On 27 February 2010 16:49, Tony Wright ton...@tpg.com.au wrote:
And I suppose Warwick Hughes has it all right?
I don't know. I didn't really opine on Warwick Hughes. The only stuff I
posted about him was written by Phil Jones of CRU.
[ ... Rant about Warwick deleted ... ]
So if you don’t
...@lists.codify.com] *On Behalf Of *noonie
*Sent:* Sunday, 28 February 2010 7:03 AM
*To:* ausDotNet
*Subject:* Re: [OT] Bill gates on our energy futures - some tech miracles
needed
Greetings,
On 27 February 2010 17:49, Tony Wright ton...@tpg.com.au wrote:
snip
So if you don’t believe any
] *On Behalf Of *David Connors
*Sent:* Saturday, 27 February 2010 3:04 PM
*To:* ausDotNet
*Subject:* Re: [OT] Bill gates on our energy futures - some tech miracles
needed
On 27 February 2010 11:54, Ian Thomas il.tho...@iinet.net.au wrote:
I just hate the inflammatory wording
] On Behalf Of noonie
Sent: Sunday, 28 February 2010 7:03 AM
To: ausDotNet
Subject: Re: [OT] Bill gates on our energy futures - some tech miracles
needed
Greetings,
On 27 February 2010 17:49, Tony Wright ton...@tpg.com.au wrote:
snip
So if you don't believe any scientist can be credible, who do
...@lists.codify.com] On Behalf Of Tony Wright
Sent: Saturday, 27 February 2010 9:02 AM
To: 'ausDotNet'
Subject: RE: [OT] Bill gates on our energy futures - some tech miracles
needed
Well that's the hope. The hope is that that the ecosystem can somehow
rebalance itself in spite of the extra
On 27 February 2010 11:54, Ian Thomas il.tho...@iinet.net.au wrote:
I just hate the inflammatory wording in that explanation of the Melbourne
Water graph –
“*What does this graph show?*
Annual inflows into Melbourne's 4 major reservoirs since 1913. While ups
and downs are a constant
...@lists.codify.com] On Behalf Of David Connors
Sent: Saturday, 27 February 2010 3:04 PM
To: ausDotNet
Subject: Re: [OT] Bill gates on our energy futures - some tech miracles needed
On 27 February 2010 11:54, Ian Thomas il.tho...@iinet.net.au wrote:
I just hate the inflammatory wording
Hi Tony,
I'm not intent on winning any argument and I think you really
fundamentally misunderstand my position.
I have only suggested that people should accept a multitude of viewpoints
and not accept something being given to them them prima facie. Current
pro-AGW research is far from beyond
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 11:44 PM, David Connors da...@codify.com wrote:
I wasn't trying to win an argument. My position remains flexible and
nuanced.
Mm, I think I need to add this as a disclaimer to the end of all of my emails.
--
David Connors (da...@codify.com)
Software Engineer
On 24 February 2010 08:56, Craig van Nieuwkerk crai...@gmail.com wrote:
really eye popping reading. Conspiracy to delete data, fudge data and
models, ensuring the deletion of mail at Hadley and uPen on impending
If you take 10 years of emails and correspondence between people in an
Subject: Re: [OT] Bill gates on our energy futures - some tech miracles needed
Do we have, or do we want to have, a general OT list? There must be some ppl
losing patience with some of these threads.
On 24 February 2010 15:27, mike smith meski...@gmail.com wrote:
I mean, its failures
On 23 February 2010 17:10, Stephen Liedig slie...@gmail.com wrote:
The green initiatives such as wind and solar are the *ultimate goal*, but
unfortunately won't be ready as a replacement fossil based energy sources
for at least another couple of decades at best. Investment sould continue in
miracles needed
From: ausdotnet-boun...@lists.codify.com
[mailto:ausdotnet-boun...@lists.codify.com] On Behalf Of David Connors
Sent: Tuesday, 23 February 2010 5:28 PM
To: ausDotNet
Subject: Re: [OT] Bill gates on our energy futures - some tech miracles needed
Hands up everyone who
depended on
it. Oh wait, it does.
