, otherwise it cvan't see the STORAGE_MEDIA kp 05.04.2015 17:48, kp kirchdoerfer пишет: Am Sonntag, 5. April 2015, 17:37:28 schrieb Andrew: Hm, strange. What says fdisk -l ? it shows /dev/sda1

Re: [leaf-devel] Install script

haven't testbox near me. If all is OK, I'll add it into LEAF. 18.03.2015 18:52, kp kirchdoerfer пишет: Hi Andrew; Am Montag, 16. März 2015, 20:29:17 schrieb Andrew: Hi. Right, it seems that mailing list strips attaches :( Here is it: http://pastebin.com/WCTHZ89s That worked

Re: [leaf-devel] LEAF upgrade squashfs

Hi Erich; sounds interesting. For building images see: http://bering-uclibc.zetam.org/wiki/Bering-uClibc_5.x_-_Developer_Guide_-_Building_an_Image and buildimage.pl in the root of the buildenv. Can you explain which repository/branch holds your testbed? The packages repo can be become a mess

Re: [leaf-devel] Install script

Am Sonntag, 5. April 2015, 18:18:17 schrieb Andrew: 05.04.2015 18:13, kp kirchdoerfer пишет: Am Sonntag, 5. April 2015, 17:57:47 schrieb Andrew: Wrong partition type :) ok I fixed that by choosing type b (should it be any other??) Any FAT type (fdisk -l should show FAT/FAT32/etc

Re: [leaf-devel] LEAF upgrade

Hi Erich; I disagree with a few of your decisions, mainly because they put a lot of extra work upon the dude instead get it once forever right in the upgrade script. I'll explain in the text... Am Montag, 30. März 2015, 15:33:48 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi Folks I adapted the 5.1.4-rc1 branch

Re: [leaf-devel] LEAF upgrade

Am Montag, 30. März 2015, 16:40:01 schrieb Erich Titl: Am 30.03.2015 um 16:10 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: Hi Erich; I disagree with a few of your decisions, mainly because they put a lot of extra work upon the dude instead get it once forever right in the upgrade script. I'll explain

[leaf-devel] kernel compilation pb

Hi Erich; Am Montag, 30. März 2015, 17:59:38 schrieb Erich Titl: BTW Can you compile the kernel on master, on my system it crashes miserably DEPMOD 3.10.69-i686 master branch provides a 3.14 kernel maint branch provides a 3.10 kernel (3.10.71) I also switched back in git to

Re: [leaf-devel] LEAF upgrade / package repository

Am Freitag, 27. März 2015, 09:12:04 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi Folks Am 24.03.2015 um 12:38 schrieb Erich Titl: .. I don't know, if we can use this to just give access to the current or stable files. I did some local experiments mega@leafbuilder:~/leaf/devel/packages$ du -s . 5961104

Re: [leaf-devel] LEAF upgrade / package repository

Am Freitag, 27. März 2015, 16:22:40 schrieb Erich Titl: Am 27.03.2015 um 15:53 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: Am Freitag, 27. März 2015, 09:12:04 schrieb Erich Titl: ... Yes it's effcient with branches.But it's not really efficient with binaries, though as discussed that's a workaround

Re: [leaf-devel] LEAF upgrade / package repository

Am Freitag, 27. März 2015, 16:39:54 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi Am 27.03.2015 um 15:53 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: ... Just play with it and let's know about your findings. Esp stable is a playground, but I hope we can shrink the other repos as well later. I can now access the packages

Re: [leaf-devel] LEAF upgrade / package repository

Am Freitag, 27. März 2015, 17:54:43 schrieb Erich Titl: Am 27.03.2015 um 16:43 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: Am Freitag, 27. März 2015, 16:22:40 schrieb Erich Titl: Am 27.03.2015 um 15:53 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: Am Freitag, 27. März 2015, 09:12:04 schrieb Erich Titl: ... Yes it's

Re: [leaf-devel] how to shrink a repository

Am Dienstag, 24. März 2015, 12:20:35 schrieb Yves Blusseau: Le 23 mars 2015 à 18:36, kp kirchdoerfer kap...@users.sourceforge.net a écrit : Hello Yves; Am Montag, 23. März 2015, 18:05:13 schrieb Yves Blusseau: Le 23 mars 2015 à 16:35, kp kirchdoerfer kap...@users.sourceforge.net

Re: [leaf-devel] how to shrink a repository

Hi; Am Montag, 23. März 2015, 12:07:35 schrieb Yves Blusseau: Le 23 mars 2015 à 09:25, Erich Titl erich.t...@think.ch a écrit : Hi Yves Am 23.03.2015 um 08:56 schrieb Yves Blusseau: ... The feature is to clone a repository without downloading all the history (several GB)

Re: [leaf-devel] how to shrink a repository

Hello Yves; Am Montag, 23. März 2015, 18:05:13 schrieb Yves Blusseau: Le 23 mars 2015 à 16:35, kp kirchdoerfer kap...@users.sourceforge.net a écrit : Hi; Am Montag, 23. März 2015, 12:07:35 schrieb Yves Blusseau: Le 23 mars 2015 à 09:25, Erich Titl erich.t...@think.ch a écrit

Re: [leaf-user] Ver 5.1.3: ipsec.lrp package missing?

Am Mittwoch, 18. März 2015, 10:45:38 schrieb Mega: Hi Jürgen Am 18.03.2015 um 08:14 schrieb j...@tux-net.de: Hi, I have to update a 3.1.x box with 5.1.3 and I can't find the ipsec.lrp but only the the ipsec.lwp. Was there a change in the past which I missed? Hang on for a while.

Re: [leaf-devel] Install script

16.03.2015 19:25, kp kirchdoerfer пишет: Am Sonntag, 15. März 2015, 00:53:14 schrieb Andrew: Hi all. I wrote small install script to make LEAF installing easier for customers. Currently it chooses partition, and installs MBR/syslinux on it. It'll be good to add packages copying from CD

Re: [leaf-devel] qemu and raspberry pi

Hi all; Am Montag, 16. März 2015, 12:50:48 schrieb David M Brooke: Hi Jim, It’s been a long while since I tried using qemu to emulate a RaspberryPi but I did get it to work. Probably kp has more recent experience. Sorry, no - I always test on the hardware... There are some notes at

Re: [leaf-devel] Install script

Am Sonntag, 15. März 2015, 00:53:14 schrieb Andrew: Hi all. I wrote small install script to make LEAF installing easier for customers. Currently it chooses partition, and installs MBR/syslinux on it. It'll be good to add packages copying from CD to this partition (how we should handle

Re: [leaf-devel] qemu and raspberry pi

Am Montag, 16. März 2015, 16:00:41 schrieb Jim Munro: Thanks David for the reply. cat initrd.lrp initmod-versatile.lrp initrd-versatile.lrp If you refer to the tarball you use to boot your raspberry, it's already in place as initrd.lrp. kp Where would I find initmod-versatile.lrp.

Re: [leaf-devel] LEAF Upgrade

Hi Erich; Am Freitag, 13. März 2015, 22:48:54 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi KP Am 13.03.2015 um 14:57 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: Am Donnerstag, 12. März 2015, 19:15:02 schrieb Erich Titl: ... I've added one. That's all in the git repo packages, uploading is via git (add, commit, push

[leaf-devel] how to shrink a repository

Hi Yves; you may have followed the threads about LEAF upgrade... Today we do have a package repository with for packages https://sourceforge.net/p/leaf/packages/ci/master/tree/ The summed packages size is about 300MB; but .git/objects is about 5,6GB. I have an idea how I (mis)managed it.

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >