Phil Cook wrote:
I hope someone can help me out here and point me in the right
direction to fix this problem. I had a spammer that authenticated
against my mail server. How did this happen? I'm running version
1.2.4(2).
They probably got your email account password by hacking your server, or
Matti Haack wrote:
Alex,
- try uninstalling perl completely,
- delete the perl folder
- Install latest activestate perl
- run the script
If there are any failures (maybe there are 4 or 5) install them with
ppm
This worked for me
Matti
Repositories must be added (edit, preferences,
Original Message
From: Daniel K. Du Vall
To: assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 11:38 AM
Subject: [Assp-user] Blocking sender completely
Is there a way to block a sender completely Like [EMAIL PROTECTED]
? I don’t want to even see this marked as SAPM
Original Message
From: Daniel K. Du Vall
To: assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 11:38 AM
Subject: [Assp-user] Blocking sender completely
Is there a way to block a sender completely Like [EMAIL PROTECTED] ?
I don’t want to even see this marked as SAPM and
Dickie Bradford wrote:
I have clamav installed as instructed with clavav.msi (running as a
service) runclamd (also running as a service) both are started and
running and I have all the modules installed as required, but i am
getting this error:
Oct-13-07 16:11:34 File::Scan::ClamAV
Norbert Doeberlein wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Charles Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2007 15:50
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Refused Connections
I was under
Josef Schmitz wrote:
I have some VIP users that want spam proctection via assp but does
not want to contribute to bayes spam corpus for privacy reasons. Is
it possible to omit saving to spam and notspam for several users.
These local users on the other side wants to use automatic
Christian Rehkopf wrote:
A custumor of mine cries around because one of his customers cant mail
him from an AOL address - and a quick view in the logs shows
205.188.144.208 as sending server
http://moensted.dk/spam/?addr=205.188.144.208Submit=Submit
shows that this server is on 4 of my
Dave Emory wrote:
Christian Rehkopf wrote:
A custumor of mine cries around because one of his customers cant
mail him from an AOL address - and a quick view in the logs shows
205.188.144.208 as sending server
http://moensted.dk/spam/?addr=205.188.144.208Submit=Submit
shows
1) wrong list. use the 'test' list for beta versions,
OK. Everything newer than 1.3.1 is beta, correct?
2) update your beta, thats an old one.
Just got (10). Thanks.
3) is Bayesian in scoring mode?
No, it's activated (mode 1).
Dave Emory wrote:
1) wrong list. use the 'test' list for beta versions,
OK. Everything newer than 1.3.1 is beta, correct?
2) update your beta, thats an old one.
Just got (10). Thanks.
3) is Bayesian in scoring mode?
No, it's activated (mode 1).
version (10) fixed it.
Dave
My log shows lines like these:
Aug-27-07 10:01:35 66.35.250.225 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
recipient accepted: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aug-27-07 10:01:35 66.35.250.225 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Regex:Redlist
Can the noPB contain values such as 66..35.250. so any blacklisted IP
addresses (including 66.35.250.0) will be removed from the blacklist?
Dave
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
Can the noPB contain values such as 66..35.250. so any blacklisted IP
addresses (including 66.35.250.0) will be removed from the blacklist?
did you try it?
Yes, but I couldn't tell which address actually worked to remove both lines
because of the delay before the file
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave
Emory Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 9:16 PM
To: assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Assp-user] archiving mail with ASSP
Has anyone devised an elegant way to use ASSP on a Windows server to
meet
the U.S. records retention
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
Nearly 17% of the spam I see is to addresses that have never or will
never
be valid on my system. As a result of this I have a relatively large
SpamTrapAdddresses.txt
Has anyone devised an elegant way to use ASSP on a Windows server to meet
the U.S. records retention requirements? I need to archive the not-spam
mail for at least one domain name for legal purposes. I'm wondering if
hMailServer can facilitate this?
If we weren't trying to stabilize the
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
The answer is in test-user maillist )).
All I see are some subscribe and test messages.
Dave
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?
