Re: [CTRL] Alien Presence? Evidence. .

2000-05-24 Thread Samantha L.

In a message dated 5/23/00 10:37:32 PM Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Firstly, We ( J2- made the original claim that there is no hard evidence of
  intelligent alien existence on Earth )are NOT required to prove that aliens
  don't exist. The more extraordinary the claim, the more solid the evidence
  needs to be. There is none. What there is plenty of, is 'stories'.


  Isn't this discussion moot on a conspiracy THEORY research list?  If we
waited for hard evidence before discussing all the subjects on this list, it
would be a VERY quiet list.  Plenty of us here, including you, J2, and the
moderator, draw conclusions on subjects based on less than hard evidence.
Why is the subject of UFOs being singled out?

Samantha

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] 2nd FBI leader heard of 'pressure' on probe

2000-05-24 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

May 24, 2000

2nd FBI leader heard of 'pressure' on probe

By Jerry Seper
THE WASHINGTON TIMES


 A second FBI executive can confirm that a top Justice
Department official said he was "under a lot of pressure not to
go forward" with an investigation into 1996 campaign finance
abuses, and that Attorney General Janet Reno's job "might hang in
the balance."

 FBI general counsel Larry Parkinson told the House Judiciary
Committee yesterday that Neil J. Gallagher, the bureau's
assistant director for national security, was present at the
meeting during which Lee Radek, head of the Justice Department's
office of public integrity, made the comments.

 The testimony from Mr. Parkinson came during an unrelated
oversight hearing about pending immigration matters after
questions by Rep. James E. Rogan, California Republican.

 Mr. Rogan asked, over the vigorous objection of Democrats,
whether an FBI inquiry had discovered that others were at the
1996 meeting, recounted by FBI Director Louis J. Freeh in a Dec.
9, 1996, memo to Deputy FBI Director William J. Esposito, who
also was present at the meeting.

 Mr. Parkinson, in response, said Mr. Gallagher also had
attended the session and could confirm the conversation.

 "He essentially corroborates the account that is described
in the director's memo to Mr. Esposito," Mr. Parkinson said.

 "Clearly, the testimony represents a major dispute in the
story that has been told by the Justice Department and raises the
potential for a conflict of interest," Mr. Rogan said.

 Mr. Radek said in a written statement he had "no
recollection of ever saying I was under pressure because the
attorney general's job hung in the balance."

 He added, "Nor is it something I would have said because it
has no basis in fact."

 Miss Reno said she did not remember being told by Mr. Freeh
that she and Mr. Radek should recuse themselves after he
complained of pressure to scuttle the probe.

 She said she talked with Mr. Freeh "about public integrity
on a continuing basis" but did not remember comments concerning
pressure on her or the department.

 The Freeh memo recounts how Mr. Radek believed he was under
pressure regarding the probe and how it could impact on whether
Miss Reno would be retained as attorney general.

 Mr. Freeh told Mr. Esposito that he met with Miss Reno, told
her about Mr. Radek's comments and suggested "on that basis" that
she and Mr. Radek step aside from the investigation.

 The memo said that the public integrity section could not
conduct a thorough investigation, and that the department should
name aggressive outside investigators —whom he referred to as
"junkyard dogs."

 In a separate memo, Mr. Freeh said Justice sought to
sidestep the use of FBI agents for the campaign finance probe.

 The memo said the department wanted to use investigators
from the inspector general's office at the Commerce Department
instead.

 The memos were turned over under subpoena to Senate and
House committees investigating campaign finance abuses during the
1996 presidential election.

 Mr. Radek, Mr. Esposito and Mr. Gallagher are scheduled to
testify today before the Senate Judiciary administrative
oversight and courts subcommittee, which is investigating the
Justice Department's handling of the campaign finance probe.

 After the 1996 election, White House aides sought to dump
Miss Reno because of her willingness to probe administration
officials and her efforts to seek independent counsels in several
scandals. During her second term, she has refused outside probes
of the fund-raising scandal.


 In 1997 and 1998, Mr. Freeh recommended in separate memos
that an outside counsel be sought to probe campaign abuses. In
1998, Charles G. LaBella, campaign-finance task force chief, also
urged Miss Reno to seek outside counsel in the probe.

 Last year, four FBI agents told the Senate Judiciary
Committee that Mr. Radek blocked a search warrant in the
destruction of evidence by Charles Yah Lin Trie, a top Democratic
fund-raiser, even after they discovered that financial, business
and travel records were being destroyed.

 Agent Ivian C. Smith, head of the FBI's Little Rock field
office, said he was so concerned about the probe that he wrote
personally to Mr. Freeh to say, "The team at [the Justice
Department] leading this investigation is, at best, simply not up
to the task."

 Last month, Senate investigators questioned Mr. Radek's
order to stop a probe just before the 1996 election into fund
raising by Vice President Al Gore at a Buddhist temple.

 In a Nov. 1, 1996, order, he said prosecutors "should take
no steps to investigate these matters at this time."


=
 Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  *Mike Spitzer* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   

[CTRL] WT: Tarnished legacy

2000-05-24 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

Washington Times-May 24, 2000

Tarnished legacy

By Tony Blankley


 From Monday's New York Times: "With time running out for a
Mideast peace accord or a new arms deal with Russia, the outcome
of the [China trade] vote has taken on huge importance in the
president's mind. 'He hates the word, but it's the legacy thing,
in a big way,' said one Cabinet member."

 Meanwhile, Monday in the Supreme Court of Arkansas: "[Y]ou
are hereby notified of the decision of the Arkansas Supreme Court
Committee on Professional Conduct to initiate disbarment
proceedings against attorney William Jefferson Clinton. This
action is being taken against the respondent attorney as a result
of . . . the findings by a majority of the committee that certain
of the attorney's conduct as demonstrated in the complaints
constituted serious misconduct in violation of . . . the Arkansas
Model Rules of Professional Conduct."

 Can you hear the rude belly laugh of tragic history
repeating itself as farce? A quarter of a century ago Richard
Nixon was disbarred by a New York court after resigning as
president over the Watergate scandal. Nixon's defenders, then,
argued that his historic breakthrough to China should outweigh
his Watergate disgrace. But it didn't (nor should it have) even
though Nixon's opening to China was a genuine world historic
event that he had carefully crafted over several years.

 Surely, President Clinton's stumbling incompetence on behalf
of his more narrowly gauged China initiative will not outweigh,
nor negate, nor even ameliorate his towering disgrace that is now
beginning to come to judgment in the Supreme Court of Arkansas.
It is fitting that the state of Arkansas should be taking the
first step to vindicate the honor of the presidency so stained by
its once-favorite son.

 Just as Nixon did, Mr. Clinton is now claiming his China
initiative to be his primary legacy. It is only fair, then, to
compare the two presidents' China efforts.

 Nixon, having planned his China move years in advance,
published an article in Foreign Affairs magazine more than a year
before he became president in which he risked undercutting his
own partisan political support with the observation: "We simply
cannot afford to leave China forever outside the family of
nations, there to nurture its fantasies, cherish its hates and
threaten its neighbors. There is no place on this small planet
for a billion of its potentially most able people to live in
angry isolation."

 Mr. Clinton, on the other hand, in the election year 1992,
in order to gain partisan advantage even at the price of our
national interest, attacked then-President Bush's effort to
engage the Chinese by accusing him of "coddling dictators."
Whether Mr. Clinton was intentionally undercutting his own future
China policy or merely had failed even to formulate it yet, we
may never know. But, as the New York Times reported: "[Clinton's]
first 18 months in office were spent digging his way out of his
own campaign rhetoric. His comments had inflamed the Chinese."

 In 1969, when Nixon saw an opportunity to reach out to China
during Soviet-Chinese fighting along the Ussuri River in Siberia,
Nixon (in Henry Kissinger's words) "made two extraordinary
decisions." He put aside America's historic dispute over Taiwan,
and he warned the Soviets that the United States would "not
remain indifferent" to a Soviet attack on China.

 But in 1995 the ever feckless Mr. Clinton once again
undercut his own China policy by allowing Taiwan's president to
make a private visit to this country because he was afraid of the
politics of denying the visa. As one of Mr. Clinton's foreign
policy advisers has been quoted observing: "He [Clinton] knows he
blew it in 1995."

 Once again in 1970-71, when our invasion of Cambodia had
threatened Nixon's China outreach, he took the bold step of
sending Henry Kissinger to carry out secret negotiations with
China, which resulted in the historic prize of an accord with
China.

 But contrast Nixon's steady and deft hand with Mr.
Clinton's. In April 1999, when Chinese Prime Minister Zhu was in
Washington, ready to sign this historic trade bill that had been
13 years in the negotiation, President Clinton once again stuck
his finger into the political wind and at the last moment refused
to agree to the accord.

 "As in so many things," Democratic Sen. Patrick Moynihan
said, "[Clinton] too often let the politics of last month or next
month affect decisions toward China that go to half-century
strategic issues."

 Mr. Clinton cannot even claim credit for the success of the
important vote scheduled later today. He has been carried along
by policies conceived by other and better men before him. He has
undercut and delayed by years this important trade bill's passage
by his craven and partisan maneuvers. It will be passed into law
by the overwhelming vote of his Republican opposition, while his
own Democratic party has deserted him. 

[CTRL] Concentration Camp Locations

2000-05-24 Thread Nicky Molloy

-Original Message-
From: American Patriot Friends Network [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: American Patriot Friends Network [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wednesday, 24 May 2000 14:01
Subject: Re: Concentration Camp Locations +


NOTE: THE U.S. HOUSE WILL VOTE FOR FREE TRADE WITH CHINA TOMORROW!
SEE URL'S BELOW FOR ADD'L INFO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

U.S. House of Representatives
http://www.house.gov/

Concentration Camp Locations in Southern California
By Don [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fact is, there's been a common thread of corroborating information
http://www.InsideTheWeb.com/mbs.cgi/mb1075995

 Original Message 
Subject: Re: GUN CONGROL: [Fwd: Emergency Alert: Wednesday 05/17/00]
 http://www.InsideTheWeb.com/mbs.cgi/mb1075995
Date: Tue, 23 May 00 16:45:43 -0800
From: Autymn D. C. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: "Christopher Ruby" [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fact is, there's been a common thread of corroborating information on this
subject over the years that reinforces the credibility of this
post.  Neophytes to this list or conspiracy lists in general may have to
hang out for awhile to see the common threads that weave a tapestry of
common sense.  Those who lack discernment via pattern recognition
capabilities may never "get it" and only get frustrated with the occasional
disinformation on these lists.


Subject: Fwd: AMERICAN CONCENTRATION CAMPS  1100   x
1,000,0
Sent:30/5/1999 18.21

Subject:  AMERICAN CONCENTRATION CAMPS
From: Byron T Weeks [EMAIL PROTECTED]

From: "Charmaine Ferreira - Apocalypse Project" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

AMERICAN CONCENTRATION CAMPS - INTERNMENT CAMPS

Here is the camps info.  3-7-99

Note - If any of you can get to these locations and take some photos, we
would appreciate seeing them and will add them to this story. Suggest you
use caution and take a zoom lens along. Thanks to Don for this
information.

Concentration Camp Locations in Southern California
By Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3-7-99

For all you disbeliever's and gun control idiots who think the government
knows best, I've compiled a short list of camps you can visit. These
camps have armed guards, surveillance systems, and many fences with the
barbed
wire pointing IN. If you voted for gun-control, then you probably deserve
a place in one of these things, as you've sold not only you and your own
children down the road, but me and mine as well. Thanks a lot.

1. PEARBLOSSOM, CALIFORNIA: Located at the intersection of Ave 116 and
the Pearblossom Highway, this is a full-service facility, complete with gas
chambers, moat, machine gun towers, and roving armed patrols. Visit at
your own risk. If you do decide to see this one, you will be descended upon
by
some very mean fellows, who will get your ID and license, then monitor
you.

2. FILMORE, CALIFORNIA: Located on highway 126, this at first glance
looks like an orange grove and is located on the north side of the highway.
It
sports guard centers, three--count em--three sets of fences, all pointing
in, and some very nasty armed men who tell you to "mind your own
business." This camp is huge.

3. SANTA PAULA, CALIFORNIA: This is a holding camp, designed as a
stock-yard type of facility for those rounded up in the early sweeps.

4. VALENCIA, CALIFORNIA: This is one of the largest camps ever
constructed and measures some two miles by three miles, using the reservoir
at
the intersection of the 5 and 405 freeways as a cover. New buildings, armed
guards, new roads, and many hundreds of buildings for housing the damned.

5. GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA: Right behind Brand Park, take the 5 interstate
to Western Ave, then head north up the hill till you arrive at the park.
Then take the road -- by foot -- by the doctor's house on the northwestern
part of the park. Proceed up the hill to you reach the reservoir, which is
in
fact, a holding facility. When we were there last, there were five armed
guards with M16s walking around.

---

Commentary on the Concentration Camps By Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3-7-99

Dear friends,

Recently, I sent out to the various news media an extremely small list of
Concentration Camps recently built by your United States Government. As
ithappens, very few journalists acted upon the information and shared it
with listeners/viewers/readers. Of course, once the information was made
public, I've now become slandered, attacked, and called all sorts of
names and the like. How interesting it is that when we bring truth to our
world, the messenger is killed, even if symbolically.

Many of us in the media have been aware of these hideous camps since
their inception. It only takes a look at the history of this century to know
what will happen in them once they are populated. The heart shudders at such
knowledge but ignoring it won't make it go away. The only answer is to
get the information out there in the world and make our elected government
answer.

I've personally visited these camps and have taken pictures. 

[CTRL] WND: Gore's fear of frying; took $100,000-plus credit line in 1998

2000-05-24 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/bluesky_sperry_news/2518_xnspy_gores_fear.shtml

WorldNetDaily
THURSDAY, MAY 18, 2000

Gore's fear of frying

VP took $100,000-plus credit line
in 1998 after fund-raising scandal

By Paul Sperry
© 2000 WorldNetDaily.com

WASHINGTON -- He was loaded for bear. But the bear never came.

After it was revealed in 1998 that Vice President Al Gore had dialed for
dollars from the White House during the 1996 campaign cycle, Gore trotted
out his "no controlling legal authority" defense.

It was quickly satirized by most legal pundits, including former federal
prosecutors. And the outcry pressured the Justice Department to review
the case to see if it was serious enough to turn over to an independent
counsel.

Gore retained Nashville, Tenn., lawyer James Neal and racked up more
than $15,000 in legal bills that year.

Unknown to the public was that Charles LaBella, head of Justice's
campaign-finance task force at the time, had urged Attorney General
Janet Reno in a 1998 memo to investigate Gore. LaBella said his conduct
during the 1996 Clinton-Gore campaign "warranted" a probe by an outside
prosecutor.

But Reno ignored her lead prosecutor and bought Gore's "no controlling
legal authority" defense. She dropped any further inquiry.

Nevertheless, Gore apparently had been expecting to be the target of a
full-blown criminal probe.

In 1998, he went to the Citizens Bank in Carthage, Tenn., and took out a
personal line of credit worth between $101,000 and $250,000, according
to records filed with the Federal Election Commission last year.

As of Monday, his latest financial disclosure, Gore still maintained the
line of credit, records show. (Though Gore listed the interest rates on
his two home loans, he left the interest-rate box next to the credit
line blank.)

According to the White House, task-force prosecutors earlier this month
told Gore he's still not a criminal target.

They nonetheless interviewed him again on April 18. And for the first
time, investigators asked him questions about his involvement in the
illegal Buddhist temple fund-raiser in 1996.

Gore reportedly was surprised at the renewed interest in him and lost
his cool. The interview ended in a shouting match between Gore and
agents, published reports say.

Neal represented Gore at the interview.

It's not clear if Gore will have to draw on his sizable bank credit line
any time soon.


Paul Sperry is Washington bureau chief for WorldNetDaily.

=
 Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  *Mike Spitzer* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

   The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
   Shalom, A Salaam Aleikum, and to all, A Good Day.
=

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] New ruling could mean end of Tripp case - analysts

2000-05-24 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

 Updated 11:48 AM ET May 21, 2000

New ruling could mean end of Tripp case - analysts

  By David Morgan

  PHILADELPHIA (Reuters) - Ten months after Linda
  Tripp was indicted in Maryland for making the secret
  tape-recordings that led to President Clinton's
  impeachment, a judge Monday could set the stage for
  prosecutors to drop the case, analysts say.

  Howard County Circuit Judge Diane Leasure, who has
  presided over a series of complex pretrial proceedings,
  was expected to give her final word on whether former
  White House intern Monica Lewinsky can provide vital
  testimony when Tripp goes to trial for alleged wiretap
  violations later this year.

  Tripp, the only major figure in the White House
  sex-and-perjury scandal to face criminal prosecution,
  recorded hours of conversations with Lewinsky in late
  1997 and handed the tapes over to independent counsel
  Kenneth Starr.

  Last July, a state grand jury named her in a two-count
  indictment for allegedly recording a conversation on
  Dec. 22, 1997, without Lewinsky's permission and
  sharing its contents with Newsweek magazine.

  To get a conviction, which could land Tripp in jail for
  10 years, Maryland State Prosecutor Stephen
  Montanarelli needs Lewinsky to identify the date on
  which the tape was made. Otherwise, he may not be
  able to prove a crucial element of the case -- that Tripp
  knew she was breaking the law when she made the
  recording.

  In a key ruling on May 5, Judge Leasure said Lewinsky
  could testify on the question of whether Tripp had her
  permission to make the recording. But the former intern
  was not credible on any other topic, including the tape's
  date, because her memory was tainted by contact with
  evidence Tripp provided Starr under a grant of federal
  immunity, the judge said.

  Since then, prosecutors have come under pressure to
  bow out of the case, with a chorus of local newspapers
  saying that to continue in a climate of legal uncertainty
  would waste taxpayers' money and risk the appearance
  of a political vendetta.

  "They could struggle to find other proof that might be
  admissible. The better course is to drop the charges and
  go home," The Washington Post said in just such an
  editorial.

  In a bid to get the case on track, Montanarelli filed a
  motion a week ago asking Leasure to clarify her ruling.
  The motion suggested Lewinsky should be able to
  identify the December tape in order to say whether
  Tripp had her consent to make it. "It is essential to the
  state's case," Montanarelli wrote.

  "If the judge denies their motion, Montanarelli might
  very well use that as a gracious way to get out," said
  University of Maryland Law School professor Abe
  Dash. "He can say he's done everything he could but he
  doesn't feel it would be fair to go ahead because he's
  not sure he can prove his case."

  Montanarelli, Maryland's special independent
  prosecutor, got the case in early 1998 after Democrats
  inundated the local Republican district attorney's office
  with demands that Tripp be prosecuted for allegedly
  taping conversations from her home in Columbia,
  Maryland.

  But the mood surrounding the case had changed
  dramatically in the ensuing months.

  "Everyone's heard as much as they want to hear about
  Linda Tripp and Monica Lewinsky and the whole affair
  involving the president," said Matthew Crenson, a
  political science professor at Johns Hopkins University.
  "I'm speculating here, but this motion on the
  prosecution's part may be precisely an attempt to drop
  the whole thing."

  On Monday, Leasure could grant or deny Montanarelli's
  motion, or decide that Maryland law does not give her
  the authority to alter a previous order calling for the
  suppression of evidence.

  Prosecutors agree that another unfavorable ruling would
  require serious soul-searching.

  But senior prosecutor Mike McDonough bristled at the
  suggestion that such a development would provide an
  opportunity to get out. "I'm not sure that dropping cases
  is what I'd call an opportunity. We charge cases to
  prosecute them," he said.

  Some Republicans agree, charging that prosecutors are
  likely to push ahead if only to curry favor with the
  Democrat-controlled state Legislature that approves
  their $800,000 operating budget.

  "I don't think we'll see them drop the case. They won't
  have much of a case, but they'll continue," said one
  Maryland Republican.


  © 2000 Reuters Limited.




=
 Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  *Mike Spitzer* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

   The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
   Shalom, A Salaam Aleikum, and to all, A Good Day.

[CTRL] A LOOK INTO THE ABYSS PT I of II

2000-05-24 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

 Washington Weekly

 05/22/2000


  A LOOK INTO THE ABYSS
   What Elian Tells Us About Ourselves

By Edward Zehr


  "They have become, in the fullest sense of the  term,  Weimar
  Republicans."


Oh no, the reader thinks upon seeing the subtitle of this  piece,
not  another  article about Elian. But this series of articles is
only incidentally about Elian -- it's really about us and what is
happening  to us. The Elian affair is like a mirror that reflects
our hidden face, the one we never identify with ourselves because
we always imagine that it belongs to somebody else.

For example, I get e-mail from people who have  chanced  to  read
one  or  more of these articles and drop me a cordial line or two
just to let me know what a numbskull I am. After all, the  way  I
tell  the  story is not the way they have heard it. If my version
were  correct  it  would  mean  that  they  have   been   grossly
misinformed,  and  the  implications  of that are too terrible to
contemplate.

It would mean that in order to be properly  informed  they  would
have  to  stop  skating over the surface of issues such as these,
letting the anchor people do all the  heavy  lifting,  and  start
doing  their own thinking. But thinking can be kind of like work.
Besides, a lot of people just don't quite have the  hang  of  it.
The  raw  material  required to do one's own thinking consists of
facts gathered from a wide variety of sources, not just  the  one
that happens to materialize when the TV set is switched on.

The "facts" presented by the mass media are typically folded into
a  smarmy  batter  of  tendentious fiction calculated to elicit a
response from the viewer that will be  useful  in  advancing  the
hidden  agenda  which  the  presstitutes are paid to promote. The
viewer,  who  does  not  comprehend  that  he  or  she  is  being
manipulated responds emotionally, as though watching a soap opera
or a TV series. After all, most people have a lot more experience
responding  emotionally  to  TV  plots than they have at thinking
critically and analytically. The script  writer  manipulates  the
emotions  of  the  audience who respond in a predictable fashion.
The viewers are being conditioned to react in a certain way.  The
leap  from  the  semi-conscious  emotional  response evoked by TV
"entertainment" to  the  conditioned  response  elicited  by  the
politicallymotivatedpropaganda   inserted   into   "news"
presentations is a short one.


THE FACE IN THE MIRROR

The   black-shirted,brown-shirtedandred-banner-waving
totalitarians  of  the  twentieth  century  missed the point on a
grand scale. All  that  rough  stuff  is  really  unnecessary  in
building  a totalitarian state. In fact, if overdone, it tends to
give the game away. Goebbels was the one who had  it  right,  not
Himmler.   Concentration  camps  are a drain on the economy. That
doesn't mean  that  you  cannot  turn  the  occasional  group  of
retrograde  religious  fundies into crispy critters if they offer
sufficient provocation.  (It adds to the entertainment  value  of
the spectacle if you torment the kiddies with noxious gas for, oh
say five or six hours  prior  to  lighting  the  bonfire  --  the
imperial  Romans  knew  about  these  things).  After  the flames
subside it will all be seen as  the  fault  of  the  fundies,  of
course.  That  sinister,  shadowy  countenance we sometimes catch
sight of, however fleetingly, in the mirror is never our own.

Not that the knock on the door in the  middle  of  the  night  is
completely  passe.  In  fact,  it  can  prove quite useful if the
courts insist upon being tedious about due process and  all  that
nausea, and balk at issuing the legal paperwork necessary to drag
away the designated victim in strict conformance with the law. No
matter,  hardly  anyone  understands the law, and who is going to
tell them -- the press? They  are  far  too  preoccupied  writing
puff-pieces  about  Janet  Reno  to shed any tears over the late,
great Fourth Amendment.  Mind you, the original Gestapo were such
sticklers  for  observing regulations they actually used to knock
before entering. (Germans tend to be polite almost to a fault  --
they would never dream of using the familiar form of the personal
pronoun with a stranger, even if they were bashing his head  in).
Our  own  ski-masked,  ninja-clad  mili-cops  do  their nocturnal
knocking with a battering ram.  Small wonder  Europeans  consider
us to be somewhat gauche.

One of the most disconcerting aspects of the Elian affair is  the
public's  response  to  Reno's  Raid on the Miami family of Elian
Gonzalez, in which the boy was illegally seized and whisked  away
to a secluded stronghold where, according to some accounts, he is
being drugged and indoctrinated by his Cuban  communist  keepers.
Ah!  smirk the Clinton/Castro apologists, you don't know that the
kid is being drugged and indoctrinated. But the evidence for 

[CTRL] A LOOK INTO THE ABYSS PT II of II

2000-05-24 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

Other horrible  examples  could  be  mentioned.  When  the  mass-
murdering  Marxist  monster Pol Pot drove the population of Phnom
Penh out of the Cambodian capital in  a  death  march,  the  pro-
communist apologist and syndicated columnist Anthony Lewis leaped
to his defense,  decrying  the  bourgeois  sensibilities  of  his
critics.  After  all,  how  is  one  to  make an omelette without
cracking a few eggs? Later, when it became clear that  Pol  Pot's
Cambodian  communist  regime  had  butchered anywhere from 1-to-3
million of his countrymen, Lewis lapsed into an awkward  silence.
Not  that  his  colleagues  ever  faulted  him  for defending the
butcher responsible. His motivation had been politically correct,
after  all,  and that's what really counts. Why pshaw, people die
every day -- what's the big deal?

Revel offers many other examples  of  the  duplicity  of  Western
journalists  in  misrepresenting  the  truth about communism. For
instance, the  April  1975  New  York  Times  article  by  Sydney
Schanberg,  titled  "Indochina  without  Americans:  For  Most, a
Better Life." He notes that Schanberg detected this marked upturn
in the living standard within the Cambodia of Pol Pot, as well as
in Vietnam. Or take the piece that James  Brooke  wrote  for  the
Jan.   3,   1985  New  York  Times,  "Angolan  Writers  Bloom  in
Independent Climate." Revel tells us that he  "searched  in  vain
for  documentary  evidence  of  this  flourishing  renaissance of
letters, which took place, according to Brooke, under  the  aegis
of a new, unexpected form of Platonic academy -- the Politburo of
Luanda." He did  happen  to  notice,  however,  the  presence  of
"50,000  Cuban  soldiers, 2,000 Soviet "advisers" and 1,000 North
Koreans."

