On Monday 04 November 2002 13:49, Frank Hage wrote:
On 2002.11.04, Joerg Schilling wrote:
: But DVD-* media is cheaper and I see no advantage in using DVD+ media.
One advantage I find is the ability to burn directly from NFS mounted
partitions. It's slow but it works well. I've got gobs and
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 8 15:52:46 2002
High frequency wobbling does not help to make the DVD recording better
in case of buffer underruns. You always use the pre-groove only to find
the course place where to resume recording. The exact position is found
by reading the already
On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 04:49:55PM +0100, Andy Polyakov wrote:
The page in question was updated with following two paragraphs:
Updated write-up is online and reads now as following:
Snip
Again. Even if DVD+RW is superior. What does it REALLY buy you?
Excluding the 0.01% of the person
From: Matthias Schniedermeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A few month ago i even read an articel in our Linux Magazin about the
2GB Barrier (The Topic was DVD-Recording). I felt like beeing warped
back into the stoneage. :-)
Well, this is Linux :-(
Most OS did support large files in 1995. Linux ignored
From: Andy Polyakov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The write speed does not matter if you use BUrnProof or packet writing.
Of course DVD+RW _only_ supports packet writing...
The page in question was updated with following two paragraphs:
What does plus stand for in DVD+RW/+R? The key feature of DVD+RW/+R
The only reason I'm answering is that I have reasons to believe that I
indeed failed to find up-to-date or accurate enough information about
DVD- formats. The only specification *publicly* available is 3.95GB
DVD-R ECMA specification which describes certain Linking scheme that
applies in
From: Frank Hage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: But DVD-* media is cheaper and I see no advantage in using DVD+ media.
One advantage I find is the ability to burn directly from NFS mounted
partitions. It's slow but it works well. I've got gobs and gobs of data
spread across many machines, many filled to
From: Matthias Schniedermeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: But DVD-* media is cheaper and I see no advantage in using DVD+ media.
Other advantages are the ability to completely fill the disks ( 4 GB
iso files are a problem on 32 bit systems) and not needing free space
for the disk images.
When you
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 02:26:21PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
From: Matthias Schniedermeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: But DVD-* media is cheaper and I see no advantage in using DVD+ media.
Other advantages are the ability to completely fill the disks ( 4 GB
iso files are a problem on 32
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 01:22:17PM -0700, Frank Hage wrote:
On 2002.11.06, Joerg Schilling wrote:
:
:
: From: Matthias Schniedermeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:
: : But DVD-* media is cheaper and I see no advantage in using DVD+ media.
:
: Other advantages are the ability to completely
From: Andy Polyakov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Slightly off-topic in this list context.
http://fy.chalmers.se/~appro/linux/DVD+RW/ was updated this weekend.
Major news are support for SONY DRU500 unit and improved compatibility
control (see new Compatibility caveat lector paragraph on the page in
From reports I got for Cdrecord-ProDVD, cdrecord does not need an update
for the Sony drive, it just works
Not when it comes to burning DVD+RW/+R media. cdrecord-ProDVD works only
with DVD-RW/-R media. A.
But DVD-* media is cheaper and I see no advantage in using DVD+ media.
I
On 2002.11.04, Joerg Schilling wrote:
:
:
: But DVD-* media is cheaper and I see no advantage in using DVD+ media.
One advantage I find is the ability to burn directly from NFS mounted
partitions. It's slow but it works well. I've got gobs and gobs of data
spread across many machines, many
13 matches
Mail list logo
