Re: OT: SPAM lists?

2001-12-06 Thread Bryan Stevenson
It's the fact that the legit folks get nailed as well. Listen..we all agree that spam is evil...we all agree that mail servers should not be open.BUT is it so bad to give the folks running the server a chance to fix it first?? My issue is that once found to be open it is incredibly

Re: OT: SPAM lists?

2001-12-06 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Bryan Stevenson wrote: It's the fact that the legit folks get nailed as well. Listen..we all agree that spam is evil...we all agree that mail servers should not be open.BUT is it so bad to give the folks running the server a chance to fix it first?? I would also very much like a

Re: OT: SPAM lists?

2001-12-06 Thread Bryan Stevenson
You're comparing what an organization like ORDB does to a virusgee I guess your are coming around to my view ;-) Bryan Stevenson VP Director of E-Commerce Development Electric Edge Systems Group Inc. p. 250.920.8830 e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~

RE: OT: SPAM lists?

2001-12-06 Thread Paris Lundis
be nice.. sure would cut down on all that spare traffic absorbed by admins who haven't patched or won't in months. Now that would be useful :) -paris -Original Message- From: Bryan Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 11:37 To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: OT: SPAM

Re: OT: SPAM lists?

2001-12-06 Thread Jon Hall
PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 11:37 AM Subject: Re: OT: SPAM lists? It's the fact that the legit folks get nailed as well. Listen..we all agree that spam is evil...we all agree that mail servers should not be open.BUT is it so bad to give the folks

Re: OT: SPAM lists?

2001-12-06 Thread BILLY CRAVENS
, December 06, 2001 11:11 AM Subject: Re: OT: SPAM lists? Bryan Stevenson wrote: It's the fact that the legit folks get nailed as well. Listen..we all agree that spam is evil...we all agree that mail servers should not be open.BUT is it so bad to give the folks running the server

Re: OT: SPAM lists?

2001-12-06 Thread BILLY CRAVENS
To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: OT: SPAM lists? It's the fact that the legit folks get nailed as well. Listen..we all agree that spam is evil...we all agree that mail servers should not be open.BUT is it so bad to give the folks running the server a chance to fix it first?? My issue is that once

Re: OT: SPAM lists?

2001-12-06 Thread Len Conrad
And shutting people down with no warning is also inexusable People running open relays are lazy or incompetent, so sending them a warning, even automated (no labor) won't energize them or power up their skills. In 2001, every mail admin has used up his virtual three strikes. No excuse, no

Re: OT: SPAM lists?

2001-12-06 Thread Len Conrad
I'll agree that a blackhole list for web servers is a great idea. Definitely a far greater risk and traffic waste than open relays. You can only say that since you haven't been the victim of a mutli-week, high-source-bandwidth DoS and other malicious attacks mounted through 1000's and 1000's

Re: OT: SPAM lists?

2001-12-06 Thread BILLY CRAVENS
True - I wasn't thinking of malicious attacks, I was thinking of SPAM. - Original Message - From: Len Conrad [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 11:57 AM Subject: Re: OT: SPAM lists? I'll agree that a blackhole list for web servers

Re: OT: SPAM lists?

2001-12-06 Thread Bryan Stevenson
Well Len thanks for calling me lazy and incompetent. Until I got blacklisted I did not know about open relays. So how does that put me in either category? The mail server I was running had no documentation about the possible abuse of or even the existence of open relays. I'm the first to

Re: OT: SPAM lists?

2001-12-06 Thread BILLY CRAVENS
PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 12:16 PM Subject: Re: OT: SPAM lists? Well Len thanks for calling me lazy and incompetent. Until I got blacklisted I did not know about open relays. So how does that put me in either category? The mail server I

RE: OT: SPAM lists?

2001-12-06 Thread Paris Lundis
in mail servers? Just because someone stumps you at Jeopardy on one question doesn't make you stupid or them gifted :) -paris -Original Message- From: Bryan Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 13:17 To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: OT: SPAM lists? Well Len

Re: OT: SPAM lists?

2001-12-06 Thread Bryan Stevenson
Yup..I'll take the hit...I should have done more research. The fact still remains that groups like ORDB are going too far in their approach to SPAM Bryan Stevenson VP Director of E-Commerce Development Electric Edge Systems Group Inc. p. 250.920.8830 e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OT: SPAM lists?

2001-12-06 Thread John Rossi
-Original Message- From: BILLY CRAVENS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 1:27 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: OT: SPAM lists? No disrespect intended, but I would say that you should have been aware of the potential issues. Lazy and incompetent are strong terms. Perhaps

Re: OT: SPAM lists?

2001-12-06 Thread Bryan Stevenson
You got it Paris..nobody's perfecteven us lazy incompetent folks need help sometimes ;-) Bryan Stevenson VP Director of E-Commerce Development Electric Edge Systems Group Inc. p. 250.920.8830 e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~ Get the mailserver that

RE: OT: SPAM lists?