Come to think of it, a correspondent  for  the  New  York  Times,
Herbert L. Mathews, told us back in 1957 that Fidel Castro was on
the side of liberty, democracy, social  justice  and  all  that's
good.   He  was,  in  fact, an "anti-communist," Mathews solemnly
avowed, committed to the restoration of the  Cuban  constitution.
We  had to find out for ourselves, the hard way, that Castro is a
communist, a despot, an enemy of the United States and  that,  at
the  time he came to power, Castro could not wait to ally himself
with the Soviet Union.

Why do they do it? Revel speculates:

  "Though not a communist, Duranty probably felt  it  would  be
  better  for the Soviet Union to have a good reputation in the
  West. From that moment on he treated information  not  as  an
  end  governed  by  a  criterion  of accuracy, but simply as a
  means of obtaining a desired effect."

Could that be it? His guess is as good as mine, though frankly  I
have  better things to do than speculate about what motivates the
ugly, twisted, third-rate minds of Holocaust and  Gulag  deniers.
The  point  to  be taken from this is that mainstream journalists
lie brazenly and without regard for the consequences,  especially
when  writing about communism. And why not? There never appear to
be any consequences  for  the  pro-communist  apologists  in  our
mainstream  press.  Taking  the  "liberal"  position on communism
means never having to say you are sorry.


ON THE EDGE

What particularly concerns me  about  the  Elian  affair  is  the
seeming  inability of so many people to discuss the topics of the
day with even rudimentary understanding. Our continued  existence
as free people depends on our ability to form our own opinions in
a rational manner.

One point of contention regarding Elian that keeps cropping up in
e-mail, on Web sites and in various newsgroups is the question of
the legality of Reno's raid  on  the  home  of  the  boy's  Miami
relatives.  I  have  taken  pains to present the views of several
noted legal scholars on this subject. Yet a number of my  critics
fail  to  even  acknowledge the existence of such expert opinion,
asserting their own interpretation of the  law  and  volunteering
their  equally  inexpert  opinions  regarding  my  sanity for not
seeing it their way.

In a court of law, a jury typically decides  questions  of  fact,
leaving  the  interpretation of the law to professionals who have
spent a great deal of time studying the subject. That  is  why  I
present  the  opinions of legal scholars regarding the meaning of
the law, while drawing my own conclusions about the facts of  the
case.

With regard to Reno's raid, the rationale usually given  is  that
the  INS  had  first obtained a warrant and that makes everything
perfectly legal. However, as Laurence Tribe, a Harvard University
constitutional  scholar  and  long time supporter of Bill Clinton
wrote in the New York Times, "The Justice Department  points  out
that  agents  who stormed the Miami home were armed not only with
guns, but with a search warrant. But it  was  not  a  warrant  to
seize the child. Elian was not lost, and it is a semantic sleight
of hand to  compare  his  forcible  removal  to  the  seizure  of

[CTRL] NYP: DUNLEAVY : CLINTON'S SMEAR SQUAD

2000-05-24 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

5-21-00

UNLESS the Clinton Tontons Macoutes can find out that Rick Lazio wears a
mask, carries a machine gun and hunts bear out of season with a crossbow,
Hillary is looking at her worst nightmare: nobody to slag.

"The Clinton doctrine of search-and-destroy is already rolling,"said Lazio
spokesman Dan McLagan.  "They're working hard at it.  It is interesting,
truthfully, amusing."

When Rudy stepped aside, Hillary was left with a terrible dilemma -a giant
arsenal of garlic-tipped bullets, but no bloody target.

"Campaigns are always costly, but at least we don't have to spendmoney on
an exploratory campaign to find out where Syracuse is," said Mike Murphy.

Murphy is a frightening weapon in any campaign.  He was the soul architect
behind the McCain magic, got Jeb Bush elected governor of Florida and the
Clintonistas should check his weight before they get in the ring of down
and dirty.

"Hey, I think as we speak, I'm sorry, Mrs.  Clinton's political advisers
are going through Rick's garbage right now.  They probably will find
something - like a ticket stub to a baseball game," Murphy was saying with
a smile as wide as a canyon.

Lazio speaks to me: "With respect to Mrs.  Clinton, I believe she is part
of the left wing that thinks that adding to the welfare rolls gives them a
bigger political base.

"I don't believe the majority of people want welfare.  They wantjobs.
But I sincerely believe that Mrs.  Clinton was part of the left that
exported jobs out of this state, out of this country.

"I don't need a Yankee cap to tell the world I'm a lover of this state.

"Oh, yeah, I played Little League.  And while I wanted a new mitt, my
father would not buy it.

"But he did say, you can work for it.  So, when I was 13, I worked for my
dad at his auto shop in Lindenhurst, L.I., sweeping floors.  I got my
mitt.

"My dad, Anthony, got out of World War II, borrowed $700 and started an
auto shop.

"Hours he worked?  I couldn't even tell you.

"But he made a success of it and I'd like to see little guys like my
father, the small business guy, the working people who are first in and
last out, get a break.

"Again, with respect to Mrs.  Clinton, I believe that her attitude islike
so many from the left - that as soon as there is a problem, you throw
money at it.

"I want to see the grades of kids in school go up and I don't think money
can do that.  It all has to do with dedication, hard work, community and
family."

Hillary got a lot of people angry by wanting to hang cops on the altar of
the Rev.  Al Sharpton and thought that bringing in a federal monitor to
look over the shoulder of our Finest was a good idea.

"Five years as a prosecutor taught me one thing," Lazio was saying.Simply,
they are a dedicated body of men and women, the cops in this state who put
their lives on the line every day for us.

"You see, I was a prosecutor, yes, and it was in this state of NewYork."

Mike Long, head of the Conservative Party, said: "Roll the clockback to
1994.  Pataki vs. Cuomo.  Cuomo was an icon.  What's a Pataki?

"In the case of Hillary vs.  Rudy, you had two celebrities.  But both
sides were battling to enlarge each other's negative polls.

"Rick Lazio?  How will you make him a target?  What will you say about
him?  Of course, I'm still interested in Joe DioGuardi, a fine man, and
Peter King.  But for Rick Lazio, of course the door is open."

Long can swing anywhere between 250,000 to 350,000 votes from
Conservatives.  And without going to your adding machine, that could mean
a landslide.

But seriously, that is just politics.

The polls show that Hillary has not moved off a gnat's eyebrow and once
again we see that wonderful character Al D'Amato as a kingmaker.

Beaten but never bowed.

Oh, he will have his day again.

But think of Hillary and her KGB right now.  What can they do?  You can't
arrest a Boy Scout for jaywalking while he is helping an old lady across
the road.

Isn't it amazing that everything you ask for, you so often get.

Well, Hill and Bill, you got your wish.  You won't have Rudy to kick
around anymore.  Thank God, he is back with us.

But who will you kick now?

Lazio?

Darling, he is going to be your worst nightmare.



=
 Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  *Mike Spitzer* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

   The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
   Shalom, A Salaam Aleikum, and to all, A Good Day.
=

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and 

[CTRL] J.C. Watts, Jr. Remarks Before The National Rifle Association

2000-05-24 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

EMBARGOED UNTIL TIME OF SPEECH: 9:00 P.M.
Contact: Bill Shapard
202-225-6165/ 202-225-3191
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

House Conference Chairman J.C. Watts, Jr. (R-Okla.)
Remarks Before The National Rifle Association
Annual Convention, Keynote Address
Charlotte, N.C.
May 20, 2000

Thank you very much. (free speech joke)

It's very good to be back with my friends from the NRA. I'm sure there are
a few Second Amendment Sisters here as well. Good work, ladies.

I've said it publicly many times, and will say it once again: I am the
NRA. I am proud of the principles you are fighting for.

As is true of each of you, I make it a habit of citizenship to honor the
entire Bill of Rights, not just the Amendments that happen to suit me. And
let me restate once again that I stand completely and forever opposed to

allowing the criminal element to destroy our liberties.

These liberties, ensured by our Bill Of Rights, were properly recognized
by our Founders as divine in origin, transcendent in nature, and beyond
the political manipulations of beings even so powerful as talk show
hostesses.

My hope tonight is to talk about what I believe lies at the heart of our
national violence problem, especially among our young people, and I also
want to say a few words about the political debate raging over the

issue of gun control. A debate that too often gets mired in superficial,
simplistic arguments.

But first, I want to address the cultural issues. In a word, I believe our
problem stems from a bizarre mentality that breeds anger, hopelessness,
despair, and sometimes murder.

It is a bizarre mentality, but it is not an alien one. Quite the contrary.
It is omnipresent and has, for many young people, replaced the mentality
on which this nation was founded - a mentality that honored transcendent
truth, personal responsibility, and duty to others.

American democracy was created for self-governing individuals - people who
did the right thing whether or not anyone else was watching. It was
created for people who honored the golden rule not because it was a rule,
but because they understood that it truly was golden.

That mentality is under attack, and let me state my belief very plainly:
If we lose our ability to teach our children individual self-restraint,
public order can only be maintained by outside forces. In Washington last
Sunday, we saw scores of thousands of Americans cry out for more laws.
What they were really asking is for the government to protect us from
ourselves.

That mass demonstration held a very clear warning. There are many, many
Americans who

are eager to exchange their constitutional liberties for additional
security. And that, my friends, represents a crisis in confidence in the
American experiment.

I now want to talk about what I believe are the most important
contributors to the bizarre mentality that affects so many of our
children, a mentality that is robbing them of the ability to develop into
self-governing individuals.

Let me be blunt. The first step we can take toward restoring our nation is
for each of us to recognize that we, as individual citizens, have all too
often drifted with the cultural tide that has brought us to this unhappy
place.

We have not, for example, reached out to the many lonely and
direction-less kids in our communities, or even to our own kids.

We have left the television on in order to entertain and babysit our
children.

We have succumbed to the easy role of trumpeting our beliefs at the
expense of listening to others.

We have fallen for the sound bite mentality, which is a poor substitute
for personal reflection and responsible action.

And as a nation, we have refused to accept the fact that we are now
reaping what almost every one of us has sown.

Make no mistake.

We should not be surprised that some of our children are killing each
other in our schools and on our streets.

We should not be shocked that many of our children have no sense of
purpose, and feel

hopeless and empty even in this era of unprecedented plenty.

We should not be surprised that, in the absence of the faith of our
fathers, our children have adopted bizarre creeds, beliefs, and practices.

We truly are reaping what we have sown. And it is a very bitter harvest.
We have all played a role in getting us here, and we all have a role to
play in taking us home.

Let's look a bit more closely at how, we as a society, have created this
bizarre mentality that affects so many of our children.

First of all, we have cut children free from parental authority. When I
was growing up, when a parent said they were going to cut a switch, you
suddenly knew the meaning of the expression "hell to pay." Nowadays, a kid
responds by threatening to dial 911. Parental rights have been seriously
eroded in many other areas, including how their children are schooled.

Parental authority has also been undermined by easy divorce and by public
policies that have made fathers as rare as Steinway grand pianos in many
inner city 

[CTRL] U.S. Agrees to Total Nuclear Weapons Ban

2000-05-24 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

[The new Republican President will have his work cut out for him.
I understood this was a non-binding agreement.  If it commits us,
where is the Senate in all this?  Don't they have a say in
treaties?  --MS]


U.S. Agrees to Total Nuclear Weapons Ban
NewsMax.com
Sunday May 21, 2000

The United States agreed, for the first time since the explosion of the
first atomic weapon in 1945, to totally eliminate its nuclear arsenal.

The sweeping U.S. policy was made Saturday when the U.S. agreed
with all other members of the U.N. Security Council to the
worldwide elimination of nuclear weapons.

The agreement had the full backing of the Clinton administration,
and was endorsed by all five admitted nuclear powers -- the
United States, Russia, Britain, France and China.

U.S. Assistant Secretary of State Robert Einhorn led the U.S.
team during the final negotiations.

Secretary-General Kofi Annan, elated at the agreement, declared
it ``marks a significant step forward in humanity's pursuit of a
more peaceful world - a world free of nuclear dangers, a world
with strengthened global norms for nuclear nonproliferation and
disarmament.''

No date or schedule for the disarmament plans have been set. But
the Clinton administration has committed the U.S. to the new
agreement, a continuation of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty.

The new agreement signed Saturday demands the ``unequivocal
undertaking by the nuclear-weapon states to accomplish the total
elimination of their nuclear arsenals leading to nuclear
disarmament.''

Other protocols will require the U.S. to:

--make full disclosure of the nation's nuclear arsenal.

--begin lowering the ``the operational status'' of weapons.

--destroy nuclear warheads by first extracting plutonium and
uranium from them.

--agree to another treaty prohibiting the making of fissile
materials for weapons.

This latest agreement codifies Clinton administration policies
that have sought to reduce and eliminate the U.S. nuclear
stockpile.

During the past eight years almost the entire U.S. tactical
nuclear stockpile - which was estimated at approximately 10,000
weapons - has been destroyed.

The administration has sought to greatly reduce the U.S.
strategic nuclear stockpile, currently with 6000 warheads, to a
modest 1500 warheads.

Such moves have met with some resistance from the Pentagon.
Previous Clinton administration directives, according to some
critics, have increased U.S. vulnerability to a Russian nuclear
strike.

One Clinton directive ended the U.S. policy of "launch on
warning" to one of "launch on destruction" - the U.S. can only
launch a retaliatory strike against Russia or China if it
confirms nuclear detonations on American soil.

Other Clinton administration proposals have called for welding
shut the missile hatch doors on nuclear submarines, and the
removal of computer programs from land-based silos to locations
150 miles from the missile sites.




=
 Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  *Mike Spitzer* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

   The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
   Shalom, A Salaam Aleikum, and to all, A Good Day.
=

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Elian Dressed in Communist Uniform at Wye: Photos

2000-05-24 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

NewsMax.com
Inside Cover

Wednesday May 17, 2000; 9:06 AM EDT

Elian Dressed in Communist Uniform at Wye: Photos

The latest photographs from Maryland's Wye River Plantation show
six-year-old Elian Gonzalez dressed in the uniform of the
Pioneers, Cuba's communist youth league, prompting concerns that
the boy's political reprogramming has begun on American soil.

A series of pictures that appeared Tuesday on the website of
Cuba's state run news service Granma show Gonzalez in a white
shirt emblazoned with the image of Cuban patriot Jose Marti, with
the Pioneer trademark blue scarf around his neck.

Several other children, clad in identical communist youth league
garb, are visible in other pictures released by Granma. Greg
Craig, the lawyer for Elian's father and source for most of the
Elian photos released since the boy was taken to Wye, chose not
make these pictures public.

Reaction in Miami's Cuban-American community was swift.

"They did not even wait until he got to Cuba to start
reconditioning him,"  Gladys Chong told The Miami Herald. "It
seems communism has penetrated the United States," added her
husband Ramon.

In Cuba, first graders are expected to join the Pioneers and wear
the uniform to school. If they don't their parents are
ostracized, labeled counterrevolutionaries and are denied
promotions at work, according to Jaime Suchlicki, director of the
Cuban-American studies program at the University of Miami.

Pioneers are also trained to spy on their parents and report any
comments they might overhear against the Castro government; a
practice that might put Elian in an emotional bind since his own
mother died trying to defect.

Reacting to the stunning photos Kendall Coffey, a lawyer for
Elian's Miami relatives, told the Herald, "He's being paraded as
a trophy in the garb of the Communist Party. It's happening more
rapidly than even our worst expectations."

But INS spokeswoman Maria Cardona was unconcerned. "It's not the
INS's business what Elian wears on a daily basis. Those issues
are up to his father."

Justice Department spokeswoman Carole Florman tried to distance
the agency from Granma's shocking Elian pictorial, telling the
Herald, "That's not something we're involved in. I don't think
it's an area under our control."

View Granma's photos of A
HREF="http://www.granma.cu/espanol/may3/fotos-e.html"a
href=http://www.granma.cu/espanol/may3/fotos-e.html/AElian in
his Pioneers Uniform/a.




=
 Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  *Mike Spitzer* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

   The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
   Shalom, A Salaam Aleikum, and to all, A Good Day.
=

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] CHEMTRAILS - AN AIRLINE MANAGER'S STATEMENT

2000-05-24 Thread Nicky Molloy

--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Surfing The Apocalypse
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AN AIRLINE MANAGER'S STATEMENT
Posted by C.E. Carnicom on behalf of the author
May 22 2000
http://www.carnicom.com/mgr1.htm

Mr. Carnicom:

I read the email you received from the anonymous mechanic and felt
compelled to respond to it. I, too, work for an airline, though I work
in upper management levels. I will not say which airline, what city I
am located, nor what office I work for, for obvious reasons. I wish I
could document everything I am about to relate to you, but to do so is
next to impossible and would result in possible physical harm to me.

The email from the anonymous mechanic rings true. Airline companies in
America have been participating in something called Project Cloverleaf
for a few years now. The earliest date anyone remembers being briefed
on it is 1998. I was briefed on it in 1999. The few airline employees
who were briefed on Project Cloverleaf were all made to undergo
background checks, and before we were briefed on it we were made to
sign
non-disclosure agreements, which basically state that if we tell
anyone
what we know we could be imprisoned.

About twenty employees in our office were briefed along with my by two
officials from some government agency. They didn't tell us which one.
They told us that the government was going to pay our airline, along
with others, to release special chemicals from commercial aircraft.
When asked what the chemicals were and why we were going to spray
them,
they told us that information was given on a need-to-know basis and we
weren't cleared for it. They then went on to state that the chemicals
were harmless, but the program was of such importance that it needed
to
be done at all costs. When we asked them why didn't they just rig
military aircraft to spray these chemicals, they stated that there
weren't enough military aircraft available to release chemicals on
such
a large basis as needs to be done. That's why Project Cloverleaf was
initiated, to allow commercial airlines to assist in releasing these
chemicals into the atmosphere. Then someone asked why all the secrecy
was needed. The government reps then stated that if the general public
knew that the aircraft they were flying on were releasing chemicals
into
the air, environmentalist groups would raise hell and demand the
spraying stop. Someone asked one of the G-men then if the chemicals
are
harmless, why not tell the public what the chemicals are and why we
are
spraying them? He seemed perturbed at this question and told us in a
tone of authority that the public doesn't need to know what's going
on,
but that this program is in their best interests. He also stated that
we should not tell anyone, nor ask any more questions about it. With
that, the briefing was over.

All documents in our office pertaining to Project Cloverleaf are kept
in
locked safes. Nobody is allowed to take these documents out of the
office. Very few employees are allowed access to these documents, and
they remain tight-lipped about what the documents say.

Mr. Carnicom, I am no fool. I know there's something going on. And
frankly, I am scared. I feel a high level of guilt that I have been
aware of this kind of operation but unable to tell anyone. It's been
eating away at me, knowing that the company I work for may be
poisoning
the American people. I hope this letter will open some eyes to what's
happening.

Again, I wish I could give you documented information, but you have to
understand why I must remain totally anonymous.

Thank you.
--- End forwarded message ---

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Buy some gas, bomb a village

2000-05-24 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

Buy some gas, bomb a village


Every time you fill your gas tank, you are helping Russia
buy a nuclear missile. Bill Clinton is trying to leave a
legacy, and Al Gore is trying to get elected. The
combination of Bill and Al has raised world oil prices to
finance a new round of the arms race.

In the May 5 article titled "Clinton approves oil-price hikes"
on Clinton energy policy and nation security, Vice
President Al Gore is incorrectly quoted as saying, "I think
the reason is because we more or less asked the
organization of petroleum producing countries to raise oil
prices in helping Russia develop its economy."

According to a transcript of the event, Sen. Bill Bradley
made the statement in answer to a question from Bernard
Shaw. The detailed transcript of answers from both
Bradley and Gore sheds light on Clinton's oil diplomacy
and its deadly results:

SHAW: Now, Sen. Bradley, for you, an Internet question
from CNN.com: We sent our armed forces to the Persian
Gulf in 1991 to return a country to its owners. Now we
see higher gas prices. What will you do to insure this does
not happen again?

BRADLEY: Well I can't quite tell what the question
means. In 1991, we did fight the Persian Gulf War. We did
win. And now gas prices are very high -- the highest
they've been. And I think the reason they're high now is
because we more or less asked OPEC to raise oil prices in
hopes of helping Russia be able to sell its oil on the
international market, make more foreign exchange and be
able to develop its economy. I think that now in California
and across this country, oil prices are skyrocketing and we
need action. Frankly, we needed action about six months
ago. We needed to release the oil from the strategic
petroleum reserve, something I built from 10 million barrels
to 57 -- or 10 days of supply to 57 days of supply. But
more importantly, we need to go to Kuwait and Saudi
Arabia, those countries that we defended in the Gulf War,
and need to tell them to increase their oil production. We
needed to tell them to increase their oil production six
months ago in order to prevent the price increases that--

SHAW: Time.

BRADLEY: -- that we're now experiencing.

GORE: Secretary of Energy Bill Richardson just
completed a tour of the Middle East and we have been in
communication, in this administration, with the OPEC
countries and frankly, Kuwait, which was freed from Iraqi
domination during the Persian Gulf War, has responded
very positively. And if you've been reading the public
signals from Saudi Arabia, they have too. But frankly, we
can get much more done on this the less we talk about it in
public. One thing we haven't done is take the strategic
petroleum reserve off the table. I also worked on that
legislation. I was in the House of Representatives at the
time while Bill was in the Senate in those years. Now, we
also need to get busy and develop alternative fuels. More
energy efficiency. A whole new generation of vehicles
that will rely on technologies like fuel cells to cut way
down on the pollution and have much more efficiency.

Clearly, Gore's oil reply centers on the recent trip by
Energy Secretary Richardson to the Middle East.
According to a Washington Post article, U.S. Energy
Secretary Bill Richardson visited Saudi Arabia in February
1999 when prices were at their lowest. Richardson
reportedly pressed Saudi Oil Minister Ali Naimi on the
"oversupplied market" and expressed concern about
"extreme price volatility."

Former Saudi minister Sheik Ahmed Zaki Yamani told a
Houston oil conference that Richardson had "saved the oil
industry," during that visit, because his "intervention" had
"persuaded" the Saudis to change policy by raising prices.

After Richardson's visit, Petroleum Intelligence Weekly,
an industry newsletter, quoted Saudi officials as wanting "a
WTI (West Texas 

[CTRL] Patche's stance on tort reform mau soon shift

2000-05-24 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

From:

http://www.bostonherald.com/news/columnists/carr05192000.htm

Patches' stance on tort reform may soon shift

by Howie Carr Friday, May 19, 2000

Pity poor Patches Kennedy.  Always the runt of the litter, never the
sharpest knife in the drawer, now the Boy Congressman from Rhode Island
is really confused.

He thought these people were his friends.

And after all he's done for them.

I mean, if a Kennedy, a member of the House Democratic leadership, can't
rely on rapacious tort lawyers and women of color to do the right thing,
well, what exactly is this world coming to?

It appears now that Patches Kennedy is going to be sued, just because he
pushed somebody.

But now she's looking for .  .  .  six figures.  Say, $210,000.  I throw
that number out because it's easy to divide into thirds - $140,000 for
Granny and $70,000 for her attorney, mouthpiece Mallory.

Oh, the multiple ironies in this Patches Kennedy hate crime, which is
exactly what this would be called if a Republican congressman had
attacked a woman, and not just any woman, either.

The victim is an African-American woman.  An elderly (well, 58)
African-American woman.  That's three protected classes - it's a triple
hate crime.

Oh yeah, and after 11 years on the job at LAX, Della is making only
$9.64 an hour.  That makes her poor, and now Patches is angrier than
ever.

He voted for the increase in the minimum wage, gosh darn it.  Where's
the gratitude?

``I've said I'm sorry for the last time,'' he says, sounding like Dick
Armey.  ``Enough is enough, and I'm not going to become a human ATM
machine.'' Well, Patches, now perhaps you can understand how taxpayers
feel about you and your Dad using us as an ATM for all your crackpot
schemes to expand the non-working classes.

As soon as he finished battering Granny, Patches went straight to the
Clinton playbook.  First he denied everything.  Then, when he found out
there was videotape, he apologized.  Now he's surly.  Why can't we all
just get along?

How great is it that Patches was busted as he returned from a
fund-raiser for the House Democratic leadership?  He and Gephardt and
Rangel and the rest of these pandering pols have been running around the
country, shaking down, among others, trial lawyers, by promising to
fight off all Republican risky schemes, most especially including any
attempt to enact tort reform.

Those evil Republicans - they want to reduce the number of frivolous
lawsuits.  How dare they, Patches would thunder - well squeak, anyway.

Now Patches is about to be the defendant in a frivolous lawsuit.  What
goes around, comes around.  Is there no honor among thieves?

Clint Eastwood was in D.C.  yesterday, testifying before Congress about
the lucrative new racket that Patches' fat cat lawyer pals have
developed, suing small businesses for exorbitant sums under the
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).  Do you think Patches listened to
Dirty Harry's arguments a little less dismissively after his brush with
the ambulance-chaser bar?

Patches' hate crime at LAX is even affecting his bloated Papa.  If Jack
E.  Robinson III can limp over the 10,000-signature requirement, Teddy
will not be able to challenge enough of them to knock him off the
ballot.  One attack on a black person could be an aberration.  Twice, it
becomes what the feds call a pattern.  The RICO statute kicks in.

Still, despite Patches' crash course in reality, I still don't think he
gets it.  Why else would he insist on releasing the LAX surveillance
video?
First of all, his ``carry-on'' was larger than the state he represents
in Congress.  Not a good way to win sympathy with the American flying
public.

Secondly, he shoves the woman but somehow believes he comes across
well.  Doesn't he have any clue about the jury pool he's trying to
taint?  If this goes to trial, they'll be drawing jurors from the same
population that acquitted O.J.  Simpson.

Don't settle, Patches, demand a jury trial in South Central L.A.  As
your new ally Clint Eastwood would say, `Do you feel lucky, punk?' Go
ahead, Patches, make her day.



=
 Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  *Mike Spitzer* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

   The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
   Shalom, A Salaam Aleikum, and to all, A Good Day.
=

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time 

[CTRL] London Times: Gun Law Protest Backfires

2000-05-24 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

London Times-May 19, 2000

Gun law protest backfires

FROM DAMIAN WHITWORTH IN NEW YORK

A SURGE in support for tighter gun control laws has resulted in record
numbers joining the National Rifle Association, America's most powerful
pro-gun group.

