Thanks for all your inputs folks.
Forcing the switch to operate in 100mbps mode on the said port and then
connecting the ROACH1 has solved the problem now.
I am super stumped by the problem - this board worked for close to 10 years
auto-negotiating and decided not to, last Friday!
Cheers,
Ramesh,
I've never actually gotten a ROACH to talk directly to a server. The
auto-negotiation in the NIC is not great.
You pretty much need a switch in-between. Which is why Jason recommended
using an old 100Mbps switch.
Regards,
James
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 4:00 PM Ramesh Karuppusamy
Yeah, but as I say, this never fixed the 1Gbps problem anyway. Was a weird
problem.
Jason
> On 17 Apr 2020, at 16:00, Ramesh Karuppusamy wrote:
>
>
>
> I just tried this by putting a spare network interface on to 100mbps and also
> forcing the ROACH1 eth0 to 100mpbs - this did not help.
I just tried this by putting a spare network interface on to 100mbps and also
forcing the ROACH1 eth0 to 100mpbs - this did not help. Looks like the ethernet
device on the ROACH1 is dead.
I used mii-tool to force 100mbps operation:
root@roach:~# mii-tool -F 100baseTx-HD eth0
root@roach:~#
Dear Ramesh,
Here is the link you can download and write the image to the SD card. If
possible use the 2GB SD card which is shipped along with the board.
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1sK69IUDKkdEw3W6aF0r7wll0QR1KoSiS
sudo dd of=/dev/mmcblk0p1 if=~/roach1_imagebkup_20190416_2GB.img
Note
Hi Indrajit,
Useful to know - I believe I do have our original ROACH1 image somewhere,
therefore I will try what you suggested.
Thanks!
Cheers,
Ramesh
> On 17. Apr 2020, at 15:30, Indrajit Vittal Barve wrote:
>
> Dear Ramesh Karuppusamy,
>
> This kind of issues we faced several times,
Just to add to what Jason has said, older 100 Mbps switches are easy enough
to pick up secondhand on eBay and such, depending on where you are. They're
quite cheap.
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 3:19 PM Jason Manley wrote:
>
> > Since we are running the ancient Debian Etch on this unit, I have no
>
Dear Ramesh Karuppusamy,
This kind of issues we faced several times, We use to do re-write the SD
card image. Then it gets resolved. If you want the image for the roach1
I can provide the same. Then you can copy your BOF and run your code.
---
Thanks and Regards
Indrajit Vittal Barve
On
> Since we are running the ancient Debian Etch on this unit, I have no access
> to ethtool, with which I understand that you can switch to 100mpbs. Is there
> any other way to force 100mbps operation?
This actually wouldn't work anyway (we tried it). Something is broken in that
Nat.Semi
Thanks Jason, I thought about it.
Since we are running the ancient Debian Etch on this unit, I have no access to
ethtool, with which I understand that you can switch to 100mpbs. Is there any
other way to force 100mbps operation?
Cheers,
Ramesh
> On 17. Apr 2020, at 15:10, Jason Manley
Can you try it with a 100mbps link partner? ROACH1's PHY was notoriously fickle
at 1Gbps. We never did get to the bottom of it, even with Nat.Semi's support,
and switched PHYs on ROACH2.
Jason Manley
DSP Manager
SKA-SA
Cell: +27 82 662 7726
Work: +27 21 506 7300
> On 17 Apr 2020, at 14:56,
Dear All,
I hope you are all staying healthy.
The gigabit ethernet on our ~10 year old ROACH1 board went silent all of a
sudden this morning. The ethernet port show no activity (the yellow LED
flickers very occasionally). On booting the unit off the SD card, and manually
bringing up the
Hello Brent,
That was it! Thanks for that! Good catch, I'm using a recent Ubuntu version
whereas my previous installs are all really old & stable systems that I
haven't had to touch or mess with in a long time.
Thanks again,
LD
On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 12:42 PM Brent Graner wrote:
> Hi Louis-
>
Hello,
I'm setting up an NFS server for a ROACH-1 board. I've done this a couple
of times before but this time there's an issue I've never encountered. The
ROACH board is assigned the correct ip address (dhcp is working) and seems
to load the uImage just fine. However, when it attempts to mount
On 04/18/2018 10:53 AM, Gary, Dale E. wrote:
What digitizer are these using? We have had issues with the KATADC on
ROACH2, which turns out to need some register initializations in order
to function properly, and the symptom is a bad est_brd_clk() result.