I have exportExtremeFileDeny checked, but nothing is getting denied because
the exported file has only 1 line in it right now. It should have over 7000
addresses in it. The log has lines like this:
Aug-11-07 16:49:36 [PBextreme][monitoring] 66.97.166.187
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I just saw these in the log:
Aug-5-07 10:52:48 64.209.223.35 [EMAIL PROTECTED] to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] recipient
accepted: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aug-5-07 10:52:54 64.209.223.35 [EMAIL PROTECTED] to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ClamAV:
scanning 3495 bytes done OK
Aug-5-07
Daniel L. Miller wrote:
I may have perhaps found the answer. My
exportExtremeFileAppend was checked, and the exportextreme file
was ... a trifle large. A sort -u shrunk it to a manageable
size, and ASSP is blocking connections again.
Hi, perl people.
I'm a bit concerned that the large
BlackHelo scoring tags on a message from this forum:
Jul-24-07 15:30:19 66.35.250.225 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
recipient accepted: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jul-24-07 15:30:20 66.35.250.225 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Regex:Redlist
From the 1.3.3 () maillog:
Jul-23-07 08:34:07 Email whitelist addition: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A while later:
Jul-23-07 08:52:30 207.243.180.183 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Regex:WildCardDomain
'1076'
Jul-23-07 08:52:30 207.243.180.183 [EMAIL PROTECTED] adding new
triplet: (207.243.180.0,
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
Did I do something wrong, or is this a bug?
what is the setting for delaying whitelisted?
Delay Whitelisted is not checked. assp.cfg has this: DelayWL:=
Dave
-
This SF.net email is
Set DoBombHeaderRe = 0.
- Original Message -
From: James Brown
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2007 6:07 PM
Subject: [Assp-user] BombHeaderRe:''
I am getting lots of emails blocked by BombHearderRe:
Jul-23-07 09:47:49
What's the difference between these two options?
Deny SMTP Connections from these IP's*
Manually maintained list of IP's which should be denied. For example:
file:files/denysmtp.txt Internal Name: denySMTPConnectionsFrom
Always Deny SMTP Connections from these IP's*
Manually maintained list of
Excellent! Thanks for th explanation.
Dave
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
What's the difference between these two options?
Deny SMTP Connections from these IP's*
Manually maintained list of IP's which should be denied. For example:
file:files/denysmtp.txt Internal Name:
Marrco wrote:
Thanks! I'll be working on some scripting to maintain a good
spamtrap list using yours as a starting point. The list I use now
was tediously created
Don't hesitate to ask, should any need arise. But don't forget to
share you findings and you improved scripts with the list.
Hmmmit looks like I'm not finding all of the invalid addresses. I'll
keep working on it.
Dave
Dave Emory wrote:
Marrco wrote:
Thanks! I'll be working on some scripting to maintain a good
spamtrap list using yours as a starting point. The list I use now
was tediously created
Dave Emory wrote:
Hmmmit looks like I'm not finding all of the invalid addresses.
I'll keep working on it.
Dave
Messy, but it all seems to work now. If I were a perl programmer, it would
be a lot better (hint hint). There must be a way to do the windows findstr
function in perl
Dave Emory wrote:
In de-dupe.pl, put this:
X---
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
use strict;
sub ltrim($);
# Set to filename of text file
my $infile = 'invalid.txt';
# Set $finalfile to filename of de-duped file
my $newfile = 'recipients.txt';
my $tempfile = 'temp.txt
Thanks! I'll be working on some scripting to maintain a good spamtrap list
using yours as a starting point. The list I use now was tediously created
using Excel some time ago. I just caught a batch of them using that old
list:
Jul-13-07 08:47:03 193.69.160.86 [EMAIL PROTECTED] PB:
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
Thanks! I'll be working on some scripting to maintain a good
spamtrap list
using yours as a starting point. The list I use now was tediously
created
using Excel some time ago. I just caught a batch of them using that
old
list:
What is here the difference from
Hi, all.
I sometimes see a flurry of attempted connections such as these from the
mail
log:
Jul-11-07 06:38:54 Connected: 58.224.155.140:1176 - 192.168.0.5:25 -
192.168.0.1:25
Jul-11-07 06:38:55 c1775 58.224.155.140 [EMAIL PROTECTED] invalid
address rejected: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jul-11-07
8-) me, too!
Dickson, Paul wrote:
I hate it when PEBKAC rears its' ugly head:-P
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave
Emory Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 2:50 PM
To: Matti Haack; Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam
Kevin wrote:
Dave Emory wrote:
Hi, all.