2001-12-06 Thread Dave Watts
Well Len thanks for calling me lazy and incompetent. Until I got blacklisted I did not know about open relays. So how does that put me in either category? The mail server I was running had no documentation about the possible abuse of or even the existence of open relays. I'm the first to

Re: OT: SPAM lists?

2001-12-06 Thread Len Conrad
Well Len thanks for calling me lazy and incompetent. Until I got blacklisted I did not know about open relays. So how does that put me in either category? If you run a public mail server, don't know what open relays are, nor how to close your own, that's incompetence. The mail server I was

Re: OT: SPAM lists?

2001-12-06 Thread Len Conrad
Yup..I'll take the hit...I should have done more research. The fact still remains that groups like ORDB are going too far in their approach to SPAM They do much more good than harm, ime. collateral damage isn't fun for the damaged, but it's recoverable. These people are doing voluntary work.

RE: OT: SPAM lists?

2001-12-06 Thread Paris Lundis
, competitors and such in there too :) -paris -Original Message- From: Len Conrad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 13:57 To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: OT: SPAM lists? Yup..I'll take the hit...I should have done more research. The fact still remains that groups like ORDB

Re: OT: SPAM lists?

2001-12-06 Thread Jon Hall
- From: Len Conrad [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 1:57 PM Subject: Re: OT: SPAM lists? Yup..I'll take the hit...I should have done more research. The fact still remains that groups like ORDB are going too far in their approach to SPAM They do

Re: OT: SPAM lists?

2001-12-06 Thread Bryan Stevenson
h..voluntarily breaking the law you meanthe predecessor to ORDB was ORBS (from Aussie Land) and they got shut down after having two successful legal injunction brought against them. Anyhoo...I'm sure we've beaten this subject to death and nothing is going to change until someone with

Re: OT: SPAM lists?

2001-12-06 Thread Bryan Stevenson
Ditto Bryan Stevenson VP Director of E-Commerce Development Electric Edge Systems Group Inc. p. 250.920.8830 e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com FAQ:

Re: OT: SPAM lists?

2001-12-06 Thread Bryan Stevenson
Exactly my point Bryan Stevenson VP Director of E-Commerce Development Electric Edge Systems Group Inc. p. 250.920.8830 e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com FAQ:

RE: OT: SPAM lists?

2001-12-06 Thread Justin Greene
It is so funny to see this discussion keep cropping up. The whole blacklisting of open relays is a very touchy issue. I agree that there is little excuse for running an open relay in today's world (though some argue that it is their right... I think this was an issue in MIT vs. MAPS). I will

Re: OT: SPAM lists?

2001-12-05 Thread Howie Hamlin
Stacks up to the competition: http://www.coolfusion.com/imssecomparison.cfm - Original Message - From: Bryan Stevenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 3:48 PM Subject: Re: OT: SPAM lists? Hey All, cf_rant I just had an mazingly

Re: OT: SPAM lists?

2001-12-05 Thread Bryan Stevenson
To go back to your gun analogy, we are restricted in possession and use of guns in order to reduce the likelihood of homicides. Otherwise, I should be able to carry a locked and loaded gun anywhere I choose. open relay MX's lying around will be picked up by spammers and used as weapons.

Re: OT: SPAM lists?

2001-12-05 Thread BILLY CRAVENS
to the local unemployment office. If you can't configure it properly, don't run it. - Original Message - From: Bryan Stevenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 10:26 AM Subject: Re: OT: SPAM lists? To go back to your gun analogy, we

Re: OT: SPAM lists?

2001-12-05 Thread Bryan Stevenson
Geesh...glad I don't work for you ;-) Bryan Stevenson VP Director of E-Commerce Development Electric Edge Systems Group Inc. p. 250.920.8830 e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com FAQ:

Re: OT: SPAM lists?

2001-12-04 Thread Michael Dinowitz
Other than black hole lists, I don't know of any. I read of a distributed system being worked up on slashdot a few days back. I was going to suggest the same thing for iMS users to catalog email addresses, subjects, etc. of spam to be blocked. At 03:15 PM 12/4/01, you wrote: I was looking at

Re: OT: SPAM lists?

2001-12-04 Thread BILLY CRAVENS
Yeah, I saw the thing on Slashdot too - I'll probably investigate that. - Original Message - From: Michael Dinowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 2:19 PM Subject: Re: OT: SPAM lists? Other than black hole lists, I don't know of any. I

RE: OT: SPAM lists?

2001-12-04 Thread Cameron Childress
:20 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: OT: SPAM lists? Other than black hole lists, I don't know of any. I read of a distributed system being worked up on slashdot a few days back. I was going to suggest the same thing for iMS users to catalog email addresses, subjects, etc. of spam to be blocked

Re: OT: SPAM lists?