Hey, wow, Dale! That was fast. Yes,
Hi Tom,
What digitizer are these using? We have had issues with the KATADC on
ROACH2, which turns out to need some register initializations in order to
function properly, and the symptom is a bad est_brd_clk() result.
Regards,
Dale
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 1:48 PM, Tom Kuiper
What situations could cause est_brd_clk() to give the wrong answer?
I have two ROACH1s and a Valon 5007. Every time we check the Valon it
puts out the required clock frequency, 1020 MHz, at about +7 dBm.
When I initialize the ROACHs (roach1, roach2) from an ipython command
line,
Excellent!
Happy ROACHing
Jack
On Thu, 12 Oct 2017 at 22:16 Mugundhan vijayaraghavan <
v.vaishnav151...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Jack,
>
> The bof was not a executable, and this seemed to be the problem.
> Once I changed it to an executable, then the ROACH got programmed.
>
> Thank to you and
Hi Jack,
The bof was not a executable, and this seemed to be the problem.
Once I changed it to an executable, then the ROACH got programmed.
Thank to you and James :)
Regards,
Mugundhan
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Jack Hickish
wrote:
> Hi Mugundhan,
>
> Is the
Hi Mugundhan,
Is the boffile that fails to program executable? I.e., if you log into the
roach and run "ls -la /boffiles/" do the working and not-working boffiles
have the asme permissions.
(I don't actually know if roach1 still requires boffiles to be executable,
but it used to, so maybe it's
Hi James,
I tried it using the version of casperfpga you suggested. The same error is
returned.
I'm attaching the python code that I'm using for programming the board.
-
Regards,
Mugundhan V.
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 5:24 PM, James Smith wrote:
> Hello Mugundhan,
>
>
Hello Mugundhan,
Casperfpga is a work in progress and unfortunately some of the more recent
developments will have broken compatibility with ROACH1. Its main focus at
the moment is SKARAB / ROACH2.
I use the following commit to work on ROACH1:
avnuser@planck:~/SKASoftware/casperfpga$ git show
And I'm using the latest version of casperfpga library and katcp version.
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Mugundhan vijayaraghavan <
v.vaishnav151...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello James,
>
> I'm attaching the model files of the first and the second designs, along
> with the bof and the fga files. I
Hello Mugundhan,
Please describe your context a bit more - what libraries are you using?
Please also paste the error that you get? (and perhaps the code you used to
generate the error.)
Regards,
James
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Mugundhan vijayaraghavan <
v.vaishnav151...@gmail.com>
This is a bit hazy, but I think that might be because the processor
hasn't stopped properly - some permutation of rebooting, unplugging
and pressing the halt button on the GUI repeatedly sometimes helps.
Also check if the processor isn't running in an overclocked
configuration
regards
marc
On
Hi Jason
Its really no problem.
I used the steps that you have send me with a ST-link V2 J-TAG (It is
almost like the USB wiggler). I can open up a serail connection with
Hyperterminal and open up an connection with the OCD Commander. Once i run
the Macro I get the following error:
Write large:
Heystek,
Sorry for the delay in replying.
I'm not sure about the converter script. Every time I've debricked a
roach, I used our USB wiggler, and followed these steps:
Hi Jason
I got my hands on a JTAG. I went through the CASPER debricking tutorial
page but I dont understand how to use the converter script? Do you perhaps
know how to use it?
Thanks for all of your help
Heystek
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Heystek Grobler
Hi Jason
The ROACH1 is a brand new board that we just unboxed. I tried connecing to
it using two diffirent serial to usb cables and both gave the same result,
a connection to the board, but the terminal only displays a black screen.
No Uboot sequence or any kind of output.
I will double check by
On Sat, 9 Apr 2016 at 20:01 Rolando Paz wrote:
> Hi Jack
>
> Today I had the opportunity to starting 3 ROACHs1, thanks to Dr. Stan from
> IRYA.
>
> Some doubts:
>
> a) When we starting two of the three Roachs1, we used minicom to
> communicate with them. Two of the roachs goes
Hi Jack
Today I had the opportunity to starting 3 ROACHs1, thanks to Dr. Stan from
IRYA.