The NRA has seen membership leap to a record 3.6 million after 200,000
people joined in the past six weeks, apparently in response to renewed
public support for gun control, which culminated in last week's Million
Mom March in Washington.

While there may be popular support for stricter gun control in the wake
of a string of school shootings, those on the other side of the debate
have also hardened their stance.

The NRA, which opposes calls to license gun owners and to register
weapons, has countered with a huge television advertising campaign. In
one advert, Charlton Heston, the actor and NRA president, as good as
called President Clinton a liar.

A new legion of gun owners rallied to the cause and $10 million (£6.7
million) poured into the organisation's coffers for use in defending
what the organisation sees as attacks on its members' constitutional
rights.

Despite much publicity for those who support what are in reality
relatively moderate changes to gun laws, the power of the NRA should not
be underestimated. "The NRA is the most influential single-issue
lobbying group in America," Brian Morton, of the campaign group Handgun
Control, told USA Today. A Bill to require checks on those who buy
firearms at gun shows is stalled in Congress because of the entrenched
opposition of NRA supporters.




=
 Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  *Mike Spitzer* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

   The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
   Shalom, A Salaam Aleikum, and to all, A Good Day.
=

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] AP: FBI Memo Cites Fund Probe Pressure

2000-05-24 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

FBI Memo Cites Fund Probe Pressure

By John Solomon
Associated Press Writer
Thursday, May 18, 2000; 8:47 p.m. EDT

WASHINGTON –– FBI Director Louis Freeh wrote a memo in the
earliest days of the Democratic fund-raising investigation
suggesting a top Justice Department official was under pressure
not to proceed with the probe to save Attorney General Janet
Reno's job.

The memo, belatedly turned over to Senate investigators this
week, also discloses that Freeh urged Reno and Justice Department
public integrity chief Lee Radek to step aside from the
investigation as early as December 1996 because of purported
comments made by Radek.

The memo was described to The Associated Press by several
government officials who have seen it since the FBI turned it
over to be produced to the Senate and House Judiciary committees
investigating the fund-raising matter.

In the Dec. 9, 1996 memo to Deputy FBI Director William J.
Esposito, Freeh recounted, third-hand, comments Radek allegedly
made to Esposito suggesting he was being pressured in connection
with the investigation into Democratic fund-raising improprieties
during President Clinton's 1996 re-election.

Freeh's memo quotes Radek as telling Esposito he was "under a lot
of pressure not to go forward with the investigation" because
Reno's job "might hang in the balance," the officials said.

At the time, there were reports speculating in Washington on
whether Reno, who requested the Whitewater independent counsel
investigation, would serve a second term as attorney general.

She steadfastly resisted an independent prosecutor for
fund-raising, but has named a total of seven independent counsels
to investigate the president and his administration – at times
angering Clinton's supporters.

Freeh wrote Esposito that he met with Reno and told her about
Radek's purported comments and suggested "on that basis" both
Radek and Reno should step aside from the investigation, the
officials said.

Reached late Thursday, Radek said he never was under pressure to
scrap the investigation to help Reno and did not recall ever
making such comments to Esposito.

"I have no recollection of ever saying I was under pressure
because the attorney general's job hung in the balance. Nor is it
something I would have said because it has no basis in fact,"
Radek said in a prepared statement.

FBI spokesman John Collinwood declined comment.

Justice Department spokesman Myron Marlin said: "This attorney
general has never let her own self-interest color her own
decision making. She bases her decisions on the law and the
facts."

The emergence of the Freeh memo comes at a sensitive time for the
FBI and Justice Department, whose relations have been strained by
very public disputes over the investigations into China espionage
and fund raising.

Law enforcement officials told AP that Reno has received an
internal report on the government's handling of the case of
nuclear lab scientist Wen Ho Lee that criticizes both agencies.

The sources, who spoke only on condition of anonymity, said the
report by prosecutor Randy Bellows blames the FBI for not
providing enough oversight and resources into the early part of
the investigation when leads of Lee's possible spying for China
emerged.

After months of suggestions that Lee would be indicted for China
espionage, the scientist was charged last December with lesser
offenses of removing nuclear secrets from the Los Alamos lab with
no suggestion he gave them to China.

The Bellows report sides with the FBI on one issue – that the
Justice Department had enough grounds to approve a warrant for
electronic surveillance in the Lee case, the officials said.
Justice had rejected the FBI's request, angering its agents.

But the Bellows report adds that the FBI did not provide the
department with all the information it collected that could have
helped in the decision.

The Freeh memo involving the fund-raising issue emerges more than
two years after Congress first began reviewing the conduct and
quality of the criminal fund-raising investigation, in which
several Democratic donors and fund-raisers have been convicted.

Officials said the FBI did not disclose the existence of the memo
to Justice officials until late last month and that it wasn't
turned over to Senate investigators until this week.

Lawmakers mostly have focused on debates within Justice and the
FBI in 1997, 1998 and 1999 to name an independent prosecutor to
take over the probe of Clinton and Vice President Al Gore's
fund-raising activities.

Freeh and the former head of the Justice task force that ran the
investigation both have acknowledged they fervently argued later
in the investigation for appointment of a special prosecutor, but
Reno turned them down.

But Freeh's memo provides the first evidence that such arguments
dated to the very beginning of the investigation in late 1996 and
were based in part on concerns about possible political
pressures.

According to the officials' description of the 

[CTRL] Latest Clinton Body Count

2000-05-24 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

From:

http://www.ardemgaz.com/today/ark/A1yclinton19.html

Clinton Body Count
http://etherzone.com/body.html

Arkansas Democrat-Gazette
Friday, May 19, 2000

Six are left to determine license case of Clinton

By MICHAEL ROWETT

Five more members of the Arkansas Supreme Court committee that
will decide whether President Clinton keeps his Arkansas law
license have recused from participating in the matter, committee
officials confirmed Thursday.

The latest recusals were from Committee on Professional
Conduct members Bart Virden of Morrilton and Dr. Patricia
Youngdahl of Little Rock and Alternate Committee on Professional
Conduct members Dr. Rose Word of Pine Bluff, Rita Mitchell-Harvey
of Little Rock and Harry Truman Moore of Paragould.

These recusals bring to eight the number of recusals out of
the combined committees' membership of 14. Members of the
alternate committee normally substitute for regular committee
members who recuse themselves from a matter or are unavailable.

Three lawyer members of the alternate committee will serve
with the three remaining members of the regular committee to make
a panel of six, regular committee Chairman Ken Reeves of
Harrison, a lawyer, said Thursday.

He said the latest recusals came several months ago, but he
wasn't sure of the dates. Committee Executive Director James A.
Neal of Little Rock declined to provide copies of any recusal
letters but confirmed that Virden, Youngdahl, Word and
Mitchell-Harvey had recused.

Moore, a lawyer, said Thursday that he accepted the state
Supreme Court's appointment to the alternate committee with the
understanding that he would recuse from the Clinton matter.

The committee meets today, but the session is closed to the
public and the agenda is not disclosed. Neither Reeves nor Neal
would comment on whether it is about the Clinton matter.

Under rules governing the committee, a quorum of four members
is required to conduct business. A vote to sanction Clinton would
require support from four of the six members who will consider
the matter.

If the committee votes to impose a caution, a reprimand, a
suspension or disbarment, the decision would not be announced by
the committee for at least 30 days, but either Clinton or the
foundation that filed the complaint against Clinton could release
it earlier, Reeves said.

Youngdahl, a psychologist, and Virden, a lawyer, have
contributed $1,925 and $625, respectively, to the campaigns of
Democratic candidates or the Arkansas Democratic Party, according
to a review of federal campaign contribution databases by the
Arkansas Democrat-Gazette.

Moore replaces David Solomon, a Helena lawyer, whose term
expired in March. Solomon contributed $1,000 to Clinton's 1992
presidential campaign and $2,250 to other Democratic candidates
over 10 years. A review of contribution databases Thursday by the
Democrat-Gazette showed that Moore has contributed $5,200 to
Democratic candidates and campaign committees since 1992. Moore's
contributions include $500 to Clinton's 1992 presidential
campaign, $1,000 to Clinton's 1996 campaign and $1,000 to Vice
President Gore's 2000 presidential bid.

"I knew questions would come up about my past connections and
contributions to Clinton because I've been a longtime Clinton
supporter," Moore said. "I didn't feel it would be appropriate
for me to participate in this matter."

No campaign contributions were reported for Mitchell-Harvey,
owner of a women's clothing store, or Word, whose occupation
wasn't available.

Matthew Glavin, president of the Southeastern Legal
Foundation of Atlanta, which filed the original ethics complaint
in September 1998 seeking the president's disbarment, commended
the members who recused.

The complaint filed by the committee against Clinton in
February is based on the foundation's complaint and an April 1999
referral from Chief U.S. District Judge Susan Webber Wright of
Little Rock.

"It is heartening to know that Arkansas committee members who
have recused themselves for apparent or perceived political
reasons are helping to maintain the integrity of this process,"
Glavin said.

"It is especially gratifying to see that attorneys on the
committee, who are held to a higher ethical standard, are
recusing themselves despite the absence of any obvious political
taint. We believe these actions will help keep this process above
reproach," he said.

Virden said his contributions to Democratic congressional
candidates Blanche Lincoln and Vic Snyder had nothing to do with
his decision to recuse. He said he recused out of concern for the
committee's reputation for integrity, which he said has been
unfairly questioned by the foundation and in Democrat-Gazette
editorials calling for Virden and others who contributed to
Democratic causes to recuse.

"There are two reasons, in a nutshell," Virden said. "One is,
I didn't want to provide any kind of further ammunition for [the
foundation] 

[CTRL] Gertz: Russia sends cruise missiles to China for new warships

2000-05-24 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

 BILL GERTZ
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
May 19, 2000



Russia sends cruise missiles to China for new warships

Russia recently delivered the first shipment of supersonic cruise
missiles to China for a new missile destroyer and more of the
weapons will be sent later this year, Pentagon officials said
yesterday.

The deployment of the 24 SSN- 22 anti-ship cruise missiles on a
Chinese Sovremenny-class destroyer is the most significant recent
weapons development by the People's Liberation Army (PLA) naval
forces, according to Navy officials.

The missile shipment was sent by a manufacturer from the Pacific
port of Vladivostok to China within the past several weeks, said
officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

The missiles will be deployed on China's new Sovremenny-class
guided-missile destroyer, the first of two advanced warships
bought by the PLA navy. The first guided-missile destroyer sailed
to China earlier this year without the sea-skimming anti-ship
missiles.

A second delivery of the high-speed missiles is expected in the
next several months, the officials said.

Naval officials told The Washington Times the cruise-missile
destroyer represents a major boost in Chinese surface warship
firepower.

``The Sovremenny arrival is obviously the big issue that really
did change the capability of the surface force,'' one official
said.

The arrival of the first missiles, known as Sunburns, was
reported to senior officials in intelligence reports yesterday.
Details were disclosed by two Russian news agencies on Monday and
Tuesday.

The missile delivery comes at an awkward time for the Clinton
administration as it seeks to lobby Congress for passage of a
trade bill to help China. The president has said improving trade
relations with China will boost U.S. national security.

The administration last month also refused to authorize the sale
to Taiwan of four Aegis radar-equipped missile destroyers and
high-speed anti-radiation missiles that could be used by Taiwan's
forces to counter the new warships.

Taiwan arms sales have been blocked by pro-China officials at the
White House and State Department who fear U.S. transfers will
upset Beijing.

Russian weapons designers originally built the SSN-22 for the
Soviet Navy to use against U.S. warships during the Cold War. The
missile has a range of between 80 and 85 miles. Its supersonic
speed is what makes the missile a major threat.

Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, California Republican and sponsor of a
bill to punish Russia for the missile transfers, said the
anti-ship missiles could be used against Americans in the future.


``The Chinese communists now have the ability to sink American
aircraft carriers and kill thousands of Americans,'' Mr.
Rohrabacher said in an interview. ``If they ever decide to use
these weapons, the American people have a right to ask who's to
blame. But maybe we should ask that question before Americans
start dying.''

A bill sponsored by Mr. Rohrabacher passed the House
International Relations Committee two weeks ago that would block
any U.S. debt relief for the Russian government if future Sunburn
missile sales are not stopped. The full House could vote on the
measure in the next several weeks.

Richard Fisher, a specialist on the Chinese military with the
Jamestown Foundation, said Russia's delivery of the missile weeks
after the Clinton administration's rejection of guided missile
ships to Taiwan is ``a humiliation on top of a retreat.''

``From Eisenhower to Bush, the operative American policy was to
promote deterrence on the Taiwan Strait by selling Taiwan's
military a technical edge over the PRC,'' Mr. Fisher said. ``In
the year 2000, the Clinton administration has abandoned this
long-standing U.S. policy and has decreased deterrence for the
foreseeable future.''

Mr. Fisher said Taiwan's navy currently is defenseless against
the supersonic cruise missile deployed on the new Chinese
warship. ``It has no defensive system that can take out this
missile besides a pre-emptive attack on the destroyer itself,
which increases instability on the Taiwan Strait,'' he said.

As for U.S. ships, any Navy ships operating outside the
protection of aircraft carrier battle groups or Aegis ships ``are
dead meat for the Sunburn.''

The Navy officials said the purchase of Russian warships and
advanced missiles is part of a buildup of naval forces by Beijing
in case it decides to use force against Taiwan, which the
communist government views as a Chinese province.

``I don't think the Chinese military is in a big hurry to deal
with Taiwan militarily,'' one official said.

However, if a conflict erupts, China's military 

[CTRL] Ignorance of Freedom

2000-05-24 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

   Thomas Sowell

   May 18, 2000

   Ignorance of freedom

 Five years ago, there was
 great consternation when the
 Supreme Court ruled that
 carrying a gun near a school
   was not interstate commerce. On
   May 15, 2000, there was great
   consternation when the Supreme
   Court ruled that rape was not
   interstate commerce. It is a sign of
   how twisted the law has become
   that each of these common sense
   rulings was by a narrow 5 to 4
   majority.

   While the 1995 case involved a
   federal law against carrying a gun
   within a certain distance of a school,
   this year's case involved a woman
   suing two men for rape under a
   federal law. Neither case was about
   whether the law was good or bad.
   The cases were about Constitutional
   limits on the powers of the federal
   government -- and all our freedoms
   depend upon maintaining those
   limits.

   The feds have been getting around
   the Constitutional limits by claiming to be regulating
   interstate commerce. But the Supreme Court didn't buy
   it.

   Rape is already illegal in every state. What the recent
   ruling said in effect was: You are in the wrong
   courthouse, lady. Sue those so-and-so's in the state
   courthouse down the street. State courts have the power
   to do everything up to and including executing people,
   so sending a case to a state court is no wrist slap.

   Why does it matter whether a case is tried in a federal
   court or a state or local court? It matters because a
   concentration of power is dangerous. The people who
   wrote the Constitution of the United States understood
   that -- and feared that -- even if too many of us today do
   not.

   The familiar division of federal power among the
   President, the Congress and the Supreme Court was
   just the beginning. The Constitution also made it
   possible to impeach anybody who abused his power. In
   addition, the crucial 10th Amendment to the Constitution
   said that the federal government had the power to do
   only what it was specifically authorized to do, while the
   people or the states could do whatever they were not
   specifically forbidden to do.

   This was understood for about 150 years. Then, during
   the heady days of the New Deal, the federal
   government's power to regulate interstate commerce
   was stretched to include virtually anything that the
   politicians in Washington chose to regulate. In one case,
   the federal government's agricultural laws were applied
   to a man who grew his own food in his own backyard.
   The rationale was that he indirectly affected interstate
   commerce, because otherwise he might have bought
   food shipped across state lines.

   As the years went by, the interstate commerce clause of
   the Constitution was used repeatedly to circumvent the
   10th Amendment. It was very clever -- and very
   dangerous, because it took down the fence that the
   Constitution had put around federal power.

   Perhaps worse, people began to judge Supreme Court
   decisions by whether those decisions helped or hurt
   policies that those people favored or opposed. The
   whole idea that the courts were there to maintain the
   framework of law -- on which everyone's freedom
   depends -- got lost in the shuffle.

   When the Supreme Court ruled in 1995 that carrying a
   gun near a school was not interstate commerce, there
   was consternation because it was the first time in
   decades that the high court had said that you couldn't
   just put "interstate commerce" on everything, like
   ketchup. Much of the outrage against this decision was
   based on people's thinking that the court was 

[CTRL] AP: Justice Said Pressured on Fund Probe

2000-05-24 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

Justice Said Pressured on Fund Probe

By John Solomon
Associated Press Writer
Thursday, May 18, 2000; 8:29 p.m. EDT

WASHINGTON –– FBI Director Louis Freeh wrote a memo in
the earliest days of the Democratic fund-raising investigation
suggesting a top Justice Department official was under pressure
not to proceed with the probe to save Attorney General Janet
Reno's job.

The memo, belatedly turned over to Senate investigators this week,
also discloses that Freeh urged Reno and Justice Department
public integrity chief Lee Radek to step aside from the
investigation as early as December 1996 because of purported
comments made by Radek.

The memo was described to The Associated Press by several
government officials. They had seen it since the FBI turned it
over to the Justice Department to produce to the Senate and
House Judiciary committees investigating the fund-raising matter.

© Copyright 2000 The Associated Press


=
 Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  *Mike Spitzer* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

   The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
   Shalom, A Salaam Aleikum, and to all, A Good Day.
=

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] AP: 7 Bow Out of Clinton Disbarment Case

2000-05-24 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

7 Bow Out of Clinton Disbarment Case

 by KELLY P. KISSEL
Associated Press Writer

 LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) -- Half the members of a state panel with the
power to strip President Clinton of his law license have bowed out of
the case.

 The recusals leave barely enough members to consider whether to
discipline him for lying under oath in the Paula Jones sexual harassment
case.

 The 14-member Arkansas Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct
meets Friday and could consider two requests that Clinton be
disciplined.

 The committee did not say Thursday why any of the seven committee
members removed themselves. Four had contributed to Clinton's
presidential campaigns or to other Democratic Party candidates.

 ''It is heartening to know that Arkansas Committee members who have
recused themselves for apparent or perceived political reasons are
helping to maintain the integrity of this process,'' said Matthew
Glavin, president of the Southeastern Legal Foundation of Atlanta, which
filed one of the two complaints.

 The committee also lost an alternate member when his term expired this
spring, leaving five lawyers and a lay person, Chairman Ken Reeves said
Thursday. Four votes are needed to impose sanctions.

 The foundation and U.S. District Judge Susan Webber Wright referred
Clinton to the conduct committee, saying the president lied under oath
in the Jones case by denying he had a sexual relationship with former
White House intern Monica Lewinsky.

 Wright also cited Clinton for civil contempt last year and fined him
$90,000 for giving ''intentionally false'' testimony.

 Glavin has said he wants Clinton disbarred for the lies and for
obstructing justice. Wright has not publicly suggested a penalty.

 Clinton seeks something no harsher than a letter of reprimand, Glavin
said last week, citing Clinton's still-unreleased response.

  AP-NY-05-18-00 1729EDT



=
 Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  *Mike Spitzer* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

   The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
   Shalom, A Salaam Aleikum, and to all, A Good Day.
=

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] AP: Kudges Probe Clinton Letter Release

2000-05-24 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

Judges Probe Clinton Letter Release

May 18, 2000
Filed at 12:29 p.m. EDT
By The Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) -- A federal appeals court today sharply questioned a
judge's ruling that President Clinton committed a crime in releasing
friendly letters from a woman who accused him of groping her.

But the appeals court expressed strong doubts that it will intervene
now, as the White House wants, in the lawsuit that spawned the ruling
against Clinton.

With the Clinton administration urging the three-judge panel to step
into the case, Appeals Judge Harry Edwards said the Justice Department
and ``this White House and all White Houses'' for more than two decades
have said the type of action Clinton took is not a violation of law. The
Privacy Act does not cover the Executive Office of the President,
previous administrations have concluded.

``How could there be intent'' on the president's part to break the law
in view of the previous discussions? asked Edwards. Appeals Judge David
Tatel, a Clinton appointee, said ``the plain language'' of the law
suggests that the Privacy Act does not cover the president and his top
advisers.

However, Edwards, a Carter appointee, and Appeals Judge Douglas
Ginsburg, a Reagan appointee, suggested the issue could be dealt with on
appeal when the lawsuit ends.

``What is the harm'' to the White House with letting the lower court
decision stand for now? asked Ginsburg.

It might chill discussions between the president and his top advisers
because the March 29 ruling by U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth, a
Reagan appointee, pierces the attorney-client privilege between the
president and his White House lawyers, Justice Department lawyer William
Schultz told the appeals court.

Edwards was dismissive of Schultz's argument that there were broad
implications for Lamberth's ruling.

``Your concern has to be focused on this case,'' Edwards told the
Clinton administration lawyer.

Lamberth found that Clinton ``had the requisite intent for committing a
criminal violation of the Privacy Act'' when he authorized the release
of the letters in the midst of the 1998 criminal investigation that led
to his impeachment and acquittal.

In an emergency appeal, the Clinton administration is asking the appeals
court to set aside Lamberth's ruling. It is highly unusual for appeals
courts to involve themselves in cases before they are disposed of.

Lamberth's ruling came in pretrial proceedings in the lawsuit by Reagan
and Bush administration appointees over the Clinton White House's
gathering of hundreds of FBI background files on Republican officials.
The judge gave the conservative group Judicial Watch, which is
representing the former officials, wide latitude in exploring whether
the White House routinely gathered and released damaging information
about opponents.

Kathleen Willey's correspondence with the president was seen by White
House aides as undercutting her allegation that he made an unwanted
sexual advance. Much of her correspondence with Clinton came after the
alleged 1993 incident.



=
 Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  *Mike Spitzer* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

   The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
   Shalom, A Salaam Aleikum, and to all, A Good Day.
=

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Criss Matthews Worries About White House File

2000-05-24 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

Newsmax-Inside Cover

Wednesday May 17, 2000 9:11 PM EST

Chris Matthews Worried About White House File

Allegations that the Clinton White House has been using confidential
government files - including FBI files - is not new.

In 1996 it was discovered that at least 1,000 FBI files on Republicans
from previous administrations had found their way to Craig Livingstone's
Xerox machine.

Bureaucratic snafu?

 Washington whispers say the Clintons beat impeachment charges and
staved off Chinagate, FBI Filegate, Travelgate and other scandals by
using files to blackmail political opponents, particularly in Congress.

Perhaps they have used them against media opponents, too.

Larry Klayman, chairman of Judicial Watch, told NewsMax.com that while
the Lewinsky scandal was exploding, he received a call from CNBC
"Hardball" host Chris Mathhews.

Matthews, Klayman said, explained that he knew of Klayman's law suit
against the White House for using the confidential FBI files.

"I think they have a file on me," Matthews told Klayman. Matthews, a
former Democratic congressional aide, has been a critic of the Clintons.

Klayman said Matthews seemed "very concerned and frightened" and asked
Klayman to keep an eye out for any information he uncovered that might
prove the White House did have a file on him.

Klayman reports he never did learn of such a file.

For sure, Matthews has rattled the Clintons' cage a bit, but not too
much, Klayman believes.

Klayman said he ran into Matthews at the recent White House
Correspondents Dinner and that he looked "white as a ghost" upon seeing
Klayman. He apparently was uncomfortable being seen with the White
House's chief legal antagonist.



=
 Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  *Mike Spitzer* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

   The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
   Shalom, A Salaam Aleikum, and to all, A Good Day.
=

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Top FBI Expert: Reno Should Have Been Fired

2000-05-24 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

Top FBI Expert: Reno Should Have Been Fired

NewsMax.com Thursday, May 18, 2000

The FBI’s former top hostage negotiator instructor says that the Miami
raid to seize Elian by federal agents was "unwarranted" and should have
led to firing Attorney General Janet Reno.

"The raid was unwarranted.  It violated everything that is taught by the
FBI in handling situations like this," explained Robert K.  Ressler.

Ressler served with the FBI for 20 years and in law enforcement for more
than four decades.  He is a best-selling author and frequent media
commentator.

Ressler said he has heard through his "grapevine" of bureau contacts
that the FBI opposed the raid and declined to participate after being
invited to do so by Reno.

Ressler’s work for hostage negotiation training has been the FBI’s model
since the 1970s.  He has worked with law enforcement in Britain, France,
Germany and other countries worldwide to develop similar programs.  He
is also a noted FBI psychological profiler.

"Reno went in with overkill, with a show of force," Ressler said,
believing the raid was meant more to send a message to the
Cuban-American community than to simply gain custody of the child.

"The Cuban-Americans showed great restraint.  Considering what the
federal government did, you could have had a disaster with many people
killed."

According to Ressler, in no way could the standoff between the family
and the federal government be considered a hostage situation.

"The federal government and Reno went berserk," he said.

He described how Reno and the Justice Department violated every cardinal
rule in crisis handling:

* Reno didn’t let negotiations run their course.

Negotiations have to be exhausted before the government escalates.
According to impartial mediators, negotiations were continuing.  Force
is a last resort.  Reno has still not explained what time constraint
demanded risking lives with force.

* Reno’s deception was a dangerous precedent.

Though negotiations were ongoing, Reno deceived the Miami family by
sending in armed agents.  Her deceit and failure to negotiate in good
faith will set a dangerous precedent, according to Ressler.

"In the future, if there is a real hostage situation involving
Cuban-Americans in the Miami area, they will not believe the government
during negotiations, and this could lead to disaster.  Honesty is the
best policy.  You only break your word if there is imminent danger to
someone.  I’d really like to see the ATF, FBI, Secret Service handle the
next incident down there successfully."

* Reno used excessive force.

Ressler said the use of more than 130 agents to make the raid means only
one thing: The federal government decided to make a statement to the
community by using a "show of force.” The amount of force had no
relation to the risks involved.

Had he been in charge, he would have followed textbook rules for dealing
with such situations.  Ressler said he would have first used minimal
force.

"I would have sent just two marshals, wearing suits, with briefcases,
and maybe with a social worker to collect the child," Ressler said.

If that effort failed or resistance was met, only then should the
government have escalated.