T.
From: ausdotnet-boun...@lists.codify.com
[mailto:ausdotnet-boun...@lists.codify.com] On Behalf Of David Connors
Sent: Tuesday, 23 February 2010 8:28 PM
To: ausDotNet
Subject: Re: [OT] Bill gates on our energy futures - some tech miracles needed
miracles needed
From: ausdotnet-boun...@lists.codify.com
[mailto:ausdotnet-boun...@lists.codify.com] On Behalf Of David Connors
Sent: Tuesday, 23 February 2010 5:28 PM
To: ausDotNet
Subject: Re: [OT] Bill gates on our energy futures - some tech miracles needed
Hands up everyone who is worried about
On 23 February 2010 21:18, Ken Schaefer k...@adopenstatic.com wrote:
I never label people as “deniers”, nor do I cut people off. If you have an
alternate viewpoint, I’d like to see what evidence you have to support that
viewpoint. Since you’ve put the claim out there…
I didn't say you did. I
Wright
Sent: Tuesday, 23 February 2010 9:29 PM
To: 'ausDotNet'
Subject: RE: [OT] Bill gates on our energy futures - some tech miracles needed
My understanding is that the base load problem has been solved, it’s just that
there’s no political will to accept it. That is, there is too much vested
Check out the UEA mail leaks as it does not sound like you have. It is
really eye popping reading. Conspiracy to delete data, fudge data and
models, ensuring the deletion of mail at Hadley and uPen on impending
assessment report findings, constant withholding of data and source code
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 11:37 AM, mike smith meski...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23 February 2010 21:29, Tony Wright ton...@tpg.com.au wrote:
And you don’t need to go nuclear. Nuclear as it currently stands is just
a disgraceful option. The radioactive waste in current nuclear reactors with
On 24 February 2010 12:59, Tiang Cheng tiang.ch...@staff.iinet.net.auwrote:
Any scientist can claims they can forecast a change in temperature better
have won a nobel prize for their work before I'ld believe them.
You actually don't need to do the actual forecast, just make a movie about
it.
.
-Original Message-
From: ausdotnet-boun...@lists.codify.com
[mailto:ausdotnet-boun...@lists.codify.com] On Behalf Of
ton...@tpg.com.au
Sent: Wednesday, 24 February 2010 6:09 AM
To: ausDotNet
Subject: Re: [OT] Bill gates on our energy futures - some tech
miracles needed
I think you
Nuclear plant in Finland 3-5billion over budget
Siemens Areva Finish govt in law suit love triangle
Areva just bought Multibird wind turbines and Ausra solar thermal
so they're so sure of Nuclear that they're diversiftying into renewables
Spain's SENER built the successful nukes in spain -- has
Not really sure if Bill deserved a standing ovation for this. He didn't
actually tell us anything new other than his nuclear interests and he was
pretty vague on the details. Bill's heart is in the right place but a little
misguided. Unfortunately, not all of Bills 5 energy miracles are sustanable
: ausdotnet-boun...@lists.codify.com
[mailto:ausdotnet-boun...@lists.codify.com] On Behalf Of silky
Sent: Sunday, 21 February 2010 6:18 PM
To: ausDotNet
Subject: Re: [OT] Bill gates on our energy futures - some tech miracles
needed
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 8:33 PM, Ian Thomas il.tho...@iinet.net.au
On 21 February 2010 19:33, Ian Thomas il.tho...@iinet.net.au wrote:
Summary: At TED2010, Bill Gates unveils his vision for the world's energy
future, describing the need for miracles to avoid planetary catastrophe
I just watched the video and it seems he is an agw worrier - which I found
On 22 February 2010 10:22, Ken Schaefer k...@adopenstatic.com wrote:
DC Quite right. I'd actually argue that cr4p government in most of the
developing world is a cause of such problems - not a carbon debt
The cause of what problems?
Deforestation.
--
David Connors (da...@codify.com)
26 matches
Mail list logo