I sometimes see a flurry of attempted connections such as these from
the mail
log:
--snip--
The messages come from different IP addresses and different senders,
but are the invalid addresses are repeated. Does anyone know of a
way to detect
Hi, all.
I often see a flurry of attempted connections such as these from the mail
log:
Jul-11-07 06:38:54 Connected: 58.224.155.140:1176 - 192.168.0.5:25 -
192.168.0.1:25
Jul-11-07 06:38:55 c1775 58.224.155.140 [EMAIL PROTECTED] invalid
address rejected: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jul-11-07 06:38:55
Micheal Espinola Jr wrote:
ASSP v1.3.2(33)
I've seen this a few times now, so it appears to be reproducible (a
real
issue). Each time I have seen it, it has happened with a redRe match:
What I am seeing are emails that have matched the redRe, and then
being
handled and post-processed by
I switched my ASSP installation from an XP box to a Win2K server box. All is
working except ClamAv (worked great under XP). I get this in the log:
File::Scan::ClamAV module version 1.8 installed but not available, error:
Cannot connect to 'localhost:3310': IO::Socket::INET: connect: Unknown
Kevin wrote:
Dave Emory wrote:
I switched my ASSP installation from an XP box to a Win2K server box.
All is working except ClamAv (worked great under XP). I get this in
the log:
File::Scan::ClamAV module version 1.8 installed but not available,
error: Cannot connect to 'localhost:3310': IO
PROTECTED] email
whitelist addition
Jul-5-07 13:34:39 87.194.120.42 is disconnected
Here's an old thread about this issue; maybe you have the same problem that
I did:
Kevin wrote:
Dave Emory wrote:
Dave Emory wrote:
Version 1.3.0 has these lines in the log when it receives a
whitelist addition
Tony Freeman @ TnTFam wrote:
Version 1.3.1
All features are in test mode. Using only Bayesian scoring with my
server processing from there. Every option in Validate Sender and
Validate Local Addresses
Mail to same user from inside network (192.168.1.*) passes to server
and is handled.
Micheal Espinola Jr wrote:
Dave Emory wrote:
A bit broader question is why any of these lines are in the
/files/redre.txt (dated 5/11/2007 here)? I got the file from the
1.3.2 directory on Fritz's site. It's not there now. Amy
apparently has the same redre.txt as me.
BIG5
CHINESEBIG
Micheal Espinola Jr wrote:
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
It was not a mistake, I run exactly that.
In addition to the bombRe it makes perfect sense. Thanks again for
turning me on to that.
It still doesn't make sense to me. If the regex is for catching spam, why
do you want the spammer to be
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
If the regex is for catching spam, why
do you want the spammer to be treated as redlisted?
Because of COLLECTION. For me, it does not make sense to have a lot of
Japanese Spam Mail in my collection.
OK, let's see if I understand now; BombRe failures would be scored
Micheal Espinola Jr wrote:
Are you sure you want to redlist Windows-1251? Thats Cryllic/Russian:
A bit broader question is why any of these lines are in the /files/redre.txt
(dated 5/11/2007 here)? I got the file from the 1.3.2 directory on Fritz's
site. It's not there now. Amy apparently
What does this mean?
ASSP wrote:
Message ID:
Remote IP: 66.35.250.225
Subject: Re_Assp_user_Server_Breach_
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recipient(s): [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Virus Detected: 'HTML.Phishing.Pay-180'.
-
This
Kevin wrote:
Dave Emory wrote:
What does this mean?
ASSP wrote:
Message ID:
Remote IP: 66.35.250.225
Subject: Re_Assp_user_Server_Breach_
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recipient(s): [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Virus Detected: 'HTML.Phishing.Pay-180'.
I'll bet it was because Amy posted a copy
Kevin wrote:
Dave Emory wrote:
Kevin wrote:
Dave Emory wrote:
What does this mean?
ASSP wrote:
Message ID:
Remote IP: 66.35.250.225
Subject: Re_Assp_user_Server_Breach_
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recipient(s): [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Virus Detected: 'HTML.Phishing.Pay-180'.