Ressler argued that Reno’s actions could have led to a loss of life.

Ressler called Justice Department claims that some people in and around
the home may have had guns "ludicrous." In America, he said, there are
almost as many guns as people, so that is not a reason for government
officials to abuse their power.

"Her judgment has proven to be so poor time and time again," Ressler
said, wondering how Reno has held on to her job as the country’s top law
enforcement officer.

He noted Reno’s mishandling at Waco that led to the death of 86
civilians, her oversight in the government attempt to frame Richard
Jewell, and the Justice Department’s improper investigation of the Ruby
Ridge case.

"The photo [of the agent seizing the boy at gunpoint] said everything.
It’s amazing to me that this can happen in America, to have civilian
rights trampled on, and for no one in the media or Congress wanting to
hold Reno accountable.  It’s very frightening to me," Ressler said.

Ressler added that he would not be surprised if civilians injured during
the unwarranted raid have successful civil suits against the government.



=
 Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  *Mike Spitzer* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

   The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
   Shalom, A Salaam Aleikum, and to all, A Good Day.
=

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. 

[CTRL] Wash Times: English Fluency Soars in Los Angeles Schools

2000-05-24 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

[I remember when this initiative was on the ballot. Those radical
liberals who opposed it claimed the sky would fall down, and
worse. To me it just made good sense. If somone cannot be fluent
in English in this country, that person is basically condemned to
be on the absolute lowest position on the totem pole.  --MS]



May 18, 2000

English fluency soars in Los Angeles schools
By Andrea Billups THE WASHINGTON TIMES

A record number of non-English-speaking students in the Los Angeles
Unified School District have become fluent in English, prompting
supporters of California's Proposition 227 initiative to claim victory.

Figures released earlier this month by the 690,000-student school system
— sued recently for failure to provide adequate services to its students
— show the highest annual increase in students achieving English fluency
since the system began keeping data on their progress.

From December 1998 to December 1999, more than 32,000 of the state's
313,442 "English learners" were reclassified as fluent, according to the
district's language acquisition branch.

"The results are positive and, I believe, cause for celebration," said
Ramon Cortines, Los Angeles' interim superintendent of schools.
"Particularly encouraging is the fact that the greatest increase is
occurring before the students leave elementary school."

Two years ago, California voters approved Proposition 227, which
mandated that state public schools teach non-English-speaking students
primarily in English until they are fluent.

Fluency means a student can understand and complete lessons taught in
English, the Los Angeles district says.  The students are evaluated by
teachers and must meet certain standards in reading, writing, listening
and speaking before they are reclassified.

Of the students who have become fluent, more than 19,000 were in
kindergarten through fifth grade, the district said.  Forty percent of
those who are now deemed fluent were in fifth grade.  That, said Mr.
Cortines, is crucial, because it means most of the newly fluent students
will spend the majority of their school years in "mainstream" English
classes taught at their appropriate grade levels.

Sheri Annis, spokeswoman for English for the Children, the California
group led by entrepreneur Ron Unz that sponsored Proposition 227, said
she was not surprised by the results.

"It's a no-brainer," she said of the Los Angeles school district's
success.  When students are taught only in English, "they learn the
language, and therefore are able to succeed on the state's standardized
tests."

"We see this as a positive step toward full implementation of English
immersion programs as called for under Prop 227," she said.

Before the English-only initiative was passed by California voters,
bilingual programs permeated the Los Angeles school district, the
state's largest. Limited-English-speaking children made up 45 percent of
the student population, Miss Annis said.
"Now we're seeing that certain classrooms are switching over and at
least defaulting toward English, rather than Spanish.  This accounts for
the stronger transition rate to mainstream English classrooms," she
said.

Other school systems, particularly those in the San Francisco area but
many sprinkled throughout the state, have been slow to follow through on
Proposition 227's provisions, which Miss Annis believes will hurt
children in the long term.  If students are speaking Spanish at home,
for example, schools ought to teach them English because they cannot get
those skills from their families, she said.

Children who become fluent ultimately will benefit "because they will be
able to compete on their SAT scores and simply get a better-paying job,
and have much more opportunity in general."

The school system has focused its efforts on training more teachers to
effectively instruct non-English-speaking students, and has implemented
other measures designed to reduce class size and improve reading skills.

While Miss Annis was hopeful, proponents of Proposition 227 said it was
likely too soon to gauge whether the law should receive sole credit for
the turnaround in Los Angeles.

Proponents, however, conceded that the news in Los Angeles was
encouraging and perhaps a sign that students whose native language was
not English would not be hurt by English immersion, as they had argued
when the law was before voters.

"Of course I think it's positive that scores didn't crash, but is it
really working?  It's too soon to tell,"Theresa Fay-Bustillos, vice
president of legal programs for the Mexican American Legal Defense and
Educational Fund, told the Los Angeles Daily News.

Her group opposed Proposition 227.

Mrs.  Fay-Bustillos questioned whether students would be able to use
their newly acquired language skills as they move into more difficult
course work in the higher grades. "What you're going to witness in a
classroom is verbal fluency," she told the Daily News.  "But 

[CTRL] Chemtrails over Desert Storm

2000-05-24 Thread Nicky Molloy

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:  ([EMAIL PROTECTED] 24 May 2000
Subject: Chemtrails over Desert Storm



--- Forwarded message follows ---
From:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Buyea)


Click at bottom to see Chemtrails over Saudi Arabia and Iraq during
Desert Storm War 1991, From a weather satellite !! After you get there
scroll down six screens.

http://www.neosoft.com/~cshramek/

--- End of forwarded message ---

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] NEW WHITE HOUSE WHISTLE BLOWER CLAIMS INTIMIDATION

2000-05-24 Thread lloyd

..

From the New Paradigms Project [Not Necessarily Endorsed]:
Conspiracy Shopping Cart: http://a-albionic.com/shopping.html

From: American Patriot Friends Network [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "\"American Patriot Friends Network\"" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: NEW WHITE HOUSE WHISTLE BLOWER CLAIMS INTIMIDATION
Date: Friday, May 12, 2000 5:55 PM

NEW WHITE HOUSE WHISTLE BLOWER CLAIMS INTIMIDATION

   Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 16:29:59 -0400
   From: "Steven Hoffman"  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DECLARATION OF KATHLEEN GALLANT

I, Kathleen Gallant, hereby state as follows:

1. I have personal knowledge of the matters attested to herein.

2. From January 12, 1998 through October 13,1998, I was the Associate
Director for the Information Systems and Technology Division (IST)
of the Executive Office of the President's Office of Administration
(OA). This position was a political appointment. Among my duties,
I was responsible for the operational support for many of the
computer systems for the EOP. I currently run an $85 million major
business group of an information technology company in Northern
Virginia with annual revenues of $500 million and approximately
4500 employees.

3. In approximately June 1998, I came to learn of Project X, or the
"Mail2" problem, which was the failure of the Automated Records
Management System (ARMS) to capture incoming Internet e-mail to
White House staff, which resided on the Mail2 computer server.
I learned in June 1998 that the problem with the email began
in August 1996. As a result, this incoming email, which numbered
in the hundreds of thousands, was not searched by the ARMS system
in response to subpoenas and document requests. I personally never
saw any emails nor was I aware that any had been printed or shown
to anyone.

4. I also understand from the public record that Mark Lindsay of
OA has also been alleged to have made threats to the contractors
over Project X in order to keep it secret. Based on my experience
in working with them, I am confident that both Crabtree and Lindsay
are capable of conveying those threats to the contractors and
others. Certainly, the contractors acted, in their numerous
interactions with me as if they had been threatened. On several
occasions, Mark Lindsay told me not to record anything of
controversy in email communications. It was clear to me that he
did not want me to create any records that might embarrass or
cause legal implications if recorded by the ARMS system.

5. I was first briefed on Project X one day in a meeting in the
office of Paulette Cichon (then Deputy Director for Information
Management at OA and my supervisor) with Ms. Cichon and Betty
Lambuth. Ms. Lambuth, who was extremely nervous, at first refused
to tell me what concerned her. Only after Lindsay came into Ms.
Cichon's office during the meeting and gave Ms. Lambuth permission
to brief me, did she divulge to me what she knew about the Project
X email problem. At that time I was not aware of the threats to
Ms. Lambuth and the other Northrup Grumman employees.

6. Shortly thereafter, I learned from contractors Betty Lambuth,
Robert Haas, John Spriggs and Sandy Golas (all of whom I interacted
with regularly) that Laura Crabtree, who worked for me, had
threatened them with jail if they gave information about Project X
to unauthorized persons.

7. I quickly realized the impact the Project X issue would have on
email searches in response to subpoenas and document requests (the
searches were incomplete) and took several management steps to try
and correct the problem. I know that Mr. Lindsay and the rest of the
OA management, such as Ada Posey and Virginia Apuzzo, were also
aware of the implications of Project X as it related to the accuracy
of email searches.

8. Having seen a document in mid-June of 1998, showing that Charles
Ruff, then White House Counsel, was to be fully briefed on the
Project X email problem, I concluded that it was no longer "classified"
and could be discussed more openly within OA. In fact, I ordered that
the term "Project X" stop being used by OA staff and that a more
descriptive term "Mail2 reconstruction" or variation thereof be used.
At this time Ms. Crabtree was removed from the project, in an attempt
to reassure the Northrup Grumman employees that they would not be
subject to any future threats.

9. The first action I took was to order that the procedure that was
used to create "user id's" be corrected to prevent any more users
from having email that would not be properly captured by the ARMS
system.

10. I held several meetings with the Northrup Grumman staff (Sandy
Golas, Bob Haas and John Spriggs) who were familiar with Lotus Notes
(the computer system upon which emails were transmitted), and the ARMS
system. Because of Crabtree's threats the contractors said they did
not want to work on the Project X problem.

11. Steve Hawkins, their Northrup Grumman supervisor, also told me that
his staff reported 

[CTRL] CONTRAILS VS CHEMTRAILS - FACTS AND CHRONOLOGY

2000-05-24 Thread Nicky Molloy

-Original Message-
From: Surfing The Apocalypse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wednesday, 24 May 2000 20:11
Subject: [surfingtheapocalypse] CONTRAILS VS CHEMTRAILS - FACTS AND
CHRONOLOGY


Contrails Vs Chemtrails -
Facts And Chronology
From Kim Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
5-23-00

http://www.sightings.com/general/chemfacts.htm

  I. Contrail vs. Chemtrail.

  A. A contrail dispurses. A chemtrail spreads into cloud cover and
  sometimes has fallout (cob-web like filaments, red/yellow powders,
  milky-white fluid).

  II. Purposes (??? weather modification, protection from ozone
holes,
  bio-vaccination, culling - ???)

  A. Weather modification.

  * Openly stated goal of the U.S. Military is "owning the weather"
  www.au.af.mil/au/database/research/ay1996/acsc/9025ag.htm

  * UN environmental Program "Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
  Change" www.ipcc.ch

  * UN "Capacity Development Initiative" on climate change ... in
  partnership with THE WORLD BANK as financiers (remember
  Seattle protests) www.gefweb.org/Capacity_Dev.pdf

  * Dr. Bernard Eastlund took up the Tesla theories. Eastlund
  released his research and concernns on the internet AFTER the
  military took over, to cover his butt.
  www.borderlands.com/newstuff/research/HPEMRAD/Eastlund.htm

  * When DOD took over Dr. Eastlund's research, the birth of HAARP
  took place. HAARP is based in Alaska and it is being applied to
the
  Earth's ionosphere for weather control and mind control purposes.
  "Angels Don't Play This HAARP", Dr. Nick Begich [Earthpulse Press,
  PO Box 201393, Anchorage, AK 99520]; Concerned citizens group
  paper at
  www.geocities.com/Area51/Shadowlands/6583/project116.html

  * US Air Force IS involved. Early April 2000, KC135s were grounded
  and during the period immediately following spraying reports
across
  the US significantly dropped. See
  http://clubs.yahoo.com/clubs/chemtrailtrackingusa (OVER 700
  members - daily reports to track) Also see the research of William
  Thomas (Author, "The Scorched Earth", "Bringing The War Home",
  "Probing the Chemtrail Conundrum")
  www.islandnet.com/~wilco/investsky.htm (Email:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]).

  * Our weathermen KNOW. The data doesn't support the cloud
  cover. For instance, last year in Sante Fe, NM there was a 21-day
  period of continuous clouud cover when humidity/dew point levels
  were no higher than 30%. Clouds can only form when humidity/dew
  point levels are 60% of higher. HOW DID THE CLOUDS FORM??
  (see www.carnicom.com/contrails.htm)

  B. There has definitely been biological warfare testing of
  UNKNOWING U.S. citizens and OUR GOVERNMENT IS FULLY
  AWARE OF IT.

  * 1977 hearings before the U.S. Senate Committee on Human
  Resources SubCommittee on Health and Scientific Research (see
  www.carnicom.com/contrails.htm)

  * AGAIN 5/6/94 U.S. Senate testimony of Dr. Leonard Cole
  (Author, "Clouds of Secrecy") before the Committee on Veteran's
  Affairs (see www.carnicom.com/contrails.htm)

  * 3 segments aired on ABC / Ted Kopple's "Nighline" which
  included the testimony of Peter Kawaja on the biowarfare exposure
  of Gulf War vets. Of the initial 697,000 soldiers deployed to the
Gulf
  War, 489,400+ (70%) are now discharged, 1000s have died and
  are dying, 67% of their babies born after are born deformed,
  family/friends/doctors/nurses becoming sick. Mycoplasmas are a
  part of their sickness.

  * UN Wildlands Project - the "re-wilding of America". 50% of the
  United States is being set aside for global parklands with NO
  HUMANS ALLOWED. Papers state "human population must be
  reduced." Concerned citizens site
  www.wildlandsproject.org/htm/summary.htm

  * Damning patents. U.S. patent 5534413 for invasive mycoplasma
  infection (isolated from the urine of AIDS patients), and THE
  VACCINE YOU NEVER EVER HEAR ABOUT U.S. Patent 5242820.
  Mycoplasmas can cause Epstein-Barr/mono, lupus, ALS, MS,
  meningitis, lymphoma, leukemia, alzheimers, Crohn's Disease, PID,
  arthritis, fibromyalgia, allergies, asthma etc etc etc.
  http://members.aol.com/ghylak/mycoplasma.htm and
  www.gulfwarvets.com/article24.htm

  * Lab results from ground samples taken from 2 unassociated
  parties (Sacramento and E.Oregon) after flyovers from unmarked
  aircraft reveal biowarfare bacterias named in over 160 Pentagon
  patents referencing biowarfare applications, toxic molds, ethylene
  dibromide (a pesticide banned by the EPA which damages
  lungs/heart/liver/kidneys). (See www.carnicom.com/contrails.htm).
  "The flu that's not the flu" - hospitals filled to capacity
TURNING
  AWAY patients: "THIS VIRUS IS A MUCH MORE SUCCESSFUL
  PARASITE", Dr. 

Re: [CTRL] Alien Presence? Evidence. .

2000-05-24 Thread Mary K. Gemmato

The more you listen to the crap coming out of Congress and the White House
and Washington DC in general...I have trouble finding intelligent life
here period 
@@
@@
@@
- Original Message -
From: Nurev Ind Research [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2000 10:38 PM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Alien Presence? Evidence. .


 Tony Dickinson wrote:
 
  Dear Ten,
   I would be happier if you could qualify your claim. What is
your
  evidence for there being 'absolutely no "hard" evidence for ET
  visitatuion' ?

 You are requesting that he  prove a negative on the same basis as proving,
 (with hard evidence,) the existence of aliens here on Earth. This is a no
no.

 Firstly, We ( J2- made the original claim that there is no hard evidence
of
 intelligent alien existence on Earth )are NOT required to prove that
aliens
 don't exist. The more extraordinary the claim, the more solid the evidence
 needs to be. There is none. What there is plenty of, is 'stories'.

 
  That I, myself, have not knowingly been exposed to any, does not tell me
  therefore that such evidence does not exist.

 If you deconstruct this sentence you will find a very a problematic
 suggestion. These words if taken in a serious context, will cause you to
 undermine your own judgment. Good judgment is not something that humans
 have a great abundance of. Good judgment is learned. It is not an instinct
 we are born with. Unfortunately, there is more to be got from people with
bad
 judgment than good judgment.

 In our society there are few tools which help
 develop judgment. School should be one of those tools but it's not. TV
could
 be the best tool but it entirely monopolized by people who know for
CERTAIN
 that a consumer with good judgment is a very bad business idea. Aint gonna
 happen. Religion...to put it politely is not the right tool for the job.

 So it's up to each individual to start his/her own Judgment Buildup
Program.
 It's tougher than body building. Every one will encourage you to build up
your
 body.

 If all your life you had never experienced the lingering aroma of Unicorn
 droppings, and you are running through a beautiful meadow, and your foot
 crashes through the crusty crown of cow crap, and the home baked smell of
 cooling cow pie wafts you in the face, your first thought ought not be -
 "Oh my god I stepped in Unicorn shit!"

 That would be bad judgment because you did not correctly judge the
physical
 situation. In nature, those individuals which miss-judge the physical
 environment more than others, significantly improve the common gene pool
 by leaving it.

 The people who diminish your judgment OR your ability to trust your
 judgment, or prevent you from developing your judgment, are doing you
 the individual, real harm. This is done both intentionally and
unintentionally
 in our interactions with people. The measure is, how many of the "events "
to
 which you are exposed during the course of any given period of time, turn
out
 to be true. This includes tv, songs, mags, books, commercials, ads,
billboards,
 salespeople, friends, relatives, strangers with candy, and the clergy.

 The more truth you are exposed to, the more you can collect as valid
 experiential data to internalize, and be a base to do comparisons with.
 Judgment ensues when you compare an experience
 in the moment, with what you have learned is true. This might also be
called
 having common sense.

 So the following ...

  Dear Ten,
   I would be happier if you could qualify your claim. What is
your
  evidence for there being 'absolutely no "hard" evidence for ET
  visitatuion' ?
  That I, myself, have not knowingly been exposed to any, does not tell me
  therefore that such evidence does not exist.

 is telling you that your experiential internal base WHICH HAS TAKEN YOU
YEARS
 TO ACCUMULATE AND WHICH HAS SUCCESSFULLY BROUGHT YOU TO YOUR PRESENT POINT
 OF SURVIVAL, should be put aside in order to accept a concept some one
wants
 you to share. This is corruption. You are asked to put asside trustworthy
data
 and replace it with " something else."

 Unless YOU YOURSELF has ever directly experienced contact with an alien or
 alien paraphernalia, you have no reason to assume that the more unlikely
 experience is the true one.

  (At least for one example, the evidence with regards meteoric
microossils
  would appear to be growing since The Murchison work by Pfloog/Hoyle back
  in the late 70s.

 We are not talking about space bacteria or viruses. We are talking about
 intelligent beings who were reviewed thusly...

  EXOPOLITICS by Alfred Lambremont Webre
 Reviewed by Nicky Molloy

 This is one of the most deeply thought provoking books I've read in some
 time.
 Alfred appears right in his perception that almost a majority of US adults
 know intuitively that we are a part of a populated universe and have been
 kept in the dark about the implications of this. 

Re: [CTRL] signoff ctrl

2000-05-24 Thread Bill Huey


A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Mind Chemtrol From The Sky?

2000-05-24 Thread Nicky Molloy

TIme to recycle this.


-Original Message-
From: Steve Wingate [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Friday, 5 November 1999 07:31
Subject: [CTRL] Mind Chemtrol From The Sky?


--- Forwarded Message Follows ---
From:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date sent:  Thu, 4 Nov 1999 08:41:49 EST
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send reply to:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:[starfriends] Mind Chemtrol From The Sky?


This morning Art Bell had a guest on his show named William Thomas.  He is a
chemtrail investigator who lives in Aspen, Colorado.  At one point in the
chilling discussion, Thomas said he'd received an e-mail from a man who said
he was a former NOAA (National Ocean and Atmospheric Agency?) pilot.  This
man wrote that, in retrospect, at the beginning of the chemtrail mystery
that
the "happy faces" of the meteorologists who had until that time been his
passengers were suddenly replaced by dour, unsmiling and non talkative
"meteorologists" and that the take off and landing weights of his planes
suddenly did not correspond anymore with the amount of fuel used, meaning
that something besides fuel was lost during those flights.

This pilot intimated that the chemtrails are really a CIA mind kontrol
operation, the purpose of which is to make the sprayed populations confused,
depressed, a bit sick and enervated and thereby submissive and lacking
crucial analytic capacities.  Stated purpose?  To kontrol targeted
populations
by making them more likely to be subservient to government officials during
Y2K confusion and/or martial law.  In addition, this is happening all around
the world now.

But in Amerika, Mr. Thomas stated that he believed forestry service planes
had been moved out of that service and into the production of chemtrails
which resulted in prolonged wildfires in the West this past summer due to
the
resulting lack of equipment to fight those fires from the sky.

We must never forget that this chemtrail spraying is apparently NOT a part
of
some new directive!  This kind of spraying has been going on in various
modes
now for over 50 years.

This is all so damned mind boggling that I feel like I'm in a dream, like
I'm
in the twilight zone, like my country has been stolen away while I slept.

Mr. Thomas' website can be found at http://www.islandnet.com/~wilco/

The attached 6K jpg of a jet obviously producing a chemtrail from its tail
is
from Contrail Connection - http://www.contrailconnection.com/ THIS IS AN
EXCEL
LENT WEBSITE with many pictures.  Remember, planes dump fuel from their
wings, not from their tails!

Art Bell's chemtrail page - http://www.artbell.com/contrails.html

What the hell is going on - because I think Art Bell is a part of a disinfo
op himself.  Or, is he a man in the middle?

Brad


Steve Wingate

California Director
SKYWATCH INTERNATIONAL

Anomalous Images and UFO Files
http://www.anomalous-images.com



 tail1.JPG


[CTRL] CHEMTRAILS ~ COMMENT/REBUTTAL TO MECHANIC'S STORY

2000-05-24 Thread Nicky Molloy

Subject: CHEMTRAILS ~ COMMENT/REBUTTAL TO MECHANIC'S STORY



-Original Message-
From: Surfing The Apocalypse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Date: Wednesday, 24 May 2000 21:10


RUMOR MILL NEWS AGENCY
http://www.rumormillnews.com


CHEMTRAILS ~ COMMENT/REBUTTAL TO MECHANIC'S STORY
Posted By: RMN Agent 003
Date: Tuesday, 23 May 2000, at 9:10 p.m.
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/config.pl?read=3369



CHEMTRAILS Did An Airline Mechanic Stumble Upon The Truth? 5-17-00

Comment

Response To Those Who Claim The Mechanic's Story Is A Hoax

From Craig Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5-23-00

As a former airlines mechanic (Western Airlines in Los Angeles), I read
the mechanic's letter on the spray gear with interest. I can say with
authority that they guy knows airlines maintenance terminology,
technics, pecking order, etc. Those who say that it is a complete hoax,
or that this guy is a phony, do not know what they are talking about.
Especially those who say "I am a commercial pilot, so I know these
things are bogus." Being a "commercial pilot" only means one has passed
a written test and a flight test for a license above "private pilot."
The requirement is 250 hours for fixed wing, and 150 hours for
helicopter. I am both a commercial pilot fixed wing (land and sea) and
helicopter. I have over 3500 hours, mostly turbine helicopter. I also am
an AP mechanic (airframe and powerplant), and worked at one time on the
Boeing airliners for Western Airlines. So I know the terminology and
airlines maintenance buisness.

Airlines now often hold reciprical agreements to do maintenance on each
other's planes at various outlying stations. Here, American Airlines
does work on various companies aircraft, and sometimes foreign and
military as well. As for having room in the jet for spray gear, I would
need to know exactly what type of aircraft the writer is talking about.
Any of the larger jets have various places gear can be installed,
expecially in the aft baggage compartment. Also, in some, the center
fuel tank is not used unless the plane does overseas long distance
flights. Here, at American, a large plane was being worked on that
belonged to another company and a friend of mine opened up a floor plate
during a "heavy check" inspection and found several mysterious black
boxes and cable bundles. When he tried to find out what they were he was
told to button it up and forget he saw it all. The plane belonged to
Evergreen Air (CIA). So anything is possible.

As for the static whips, it would be extremely difficult to run tubing
down the inside of a wing to such a wingtip location. It would be much
easier to just run a line to the fuel dump system and use the onboard
systems to discharge chemicals into the atmosphere.

One part that bothers me about this story is using civilian companies to
do this. Too many leaks are possible for a classified operation. There
are plenty of planes in storage, in Marana, Arizona, run by Evergreen,
that could be brought into service with contract pilots. This is where I
think they are really coming from.

Craig Roberts Author: The Medusa File: Crimes and Coverups of the US
Government

--

Comment

From (Name On File - Confidentiality Requested) 5-22-00

Hate to burst your bubble. As an aircraft mechanic (ALL systems, ALL
ATA's) for the past 30 years and a Sr. Maintenance instructor for the
past ten years, I have the qualifications to comment on the recent
article about chemtrails. It is the article from the "mechanic" and what
he "found" on aircraft he "worked" on.

#1. The pecking order: We work on what we are told to work on. I have
worked on every system on the aircraft, from the Radar to the waste
disposal, to the tires. Nobody has EVER told me not to work on a
specific aircraft. (I work on mostly B747's, DC10's, MD11's and all the
narrow body jets) I have also been a "Tech Rep" with the Air Force and
carry a Top Secret Clearance AND a P certification. There is no place on
an aircraft I am not permitted to go.

#2. The static dischargers. I Have included a drawing of the Static
dischargers in use today, on wide body and narrow body jet aircraft.
This type of static discharger has been in use since the introduction of
jet aircraft. The type described by your "mechanic" was used on
propeller driven aircraft. To use the wick type on a jet is just not
done. It would be ripped off in the airstream on the first flight. I
would like to know how a discharger 1/4" by 1/2" could possibly be
drilled out to give enough of an output to show the chemtrails? And if
they could be drilled out they would fall apart on takeoff.