Some doubts:
a) When we starting two of the three Roachs1, we used minicom to
communicate with them. Two of the roachs goes directly to "roach_login"
where we put "root" and then we enter into an operating
Regarding the kernel and filesystem, which you advise me to use?
The kernel
https://casper.berkeley.edu/svn/trunk/roach/sw/binaries/linux/
The filesystem
https://casper.berkeley.edu/svn/trunk/roach/sw/binaries/filesystem/
Regards
Rolando
2016-04-06 23:37 GMT-06:00 Jack Hickish
Hi Rolando,
That guide should still be up to date and working.
Jack
On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 at 22:35 Rolando Paz wrote:
> Thanks Jack.
>
> So, Can I follow this guide?
>
> https://casper.berkeley.edu/wiki/ROACH_NFS_guide
>
> Regards
>
> Rolando
>
>
> 2016-04-06 23:07 GMT-06:00
Thanks Jack.
So, Can I follow this guide?
https://casper.berkeley.edu/wiki/ROACH_NFS_guide
Regards
Rolando
2016-04-06 23:07 GMT-06:00 Jack Hickish :
> Hi Rolando, CASPER,
>
> The ROACH should still be supported by all the CASPER tutorials which are
> on the wiki --
Hi Rolando, CASPER,
The ROACH should still be supported by all the CASPER tutorials which are
on the wiki -- https://casper.berkeley.edu/wiki/Tutorials
Cheers,
Jack
On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 at 16:48 Rolando Paz wrote:
> Hi Jack
>
> The next Friday I will travel to Mexico to pick
Hello,
a usually working roach1 ceased to answer on its ethernet.
We tried to power OFF/ON with no result
We re-connect the serial line and got the following through
minicom at power on:
---
U-Boot 2008.10-svn2226 (Nov 13 2009 - 09:27:45)
CPU: AMCC PowerPC 440EPx Rev. A at 500 MHz
Thanks Marc, I shall try the very first alternative for the time being.
Cheers,
Ramesh
> On 28 Oct 2015, at 10:10, Marc Welz wrote:
>
>>
>> I use an ancient version of the core package, and here is the help on on
>> tg_tap - no mention of a gateway here...
>>
>>
>
> I use an ancient version of the core package, and here is the help on on
> tg_tap - no mention of a gateway here...
>
> tap_start(self, tap_dev, device, mac, ip, port) method of
> corr.katcp_wrapper.FpgaClient instance
> Program a 10GbE device and start the TAP driver.
>
> @param
Hello List,
For a set up here, we have a ROACH1 with it 10GbE (assigned to 10.0.0.30) ports
connected to a HP 5412l switch’s VLAN (subnet 10.0.0.0/24). Is there a way to
get the ROACH1’s 10GbE packets on a second VLAN (subnet 10.0.2.0/24) on the
same switch?
On starting tgtap, the following
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Ramesh Karuppusamy
wrote:
>
> Hello List,
>
> For a set up here, we have a ROACH1 with it 10GbE (assigned to 10.0.0.30)
> ports connected to a HP 5412l switch’s VLAN (subnet 10.0.0.0/24). Is there a
> way to get the ROACH1’s 10GbE
Hi Marc,
> Shouldn't you then have a route involving the tap0 interace with a G
> flag in it ?
>
Sure - here is output after the route was added:
root@dhcpeff64253:~# route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface
10.0.0.0
So this is new. When I rebooted to check the boot process, it took the IP
address immediately, started loading Uboot, but restarted around block 162.
Wireshark shows multiple packets of the same number being send and
acknowledged.
Yes, I'm using dnsmasq.
U-Boot 2008.10-svn3231 (Jul 15 2010 -
I have no issues with the Roach2 that is also connected to this host
computer.
I switched the Roach1's and Roach'2 ethernet cables and still have the same
problem on the Roach1 and Roach2 is still working fine.
Which pins / voltages should I be checking on the power supply?
Brad Dober
Ph.D.
Hi, Brad,
On May 27, 2015, at 9:37 AM, Brad Dober wrote:
I have no issues with the Roach2 that is also connected to this host computer.