I'll bet
These are examples of SPF query responses that are not comprehended by ASSP:
Received-SPF: permerror -extension:foo (mybox.example.org: domain of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] uses mechanism not recognized by this client)
Received-SPF: temperror (mybox.example.org: error in processing during
lookup
Dickson, Paul wrote:
In reverse order, you can see by this log that [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
whitelisted back in apr. A message from her was tagged as spam and
when re-submitted to whitelist, was whitelisted again, thus it was
some how removed from whitelist. Usually, when I see a whitelist
Options for temperror and permerror like the ones ASSP has for softfail and
neutral would be good to have. Every instance of a permerror I've seen has
been spam here, so I would use Fail SPF PermError Validations if we had
that option.
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
These are examples of SPF query
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
May be, I do it.
But first things first. I replaced with the help of Nate the older SPF
module by the newest one. Please test this.
You have to install Mail::SPF and see then:
Mail::SPF module version v2.005 installed and available
Will version 2.00 work? That's
Morris, Nate wrote:
ActiveState's v2.00 does NOT work. The interfaces are totally
different.
I'm working on instructions for installing it from CPAN because in my
experience, it didn't go so smooth.
Nate
Yes, I found out quickly that 2.00 does not work -- ASSP crash after a few
messages.
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
Will version 2.00 work? That's the newest Activestate version.
I am really tired of this. Is it not possible to test this without
asking? Should I know, if Activestate 2.00 work?
No, I don't expect you to know everything about CPAN versus Activestate
modules. I won't
Kevin wrote:
Dickson, Paul wrote:
We had a problem with assp crashing every few hours. I noticed
after a couple days of trying to figure it out that the server time
had walked off by 2~3 min. It has been rock solid for a week since
syncing w/ an NTP server.
Intresting. I'll have to make
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
What in perl or the ASSP code itself would have caused the crash? I
think
this failure mode still needs some investigation/verification.
Dave
I doubt, that a clock out of sync for some seconds would cause a crash
in assp.
May be, there is a reason why the
Is it possible to put a debug option in ASSP that logs debug details to a
*.dbg file for a specific IP address, domain, etc.? I think most problems
that need to be debugged are address or domain specific, so the data would
be most helpful if it only contained the interesting stuff.
Dave
Does ASSP check for packets received during the delay period (before the 220
command is sent)? If so, does it do anything to block the offender when it
tries again?
Marrco wrote:
I'm anxious to try this in ASSP. I've used Response Delays with
other software and found it very effective. But
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
Does ASSP check for packets received during the delay period (before
the 220
command is sent)? If so, does it do anything to block the offender
when it
tries again?
I answered that already twice.
I saw this response from you in an earlier message:
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
That's not what I was asking. I was asking if the offending address
went
into the blacklist, graylist, or other blocking mechanism.
No.
fritz
Would it not be better if addresses that disregard the greeting delay time
could add to the PB score, be blacklisted for
Dave Emory wrote:
Version 1.3.0 has these lines in the log when it receives a whitelist
addition message:
May-20-07 12:30:58 Connected: 192.168.0.6:2210 - 192.168.0.5:25 -
192.168.0.1:25
May-20-07 12:30:59 192.168.0.6 [EMAIL PROTECTED] email whitelist
addition May-20-07 12:30:59 Email
Kevin wrote:
Dave Emory wrote:
Dave Emory wrote:
Version 1.3.0 has these lines in the log when it receives a
whitelist addition message:
May-20-07 12:30:58 Connected: 192.168.0.6:2210 - 192.168.0.5:25 -
192.168.0.1:25
May-20-07 12:30:59 192.168.0.6 [EMAIL PROTECTED] email whitelist
Version 1.3.0 has these lines in the log when it receives a whitelist
addition message:
May-20-07 12:30:58 Connected: 192.168.0.6:2210 - 192.168.0.5:25 -
192.168.0.1:25
May-20-07 12:30:59 192.168.0.6 [EMAIL PROTECTED] email whitelist addition
May-20-07 12:30:59 Email whitelist addition: [EMAIL
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
Is there anybody, who is willing to replace Mail::SPF::Query
with Mail::SPF ?
I'll try it, but I'm not sure if the Activestate Perl is good or not. It
installed with no errors using ppm.
dave
-
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
I'll try it, but I'm not sure if the Activestate Perl is good or
not. It
installed with no errors using ppm.
I am talking of replacing the code inside ASSP.
fritz
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
I knew what you meant. I assumed I would have to install the
Mail::SPF
module to test your code. Is that correct? The Activestate
Mail::SPF
module may be buggy, but I'll be glad to test your new ASSP version
to find
out.