I am not trying to say that the chemtrails are a fiction, only that the
delivery system described is not viable. You will have to do better. A
separate connection to the fuel vent pipes would do it, and hide the
tanks in the fuel tanks. There are pumps that could be used for this,
and you could just pump the tanks full of fuel to get them pressurized.
Or you could use 

Re: [CTRL] INS Investigating Beating of Elian Camera Crew

2000-05-24 Thread Ynr Chyldz Wyld

 The Immigration and Naturalization Service is actively
 investigating allegations that a federal SWAT team beat up an NBC
 camera crew as it was preparing to film last month's raid on the
 home of Elian Gonzalez's Miami relatives, NewsMax.com has
 learned.

 "That issue is now being taken up by our Internal Audit Office,"
 INS spokeswoman Maria Cardona told NewsMax.com in an exclusive
 interview Tuesday. "They're looking into it more closely."

  Last month, Cardona told Accuracy In Media's Reed Irvine that
 the machine-gun-toting agents denied having "any physical
 contact" with freelance NBC camerman Tony Zumbado and his
 soundman Gustavo Moeller. The two had been designated as the sole
 source to provide network "pool" video coverage from inside the
 house.

I've posted about this subject here before, but it bears repeating...

What isn't mentioned above is that the designation of 'sole source
to provide network 'pool' video coverage' came from the Miami gang,
not from any 'network pool', because Zumbado, a Cuban-American
himself, was openly supportive of the Miami gang...

And Zumbado was interviewed live on MSNBC shortly after 7am the day
of the raid...barely two hours after the event.

He not only showed no signs of being 'roughed up', he told a very
different story than the one he seems to be saying now.  He repeated
this early version of events later that same day, in yet another
live MSNBC interview, done about midday...

In his early version he claimed that he was immediately knocked
unconscious by the front door, because that was where he was sleeping.
No mention of being 'roughed up'.  No mention of waking up outside.
No mention of his soundman buddy. No claim of equipment or tape being
destroyed.  Zumbado had to keep reiterating to the anchor interviewing
him that the reason he didn't get any tape footage was due to being
knocked unconscious when the INS first entered, he made it a point to
claim of being taken so much by surprise before losing consciousness
that he never had time to even lift his camera, let alone get it ready...


 Cardona's denial came after Zumbado told MSNBC, "We got maced.
 ... We were told to lay on the floor. ... I was kicked in the
 stomach and pushed down and they kind of like put their foot on
 my back and told me not to move or else they were going to
 shoot."

Again, as I mentioned above, this is at odds with Zumbado's original
description of events made just a few hours afterwards...in his first
interviews, he never mentions mace (indeed, we now know that mace wasn't
used, but pepper spray...perhaps a minor point, but it shows that
whomever is writing this article isn't doing research).

Zumbado's original interviews had him claiming of being immediately
knocked out, and knowing nothing of what happened afterwards until he
conveniently regained consciousness just moments after the INS left.  No
kicking in the stomach, no pushing him down (because he was already on
the floor, supposedly sleeping, when the INS came in).  No jackboots on
his back.  No agents telling him not to move or else they'd shoot.  No,
in his original description he repeatedly stated he was knocked out cold
by the door when the INS first entered, and that he had no knowledge of
what happened thereafter, until he came to just after the INS left.


  While the NBC cameraman was being attacked inside the house, his
 soundman, who was still outside, was hit on the head with the
 butt of a shotgun, then held at gunpoint for the duration of the
 raid.

This perhaps is true.  But it would have to be the soundman who would
have to verify what in fact happened to himself.  What we have here is
hearsay, inadmissable in a court of law.  Anything that Zumbado claims
happened to the soundman is NOT due to his direct observation, but what
he would have been told by the soundman and others afterwards...


  NBC reporter Kerry Sanders, who was also assigned by the network
 to cover the raid, told NewsMax.com that Zumbado and Moeller gave
 him identical versions of the assault minutes after INS agents
 sped away with Elian.

Perhaps.  But all this statement tells us is that a colleague of theirs
claims they described the same thing...not WHAT they described.

Sanders should be aware of Zumbado's original interviews, which describe
a totally different event than what is now being described...


Zumbado was later hospitalized for back trouble, Sanders said.

Again, Zumbado was interviewed within two hours of the raid, and a
second time about 5 to 6 hours later.  Not only did he not look 'roughed
up' (neat clothes, no bruises or abrasions), he looked very hail and
hearty, and indeed stressed to the anchors interviewing him, when they
asked if he was okay, that he indeed was fine and felt fine and wasn't hurt.


  When Irvine asked Cardona why the NBC crew would simply make up
 such a story, the INS spokeswoman told him, "It could be because
 they needed an excuse for not doing their jobs."

Based solely on 

[CTRL] I TOO WOULD LIKE TO KNOW...

2000-05-24 Thread Ynr Chyldz Wyld

...why Michael Spitzer gets to send 20+ posts in one day to this
list, while I and the rest of the list are restricted to only 7
per day...


June

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Chemtrails over Desert Storm

2000-05-24 Thread nessie

[EMAIL PROTECTED],Internet writes:

Click at bottom to see Chemtrails over Saudi Arabia and Iraq during

Desert Storm War 1991,



What, exactly, makes thes things "chemtrails" and not ordinary contrails?
Be specific.

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Mind Chemtrol From The Sky?

2000-05-24 Thread nessie

[EMAIL PROTECTED],Internet writes:


-Original Message-

From: Steve Wingate [EMAIL PROTECTED]

(snip)


From:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

(snip)


To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


(snip)


This morning Art Bell had a guest on his show named William Thomas.  He
is a
chemtrail investigator who lives in Aspen, Colorado.  At one point in the
chilling discussion, Thomas said he'd received an e-mail from a man who
said
he was a former NOAA (National Ocean and Atmospheric Agency?) pilot.



So let me get this straight.  Nicky says that Steve says that ManBrad says
that a guy on the Art Bell show says that he got an email from a guy he
says is named Thomas who says some guys whose names we don't know but he
claims were "meteorologists" made faces once so we're supposed to be
scared the sky is falling.

Yeah. OK. Sure.

Maybe the sky is really falling. Hey, it could happen. But this is not
evidence that the sky is falling. This is fifth-hand hearsay from people
we have never even met. We have  no proof whatsoever that any of them even
exist. For all we know for certain they could all be literary creations,
characters in some psycho-drama psy-op. Whatever they are, evidence they
are not. Evidence they do not present. And if we can't learn how to tell
the difference between hearsay and evidence, we are doomed to be herded
like livestock for the rest of our lives.

On the other hand, yeah, the government does do spray stuff in the air
sometimes. For example: two miles from where I sit right now they once
sprayed serratia marcescens into the air and infected the entire SF Bay
Area. See: A High Form of Killing by Robert Harris and Jeremy Paxman, ISBN
0-8090-5471-x, p 156.

So we cannot, and should not, dismiss out of hand the possibility that
foul play is afoot here. But let's be rational and follow the basic rules
of logic and evidence as we investigate the possibility. How would you,
personally, like to be convicted in a court of law and then imprisoned on
the basis of fifth-hand hearsay? I didn't think so. So please, show us
some common courtesy here and don't attempt to imprison our minds in a
cage of unsubstianted claims, wild rumors and disinformation.

The government, and the entities the animate it,  all have a long, thick,
rich history of engaging in massive disinformation campaigns. Is the whole
chemtrail affair a psy-op? We don't know yet. We may never know.  And we
don't know what else it is or isn't, either.

But we do what hearsay is, don't we? I do. If you don't, go buy a goddam
dictionary.

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] You are a fraud.

2000-05-24 Thread Franklin Wayne Poley

On Tue, 23 May 2000, Nurev Ind Research wrote:

 5/23/00

 It's over now Yair. Genetics have put an end to your con game. No more
 extracting
 book money from those pathetic Biblical Israelite wannabes.

 You should be made to pay back every penny you got from these idiots.

 If I lived in Israel, I would have you and those Bible Code con men arrested
 for intentionally defrauding the public.

 Find new snake oil to sell the idiots buddy, this con is over. Genetic markers
 have defined who's who.

 Joshua2

What markers, J2?
FWP.

---
  Machine Psychology: http://www.atoma.f2s.com/atomareport.html (file #10)
---

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Was America Founded as a Christian Nation?

2000-05-24 Thread Franklin Wayne Poley

On Tue, 23 May 2000, Nurev Ind Research wrote:

 How could this ever compare with my main rival Allan Greenspan whose economic
 theories are based on those of yet another co-religionist of ours, Ayn Rand.

Are all you co-religionists atheists or do you all have the same "genetic
markers" for religion x?
FWP.

---
  Machine Psychology: http://www.atoma.f2s.com/atomareport.html (file #10)
---

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Media Miasma-fication

2000-05-24 Thread Alamaine

From http://www.swans.com/

}}Begin
c o m m e n t a r y
May 22, 2000

Trade liberty for safety or money and you'll end up with neither. Liberty, like
a grain of salt, easily dissolves.
The power of questioning -- not simply believing -- has no friends. Yet liberty
depends on it.

Note from the Editor:  The Peter Weiz Price, an award funded by the German
Marshall Fund, was won this year by Steven Erlanger of The New York Times.
According to The Times, the prize, worth $10,000, "rewards excellence and
originality in reporting and analyzing European and transatlantic affairs."
Excellence and originality in reporting? What was excellent about the lies and
disinformation passed on to the US public but the lies and the disinformation?
And what originality did this reporter, this Bureau Chief, demonstrate in the
war zones of Serbia and Kosovo? Didn't he simply regurgitate whatever
propaganda his NATO masters provided him on a daily basis? Read our lead
article, written by Michael Parenti. Then you'll understand that when
journalists serve the interests of their masters they get a recompense. It's a
win-win situation. It's a self-serving system doing the rounds. Meantime the
truth has gone AWOL.

The Media and Their Atrocities
by Michael Parenti

"Believe nothing,
no matter where you read it,
or who said it, no matter if
I have said it, unless it agrees
with your own reason and
your common sense."
-- Buddha

For the better part of a decade the U.S. public has been bombarded with a media
campaign to demonize the Serbian people and their elected leaders. During that
time, the U.S. government has pursued a goal of breaking up Yugoslavia into a
cluster of small, weak, dependent, free-market principalities. Yugoslavia was
the only country in Eastern Europe that would not dismantle its welfare state
and public sector economy. It was the only one that did not beg for entry into
NATO. It was--and what's left of it, still is--charting an independent course
not in keeping with the New World Order.

Targeting the Serbs

Of the various Yugoslav peoples, the Serbs were targeted for demonization
because they were the largest nationality and the one most opposed to the
breakup of Yugoslavia. But what of the atrocities they committed? All sides
committed atrocities in the fighting that has been encouraged by the western
powers over the last decade, but the reporting has been consistently one-sided.
Grisly incidents of Croat and Muslim atrocities against the Serbs rarely made
it into the U.S. press, and when they did they were accorded only passing
mention. 1 Meanwhile Serb atrocities were played up and sometimes even
fabricated, as we shall see. Recently, three Croatian generals were indicted by
the Hague War Crimes Tribunal for the bombardment and deaths of Serbs in
Krajina and elsewhere. Where were the U.S. television crews when these war
crimes were being committed? John Ranz, chair of Survivors of the Buchenwald
Concentration Camp, USA, asks: Where were the TV cameras when hundreds of Serbs
were slaughtered by Muslims near Srebrenica? 2 The official line, faithfully
parroted in the U.S. media, is that Bosnian Serb forces committed all the
atrocities at Srebrenica.

Are we to trust U.S. leaders and the corporate-owned news media when they dish
out atrocity stories? Recall the five hundred premature babies whom Iraqi
soldiers laughingly ripped from incubators in Kuwait? A story repeated and
believed until exposed as a total fabrication years later. During the Bosnian
war in 1993, the Serbs were accused of pursuing an official policy of rape. "Go
forth and rape" a Bosnian Serb commander supposedly publicly instructed his
troops. The source of that story never could be traced. The commander's name
was never produced. As far as we know, no such utterance was ever made. Even
the New York Times belatedly ran a tiny retraction, coyly allowing that "the
existence of 'a systematic rape policy' by the Serbs remains to be proved." 3

Bosnian Serb forces supposedly raped anywhere from 25,000 to 100,000 Muslim
women, the stories varied. The Bosnian Serb army numbered not more than 30,000
or so, many of whom were engaged in desperate military engagements. A
representative from Helsinki Watch noted that stories of massive Serbian rapes
originated with the Bosnian Muslim and Croatian governments and had no credible
supporting evidence. Common sense would dictate that these stories be treated
with the utmost skepticism--and not be used as an excuse for an aggressive and
punitive policy against Yugoslavia.

The "mass rape" propaganda theme was resuscitated in 1999 to justify the
continued NATO slaughter of Yugoslavia. A headline in the San Francisco
Examiner (April 26, 1999) tells us: "SERB TACTIC IS ORGANIZED RAPE, KOSOVO
REFUGEES SAY." No evidence or testimony is given to support the charge of
organized rape. Only at the bottom of the story, in the nineteenth paragraph,
do we read that reports gathered by the Kosovo mission of the 

[CTRL] Fwd: The Week of Peace

2000-05-24 Thread Kris Millegan







-Original Message-
From: Steven Plaut [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

Subject: The Week of Peace




  Ok so let's see if we can sum up the debacle of the past week.  Days
after promising to hand Arafat parts of Jerusalem, in response to which
Arafat orders an auto da fe of a Jewish baby in Jericho, Barak orders
Israeli troops to race out of Lebanon in total panic and confusion, making
the US pullout from South Vietnam look like the epitome of good logistics.
Leaving behind equipment and ammunition, all the time under the shelling
and fire of the Hizbollah, which wishes to prove to the world that it is
driving out the cowardly Israelis.
   Israel unilaterally eliminates the entire Southern Lebanese Army, whose
tanks and APC's are left behind for the Hizbollah to collect.  While
intending to turn the area over to the Lebanese army, Israel allows the
Hizbullah simply to drive in, in most cases without a shot being fired,
and take up positions inches from the Israeli border.  Many of the SLA
soldiers are kidnapped and imprisoned by the Hizbollah and their life
expectancies are suddenly quite short.  Others are allowed in to Israel
and placed in a "Maabara" next to the Kinneret.   Stories are flying of
Hizbollah terrorists passing themselves off as SLA soldiers to gain access
to Israel.
   The Cloud Monkey of the UN, Kofi Anan, announces that any UN troops to
be introduced into the area will do nothing to prevent Hizbollah attacks
on Israel nor ethnic cleansing of Southern Lebanese Christians and
Shi'ites.  The Hizbollah takes over without a shot the "Hiam" prison in
which the SLA had been holding assorted terrorists, including those Israel
had been holding as "bargaining chips" to get Ron Arad released but moved
to Hiam, thanks to its Supreme Court activist tyrants.  Israel's pompous
generalissimos appearing on TV and boasting how this is a great victory
for Israel.  Kiryat Shmona and border towns almost totally emptied of
people, and on kibbutzim people living underground afraid to emerge into
the wonderful daylight of the era of peace.   The Hizbollah announcing
openly it will continue to shell and murder because Israel has not
released the few remaining terrorists from Lebanon it is still holding,
like Durani - who kidnapped and then sold Ron Arad to Iran.  Meaning it's
only matter of short time before Israel releases these as well in a great
illustration of its military victory and triumph in Lebanon.   And the
Hizbollah also says it will shell and murder because Israel has not pulled
out of parts of the Golan Heights the Hizbollah thinks it needs to.

   You with me so far?

   So what are we left with?   I left out the very BEST part of Israel's
great new triumph.

   Under the universally-accepted rules of international politics, it is
always legitimate and progressive and peaceful to murder a Jew.  But
whenever a Jew retaliates or stages deterrent strikes, this is aggression
and criminality.  Especially if a civilian gets hurt. Not that anyone
cares about Arab civilians getting hurt when other Arabs are the perps,
just when Jews hurt them.  In other words, if tomorrow Syria drops an
atomic bomb on Haifa and in retaliation Israel bombs Damascus and as a
result of this bombing a single pregnant Arab woman is killed or a child
scratched, this will constitute proof that Israel is the aggressor and war
criminal and the entire world will demand that Israel restrain itself and
give out goodwill concessions and give Syria the Sea of Galilee.

   Now as part of this game, the very worst thing Israel can do is allow
hostile terrorists to take territory and hide among civilians.  This
simply immobilizes Israel permanently.   As long as the Hizbollah was 20
miles from the border and not hiding among Southern Lebanese civilians,
Israel could sometimes strike at it, although always feared hitting the
actual Shi'ite villages NORTH of the security zone in which the Hizbollah
terrorhoids were ensconced.   Such attacks do not look good on CNN.  In
the SOUTH, the SLA could enter villages and dispatch Hizbollah terrorists
quietly, under the iron rule that no one cares when Arabs kill other
Arabs.

   But now the very crowning achievement of triumph and success in Lebanon
is that Israel sits back uselessly as the Hizbollah drives right up to the
border fence, taking the entire zone and arriving with lots of civilians.
Who move in to immobilize Israel.

 Which means that all the bravado from Israel's politicians and
generalissimos about how Israel will strike back REALLY REALLY HARD and
invade deep into Lebanon next time the Hizbollah blows up a school bus or
similar military target in Israel is complete nonsense and everyone knows
so.  Israel has now tied its own hands perfectly in such a way that it can
do absolutely nothing in Lebanon besides bomb some empty warehouses
somewhere or knock down power lines.  All thanks to the decision to play
coward in Southern Lebanon and ostrich in Jerusalem.

   And why 

Re: [CTRL] I TOO WOULD LIKE TO KNOW...

2000-05-24 Thread Kris Millegan

In a message dated 5/24/00 4:51:50 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

...why Michael Spitzer gets to send 20+ posts in one day to this
list, while I and the rest of the list are restricted to only 7
per day...


June

June, Michael had asked if he could awhile back and he has been made an
"editor" which allows him to post more. He has been using this "privilege"
generally wisely. He had some problem with his ISP and dumped several days
worth. I have been getting increasing busy with research and the upcoming
CIA-Drugs Symposium and the list does need content.  Michael has not used his
extra posts to browbeat folks and has supplied the list with some interesting
articles. Whetther or not he believes all what he posts, I know not. No
matter what, he is posting what some believe to be true. A conspiracy theory
does not have to be true to have an effect. As a matter of fact we all know
that conspiracy theories and fear are used all the time to goad and hoodwink
us hoi polloi.

So yes, Michael can posts more. If he oversteps his "power", this is an
electronic jungle and the "club: will come out 'da sky.

Got much to do.

Om
K

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Les Follies des foux et folles du Village

2000-05-24 Thread Alamaine

Extracted from:
http://www.nypress.com/content.cfm?content_id=1947now=05/23/2000content_sectio
n=1

}}Begin

Taki
LE MAÎTRE

A Village of Idiots

With apologies to the great Thomas Sowell (imagine how much better the black
American community would be if it had Sowell and Ward Connerly as leaders,
rather than hustlers like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton), here are a few random
thoughts:

...There are two things that people in general, and the Clintons in particular,
habitually lie about, and these are sex and money. Hillary called the blowjobs
her hubby got from Monica a vast right-wing conspiracy. Ditto where Gennifer
Flowers, Paula Jones, Kathleen Willey and the rest of the "beauties" are
concerned. (The Draft Dodger’s women resemble the countries he bombs; they are
poor, ugly, weak and no one comes to their rescue.) Here is a candidate whose
law and business partners are in jail, who advocated the pardoning of convicted
terrorists, who called innocent people murderers and who is the co-beneficiary
of a $7 million tax-free "legal defense fund," with $4 million in personal
legal bills still unpaid.

The Clintons’ great weapon, however, is the liberal and left-wing media. For
example, Frank Rich of the Times, better known to us insiders as Françoise, who
has blurred the issues to help her candidacy. The President committed perjury
and obstructed justice and is the first president of the United States to be
held in contempt by a federal judge. Rudy Giuliani did not volunteer the fact
that he had a girlfriend. In fact, I will let you, dear readers, in on a little
secret. A world exclusive. Françoise Rich and Hillary Clinton are one and the
same person. Their whole rationale is to stir up hatred and fear of a
supposedly Neanderthal extremist right. Physically they are the same:
profoundly puffy and unattractive; both wear suits; big-hipped and
heterosexually challenged. You know what they say about looking and acting
like a duck. Hillary and Françoise are one person.

...The most sinister buffoon, shallow, stupid, loud and uninformed, has to be
the egregious Rosie O’Donnell. This overweight moron, an unabashed Hillary-for-
senator huckster and Giuliani basher, recently appeared on Who Wants to Be a
Millionaire. When asked what islands off the coast of Argentina are controlled
by the British–multiple choice–she failed to answer, "The Falklands," but made
a crack about not even knowing where Argentina is. This ignoramus par
excellence once said that "Giuliani is so dumb, if he ever wrote a book, it
would be called It Takes a Village Idiot." Never mind that it took a village to
ghostwrite Hillary’s book; never mind that a bloody war was fought over the
Falklands in 1982; never mind that the buffoon warned Congress that she and her
ilk will be watching and they better vote her way on gun control or else. What
really grates is the disproportionate amount of publicity mental midgets like
O’Donnell receive from the liberal press as soon as they make some public-
policy prescription. If she had a little pride and decency, the sinister
buffoon would go back to school and leave the politics to other sinister
buffoons like Sid the Scumbag. At least no one has yet called Blumenthal a
moron.

...If any of you out there are against the blacklisting that went on in
Hollywood during the early 50s–about 10 people lost their jobs, although most
of them continued to work under assumed names–go out and boycott Procter 
Gamble. Don’t touch Ivory soap, and stay away from Tide laundry detergent. PG
caved in and withdrew its advertising from Dr. Laura Schlessinger’s radio and
tv shows after homosexual activists flooded the sponsors with threats of a
boycott. Schlessinger voices religious views that have been around for
thousands of years. She has as much right to her opinions as homosexuals have
to theirs. But, unlike the latter, Dr. Laura has not tried to pressure the
networks, which, according to the Parents’ Television Council, have increased
the references to homosexuals from four in 1989, to 125 10 years later. In the
meantime, where are the soi-disant civil libertarians? Why hasn’t the ACLU
screamed against the "McCarthyism" of the homosexual pressure group? I’ll tell
you why. Freedom of speech applies only to the left. But let’s boycott PG
anyway.

...The Clinton stage-managed spectacle of a Million Moms was designed to sell
the Draft Dodger’s gun control agenda to the public. As an avowed
pacifist–except when, to divert public opinion, he murders innocent Sudanese
and Serbs–Clinton once again exhibited his talent for manipulating a zonked-out-
by-too-much-tv populace. There are more gun control laws in place than there
are name-droppers in Hollywood. The reason the laws don’t work is because
felons are hardly ever prosecuted for lying when they apply for guns. It’s
outrageous but true. The last thing we need is more legislation. But try to
tell that to the hypocrites at the White House.

...A very important book on Vietnam 

Re: [CTRL] Giuliani, A string of bad luck??

2000-05-24 Thread Prudence L. Kuhn

In a message dated 05/20/2000 11:29:41 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

   Those who are familiar with the long list of people connected
with William Jefferson Clinton who have died under strange and
mysterious circumstances should perhaps add Mayor Giuliani's
political death to the list.

Regards to All
Nakano 

Well, I don't know about Giuliani.  He's been sleeping around for donkeys'
years, but if you want to look at the list of folks who have been less than
lucky, start compiling the ones who ran afoul of the Bush family.  Prudy

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] OEN 5/24/00

2000-05-24 Thread Kris Millegan

from:
http://www.aci.net/kalliste/
Click Here: A HREF="http://www.aci.net/kalliste/"The Home Page of J. Orlin
Grabbe/A
-
Be Afraid, Be Very Afraid


Janet Reno Declares Taiwan Hostile Threat


Why can't they just pay us for secrets like China does.

 The Clinton administration, in a departure from longtime U.S. policy,
has placed Taiwan on the FBI's secret list of hostile intelligence threats,
equating Taipei with aggressive spying by Beijing and Moscow.

 China, Russia and Taiwan are among 13 nations designated as priorities
for FBI intelligence and counterespionage activities, according to a
classified memorandum from Attorney General Janet Reno.

 "I hereby designate the following countries as country threats under the
[National Security List] for 1999/2000," Miss Reno wrote.

 Based on FBI, Justice and State Department reports, Miss Reno then
listed, in order of priority, Russia, China, North Korea, Federal Republic of
Yugoslavia, Serbian-controlled Bosnia, Vietnam, Syria, Iraq, Iran, Libya,
Sudan and Taiwan.

 In addition to nations, the so-called national security threat list
includes eight issues that guide FBI intelligence work: terrorism, espionage,
proliferation, economic espionage, infrastructure targeting, government
targeting, perception management and legal intelligence gathering.
 Disclosure of the threat list comes as the House is preparing to vote on
legislation that would loosen trade restrictions on China.

 Current and former U.S. intelligence officials said the inclusion of
Taiwan on the list appears based on the administration's pro-Beijing policies
that seek to equate Taiwan in the same threat category as China.

 Asked about the inclusion of Taiwan on the list, Sen. Jon Kyl, Arizona
Republican and a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said: "What
threat?"

 "It's very strange to me that Taiwan would be on this list, especially
since other countries that spy on us are not," Mr. Kyl said. He added he
plans to seek an explanation from intelligence officials.

 If Taiwan is on the threat list, then Israel, India, Pakistan and France
also should be added since those nations conduct spying operations against
the United States, said a former senior U.S. intelligence official.

 "This is just for political purposes. The Taiwanese are not in the same
league as the other
threats and they are the one country on the list that is not a mortal enemy
of the United States."
 Justice Department sources said the memorandum was written by Frances
Fragos Townsend, counsel for intelligence policy and a political appointee
who is close to Miss Reno. Miss Townsend was criticized in a recent internal
Justice Department report for turning down an FBI request for a wiretap of
Los Alamos National Laboratory scientist Wen Ho Lee.

 Mr. Lee is the chief suspect in an FBI investigation of Chinese nuclear
spying. He was indicted in December for mishandling nuclear secrets.

 The former official said the danger from "politicizing" the threat list
is that "it has the practical effect of distorting the focus of the FBI and
other intelligence community agencies" charged with protecting national
security.

 "It distorts the reality of the threat and confuses people," he said.

 Said a second former high-ranking intelligence official, "Why isn't
Israel on the list?"