2001-12-04 Thread Howie Hamlin
iMS does have direct support for ORBs-type blackhole lists... Regards, Howie - Original Message - From: Michael Dinowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 3:19 PM Subject: Re: OT: SPAM lists? Other than black hole lists, I don't know

Re: OT: SPAM lists?

2001-12-04 Thread Len Conrad
I was looking at automating my server-side SPAM filtering. Are there any resources for pulling known SPAM addresses? Free, as in beer? We run an SMTP anti-abuse gateway, and subcribe it to selected RBL servers, do DNS validations, enforce SMTP protocol compliance, regex filters on headers,

Re: OT: SPAM lists?

2001-12-04 Thread Michael Dinowitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 3:19 PM Subject: Re: OT: SPAM lists? Other than black hole lists, I don't know of any. I read of a distributed system being worked up on slashdot a few days back. I was going to suggest the same thing for iMS

Re: OT: SPAM lists?

2001-12-04 Thread BILLY CRAVENS
PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 2:54 PM Subject: Re: OT: SPAM lists? I was looking at automating my server-side SPAM filtering. Are there any resources for pulling known SPAM addresses? Free, as in beer? We run an SMTP anti-abuse gateway, and subcribe

Re: OT: SPAM lists?

2001-12-04 Thread Bryan Stevenson
Hey All, cf_rant I just had an mazingly frustrating experiences with one of the blackhole database maintainers (ordb.org). These folks think they are doing favours by helping ISP's to block mail server IPs that are running open relays (allow spammers to send using that mail server), but their

Re: OT: SPAM lists?

2001-12-04 Thread Troy Montour
, 2001 2:48 PM Subject: Re: OT: SPAM lists? Hey All, cf_rant I just had an mazingly frustrating experiences with one of the blackhole database maintainers (ordb.org). These folks think they are doing favours by helping ISP's to block mail server IPs that are running open relays (allow

RE: OT: SPAM lists?

2001-12-04 Thread Paris Lundis
for debugging purposes never nice dealing with them... It is like dealing with the Borg... Well two of us.. who else hates this piece of net trash? -paris -Original Message- From: Bryan Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 15:48 To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: OT

Re: OT: SPAM lists?

2001-12-04 Thread BILLY CRAVENS
in their implementation. - Original Message - From: Troy Montour [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 4:34 PM Subject: Re: OT: SPAM lists? Bryan, I know your feeling they did it to me while I was first setting up my server for my domain

RE: OT: SPAM lists?

2001-12-04 Thread Paris Lundis
To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: OT: SPAM lists? My opinion would be that if you are running a mail server, it is your responsibility to be aware of and control how it relays. (IMO, falls into the same bucket as setting up IIS and being aware of things like Code Red) However, I will agree that some

RE: OT: SPAM lists?

2001-12-04 Thread Cameron Childress
: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 5:40 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: OT: SPAM lists? My opinion would be that if you are running a mail server, it is your responsibility to be aware of and control how it relays. (IMO, falls into the same bucket as setting up IIS and being aware of things like Code Red

Re: OT: SPAM lists?

2001-12-04 Thread Bryan Stevenson
Go Paris! I think we see eye-to-eye ;-) Bryan Stevenson VP Director of E-Commerce Development Electric Edge Systems Group Inc. p. 250.920.8830 e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide

Re: OT: SPAM lists?

2001-12-04 Thread Bryan Stevenson
Ahh yes...blacklisting is fine BUT They should give you a few days grace to fix the issue before they do it. A little more spam won't hurt anyone and the grace period means that the valid users of the mail server don't have their service interuppted as a result of the blacklisting

Re: OT: SPAM lists?

2001-12-04 Thread tom muck
The only thing worse than spam is that nazi-like ORBZ. tom Paris Lundis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... yeah we have had problems with ORBS... weirdly it called one of our servers open somehow because we customarily bounce bad mail back or have

Re: OT: SPAM lists?

2001-12-04 Thread Bryan Stevenson
yup..but they are gone apparently..the lawyer got 'em Now can I hear a big w what a shame ;-) Bryan Stevenson VP Director of E-Commerce Development Electric Edge Systems Group Inc. p. 250.920.8830 e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~ Get

RE: OT: SPAM lists?

2001-12-04 Thread Paris Lundis
amen. -Original Message- From: tom muck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 18:20 To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: OT: SPAM lists? The only thing worse than spam is that nazi-like ORBZ. tom Paris Lundis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: OT: SPAM lists?

2001-12-04 Thread Len Conrad
To go back to your gun analogy, we are restricted in possession and use of guns in order to reduce the likelihood of homicides. Otherwise, I should be able to carry a locked and loaded gun anywhere I choose. open relay MX's lying around will be picked up by spammers and used as weapons.