No issues meaning that you can tftp the uImage file from the server to the
roach2? Does tcpdump/wireshark show any clues vis a vis the ROACH1's attempted
So I plugged my other Roach1 that's in the lab into where the troubled
Roach1 was sitting and started up the netboot. The uImage transferred fine
this time, but I got another problem: *VFS: Unable to mount root fs via
NFS, trying floppy.*
*VFS: Cannot open root device
There was a very long thread about this new problem a few weeks ago.
Bottom line is that it's likely that your host isn't exporting the
filesystem correctly, there's a typo in the DHCP offer, or some other such
host problem. Look in the mail archives...
John
So I plugged my other Roach1
Hi, Brad,
On May 27, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Brad Dober wrote:
Kernel command line: console=ttyS0,115200
mtdparts=physmap-flash.0:1792k(linux),256k@0x1c(fdt),8192k@0x20(root),54656k@0xa0(usr),256k@0x3f6(env),384k@0x3fa(uboot)fdt_addr=0xfc1c
Hi Dave,
Here is the configuration of the network. The host computer, a ROACH1 and a
working ROACH2 running in soloboot are the only ones connected. The host is
192.168.40.1 and is offering 192.168.100.50 and the ROACH2 is assigned to
192.168.40.50. Is there anything weird about how the ROACH1
Nothing obvious comes to mind (yet). Can you watch the roach1 boot process via
serial console? What does that show? Are you using dnsmasq for the DHCP
server? What if you try direct connect with mii-tool to set the speed of eth1
to 100 Mbps?
Dave
On May 26, 2015, at 5:00 PM, Brad Dober
I've switched to NFS boot to avoid SD card corruptions.
However, when attempting to run netboot, the roach will send an IP
discover, the host will offer one, and then the roach will send a discover
again.
This goes on for 10-15 times when finally the roach will request the
correct IP, and the
Are you trying to run the ROACH1 on 1 GbE? ROACH1 is not reliable on 1 GbE.
You have to force it to be 100 Mbps. This can be done by using an unmanaged
non-gigabit switch (or hub), a managed switch that can force its port for the
ROACH1 to be 100 Mbsp only. For direct connect, you'll have
Hi Dave,
I switched to a 100 Mbps switch, and now I'm still getting the ROACH1
continuously sending DCHP discovers, and my host computer continuously
sending offers, but now the occasional request/acknowledge and uboot
download is no longer happening.
For what it's worth, I am not using jumbo
Weird. Are there any other hosts on the network that might be also sending
(non-netboot-aware) DHCP offers?
What does sudo tcpdump -i eth0 -n -e -v port bootps or port bootpc show
(replacing eth0 with the actual network interface name where the DHCP activity
is).
Dave
On May 26, 2015, at
Hi Casperites,
I have a Roach1 which is booting from an SD card.
I booted it up yesterday, and it was displaying the STALE NFS handle
error that other people have seen in the past (which suggested a corrupt
flash card). I ran fsck and fixed several errors, and when rebooting, the
stale nfs handle
I ran into this a lot when trying to use the sdcard filesystem. I think the
problem is that the filesystem is ext2 or something old like that which is
prone to corruption if the system is hard rebooted. My advice is use NFS
file system.
On May 20, 2015 1:20 PM, Brad Dober do...@sas.upenn.edu
Hi David,
It gives me this result.
/home/nfs/roach1/boot
192.168.70.0/24(rw,wdelay,no_root_squash,sec=sys,rw,no_root_squash,no_all_squash)
thanks
Nishanth
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 7:59 PM, David MacMahon dav...@astro.berkeley.edu
wrote:
Hi, Nishanth,
On May 10, 2015, at 11:41 AM,
Hi All,
I set the link to 100MBPS as well as 10mbps and tried its giving me the
same result.
thanks.
Nishanth
Here is the screen shot
U-Boot 2008.10-svn3231 (Jul 15 2010 - 14:58:38)
CPU: AMCC PowerPC 440EPx Rev. A at 533.333 MHz (PLB=133, OPB=66, EBC=66
MHz)
No Security/Kasumi
Well, then you are almost there: Note that the NFS server somehow isn't
happy:
Root-NFS: Server returned error -13 while mounting
/home/nfs/roach1/current
regards
marc
Hi, Nishanth,
On May 7, 2015, at 8:23 PM, Nishanth Shivashankaran wrote:
ENET Speed is 1000 Mbps - FULL duplex connection (EMAC0)
I don't know whether this is causing your problem, but I believe the ROACH1
ethernet port is not reliable at 1 Gbps. I think you somehow need to limit it
to 100
Hi.
error 13 is permission denied. Probably your exports file isn't quite
right. Note that you have to allow root permission on the mount.