 Taiwan's intelligence service in the past has engaged in intelligence
gathering aimed at classified information, and also has sought weapons
technology. However, the Taiwanese have not been involved in recent cases,
this former official said.

 "I'm really surprised," he said of Taiwan's inclusion on the list.

 A current U.S. government official involved in China issues said putting
Taiwan on the threat list reflects the administration's pro-Beijing and
anti-Taiwan stance. "The administration clearly sees Taiwan as the problem,
as a provocateur and troublemaker," he said.

 Seven of the threat nations are states subject to U.S. sanctions as
state sponsors of international terrorism: Cuba, North Korea, Syria, Iraq,
Iran, Libya and Sudan.

 The FBI National Security Division stated in a separate document that
the threat issues apply to the activities of all foreign nations, "with
special attention given to those nations determined to be a strategic
national security threat." The strategic national security threats are those
on the threat list.

 FBI officials privately have expressed frustration at limits imposed by
the White House and State Department that prohibit any public identification
of the hostile nations and threat issues.
 Justice Department and FBI spokesmen had no comment.

 A copy of the document was obtained by The Washington Times from
investigative reporter Scott Wheeler of American Investigator, a television
news show. Mr. Wheeler turned up the document following production of a
documentary film on China called "Trading With the 

[CTRL] Fwd: VoteFraud Convention

2000-05-24 Thread Kris Millegan





Sorry if this is a duplication. I've just subscribe under this alternate
email address.

Please help restore honest elections to save America. Support the upcoming
VoteFraud Convention in Cincinnati, Ohio on August 25-27. Visit
http://www.votefraud.org/ for details.

Godspeed!

/s/ cia



Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com




[CTRL] American Investigator

2000-05-24 Thread Kris Millegan

from:
http://www.americaninvestigator.net/
Click Here: A HREF="http://www.americaninvestigator.net/"American
Investigator/A
-



American Investigator Exclusive:
Janet Reno sends secret document to Louis Freeh classifying China as
terrorist state! Click here to view document.


*   Will this document affect the MFN vote? The Washington Times runs front
page article Wednesday on secret document uncovered by American Investigator.
*   Click here for American Investigator correspondent Scott Wheeler's report
on the Reno-Freeh memo.






Order China Documentary

"Trading With The Enemy: How the Clinton Administration Armed Communist China"


1-888-200-TAPE or click here to order online.
Click here for more information.





Click here to see Insight Magazine's coverage of American Investigator's
China Documentary!




Exclusive:
American Investigator's
Earth Day 2000 Coverage

*   Chevy Chase Loses Temper; Says He Is "Intellectual."
*   Chevy Chase Says Socialism Works; Cuba the Model
*   Chase Transcript






New Amazon Documentary: Debunking Myths  Misinformation of Environmental
Groups.


Click here for more information.





AMERICAN INVESTIGATOR is a nationally syndicated television newsmagazine
featuring correspondents Scott Wheeler and Marc Morano. The program's ground
breaking investigative work focuses on debunking the myths of today's
headlines. American Investigator travels the globe to bring you the real
story: To Iceland for an expose on Keiko the Killer Whale and star of "Free
Willy", to Brazil and the heart of Amazon rainforest, to Germany on the trail
of international arms smugglers and to war torn Kosovo with in depth
reporting and a fresh perspective on the worlds top stories.
 (Airs the last Friday of every month at 10:00 pm eastern)



Correspondents Marc Morano and Scott Wheeler
-
Aloha, He'Ping,
Om, Shalom, Salaam.
Em Hotep, Peace Be,
All My Relations.
Omnia Bona Bonis,
Adieu, Adios, Aloha.
Amen.
Roads End

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] BRITLAND NEWSBYTE [nwo in scotland]

2000-05-24 Thread Andrew Hennessey

NEW WORLD ORDER has hard time in SCOTLAND   by andrew hennessey

Scottish daily Record editorial as NWO kid control policies go public .
wed 24 may 2000 page 8

They've banned school sports days, canned kids' football medals and
denounced Noddy [cartoon character] as a danger to our childrens morals.
Now the politically correct brigade have set their sights on the
scandalously seditious childhood pursuit of musical chairs.
Incredibly, Education Minister Margaret Hodge has launched a new booklet
urging nursery teachers to outlaw the timeless party favourite.
This latest PC pamphlet, entitled Towards a Non-Violent Society, states
that musical chairs encourages aggression because 'children learn that the
strongest/fastest one who pushes the other children out of the way wins'
Excuse me ? Isn't that a pretty good grounding for adulr life ?
Well No. It isn't in Labours Brave New Britain.
In fact we've unearthed a secret document from a government think-tank with
the next raft of changes to ensure our kids grow into perfectly rounded
little automatons.
Out goes pin the tail on the donkey on grounds of potential cruelty to
animals.
Blind mans Buff has been branded an insult to the visually impaired.
Postmans Knock has bred a generation of young males who think they can
father children and walk out on their partners without a second thought.
And the outrageous Pass the parcel has been identified as the root cause of
all those dodgy drug deals going on under the noses of our emasculated
police force.
Think we're kidding ?  Just Watch this space.



Whilst jack Straw Home Office Secretary's relatives are being picked up for
drug abuse and sex offences - he has openly defied the will of the Scottish
people and other watching groups and let Mick Tyson enter the uk.
Opposition to Tyson was because of his conviction for rape.
It has to be said that he found a place to fight in scotland against the
overwhelming tide of public opinion - it was Scotlands national Soccer
stadium.

Oddly enough the same venue and management team that played a match on the
day of Dianas Funeral.
The glove puppets of Scottish football bow and wheedle to their English
masters, and bring further shame to Scotland as they vainly try to
eradicate scottish identity.
__
Speaking of which

The national Clause 28 ballot on whether to allow or disallow the active
promotion of homosexuality in schools in scotland - a ballot which was
sabotaged by the alleged independent, electoral reform society, a ballot
reviled and sabotaged by homophobic spin from Blairs and Dewars toadies,
a Ballot finally funded by someone out of their own pocket - Illustrates to
the deaf dumb and blind Politicians who choose not to hear the people that
elected them that 70 percent of people in scotland - and the poll cast 1.2
million votes - a larger turn out than some local elections - 70 percent of
people in scotland want the status quo - to keep the clause and its legal
guidelines -
which is to say that Homosexuality should get equal consideration in schools
along with other genders - and not be actively promoted to confused children.
Although Donald Dewar first minister of scotland face an outright and
scandalous defeat - his toadies are claiming to belistening in an
embarrassing u-turn. They had attempted to railroad the legislation through
in scotland despite it being rejected in england, by Blair and the House of
Lords.
The reason appears to be that explicit homosexual school books seem to be
filling a couple of warehouses - awaiting distribution to the 'needy'
children of scotland.
It would seem that some political careers and favours rested on the seedy
new legislation which  gives no place to Marriage.
Senior Church figures in scotland want to keep the clause and legal
protection of kids and retain the family as the main surrogate of all
children - and not the NWO values of State Surrogacy.
In scottish law - if a pedophile sex crime is not reported within 1 year -
the crime expires.
_

The Emperor Tony has had a new sprog - a son - called Leo after his granddad -
Cherie Blair participated too.
_

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives 

Re: [CTRL] Alien Presence? Evidence. .

2000-05-24 Thread Tony Dickinson

Dear J2,
many thanks for your considered contribution to this thread, a few
further commments of clarification re my position if I may:

 
  Dear Ten,
   I would be happier if you could qualify your claim. What is your
  evidence for there being 'absolutely no "hard" evidence for ET
  visitatuion' ?

 You are requesting that he  prove a negative on the same basis as proving,
 (with hard evidence,) the existence of aliens here on Earth. This is a no no.


My intent here was not a request for proof, but merely to establish the
basis of the strong negative claim made. My own position remains
an agnostic one on this issue (coming clean, therefore, I am a skeptic
rather than a cynic).

 Firstly, We ( J2- made the original claim that there is no hard evidence of
 intelligent alien existence on Earth )are NOT required to prove that aliens
 don't exist. The more extraordinary the claim, the more solid the evidence
 needs to be. There is none. What there is plenty of, is 'stories'.

 
  That I, myself, have not knowingly been exposed to any, does not tell me
  therefore that such evidence does not exist.

 If you deconstruct this sentence you will find a very a problematic
 suggestion. These words if taken in a serious context, will cause you to
 undermine your own judgment.

Maybe so, but this is a risk that I am prepared to take in guiding my
intellectual growth trajectory. I find that a healthy skepticism keep me
open-minded and more likely to entertain a wider variety of novel
solutions to unsolved problems. I am not happy to hold the view that
something is NOT the case on a priori grounds. The search for
inconsistencies and falsification would appear to better satisfy my
curiosity, whilst at the same time entertaining as wide a number of
possibible explanations as conceivable (which ideally should reduce in
number as data continues to comes in).


 In our society there are few tools which help
 develop judgment. School should be one of those tools but it's not. TV could
 be the best tool but it entirely monopolized by people who know for CERTAIN
 that a consumer with good judgment is a very bad business idea. Aint gonna
 happen. Religion...to put it politely is not the right tool for the job.

 So it's up to each individual to start his/her own Judgment Buildup Program.
 It's tougher than body building. Every one will encourage you to build up your
 body.

With these sentiments I would largely agree. The evolution of the
brain/nervous system is co-emergent with the evolution of what we call
intellegence. The mind/brain system would appear, at least to me, to have
evolved as much a problem-seeking device, not just a problem-solving
device.
Much of our formal education establishment activity (possibly not
guided by pedagogic aims alone) involves the teaching of WHAT to learn
rather than HOW to learn. I find that my brand of 'healthy skepticism'
allows an emergent process of "learning to learn" which scaffolds
exponentially (in the face of some degree of task-success, of course).
This latter learning-to-learn scenario supercedes (although operates
partially in addition to) more 'reflexive', hard-wired behaviours not
necessarily requiring much intellectual input under normal circumstances
(e.g., blushing, panting, hearing [can you urn your ears 'off' ?] and the
chemotoxin regulation processing of the liver).


 If all your life you had never experienced the lingering aroma of Unicorn
 droppings, and you are running through a beautiful meadow, and your foot
 crashes through the crusty crown of cow crap, and the home baked smell of
 cooling cow pie wafts you in the face, your first thought ought not be -
 "Oh my god I stepped in Unicorn shit!"


OK, here, I would propose that it would be "what's this funny brown stuff
on my foot, coincident with that novel aroma ? - have I come across
anything like this before ?"
It would not be efficient at that time to decide what it was not (the
exponetial list of possibilities will always be too large a set). The job
at hand is to decide whether and what action be required on my part in the
face of this novel situation once recognised as such.

 The people who diminish your judgment OR your ability to trust your
 judgment, or prevent you from developing your judgment, are doing you
 the individual, real harm. This is done both intentionally and unintentionally
 in our interactions with people.

Yep, so keep an open mind and watch how many explanations are quickly
ruled out due to lack of knowledge, rather than lack of evidence. It is
not always obvious to the uninformed what one might 'need' to know in
order to establish existence proof of some phenomenon. [e.g.,knowing
what cholestrerol is/functions to do before deciding whether one needs
to change diet in order to ingest more or less of it; or knowing what
detector device switches causes the wee red light to blink before
deciding whether the fuel level is really needing a top up]. On the other
hand, 

[CTRL] George W. Bush's Booze And Drug Problems...

2000-05-24 Thread Kris Millegan

from:alt.conspiracy
As, always, Caveat Lector
Om
K
-
Click Here: A HREF="aol://5863:126/alt.conspiracy:617107"George W. Bush's
Booze And Drug Problems.../A
-
Subject: George W. Bush's Booze And Drug Problems...
From: A HREF="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] "[EMAIL PROTECTED] /A (Abemarf)
Date: Tue, May 23, 2000 12:58 AM
Message-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

...the allegations just won't go away !!!





[ London Sunday Times ]   UNITED STATES
January 23, 2000




  Bush hit by claims of 'lost
  weekends' in Mexico

 Tom Rhodes, New York


 A BOOK to be published this week about George W
 Bush, the Republican frontrunner, claims his father's
 chief of staff admitted in 1998 that the candidate had
 taken cocaine during the 1970s.

 Michael Dannenhauer, chief of staff to former president
 George Bush, is said to have told Toby Rogers, a
 journalist with the Houston Public News, a newspaper in
 Texas (where Bush Jr is governor), that the politician
 was "out of control" from the time he attended Yale
 University.

 "There was cocaine use, lots of women, but the drinking
 was the worst," the aide is alleged to have said.

 Dannenhauer purportedly also told Rogers of an
 admission by the former president that his son
 experienced "lost weekends in Mexico".

 Rumours of drug abuse have plagued Bush Jr for
 months since he declared himself a candidate in the
 presidential race. Since character is an important
 election issue, the latest claims are bound to rekindle
 interest in Bush's past. He has admitted to a "misspent
 youth", but has repeatedly evaded questions about
 cocaine.

 The claims will come under intense scrutiny. They were
 never published by the Houston newspaper, which has
 since closed.

 The story was briefly aired on September 13 last year by
 The Greenwich Village Gazette, an internet magazine in
 New York, but was pulled from its website. The publisher
 was concerned about legal action and the absence of
 any second source to support the allegation that Bush
 had started to use cocaine "some time before 1977".

 In a taped conversation with Rogers, Dannenhauer
 subsequently called the allegations a "total lie". He
 initially denied they had met, then claimed the interview
 had taken place years earlier.

 Rogers, now a freelance contributor to various
 publications including The Village Voice, the respected
 liberal paper in New York, claims a photograph
 apparently showing the two men together was taken on
 April 21, 1998. The allegations appear in the introduction
 to a revised biography of Bush by J H Hatfield, a Texan
 writer.

 The first imprint of his book, Fortunate Son, published in
 October last year, was withdrawn from shops after it
 emerged that Hatfield had served a five-year prison
 sentence for soliciting the attempted murder of his boss
 at a finance company in 1987.

 The book, with additional material from Rogers, is now
 being reissued by Soft Skull, a radical publishing
 company based in New York.

 It retains hotly disputed accusations made in the earlier
 version, which cited claims by three anonymous
 sources - one of them identified as a former Bush
 contemporary at Yale and another said to be an
 unofficial political adviser - that Bush was arrested in
 1972 for cocaine possession.

 The book alleges that the record was expunged by a
 friendly judge as a favour to Bush Sr.

 Both father and son strenuously deny the claims. Last
 night Scott McClellan, the Bush presidential campaign
 spokesman, said: "This book belongs to science fiction.
 All allegations in it are ridiculous, false and libellous."

 Hatfield alleges that in return for a clean slate the judge
 ordered Bush to perform community service as a youth
 counsellor at the Professionals United for Leadership
 League (Pull), an urban poverty programme in Houston.

 The former president, however, has said he referred his
 son to the youth centre after an incident in which Bush
 drove drunk with his brother as a passenger.

 Sixty Minutes, the CBS documentary show, is due to
 broadcast an interview with Hatfield next month, raising
 the prospect that his allegations will attract further
 attention as the primaries get under way.
=
Subject: More About George W.'s Drug Abuse
From: A HREF="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] "[EMAIL PROTECTED] /A (Abemarf)
Date: Tue, May 23, 2000 1:13 AM
Message-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Seems like George W. Bush would make a great
"vice" President !!!

===

Bush Jr.'s Skeleton Closet

{A HREF="http://www.realchange.org/bushjr.htm}"http://www.realchange.org/bus
hjr.htm}/A


Party Hearty: Sex, Drugs, And Rock 'N Roll?

For almost half his life, Junior was distinguished mainly by his hearty
appetite for partying. A Newsweek profile by Evan Thomas, describing his
college years, says he "seems to have majored in beer drinking at the Deke
House." After he formed his first company (which failed), Thomas writes, "By
his own 

[CTRL] ISRAELIS TAKE REVENGE TARGETING JOURNALISTS (fwd)

2000-05-24 Thread Yardbird

-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 12:49:51 +
From: MER [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MER [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ISRAELIS TAKE REVENGE TARGETING JOURNALISTS

   ___      __
  /  |/  /  /___/  / /_ //M I D - E A S T   R E A L I T I E S
 / /|_/ /  /_/_   / /\\ Making Sense of the Middle East
/_/  /_/  /___/  /_/  \\   ISRAELIS TAKE REVENGE TARGET JOURNALISTS
 http://www.MiddleEast.Org

  News, Information,  Analysis That Governments, Interest Groups,
and the Corporate Media Don't Want You To Know!
  - - - - - - - - - -
YOU ARE WHAT YOU KNOW AND WHAT YOU DO WITH WHAT YOU KNOW
To receive MER regularly email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



ISRAELIS TAKE REVENGE TARGETING JOURNALISTS

A Gunmetal blue Mercedes snaked its way below the escarpment marking the border
between Israel and Lebanon. It stopped for a minute or two, then disappeared in
a ball of fire - blasted by an Israeli tank lurking in trees 200 yards away. A few
hours later I discovered my personal connection with the vehicle.

It was the second car I had seen the Israelis destroy in ten minutes yesterday.
Their pride hurt by the rout of their forces and those of their allies in the South
Lebanon Army, who were fleeing back into Israel, and by the defiant flags of Hezbollah
that fluttered over the border hamlets they had fled, this was payback time.

I was to learn that they were shooting at Jeremy Bowen, the BBC correspondent, and
his Lebanese cameraman. Inside the car, Abed Taboush, a veteran driver and "fixer"
known and loved by hundreds of journalists who had been taken under his wing over
25 years, was dead.

I first met Mr Taboush in January. It was the finest contact a novice could make.
A guarded attitude gave way to enormous warmth. He insisted that I meet his family.
In the hours between risky trips through South Lebanon's tribal maze, Abed would
clutch a cold beer and render his listeners tearful with laughter at his irreverent
descriptions of our colleagues.

I last sat beside him on Sunday when he drove me to Beirut airport. He told me then
that he feared his luck would run out. "I have been so lucky all my life," he said.

His car was well-known to the Israelis. Two weeks before he was killed, he and I
were in Mjdal Zun when Israeli gunners shelled us for 40 minutes.  "They know me!
They know me!" he said with a smile.

He had driven through artillery bombardments, braved helicopter cannon fire to bring
his cameramen into the heart of hundreds of battles. But his wife and friends had
begged him to stay away from the south during the Israeli retreat.

In 1996 he was the first into the Qana massacre, when Israeli gunners killed 130
people queueing for bread at a UN bakery. In the same month he carried the 11 dead
of one family out of the cellar where they had been killed by an Israeli 
"bunker-buster"
bomb.

Yesterday I watched what amounted to his execution. Mr Bowen told of how he and
Mr Taboush had stopped to film us: the group of spectators with ringside seats on
the front line. "I got out of the car with the cameraman and waved my arms so that
the Israelis could see that we were not armed. I was wearing a pink shirt [unusual
attire for a Hezbollah fighter]," he said.

Then a massive explosion ripped Mr Taboush's car apart and the Israelis used the
tank's machinegun to try to kill the rest of the BBC crew. At Menara, a religious
kibbutz, soldiers said that "two terrorists" has escaped and they were trying to
gun them down. A Red Cross team that tried to retrieve Mr Taboush's body also came
under fire.

I had spoken to Mr Taboush and Mr Bowen yesterday morning. They were in good spirits.
"Be careful, stay safe," I said.

FROM SAM KILEY IN MENARA - The Times, London - 5/24/00




.
   MID-EAST REALITIES
   http://www.MiddleEast.Org
  Phone:  202 362-5266  Fax:  815 366-0800
  Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To receive MER regularly email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with subject SUBSCRIBE
To stop receiving MER email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with subject UNSUBSCRIBE

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:

Re: [CTRL] Gladiator; Argentus Scoutus? OHIO-RIVER . . . AWAY!

2000-05-24 Thread Daryl Stambaugh

THE MARKET PLACE SPEAKS!

AOL maintains a running poll   [ YUCH!! gag me with a spoon]   in their movie
review section wherein visitors vote on several characteristics of currently
running movies.
I have listed below, the totals for several movies on that list; I have
included only two of the figures listed for each film.
The first figure is the number of visitors who entered their vote about the
film and the second figure is the percentage of those voting who would
recommend the movie to others as worth screening . . .

HAMLET  201 55%
BATTLEFIELD EARTH   4,103   32%
ERIN BROKOVICH  5,907   89%
ROAD TO ELDORADO1,696   62%
GLADIATORS  23,969  93%   ***
I DREAMED OF AFRICA 962 45%
RETURN TO ME2,135   92%
U571728787%
ROAD TRIP   3,109   87%
THE SKULLS  3,493   79%
RULES OF ENGAGEMENT 2,869   87%
28 DAYS 3,352   74%
AMERICAN PSYCHO 2,395   54%
BIG KAHUNA  264 57%
COMMITTED   71  53%
DINOSAUR3,496   82%
PRICE OF GLORY  146 66%
FREQUENCY   3,921   91%
GOSSIP  843 67%
SCREWED 2,543   67%
FLINTSTONES VIVA LAS VEGAS  232245%


While examining this list, I determined to reaffirm my support for bacteria .
. . it's the only culture some people have!

Daryl Stambaugh

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Mind Chemtrol From The Sky?

2000-05-24 Thread Byron R Wahl

 I don't understand how the sickening aerial spraying is kept out of the 6 o'clock 
evening news. How? And why have no "scientists" taken up the topic. Which is worse, 
the media lid, or the aerial spraying. I've seen the chemtrails and I wasn't 
hallucinating!
--

On Wed, 24 May 2000 05:49:04   nessie wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED],Internet writes:


-Original Message-

From: Steve Wingate [EMAIL PROTECTED]

(snip)


From:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

(snip)


To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


(snip)


This morning Art Bell had a guest on his show named William Thomas.  He
is a
chemtrail investigator who lives in Aspen, Colorado.  At one point in the
chilling discussion, Thomas said he'd received an e-mail from a man who
said
he was a former NOAA (National Ocean and Atmospheric Agency?) pilot.



So let me get this straight.  Nicky says that Steve says that ManBrad says
that a guy on the Art Bell show says that he got an email from a guy he
says is named Thomas who says some guys whose names we don't know but he
claims were "meteorologists" made faces once so we're supposed to be
scared the sky is falling.

Yeah. OK. Sure.

Maybe the sky is really falling. Hey, it could happen. But this is not
evidence that the sky is falling. This is fifth-hand hearsay from people
we have never even met. We have  no proof whatsoever that any of them even
exist. For all we know for certain they could all be literary creations,
characters in some psycho-drama psy-op. Whatever they are, evidence they
are not. Evidence they do not present. And if we can't learn how to tell
the difference between hearsay and evidence, we are doomed to be herded
like livestock for the rest of our lives.

On the other hand, yeah, the government does do spray stuff in the air
sometimes. For example: two miles from where I sit right now they once
sprayed serratia marcescens into the air and infected the entire SF Bay
Area. See: A High Form of Killing by Robert Harris and Jeremy Paxman, ISBN
0-8090-5471-x, p 156.

So we cannot, and should not, dismiss out of hand the possibility that
foul play is afoot here. But let's be rational and follow the basic rules
of logic and evidence as we investigate the possibility. How would you,
personally, like to be convicted in a court of law and then imprisoned on
the basis of fifth-hand hearsay? I didn't think so. So please, show us
some common courtesy here and don't attempt to imprison our minds in a
cage of unsubstianted claims, wild rumors and disinformation.

The government, and the entities the animate it,  all have a long, thick,
rich history of engaging in massive disinformation campaigns. Is the whole
chemtrail affair a psy-op? We don't know yet. We may never know.  And we
don't know what else it is or isn't, either.

But we do what hearsay is, don't we? I do. If you don't, go buy a goddam
dictionary.

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance not soap-boxing please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory' with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Get your FREE Email at http://mailcity.lycos.com
Get your PERSONALIZED START PAGE at http://my.lycos.com

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Re: [CTRL] Rejected posting to CTRL@LISTSERV.AOL.COM

2000-05-24 Thread Byron R Wahl

 I received no indication that my earlier questions and comments on chemtrails had 
been successfully transmitted by mailcity.com  Yahoo is the only one that doesn't 
drive me nuts but it's already busy with prj and M.O.M.
(M.O.M. certainly presents some astounding info at times.)
--

On Wed, 24 May 2000 14:28:31   L-Soft list server at America Online (1.8d) wrote:
Your message  is being returned to  you unprocessed because it  appears to have
already been  distributed to the CTRL  list. That is, a  message with identical
text (but  possibly with different  mail headers) has  been posted to  the list
recently, either by you or by someone else. If you have a good reason to resend
this message  to the  list (for instance  because you have  been notified  of a
hardware failure with  loss of data), please  alter the text of  the message in
some way and resend  it to the list. Note that altering  the "Subject:" line or
adding blank lines at  the top or bottom of the message  is not sufficient; you
should  instead add  a  sentence or  two  at  the top  explaining  why you  are
resending the  message, so that the  other subscribers understand why  they are
getting two copies of the same message.

 Rejected message (131 lines) -
Received: from mailcity.com (fes-qout.whowhere.com [209.1.236.7])
 by listserv.aol.com (8.8.8/8.8.8)
 with SMTP id OAA24543 for [EMAIL PROTECTED];
 Wed, 24 May 2000 14:28:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from Unknown/Local ([?.?.?.?]) by mailcity.com; Wed May 24 11:28:19 2000
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
"Conspiracy Theory Research List" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 14:28:19 -0400
From: "Byron R Wahl" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Sent-Mail: on
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: MailCity Service
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Mind Chemtrol From The Sky?
X-Sender-Ip: 209.198.116.53
Organization: MailCity  (http://www.mailcity.lycos.com:80)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Language: en
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

 I don't understand how the sickening aerial spraying is kept out of the 6 o'clock 
evening news. How? And why have no "scientists" taken up the topic. Which is worse, 
the media lid, or the aerial spraying. I've seen the chemtrails and I wasn't 
hallucinating!
--

On Wed, 24 May 2000 05:49:04   nessie wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED],Internet writes:


-Original Message-

From: Steve Wingate [EMAIL PROTECTED]

(snip)


From:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

(snip)


To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


(snip)


This morning Art Bell had a guest on his show named William Thomas.  He
is a
chemtrail investigator who lives in Aspen, Colorado.  At one point in the
chilling discussion, Thomas said he'd received an e-mail from a man who
said
he was a former NOAA (National Ocean and Atmospheric Agency?) pilot.