No. I wanted somebody to change the code
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
I reduced the
frequency test duration due to this issue so the function still helps
prevent denial-of-service, but mail isn't blocked for the default
3600
seconds.
Is does not help to reduce expiration by reducing duration.
I see what you mean. Thanks.
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
Tell me if this is a dumb idea: Would it be possible to have an upper
and lower threshold on PB scoring to filter the terribly obvious spam
from the not so obvious
Elvar wrote:
Hello,
The majority of my clients prefer to have their spam discarded rather
than tagged and passed through, but the problem arises when something
legit is blocked.
The users can easily store their own spam mail. The {SPAM} tag inserted in
the subject and a simple rule in the
Mauro Lanci wrote:
Thank you for the suggestion. How I can install Net::DNS 0.57?
Mauro
This link http://ppm.activestate.com/PPMPackages/ has the older package
versions. Add a local directory to the repository list using the GUI PPM,
unzip the old version there, uninstall the problem
Yes, the whitelist email function has always added every address in the
email file as far as I know. Maybe that should be optional, with a default
of adding only the valid sender address to the white list. Fritz, what do
you think?
Kevin wrote:
Dickson, Paul wrote:
Apr-18-07 15:41:08 Email
Rick Klinge wrote:
Running ASSP v1.3.1(47) on Windows.
Fri Apr 13 00:49:22 2007: Analyzing started Fri Apr 13
00:51:27 2007: Analyzing c:\assp/errors/spam 3621 Fri Apr 13
00:51:44 2007: Analyzing c:\assp/errors/notspam 3974 Fri Apr
13 01:00:55 2007: Analyzing c:\assp/spam 21605 Fri Apr 13
I think this just started with v 42. An address (just the user name, no
domain) in the unprocessed section is being delayed now. Is a user name
listed in unprocessed supposed to skip delaying? It's not a big problem,
but it may be an unintended consequence of some other change to ASSP, so
Ethan Albone wrote:
please look these lines from 1.3.1 (40)
Apr-4-07 09:55:06 213.205.33.42 [EMAIL PROTECTED] to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] deleting spamming whitelisted tuplet:
(213.205.33.0,linuxquestions.org) age: 2s
Apr-4-07 11:22:45 213.205.33.42 [EMAIL PROTECTED] adding new triplet:
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
I count only about
30 actual URIs.
I count much more for : costco.com
There are 48 occurences of .com. There are 40 occurences of costco.com.
What does the script consider a URI? RFC 3986 section 1.1.2 examples all
have a colon after the scheme parameter. The
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
I count only about
30 actual URIs.
I count much more for : costco.com
I spent some time trying to understand why the URIs were overcounted.
Although I don't know why it makes a difference, a single added space in one
line seemed to greatly reduce the extra counts.
I put a temporary mlog line in the script that wrote the $uri and $ucnt
every time the maxuri routine looped. Here's the log for the last
iteration:
Apr-2-07 12:09:49 206.190.58.212 [EMAIL PROTECTED] to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
URI=yahoo, count is 231
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
ASSP thinks there are
We cache RBL and URIBL already, and this mechanism works great. Wouldn't
there also be benefits to caching other look-ups such as SPF and PTR?
Forgive me if ASSP already does this; I don't see options in the web
interface to control caching of SPF if it's being done.
Regards,
Dave
Sure, there's a way. It's just not part of ASSP.
I did a quick analysis using Excel of a chunk of the maillog after enabling
unique id. Unique id provides a way to group the data lines:
Total Count of Delayed 166
Total Count of Accepted 53
Total Count of Whitelisted 38
My
Some setting sections are rendered in blue text, others in green text. Do
the different colors signify something?
Dave
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and
Upgrading should work just as well as a first-time installation. The
failure of the ASSP script to properly initialize new variables and rewrite
the config file after an upgrade/restart is a significant problem. At the
very least, the web interface should have displayed the uriblTestMode
Hello, Fritz.
I'm using the exportedextreme.txt file as my denysmtpfile (works great!).
The only problem is that there's always a log entry when the file changes,
which is frequent.
I sent this message earlier:
Please consider making this change to the code in sub checkOptionList:
#
Paul wrote:
On 1 Mar 2007 at 11:46, Dave Emory wrote:
Hello, all.