Something like this should be in /etc/exports:
/home/nfs/roach1/current 192.168.40.0/24(sync,rw,no_root_squash)
John
Hi All,
I used the usb
Note that for recursive, you need -R not -r
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Nishanth Shivashankaran nshiv...@asu.edu
wrote:
Hi All,
Thanks for the reply. I have the exports set to
/home/nfs/roach1/current 192.168.70.0/24(sync,rw,no_root_squash)
and it did not work. I changed the
Hi All,
Thanks for the reply. I have the exports set to
/home/nfs/roach1/current 192.168.70.0/24(sync,rw,no_root_squash)
and it did not work. I changed the permissions of all the files in the boot
and current to chmod -r 777 and it still gives me the same error.
thanks and regards,
Hi All,
I used the usb wriggler and ito load the bootloader and now I am seeing
data comming out of the serial terminal as before.
But the roach is still not booting properly. I am trying to boot the roach
through nfs boot and I am seeing this at the terminal. Please can any tell
me how to fix
HI Marc,
Thank you for the reply, I am not seeing anything on the serial
terminal. I have ordered a macraigor wiggler, I will try using that and see
if the roach starts working.
Thanks and regards,
Nishanth
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 12:28 AM, Marc Welz m...@ska.ac.za wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29,
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 10:49 PM, Nishanth Shivashankaran nshiv...@asu.edu
wrote:
Hi All,
We bought a new desktop and I tried installing nfs boot on to the new
computer to boot the roach1 and was trying to bring the roach1 up. But I
think I messed up installing something somewhere and
Hi. I think maybe you have bricked your ROACH, i.e. the bootloader is
messed up. You'll possibly need a jtag pod and software to reload it.
See:
https://casper.berkeley.edu/wiki/ROACH_Debricking
John
Hi All,
We bought a new desktop and I tried installing nfs boot on to the new
Thank you John for replying,
I saw this wiki page before. The Jtag suggested in this website is no
longer available. I was wondering you can suggest me a cheaper Jtag that is
compatible with the micro processor on the roach board.
Thanks and regards,
Nishanth
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 7:56
Hi All,
We bought a new desktop and I tried installing nfs boot on to the new
computer to boot the roach1 and was trying to bring the roach1 up. But I
think I messed up installing something somewhere and the roach 1 is not
returning anything to the minicom terminal at all.
I am sure it is
Greetings,
Digicom Electronics is asking anyone or organization that is retiring or
has retired their Roach1 assemblies to please contact us.
Digicom is at a fork trying to decide weather to build more boards or simply
re allocate boards not in use.
You can use one of the email addresses
All,
I'm currently troubleshooting a bad roach1 board, and I thought I'd ask
for some advice about the problems I'm seeing.
The board seems to be bricked. It doesn't do anything on power up. So,
I attached our wiggler and it appears to successfully run the macro
loadram_rinit_auto.mac.
Hi Louis and Jason,
Thank you very much for the detailed instructions. I will set the
auto-poweron via Xport and see how it goes. If it ends up being unreliable
or it turns out our Xport is dead too then we'll look into getting
something like an Arduino board as you suggest.
Thanks,
Alex
On
Hello all,
Is there a way (maybe with a jumper in the right place) to make the ROACH1
boot automatically when the main power is supplied (i.e., after a power
failure or shutdown). The Xport isn't really convenient for our current
hardware setup, but we could make it work if that's our only
Hi Ryan
Can you say a few words about how the in-place corner turner works? I'd
be fascinated to hear.
Thanks
Gerry
On 3/1/2013 11:28 AM, David MacMahon wrote:
Thanks, Ryan,
The problem was actually in the integration buffers. We were using QDR vector
accumulators and the vector was too
hi gerry,
you might be interested in aaron's paper about in place corner turners:
https://casper.berkeley.edu/wiki/Papers
Parsons, A., The Symmetric Group in Data Permutation, with Applications to
a High-Bandwidth Streaming FFT
Hi All,
Is someone able to confirm that the size of the QDR chips on ROACH 1 boards
depends solely on the board version? If this is indeed the case, does
anyone know the QDR specs for the different board iterations?