So let me get this straight.  Nicky says that Steve says that ManBrad says
that a guy on the Art Bell show says that he got an email from a guy he
says is named Thomas who says some guys whose names we don't know but he
claims were "meteorologists" made faces once so we're supposed to be
scared the sky is falling.

Yeah. OK. Sure.

Maybe the sky is really falling. Hey, it could happen. But this is not
evidence that the sky is falling. This is fifth-hand hearsay from people
we have never even met. We have  no proof whatsoever that any of them even
exist. For all we know for certain they could all be literary creations,
characters in some psycho-drama psy-op. Whatever they are, evidence they
are not. Evidence they do not present. And if we can't learn how to tell
the difference between hearsay and evidence, we are doomed to be herded
like livestock for the rest of our lives.

On the other hand, yeah, the government does do spray stuff in the air
sometimes. For example: two miles from where I sit right now they once
sprayed serratia marcescens into the air and infected the entire SF Bay
Area. See: A High Form of Killing by Robert Harris and Jeremy Paxman, ISBN
0-8090-5471-x, p 156.

So we cannot, and should not, dismiss out of hand the possibility that
foul play is afoot here. But let's be rational and follow the basic rules
of logic and evidence as we investigate the possibility. How would you,
personally, like to be convicted in a court of law and then imprisoned on
the basis of fifth-hand hearsay? I didn't think so. So please, show us
some common courtesy here and don't attempt to imprison our minds in a
cage of unsubstianted claims, wild rumors and disinformation.

The government, and the entities the animate it,  all have a long, thick,
rich history of engaging in massive disinformation campaigns. Is the whole
chemtrail affair a psy-op? We don't know yet. We may never know.  And we
don't know what else it is or isn't, either.

But we do what hearsay is, don't we? I do. If you don't, go buy a goddam
dictionary.

A 

Re: [CTRL] Mind Chemtrol From The Sky?

2000-05-24 Thread nessie

[EMAIL PROTECTED],Internet writes:

 I've seen the chemtrails and I wasn't hallucinating!



I've seen 'em, too, twice. That doesn't mean I know what they are. Unlike
some people, I have the common decency to not say that I do when I know
that I don't. More importantly, I don't repeat hearsay and treat it as
fact. As far as I'm concerned, doing that just plays into the hands of
whoever is behind whatever they are.

Twice this spring I have seen the famous cross-hatch pattern over the city
of San Francisco. I've avoided writing about it so far because I don't
want to contribute to confusion and growing hysteria and because i haven't
figured out what the hell is happening with this. But I go outside every
day a couple times a day to walk my dog and every day I look up at the
sky. I am intimately familiar with the contrail patterns normally produced
by traffic at our local airports. These cross-hatches were substantially
different.

The first one I saw from my bike as I was riding near the Panhandle of
Golden Gate Park. It appeared to be over North Beach, downtown and Pacific
Heights. This was last February. The second was a couple of weeks ago. I
was on Ocean Beach, near Kelly's Cove. This second cross-hatch appeared to
be over the Sunset district. I'm on that beach every single day and I've
never seen anything like this before or since. At two of the contrail
intersections a peculiarity of light took place. One was a patch of
iridescent turquoise. The sky was a uniform, cloudless azure. The
turquoise patch stood out prominently. The other anomaly, also at an
intersection of two of the trails, was an iridescent brownish orange. Both
were bright, clear and above all uniform, laser-like, single frequency
colors. That's weird, thinks I immediately, that looks like somebody is
shining  lasers on those things. But I shut up about it till now because,
like I said, I don't want to fan the hysteria, at least not till I'm sure
what I'm talking about. I don't, but I'd very much like to.

What did I see? Anybody care to venture a guess?

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] George W. Bush's Booze And Drug Problems...'

2000-05-24 Thread Thomas A. Butler

A very interesting commentary on the past of Bush.  Can we ever
get a candidate for prez that does not lie, cheat, or embarass
themselves?



-
Sent using MailStart.com ( http://MailStart.Com/welcome.html )
The FREE way to access your mailbox via any web browser, anywhere!

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] state of CTRL list

2000-05-24 Thread Andrew Hennessey

hi,

I signed off the CTRL list a month or so ago - and have recently rejoined
to find that the nature of the conspiracy information coming through has
polarised itself into several basic sets.

1. the long running jews and nazis thing
2. NRA vs. the FEDS
3. pseudo skeptical denial of the existence of ET life
4. the american elections  assorted lion baiting

It was not so long ago that we were collectively dealing with the y2k stuff,
where various ex-military experts were talking about the end of the world,
roundups and the beast incarnate announcing the nwo.
I kept all of these posts.
I even urged my mom and dad to stock up short term on basic essentials.

I remember then posting words to the effect that nothing would happen -
and luckily for me - nothing did ... to me it seemed like nothing was going
to shift the wall of silence even if we wanted it to - the inexorable grind
of the mass cull goes on whether we're hotheaded or not - eg. chemtrails,
gm foods etc
I think that it will take cool reasoning and some sense of perspective -
for it may be that the predominately american list has become unsettled.

I detect [from someone not exposed to the daily US political hype] that
this list has been seriously wound up.

Yes these are severe issues and a great deal is at stake - but so was Y2K
remember - committing too early to a course of action - hotheads being
flushed out of the moderates is my interpretation.

I think you guys have been got somehow.

I'm sorry if these comments offend anyone - I'm just trying to be helpful

andrew

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Fw::afp- Macedonian police seize Albanian with 57 kilos of marijuana

2000-05-24 Thread Mrs. Jela Jovanovic, Secretary General

-Original Message-
From: Aleksandar Stojsic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tuesday, May 23, 2000 9:30 PM
Subject: SN796:afp- Macedonian police seize Albanian with 57 kilos of
marijuana


 SKOPJE, May 23 (AFP) - Macedonian police and customs officers
seized 57 kilos (125 pounds) of marijuana worth around (130,000
dollars/144,000 euros) on Tuesday at a crossing on the Bulgarian
border, police said.
   The drug, of Albanian origin and destined for the Turkish
market, was hidden in a car driven by an Albanian, who was arrested,
they said.
   In April, Macedonian police seized 465 kilos (1,023 pounds) of
marijuana at a border crossing with Albania.



A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Fw: SN790:Bosnian Posavina (Part Eight)

2000-05-24 Thread Mrs. Jela Jovanovic, Secretary General

-


-Original Message-
From: Elich, Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'siemvesti' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tuesday, May 23, 2000 8:01 PM
Subject: SN790:Bosnian Posavina (Part Eight)



PART EIGHT

3.5.3. Humiliation, Harassment and Intimidation

The testimonies of all the former inmates of the prison camps, of Serbian
nationality, given before the court, confirm that further to the above
almost impossible living conditions regarding accommodation, food and
hygiene in which the Serbs were living as inmates of the prison camps in
Odzak which were beneath any human dignity, further to a multitude of
forms
of torture - body injuries inflicted on the inmates (as described
hereinabove), and harassment of the inmates which shall be discussed
further
in this report, members of the Serbian nationality were also in different
ways exposed to humiliation and intimidation.

We shall state here several concrete examples of humiliation and
intimidation.

3.5.3.1. In the month of May 1992 in the prison camp located in the
premises
of the Primary School in Odzak, Hodzic Adisa, member of the military
police
of the 102nd Odzak Brigade ordered the Serb inmate G.Z. to take off all of
his clothes and then brought into the room a German boxer dog and took off
the dog's protection basket but the dog on that occasion did not hurt the
inmate.

EVIDENCE: witness 280/95-39

3.5.3.2. In the prison camp located in the premises of the Primary School
in
Odzak during the year 1992 the inmates were ordered to hit each other, to
lick the blood off the floor, to lick the boots of the staff, to hit the
blackboard or the wall with their heads.

EVIDENCE: witness 280/95-7

3.5.3.3. In the prison camp in the Primary School in Odzak during the year
1992 Terzic Albina called "Nina" member of the HVO military police,
ordered
the inmates to take off their pants and underwear and her dog the big Dane
would sniffle their sexual organs.

EVIDENCE: witness 191/94-13.

3.5.3.4. In the prison camp in Odzak during one "interrogation" during the
month of May - June 1992 Nikolic Zdenko, member of the HVO military police
of the 102nd Odzak Brigade, who was physically torturing on several
occasions the inmate 191/94-4 from Trnjak, threw in front of him several
pork bones that he was eating, saying:

"Eat this, curse your Chetnik mother, this is for you, you are no better
than the dogs".

EVIDENCE: witness 191/94-4

3.5.3.5. GOLUBOVIC ANTO, as the prison camp commander in Odzak, TOLIC
JOSIP,
as the chief of the guards shift and TERZIC ALBINA called "Nina", several
times organized the so-called "Camp Wedding" - of a woman inmate and a man
inmate, members of Serbian nationality, with the music and in their
presence
and the presence of other inmates, forcing them to have a public sexual
intercourse.

EVIDENCE: 191/94-4 and 191/94-13

3.5.3.6. The witness 476/94-7 (born in 1960) testifies, inter alia, that
in
the prison camp in Odzak the following was happening:

"...They took out J.G. and Dj.K. In front of every body they were forcing
J
to suck the sexual organ of Dj, and then to put a finger in each other's
anus and lick the fingers..."

This witness, certainly under the impression of everything that he
suffered
in the prison camps, is saying:

"...The other martyrs can not complete this picture of humiliation and
torture by their testimonies. They were killed. That is why I can say only
one thing: those Serbs who are again in favor of the false brotherhood and
unity, I wish to God that they will fall into the hands of their
"brothers"..."

3.5.3.7. It should be mentioned that in the presented survey of the
methods
of torture - humiliation, harassment and intimidation committed against
the
members of Serbian nationality in the prison camps in the area of Bosnian
Posavina, in this report in the section 3.2. presentation was given for
the
said forms of humiliation, harassment in the prison camps of Odzak as well
and the evidence numbers quoted, so we shall not repeat this here.

Furthermore, from the said presentation it is determined that in the
prison
camps in Odzak the other forms of humiliation, torture and intimidation
were
present.

We shall state here several of them:

A group bathing of naked inmates, even in front of citizens, by a jet of
ice
cold water under pressure (evidence: witnesses 55/85-8, 424/95-41);
Forcing of inmates to kiss the boots of the guards and then kicking of the
inmate on the head with the same boot (evidence: witness 424/95-34)

For all the stated crimes against civilian population - members of Serbian
nationality, the direct responsible perpetrators are, of course, the
individuals whose names were stated, and certainly Golubovic Anto as the
prison camp commander.

3.5.4. Killing of Serbian Inmates in the Prison Camps in Odzak

Further to the already presented various types of torture - body injuring
of
inmates, members of Serbian nationality in the prison camps in Odzak, the
presented poor, almost impossible, living conditions 

[CTRL] Fw: SN791:Bosnian Posavina (Part Nine)

2000-05-24 Thread Mrs. Jela Jovanovic, Secretary General


-Original Message-
From: Elich, Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'siemvesti' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tuesday, May 23, 2000 8:06 PM
Subject: SN791:Bosnian Posavina (Part Nine)



PART NINE

3.6.4.4. BLAGOJEVIC DESANKA, a nurse from Tesanj, was killed during the
transfer of the Serb inmates from the prison camp in Bosanski Brod to the
prison camp in Slavonski Brod. Mlivic Kadrija from Sijekovac, member of
the
101st Bosnian Brdska Brigade killed her from fire arms. Previously she was
detained in the prison camps in Brod - at the stadium and in the Secondary
School Center. Her liquidation was preceded by the most ruthless torture
and
rape perpetrated by Mlivic Kadrija, together with Jurkovic called
"Mangas",
also a member of the 101st Bosnian Brdska Brigade.

About the torture to which Blagojevic Desanka was subjected testified
several witnesses:

The witness 584/94-14 stated the following before the investigating judge:

"...I also know that at the prison camp in the stadium there was a medical
nurse Desa Blagojevic from Tesanj, I think she was born in 1946. She was
raped in front of us in the room in which I was detained. I remember that
upon the return from interrogation on one occasion she was all burnt up.
Her
posterior was all burnt and she told us that they forced her to sit on a
red
hot stove and that they were placing the red hot fire on the other parts
of
her body. I saw myself her burnt up posterior because I was personally
washing her up together with a certain M. I do not know her family name.
That woman was washed also by a certain M.R.. I think she is from
Odzak...During the transfer to Slavonski Brod, since Desa was all beaten
up
and burnt up, she could not move without assistance from others and she
was
helped by M.R. Suddenly a round of ammunition was fired and afterwards
M.R.
told us that Desa was killed by a certain Kadrija Mlivic who was
transferring us. She told me that I will not have to wash Desa any
more..."

The witness 267/94-2 (584/94-32) testifies as follows:

"...Lukica Jozic from Kovac was the commander in chief of the prison camp
in
the stadium. In that Ustashi bestial lard I had spent about one month. In
that period they brought also Desanka...she was working abroad and was
going
home. She fell into the Ustashi hands and experienced a terrible fate. She
was not only raped. They pulled all the hair from her head, so that she
was
bald. They were placing her naked on the red hot electric stove. She was
all
burnt up. They were literally frying her posterior, elbows and knees. She
was lying immobile. The burnt up parts of her body were stinking - the
live
meat on her body started to putrefy...Before they killed her they raped
her
and so deformed...on the red hot stove they fried her - Jurkovic called
"Mangas" from Bosanski Brod, Ustashi with the nick name of "Bekan" and
"Cicak", both from Sijekovac. I will remember for ever her terrible
screams,
how she cried the terrible insufferable screams of anguish. She was taken
out by a Ustasha who came with a huge dog...During the liberation of Brod
by
the Republic of Srpska Army in early October 1992, Ustashi ordered us all,
suffering and exhausted, to cross the bridge by running between Bosanski
and
Slavonski Brod. So burnt up and physically completely destroyed Desanka
could not walk. She was killed by Kadrija Mlivic and Jurkovic called
"Mangas". They both shot at her from their guns and this I have seen with
my
own eyes and have remembered as one of the terrible images that I shall
forever have on my mind..."

The witness 593/94-29 (280/95-45), born in 1951, stated, inter alia, the
following:

"... In late September 1992 the said group was transferred to the
Secondary
School Center "Fric Pavlik" in Brod where the prison camp was located from
the people from the area of Brod and Odzak and where we remained until
October 6, 1992, when the inmates were, on foot and in a column, taken
over
the bridge on Sava river to Slavonski Brod. During the crossing of the
bridge, I was helping a woman, some 40 years old, I think she was called
Desanka, who was from rape and torture almost unable to move, and
furthermore her skin on knees and elbows was all in wounds because she was
roasted on the stove. During the last day she was talking without much
sense. Then I took her across the bridge in a group with the other
inmates.
She could no longer walk and although it was raining, she lied down in the
wet grass close to the bridge. Then a certain Kadrija from Sijekovac,
approached, a younger man and of medium height, of poor under nourished
build, with short brown curly hair, later I heard in Orasje that his
family
name is Mlivic or Milvic, and with him were another two or three to me
unknown persons, military policemen who were escorting the column of
inmates. After he had approached us, Kadrija started cursing and told me
"You go on, we will take care of her". After I crossed some hundred
meters,
I heard two or three shots, I can not say whether 

[CTRL] Antiglobalization

2000-05-24 Thread Nurev Ind Research

The following article appeared in Left Business Observer #71, January 1996.
It was written by Doug Henwood, editor
and publisher. It retains its copyright and may not be reprinted or
redistributed in any form - print, electronic,
facsimile, anything - without the permission of LBO.

   Antiglobalization

Since the heavily advertised death of socialism, if there's an idea that
unites much leftish economic thought today, it's that globalization is the
root of many evils. It's a strangely amorphous enemy, one at odds with the
usual progressive celebration of diversity, and an interesting shift for a
tradition that was once deeply cosmopolitan.

An excellent laboratory for studying antiglobalism was assembled in New York
in November by the International Forum on Globalization, "a project of El
Bosque." El Bosque is a project of Doug Tompkins, cofounder of Esprit. The
one delightful thing about the conference was the attendance -- 2,000, with
a pleasingly low median age. Many more of these conferences are promised
over the next few years.

The opening plenary, held in Riverside Church (a project of the Rockefeller
family), assembled a long night's worth of speakers -- Maude Barlow (Council
of Canadians), John Cavanagh (Institute for Policy Studies), Barbara Dudley
(Greenpeace), David Korten (author), Ralph Nader, Carl Pope (Sierra Club),
and Vandana Shiva (Third World Network). The MC was adman Jerry Mander, who
believes that TV, which he hates, will soon implode of its own
contradictions. Mander is on the board of El Bosque and is the program
director for Tompkins' Foundation for Deep Ecology, whose funding was
acknowledged, along with that of the Goldsmith Foundation.

Korten's book When Corporations Rule the World embodies a lot of the
antiglobalist thinking common among progressive nongovernmental
organizations (NGOs) and the philanthropists who fund them. The volume,
subsidized in part by Tompkins, is blurbed by Archbishop Desmond Tutu; John
Cavanagh and Richard Barnet, authors of Global Dreams; catalog merchant and
economic moralist Paul Hawken; Doug Tompkins; and Teddy Goldsmith, editor of
The Ecologist. The New Internationalist just reviewed it enthusiastically.

In his prologue, Korten says he was born "into a conservative, white
upper-middle-class family" who ran a retail business in a small Washington
timber town -- and the unexamined consciousness of a small-town worthy
permeates the entire book. He went to Stanford, got an MBA and PhD; taught
at the Harvard Business School, which he left for the Ford Foundation and
then the U.S. Agency for International Development (AID). Korten shares
these details "to establish the depth of [his] conservative roots" -- a
theme that recurs in his hymns to Adam Smith. While with AID, Korten had an
epiphany -- AID was too big, too bureaucratic, and too centralized, stifling
local autonomy and initiative. He left AID for the NGO world, where people
were "asking basic questions about the nature and process of development."

Korten exhibits an American distaste of big government, without noticing
that the U.S. has one of the most decentralized state systems on earth. This
decentralization has accomplished not local "empowerment" (a word that
deserves a long vacation) but fragmentation, duplication, and bidding wars
for corporate investment -- not to mention Jim Crow laws.

The Garden

It's common in quasi-radical thinking to imagine a Golden Age with a better
set of rulers, now displaced by vile usurpers. In the old days, says Korten,
"rich and poor alike...shared a sense of national and community interest."
So "the problem is not business or the market per se but a badly corrupted
global economic system that is gyrating far beyond human control. The
dynamics of this system have become so powerful and perverse that it is
becoming increasingly difficult for corporate managers to manage in the
public interest, no matter how strong their moral values and commitment."

When was this Golden Age? The 1960s, when GE was filling the Hudson with
PCBs? The 1930s, when Chase was banking with Nazis? Or the 1890s, when
Carnegie's Pinkertons shot strikers? Was it the 1850s, when British
industrialists kidnapped children to work in their factories, and when the
locally owned bakeries of London worked their staffs up to 20 hours a day to
produce bread fortified with, in the words of a contemporary, "a certain
quantity of human perspiration mixed with the discharge of abscesses,
cobwebs, dead cockroaches and putrid German yeast, not to mention alum, sand
and other agreeable mineral ingredients"?

Golden Age myths belong to literature, not nonfictions, but even there they
vanish on close inspection. As Raymond Williams tells it in The Country and
the City, Leavis' 1930s culture lamented the loss of the "organic community"
of the turn of the century; just before the century's turn, Hardy wrote of
the lost England of the 1830s; the 1830s had Cobbett writing of the 

[CTRL] Boom for whom?

2000-05-24 Thread Nurev Ind Research

Boom for whom?

This is an update, and not an exhaustive treatment of the subject. For a more
thorough income
and poverty workout, see articles in LBO issues 61, 65, 66, 69, 80, and 86, the
supplement on
income and poverty on this site, or Doug Henwood's book A New Economy?, due
later this year
from Verso.

"Boom" is the word typically used to describe the U.S. economy these days.
True enough if you own stocks. But, according to the Census Bureau's annual
reports on income and poverty published last fall, the median U.S. household
- the one in the very middle of the income distribution, with half the
households above it, and half below - was only just a hair better off in
1998 than it was in 1989. In fact, most of the boom years have been devoted
to recovering the income losses of the early 1990s. Poor households - those
in the bottom 20% of the income distribution - still hadn't recovered 1989's
level. And this in a time when GDP was up almost 30% after adjustment for
inflation - 14% per capita, after accounting for population increase.


graph


So where'd all the growth go? It went mainly into the pockets of the richest
5%, whose incomes are up 22% since 1989, with more than half of it coming in
the last 5 years. (And though the Census figures don't show it, other
sources show that those gains mainly went to the top 1shy;2%.) Inequality
of family incomes in 1998, as measured by the Gini index (see box on facing
page), was at its highest ever since the Census Bureau started publishing
annual figures in 1947; that for the broader category of households (which
includes singles and nonfamily arrangements) fell slightly from 1997's
record level. Figures for years before 1947 are hard to come by, but by at
least one measure - that assembled by Eugene Smolensky and Robert Plotnick -
the U.S. hasn't seen this level of polarization since the 1930s. The figures
are much worse than the 1980s, when people used to worry more loudly about
inequality; now, with a Democrat in the White House, think-tank liberals are
less likely to moan.


graph?


Finer details

The gender gap narrowed slightly from 1997 to 1998, but that progress has
slowed considerably in recent years. Women earned 54% as much as men in
1998, barely higher than 4 years earlier. For year-round, full-time workers,
women earned 74% as much as men, slightly lower than in 1996. It's hard to
tell whether this is just a pause, or something of longer-term significance;
one reason to believe the former is that men tend to work in more cyclical
industries, like manufacturing, so they do relatively better in good times
and relatively worse in bad ones. But maybe women have run into an
economy-wide glass ceiling. We'll see.


Racial/ethnic gaps are a mixed bag. Though the black/white differential has
been closing raggedly since the late 1980s, that's not true of the last
couple of years (though it should be pointed out that this is because white
incomes were up more strongly than black, not because of a decline in black
incomes). So-called "Hispanic" households - the skeptical phrasing and
punctuation is an expression of doubt that this category has much analytical
power, given the vast difference between the groups gathered under this
single label - have been doing better in recent years. But that bounce
barely compensates for the widening of the income gap from the early 1980s
into the early 1990s, which is mainly the result of the arrival of poorer
immigrants. (For more on immigration see p. 8.) [Article in print edition;
not on this site.]

Poverty

The poverty rate declined slightly from 1997 to 1998, from 11.6% to 11.2% -
but the trend over the last 20 years has been remarkably flat, despite
supposed boom conditions. And that's by a very flawed measure. The U.S.
poverty line was established nearly 50 years ago, on the basis of some very
casual research: the government's estimate of a minimal food budget was
simply multiplied by three, on the rationale that households spent an
average of one-third of their incomes on food, and that level has been
adjusted for inflation ever since. No adjustment has been made for rising
average incomes or changing consumption norms. As a result, the poverty line
has continued to decline as a percentage of median incomes - from 43% of the
median in 1959 to 33% in 1982 to 28% in 1998. Were poverty defined more
reasonably - like, say, half the median income, a common metric among
academic researchers - U.S. poverty rates would be half again to twice as
high as they are.

The good news about poverty is that the black poverty rate is the lowest on
record, by a very flawed measure. The bad news is that almost 28% of
female-headed households are officially poor, and 19% of our children live
in poor households. The amount of money it would take to bring all
officially poor households up to the poverty line is amazingly small: 0.5%
of GDP, or just over 3% of the income of the richest fifth of households. It
would take a bit more 

Re: [CTRL] Was America Founded as a Christian Nation?

2000-05-24 Thread Nurev Ind Research

Franklin Wayne Poley wrote:

 On Tue, 23 May 2000, Nurev Ind Research wrote:

  How could this ever compare with my main rival Allan Greenspan whose economic
  theories are based on those of yet another co-religionist of ours, Ayn Rand.

 Are all you co-religionists atheists or do you all have the same "genetic
 markers" for religion x?
 FWP.


Poley, That is a very intelligent question.

J2

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] You are a fraud.

2000-05-24 Thread Nurev Ind Research

Franklin Wayne Poley wrote:

 On Tue, 23 May 2000, Nurev Ind Research wrote:

  5/23/00
 
  It's over now Yair. Genetics have put an end to your con game. No more
  extracting
  book money from those pathetic Biblical Israelite wannabes.
 
  You should be made to pay back every penny you got from these idiots.
 
  If I lived in Israel, I would have you and those Bible Code con men arrested
  for intentionally defrauding the public.
 
  Find new snake oil to sell the idiots buddy, this con is over. Genetic markers
  have defined who's who.
 
  Joshua2

 What markers, J2?
 FWP.

Magic markers Poley.

J2

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] CIA, AFL-CIO, and Pinochet

2000-05-24 Thread Nurev Ind Research

What a spectacular find Kris.

This is superb. This will go into my " understanding the New World Order "
under Foxes in the Hen House. A section which explains why the Labor Elite
are part of the Corporate Elite.

Thanks.

Joshua2

Kris Millegan wrote:

 Click Here: A HREF="http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/42a/126.html"CIA,
 AFL-CIO, and Pinochet/A
 -
 Documents menu
 
 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Thu, 3 Dec 1998 01:57:00 -0800
 Reply-To: Forum on Labor in the Global Economy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sender: Forum on Labor in the Global Economy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 From: Kim Scipes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: CIA, AFL-CIO, and Pinochet
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

 CIA, AFL-CIO, and Pinochet

 From Kim Scipes
 2 December 1998

 December 2, 1998
 Dear Folks--
 I am delighted to hear that the Clinton Administration has decided to release
 some of the files relating to the tortures and killing of Pinochet (New York
 Times, December 2, 1998)." But they should fully disclose all of their files
 not only about events during Pinochet's rule, but for all of the events of
 which they have knowledge, and I especially refer to events both before and
 during the coup against the Allende government.

 The Times reports that "The secret files on the Pinochet regime are held by
 the CIA, the Defense Intelligence Agency, the State Department, the Pentagon,
 the National Security Council, the National Archives, the Presidential
 libraries of Gerald R. Ford and Jimmy Carter, and other governmental
 agencies."