I moved zip attachment handling from level 3 to level 4:
Mar-1-07 11:37:54 Badattach Level 3 updated from 'zip' to ''
Mar-1-07 11:37:54 Goodattach Level 4 updated from
'doc|xls|ppt|pdf|zip|rtf|txt|rar' to
'doc|xls|ppt|pdf
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
Hello, Fritz.
I'm using the exportedextreme.txt file as my denysmtpfile (works
great!).
This is not necessary if pb is active. All what is exported is already
blocked by pb-extreme in a very early stage.
If you want to use the exported file, then copy and *add* the
Hello, Fritz.
Please consider making this change to the code in sub checkOptionList:
# mlog(0,option list file '$fil' reloaded ($name)) unless $init;
mlog(0,option list file '$fil' reloaded ($name)) unless (($init ||
!$MaintenanceLog));
That will disable repetitive log lines like this
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
Hello, all.
I moved zip attachment handling from level 3 to level 4:
Mar-1-07 11:37:54 Badattach Level 3 updated from 'zip' to ''
Mar-1-07 11:37:54 Goodattach Level 4 updated from
'doc|xls|ppt|pdf|zip|rtf|txt|rar' to
'doc|xls|ppt|pdf|zip|rtf|txt|rar|zip|dat'
The dat extension wasn't in level
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
The dat extension wasn't in level 4 until I added and saved the zip
extension. Was the dat extension intended to be added when I
upgraded to
1.3.0 and restarted?
yes, I added dat because of winmail.dat
My point is that dat wasn't added until I manually changed that
Micheal Espinola Jr wrote:
Greg Wright wrote:
Spam Log Frequency: Store every n'th spam message. The same as for
non spam but helps prevent spam corpuses being skewed by flooding.
It is recommended that this be set depending on spam volume. Default
value = 1, log every message.
An excellent
Hi, all.
Yesterday, I created the file dnsbldb in the ASSP directory and added the
file name to the dnsbl section of the config. The description of the file
in the interface is The file with the current DNSBL -- make this blank if
you don't use it.
My log says this today when I restart:
Patrick Butts wrote:
BTW, Fritz.. meant to point this out earlier... small cosmetic thing..
Lookup valid Local Addresses from here*
The first addresses is missing a d.
There are about six more places in the code with address spelled wrong.
There are probably other spelling errors. It would
Hi, all.
I piped the output if the new db rebuild script to a file (using the -notick
option). Here's what the file contains:
--snip---
mt=288078
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Today, this happened:
Feb-23-07 16:51:56 202.211.85.21 [EMAIL PROTECTED] to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Received-SPF: unknown (ASSP: error in processing
during lookup of [EMAIL PROTECTED]) client-ip=202.211.85.21;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; helo=C085H021.
home05.cable.mecha.ne.jp;
I've seen the SPF: unknown
The syntax of a legal Internet host name was specified in RFC-952
[DNS:4]. One aspect of host name syntax is hereby changed: the
restriction on the first character is relaxed to allow either a
letter or a digit. Host software MUST support this more liberal
syntax.
Is
Kevin wrote:
Dave Emory wrote:
The syntax of a legal Internet host name was specified in RFC-952
[DNS:4]. One aspect of host name syntax is hereby changed: the
restriction on the first character is relaxed to allow either a
letter or a digit. Host software MUST support
Eric Carr wrote:
WORKAROUND:
I whipped up a small windows app - ASSPacemaker - for checking ASSP,
then killing and restarting it if it hangs. It's simple and intended
for my own use, but if anyone else needs it, feel free to grab it
from here: http://carr.no/asspacemaker.zip
Screenshot:
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
This made me wonder if there's a way to remotely signal ASSP to
restart. If
there there were, a program like Erics might work across a LAN or the
internet. Does anyone know if that capability exists?
This made me wonder.
fritz
Never mind the question, then. I
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
Does the recipient address match any re or list in the config?
I think we found the problem. ASSP did the right thing to see an
attachment, which was not allowed. Winmail.dat is generated by MS
Exchange if the recipient can not understand RTF.
What's the effect of using various embargo time durations, say, 1 minute, 5
minutes, 60 minutes? Are there any servers known to bounce mail if they
don't get a connection in less than a minute? I'm wondering if this
parameter should allow fractions of a minute to be entered via the web
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