Cheers,
Jack
Hi, Jack,
We noticed that one of our designs gave bogus results when run on a ROACH 1
board with a serial number in the range 02, but valid results when run on a
ROACH 1 board with a serial number in the ranges 03 or 04.
After much head scratching, we opened up one 02, one
Hey David,
I know it's probably too late, but I figured out how to do a QDR-corner
turn without ping-ponging (thus, doubling the effective size of the
QDR). Give me a shout if you need this in the future!
On 03/01/2013 10:23 AM, David MacMahon wrote:
Hi, Jack,
We noticed that one of our
hi ryan,
can you check this into one of the GIT repositories?
thanks,
dan
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Ryan Monroe ryan.m.mon...@gmail.comwrote:
Hey David,
I know it's probably too late, but I figured out how to do a QDR-corner
turn without ping-ponging (thus, doubling the effective
It's not that complete. I could write a memo about it and throw around
some matlab code. I implemented it for a demo several months ago but it
was never tidy. Whoever actually needs it would have half of their work
done though. Basically, you just have to permute the bits of the address
Hi David,
That was exactly the information i was looking for -- thanks!
Jack
On 1 March 2013 18:23, David MacMahon dav...@astro.berkeley.edu wrote:
Hi, Jack,
We noticed that one of our designs gave bogus results when run on a ROACH
1 board with a serial number in the range 02, but
From my experience with uBoot, you cannot ping a board running uBoot,
as uBoot does not listen for pings. You can however ping a PC from the
board running uBoot.
On 14/05/2012 00:23, Marc Welz wrote:
Hello
With the Roach1 in the uboot state. Network address (192.168.3.240)
acquired via
Hi,
Is anyone willing to explain what seems to me to be an unexpected
behavior in a windows+cygwin PC to Roach1 network connection ?
With the Roach1 in the uboot state. Network address (192.168.3.240)
acquired via dhcp, from a directly connected windows+cygwin
PC host system (192.168.3.2).
Glen,
The problem you describe sounds like an issue we had during testing at
Green Bank last December where the NRAO DHCP server would release the DHCP
entry if the client did not renew it at regular intervals. It turns out
that the ROACH linux was not renewing the DHCP entries. I think the final
Glen,
The problem you describe sounds like an issue we had during testing at
Green Bank last December where the NRAO DHCP server would release the DHCP
entry if the client did not renew it at regular intervals. It turns out
that the ROACH linux was not renewing the DHCP entries. I think the
I agree with Francois and suggest you just disable the PPC temperature
monitoring on that board rather than trying to rework it. Using different code
on that ROACH's Actel Fusion might be painful though. You could either disable
all the safety shutdowns with that flag as you've done and live
Hi,
Yesterday I spent some time debugging a Roach1 with
something strange with the PPC temperature sensor.
The PPC temperature reported is about 50 deg higher
than that reported for the Xilinx FPGA or Actel Fusion
device (which actually has the ADC).
As in 80 vs 30 when just the Xport is
Hi Matt
I have, for ROACH-1:
X1:
CX-0 maps to MGT bottom 0
CX-1 maps to MGT bottom 1
X4:
CX-2 maps to MGT top 0
CX-3 maps to MGT top 1
Jason
On 07 Apr 2012, at 03:46, Matt Dexter wrote:
Hi,
I've confused myself when I try to map CX4 port to reference
crystal - I hope one of you can
Hi,
I've confused myself when I try to map CX4 port to reference
crystal - I hope one of you can help me unconfuse me.
When viewing the rear of the Roach1 board, with components on top,
the design tools call out, I think, the CX4 ports as:
upper left=2 upper right=1
lower left=3
Hi,
We had a Roach1 that had been used for a long time but only on designs
that did NOT use any of the CX4 ports. When it came time to finally
use it to ship around 10 GbE traffic we found something amiss.
Pin 1 of U21 wasn't well soldered to the PCB pad so the logic
to apply power to the
89 matches
Mail list logo