 However, already high-level CIA officials--unidentified, of course--are
 arguing against such disclosure." In fact, a former CIA official who served
 in Chile was quoted in theTimes as saying, "The CIA had nothing to do with
 the coup ... but it wasn't a complete surprise."

 As Bill Cosby might say, "Right!"

 It's time for a little labor history." This is going to be a little long,
 since I'm going to try to tie a lot of stuff together." But damn few people
 know this story, and I think it will be worth following me to the end of this
 message."

 In 1987, the Meiklejohn Civil Liberties Union in Berkeley, California
 published a quite interesting two volume work entitled The Cold War Against
 Labor, focusing primarily on the period in the late 1940s-early 1950s, but
 not entirely--they also published some material that was contemporaneous."
 This, incidentally, was an anthology edited by Ann Fagan Ginger and David
 Christiano." (Meiklejohn can be reached at P.O. Box 673, Berkeley, CA 94701,
 USA.)

 In Volume 2, there is a fascinating article on pages 723-768 by Fred Hirsch
 and Virginia Muir, that I recommend highly." The article, told from Fred's
 perspective, is titled "A Plumber Gets Curious About Exporting McCarthyism.""
 Fred, at that time, was a plumber and long-time member of Plumbers  Fitters
 Local 393; Viriginia a member of Local 29, Office and Professional Employees
 International Union, both affiliated to the AFL-CIO." [AFL-CIO stands for
 American Federation of Labor-Congress of Industrial Organizations:" this is
 the result of a 1955 merger between two separate organizations, although some
 of the CIO unions had been in the AFL before a split in 1935.]" Fred and
 Virigina lived in San Jose, California." (And although it's been a while
 since I've seen either of them, Fred and I worked together some in the 1980s
 to counter the AFL-CIO's international labor operations.)

 Fred investigated the coup in Chile after it had taken place, and found that
 the AFL-CIO had been deeply involved." He presented his evidence to the Santa
 Clara County Labor Council, and the Labor Council condemned the AFL-CIO role
 in Chile." This article includes some of Fred's material about AFL-CIO labor
 activities in Latin America, in Chile and elsewhere.
 This is a very detailed and extensive article that is extensively
 referenced--and I am going to try to summarize it." One word of warning--the
 article is very long, and to save space, the editors sometimes referred to
 the same entry several times, so they just referred to the general work and
 not to specific pages." This will probably irritate some readers, but it's a
 problem of the editing, not of my citing." This is complex, so you will have
 to be patient--I need to tell enough to make this comprehensible.

 
 We have to go back to the founding of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)
 in 1919." The "CFR calls itself a 'non-partisan and non-commercial
 organization studying the international aspects of America's political,
 economic, strategic and financial problems,' such study leading to 'actions
 the US or elements in the US should take about particular problems or
 questions in the world."" [Hirsch  Muir (hereafter, HM): 728]."

 [Kim note:" 

Re: [CTRL] allegations against priests

2000-05-24 Thread Smart News

Dear List,

Below please find an article about allegations against priests.

Sincerely,  Neil Brick


excerpt from http://www.tremont-sheldon.com/church/church.html

This article may be triggering for survivors of abuse.

all accusations are alleged

Sexual Abuse by Priests

Citizens of Connecticut were shocked in January of 1993 when two lawsuits
were brought on behalf of individuals who were (allegedly) sexually abused by
... a Catholic Priest in the Diocese of Bridgeport. Over the next two months,
fifteen additional individuals stepped forward claiming that they too were
sexually abused...
The publicity of the ... case empowered other victims of sexual abuse by
Catholic Priests to step forward.

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Message From Lloyd Pye

2000-05-24 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

 Hello, Everyone!

  For four hours tomorrow night I will be on the Coast To Coast
show (Art Bell's old haunt) with Mike Siegel. This will be my
"get acquainted" session with Mike, and I look forward to meeting
him. We are supposed to be going over some of my old material
about hominoids and human origins, but we will also go over some
of the new material I have been discovering about human origins
while doing research for Book Two. The most important of these is
my exploration of the so-called "aquatic theory" of man's early
development, which I feel is as significant as anything I have
ever found in this field.  And, of course, I will have the latest
updates on the Starchild testing from the Canadian researchers.
They've turned up a couple of genuine humdingers!

  The program begins at 10:00 pm Pacific Time (1:00 am Eastern)
and runs until 2:00 am Pacific time (5:00 am Eastern). You can
listen to the program live on your computer by going to
www.artbell.com and clicking on the listen button at the top of
the page. If you can't listen live (and I realize most of you
can't), you can listen to the archive on the same page. And to
obtain a list of radio stations that carry the program live
nationally, go to http://www.artbell.com/stations.html . New
Orleans residents can hear it at WSMB, 1350 AM.

  In addition to the above, I hope to also be announcing what I
am about to tell you now as a kind of "advance preview." As most
of you know, I wrote fiction for many years. During those years I
produced a large body of material. For a long time now it has
simply been hidden from view, either unpublished or long out of
print. Now I have found a way to make ALL of my major material
available for public consumption, and I will be asking the
audience--as I am asking you now--for help in deciding how to
deal with this project.

  Because the sales end of my marketing campaign has overwhelmed
me, I can no longer meet the demand for my book and continue with
my research and writing at the same time. So I am now entering
into an agreement with a company called iUniverse
(www.iUniverse.com), which is designed to get books out to market
in both e-book format and as regular print-on-demand books. For
me this is the best of all possible worlds because it relieves me
of pressures and obligations I have simply been unable to live up
to lately.

  By the start of the show with Mike, my website will be
completely revamped to feature the six new fiction offerings I
will soon be making available as e-books and as regular books. It
addition to "Everything You Know Is Wrong,"  I will be offering
five novels and three optioned movie scripts (separately as
e-books and together as a regular book), all of which will
hopefully be available for acquisition by the end of August. But
the sequence I choose to produce them will be important because
converting each one to the proper format is difficult and time
consuming. "Everything You Know Is Wrong" will be first, of
course, so it will be available for purchase again by the end of
July. What I need to know is the order I should work on the rest
of them.

  If you can give me an hour or so from your busy life, I would
very much appreciate you reading the synopsis of each of the five
books and the screenplays (this is not as extensive as it
sounds), rank them in your order of preference, and email those
results to me. You don't have to bother with the excerpts of each
if you don't want to. Those are more of a selling tool than an
evaluation tool. And I need your feedback within the next week,
if possible, because as soon as I prepare Book One for
republication with iUniverse, I will be needing to know which of
the fiction books the majority of you would like to see made
available first. Eventually all of them will be made available,
but as you can see, the sequence I do them in will be important.

  The bad news is that this sidetrack is going to require two
months of my time, if not more. At this point I can only guess,
but it seems like a lot of work. Understand that much of what I
wrote in the old days was done on typewriters (for those of you
who can't remember that far back, they were what we used before
computers!). So every page of that material has to be scanned
into the computer and then formatted into Word.  And, of course,
some of it has to be edited to close the gap between when it was
written and today.

  Though this will have a definite negative impact on my schedule
for Book Two, I believe it will be worth it in the long run. It
is a one-time effort I will never have to make again, and it
truly is something I've been anxious to do for a long time. I was
a good fiction writer, and I'm confident that people will like my
work as much today as they did in the past. So now when someone
asks me if they can read any of my fiction, I won't have to tell
them it is all out of print. It will be available to anyone who
wants it. But not for another month or two!

  Thanks for paying 

Re: [CTRL] I TOO WOULD LIKE TO KNOW...

2000-05-24 Thread William Shannon

In a message dated 5/24/00 10:58:02 AM Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 So yes, Michael can posts more. If he oversteps his "power", this is an
 electronic jungle and the "club: will come out 'da sky. 


I'd suggest that this power is being abused then...granted his posts are
informative but c'mon!!!

Bill.

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Bush And The Jewish Vote...

2000-05-24 Thread William Shannon

Houses of the holy
George W. Bush offers an olive branch to Jewish voters while trying to set a
different tone from his father's squabbles with pro-Israel lobbying groups.

- - - - - - - - - - - -
By Jake Tapper

May 24, 2000 | In a speech to the country's most influential Zionist interest
group Monday, Texas Gov. George W. Bush tried to out-Israel Vice President Al
Gore, even issuing a stern rebuke to the Clinton administration for
"attempt(ing) to take sides in the most recent Israeli election."

"America should not interfere in Israel's democratic process," Bush said to
the thunderous applause of 1,600 delegates at the 40th annual policy
conference of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, or AIPAC. "And
America will not interfere in Israeli elections when I am president."


Democrats in the White House and the campaign trail immediately slammed
Bush's comments. Calling the charges irresponsible and baseless, Gore
spokesman Chris Lehane mocked the presumptive GOP nominee's past geographic
confusion.

"George W. Bush seems as confused about the Middle East peace process as he
was confounded about the difference between the Mediterranean Sea and the Red
Sea," said Lehane, referring to a September 1999 Bush statement in which he
apparently confused the two bodies of water. "Al Gore's leadership
credentials on facilitating the Middle East peace process are impeccable,
while Bush is suffering from an antiquated analysis, reminiscent of the
Republican approach of the 1980s."

When read Bush's remarks, National Security Council spokesman P.J. Crowley
erupted with laughter. "He's suggesting that we interfered in the Israeli
elections?" Crowley asked. After reviewing a copy of the speech, which he
called "naive" and "puzzling," Crowley stated that "U.S. administrations --
Democratic and Republican alike -- are steadfast in avoiding any interference
in the electoral processes in other countries; it's a ridiculous charge.
These have been choices for the Israeli people to make as part of a very
vibrant democratic electoral process."

But far more important than Bush's attempt to distinguish himself from Gore
was his attempt in this speech to separate his policy and position toward
Israel from that of his father.

Bush the senior was criticized in October 1991 by Morris Amitay, a past
president of AIPAC, who was quoted in the Jerusalem Report accusing a comment
by President Bush as having come "close to inciting anti-Semitism." Added
Amitay: "We no longer have a president who sees the value of a strategic
relation with a country like Israel in a region as unstable as the Middle
East."

This Bush -- continuing to reach out to traditionally Democratic voting
blocks -- however, made sure to cut quite a different figure. In his speech
Monday, Gov. Bush went on to outline several positions guaranteed to meet
with AIPAC claps -- moving the U.S. Embassy from Tel Aviv, Israel, to
Jerusalem; standing against "the ancient wrong of anti-Semitism" as most
recently demonstrated with the "unjust" imprisonment of 13 Iranian Jews
accused of espionage; military aid to Israel such as that provided by the
Arrow missile defense system. And along the way, with help from a supporter
and AIPAC board member, Mayer "Bubba" Mitchell, Bush portrayed his position
on the Middle East's lone democracy as quite different from the one held by a
certain, nameless ex-president.
"He staked out his own position and showed that he's his own man and he does
his own thing," said one official of a pro-Israel organization who attended
the conference. "It was a call to the Jewish community where he said, 'Do not
visit the sins of the father on the son.' That's how I took it, anyway, and
that's how many members of the audience took it. It was a very, very
pro-Israel speech."

Maybe it needed to be. While many AIPAC members saw Ronald Reagan as one of
the nation's most pro-Israel presidents, the Governor's father is seen by
many of those same AIPAC members as one of history's worst presidents for
U.S.-Israel relations.

Thus Bush quoted Reagan in his remarks to the AIPAC, while his father went
unmentioned.

Additionally, the man who introduced Bush -- "Bubba" Mitchell, a Mobile,
Ala., resident and past chairperson of AIPAC's board -- did reference the
younger Bush's foreign policy advisers as familiar faces, ones seen as
pro-Israel, such as Reagan Secretary of State George Shultz, "arguably the
most supportive secretary of state in the history of the state of Israel,"
according to Mitchell.

Other advisers to Gov. Bush cited by Mitchell include Richard Perle, Reagan's
assistant secretary of defense for international security policy; Ambassador
Paul Wolfowitz, Bush's undersecretary of defense for policy and dean of the
School for Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins University;
Ambassador Richard Armitage, Reagan's assistant secretary of defense for
international security affairs; and Dr. Condoleezza Rice, President Bush's
National Security 

[CTRL] Nealz Nuze Editorial

2000-05-24 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

From:

http://boortz.com/nealznuz.htm

SO --- YOU PEOPLE THOUGHT I WAS KIDDING, HUH?

Well ... You're wrong.

You are right to doubt though. As I say, don't believe anything
you hear on my program or read on my site unless it is consistent
with what you already know to be true, or you have verified the
information with other reputable sources.

Now, what are we talking about? Do you remember those storm
troopers that grabbed Elian in Miami? Well, we have an innocuous
little law working its way through the Congress that would make
it easier for Janet Reno to send those same people into your
home, conduct a search, seize or copy things such as your papers,
photos, computer disks and hard drives, and then leave.

Would they have to leave a copy of the search warrant as they do
now?

Nope.

Would they still have to leave an inventory of what they copied
or took?

Nope.

Would they still have to even notify you that they were there and
conducted the search?

Well ... yes. But not until months later.

Is this another one of those Democrat intrusions into our privacy
and rights?

Actually, no. It's Republican. The culprit is none other than
Senator Orrin Hatch of Utah.

It's all part of the absurd war on drugs. It's part of something
called the Methamphetamine Anti-Proliferation act. The purpose is
to make it easier for federal agents to bust the meth labs out
there ... but the law can be used for any other federal
enforcement activity. Searching for evidence of tax evasion.
Taking a peek to see what kind of guns you have around the house.
You name it.

Day after day politicians figure out different and innovative
ways to infringe on our privacy and chip away at our
Constitutional rights --- and, more often than not, they use the
war on drugs as their excuse.

So, here's the scenario under Hatch's nifty little law. The IRS
suspects you of not disclosing all of your income. The BATF
wonders just how many guns you own. The DEA thinks you might be
smoking a little chronic after a hard days work. So --- they use
this law to get a warrant. They enter your home while you're
away. They make copies of any papers or pictures they're
interested in. They take pictures. They copy your computer disks.
They make a copy of your hard drive. They note what types of
books you read, videos you watch, and magazines you subscribe to.
Then they leave. When you get home you have no idea they've been
there. No warrant. No notes. No thank you letter. No inventory of
items taken or copied. No nothing. Federal agents have been
crawling around your private home and you aren't even told. Not
then, anyway. Finally, four, five, six months from now you
receive a letter from the FBI, the BATF, the DEA or some other
federal agency saying something like "Oh, yeah ... we meant to
tell you that we were in your house about five months ago and we
copied all your files. Have a nice day."

But --- as the average year-2000 American would say; "Well, if
you aren't doing anything wrong you don't have anything to worry
about."

Any person who utters those words ought to have their voting
privileges revoked.

http://www.capitolhillblue.com/article2.asp?ID=203
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/bluesky_exnews/2524_xex_barr_pleads_.shtml



=
 Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  *Mike Spitzer* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

   The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
   Shalom, A Salaam Aleikum, and to all, A Good Day.
=

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL 

[CTRL] A Thomas Sowell Editorial

2000-05-24 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

"Ours may become the first civilization destroyed, not by the
power of our enemies, but by the ignorance of our teachers and
the dangerous nonsense they are teaching our children. In an age
of artificial intelligence, they are creating artificial
stupidity."

http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/sowell1.asp



Random thoughts


NO MATTER WHAT YOU SAY, some people will hear only what they want
to hear. Old age at least gives me an excuse for not being very
good at things that I was not very good at when I was young.


It is amazing how many people consider it an answer to criticism
to call it "bashing."

Apologizing for sins committed by other people in the past seems
to have become a political vogue. Considering all the wrongs
committed around the world for centuries -- against people of
every race, color, creed, national origin, and sexual orientation
-- if we are going to apologize for all that, we are not going to
have any time left to get anything else done.

Why do the people who create computer software inundate you with
so many confusing features that it is an ordeal to cut your way
through the jungle of options to try to reach the simple thing
you want to do?

It is painful watching Senator John McCain straining to keep
himself in the public eye while the Republicans' choice of a vice
presidential candidate is pending -- all the while protesting
that he doesn't want the nomination.

First, there was his gratuitous revisit to South Carolina to
flip-flop on the confederate flag issue, and then came his
well-publicized visit to the prison where he was once held in
Vietnam -- something he never did in all the years before.

The promotion of "self-esteem" in our schools has been so
successful that people feel free to spout off about all sorts of
things -- and see no reason why their opinions should not be
taken as seriously as the views of people who actually know what
they are talking about.

Being in the right place at the right time plays a bigger role in
our lives than many are ready to admit. Earle Combs played center
field for the New York Yankees for more than a decade and had the
same lifetime batting average as Joe DiMaggio (.325). Yet Combs
is virtually forgotten, because he played in the shadow of Babe
Ruth and Lou Gehrig.

Doesn't anyone find it strange that Attorney General Janet Reno
gave us sermonettes on "the rule of law" in the Elian Gonzalez
case at the very same time when she was announcing that those who
violated federal laws by making Linda Tripp's private personnel
records public would not be prosecuted?

The political left's answer to Third World poverty is classic:
Let Third World countries welsh on their loans, but don't let
them sell the fruits of their labor in the United States, and
harass multinational corporations that provide some of the best
jobs in poor countries. What these policies have in common,
besides being crazy, is that they all enable the left to feel
morally superior.

Ours may become the first civilization destroyed, not by the
power of our enemies, but by the ignorance of our teachers and
the dangerous nonsense they are teaching our children. In an age
of artificial intelligence, they are creating artificial
stupidity.

One of the great meaningless phrases of our times is: "I take
full responsibility." This does not mean that you are prepared to
pay the consequences for what you have done. On the contrary,
this statement is usually offered instead of taking the
consequences.

If you don't believe that the relationship between men and women
is being cheapened, non-stop around the clock, then just go
channel-surfing on cable TV at any hour of the day or night.

Despite both liberals and conservatives piling on Hillsdale
College, because of a personal tragedy there, I would send my
children to Hillsdale over many other colleges with bigger names.

A recent television re-run showed the Lone Ranger shooting a gun
out of the bad guy's hand, while galloping full speed on his
horse Silver. Maybe that is why a generation raised on this kind
of stuff has such unrealistic expectations of police shooting.

The political left loves to refer disdainfully to people who have
"faith in the free market." Mountains of empirical evidence from
countries around the world on the superior performances of free
markets are thus dismissed as mere faith. Meanwhile, the repeated
failures of government-run economies are attributed to personal
mistakes by Stalin, Mao or others -- thereby preserving the
left's faith in political control of economic decisions, if only
the right people were in charge.

When you look at the actual consequences of "corporate greed"
versus corporate philanthropy, you find that greed doesn't do
nearly as much harm.


=
 Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  *Mike Spitzer* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  

Re: [CTRL] A Thomas Sowell Editorial

2000-05-24 Thread William Shannon

OK...5 million posts a day is one thing but now we're subject to every
right-wing republican's editorials too??? Yuck! Please cease the insanity!

Bill.

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] FOX: Paula Jones Fears Vengeance From Clinton; Says No to Penthouse (fwd)

2000-05-24 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

Paula Jones Fears Vengeance From Clinton; Says No to Penthouse

Fox News-Tuesday, May 23, 2000


NEW YORK — Paula Jones said she fears that when President Clinton
leaves office he may have her killed or injured out of vengeance
for her allegations that he sexually harassed her.


During an exclusive interview with Fox News Channel's Hannity and
Colmes, she said friends have told her they too fear that "when
Clinton gets out of office, he'll have something done to me." She
said she told her friends that she is a good car driver and would
never take her own life, so they should suspect foul play if she
is found dead by an apparent suicide or car accident.

"He may not do it himself," she said, but "he will always have
the authority to get what he wants done."

However, when questioned if she had any proof that the president
plans to harm her, she admitted, "Well, I have no proof
whatsoever." She attributed her suspicion to rumors she's heard
about Clinton, adding "he still thinks he's above the law."

The interview came a day after a committee of the Arkansas
Supreme Court recommended that President Clinton be disbarred for
giving false testimony about his relationship with Monica
Lewinsky during the Jones case, and she called that a "great
decision."

"He's supposed to be a role model," she said, "And he's not a
role model."

"He's like a duck out of water; everything runs off his back."

Jones said she is confident she would have won her case against
the president, which Clinton settled for $800,000, because the
president "knew he was going to lose, and that's why he settled
the case."

She also denied Penthouse magazine publisher Bob Guccione's
claims that he was close to making a deal with her to pose naked
in his magazine.

"I'd never, ever pose naked for a men's magazine, ever" Jones
said.

Jones also said that since she's been out of the spotlight she's
been living "a normal Arkansas life," raising two young sons and
"doing the soccer stuff."


=
 Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  *Mike Spitzer* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

   The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
   Shalom, A Salaam Aleikum, and to all, A Good Day.
=

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] A Thomas Sowell Editorial

2000-05-24 Thread M.A. Johnson

Bill
  OK...5 million posts a day is one thing but now we're subject to every
  right-wing republican's editorials too??? Yuck! Please cease the
insanity!

MJ
Why not explain WHY Dr. Sowell's piece is 'nonsense' rather
than utilizing Hillary Clinton's tact at diverting attention from
substance and to personalities -- real or imagined.

Regard$,
--MJ

The road to tyranny, we must never forget, begins
with the destruction of the truth. -- Bill Clinton

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] A Thomas Sowell Editorial

2000-05-24 Thread William Shannon

In a message dated 5/24/00 6:52:42 PM Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Why not explain WHY Dr. Sowell's piece is 'nonsense' rather
 than utilizing Hillary Clinton's tact at diverting attention from
 substance and to personalities -- real or imagined. 

Who said it was "nonsense"??
It probably is but I didn't say that it was...I simply lamented the fact that
this fellow is posting TONS of info and now he's posting right-wing
editorials...

Bill.

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] FOX: Paula Jones Fears Vengeance From Clinton; Says No to Penthous...

2000-05-24 Thread William Shannon

In a message dated 5/24/00 6:49:08 PM Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 NEW YORK — Paula Jones said she fears that when President Clinton
 leaves office he may have her killed or injured out of vengeance
 for her allegations that he sexually harassed her. 


So what?
She's a paranoid dimwit with an exaggerated sense of self-importance...we
already knew that...plus the fact that she ain't worthy of Penthouse's
pages...Chic or Gallery maybe...

Bill.

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] 'I Won't Pose Naked': Paula Jones fears Clinton's Revenge (fwd)

2000-05-24 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

[I think she's damn justified in being cautious about the
vengeance thing!  Also, if my memory serves me correctly, not
long after the harassment case broke she posed for Playboy, I
think, not nude but close.  That kinda takes the bite off the
"never" statement, no?  --MS]



Newsmax-Inside Cover

Wednesday May 24, 2000; 2:28 AM EDT

'I Won't Pose Naked': Paula Jones

Contradicting recent reports that she was set to do a nude layout
in Penthouse magazine, Paula Jones said Tuesday night that she
would never pose naked in any men's magazine.

 In her first interview since an Arkansas Supreme Court committee
recommended that President Clinton be disbarred for testifying
falsely in her sexual harassment lawsuit, Jones told Fox News
Channel's "Hannity  Colmes":

 "Let me tell you, this is the first time I've said this publicly
and I want to say it on your show. I will never pose nude for any
men's magazine. Never! And that's all I have to say about that."

 Jones said comments last week by Penthouse publisher Bob
Guccione suggesting she was on the verge of signing a contract to
do the nude layout were false.

Reacting to the court's recommendation that Clinton be disbarred,
Jones said, "I think it's a great decision. ... I know they would
have never made that decision unless they realized that Clinton
did lie in my deposition and that he defrauded the court."

 Asked whether she thought Clinton should be indicted for
perjury, Jones told Sean Hannity, "In my opinion, I think he
should, because he lied and he is the president. He's supposed to
be a role model to all people, children, men, women. And he is
not a role model to anybody."

 And Jones says she still fears that Clinton may exact revenge
for her sexual harassment lawsuit, which ultimately led to his
impeachment.

 "Absolutely. I was just talking about that tonight with some
friends of mine. They have concerns about that. They really
believe that when he gets out of office he will have something
done to me. ... There is nothing I would not doubt that that man
would try to have done."

 Asked what evidence she had to support such suspicions, the
Clinton accuser told Alan Colmes about incidents that made her
fearful while she was living in California:

 "I had to report things to the police department in Long Beach.
People [were] following me and my children to the park. Don't
know who they were. They were not reporters."

 Jones said she remains concerned, telling Colmes, "Don't think I
am not on my guard every single day."




=
 Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  *Mike Spitzer* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

   The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
   Shalom, A Salaam Aleikum, and to all, A Good Day.
=

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] A Thomas Sowell Editorial

2000-05-24 Thread M.A. Johnson

MJ
   Why not explain WHY Dr. Sowell's piece is 'nonsense' rather
than utilizing Hillary Clinton's tact at diverting attention from
substance and to personalities -- real or imagined.
Bill
   Who said it was "nonsense"??

MJ
Note 'nonsense' in quotes ... this was implied.


Bill
  It probably is but I didn't say that it was...I simply lamented
  the fact that this fellow is posting TONS of info and now he's
  posting right-wing editorials...

MJ
Yes, and I was simply pointing to your use of logical fallacy.
... in particular ad hominem.

Regard$,
--MJ

It is error only, and not truth, that shrinks
from inquiry.  -- Thomas Paine

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Was America Founded as a Christian Nation?

2000-05-24 Thread Franklin Wayne Poley

On Wed, 24 May 2000, Nurev Ind Research wrote:

 Franklin Wayne Poley wrote:
 
  On Tue, 23 May 2000, Nurev Ind Research wrote:
 
   How could this ever compare with my main rival Allan Greenspan whose economic
   theories are based on those of yet another co-religionist of ours, Ayn Rand.
 
  Are all you co-religionists atheists or do you all have the same "genetic
  markers" for religion x?
  FWP.
 

 Poley, That is a very intelligent question.

Thank you. Would it surprise you if there was a set of "jew genes" which
determined who was entitled to aliyeh rights and who wasn't? It would
change the Constitution of Israel of course since the documents on right
of return say that those who convert to another religion may be denied
aliyeh rights. (Though they would still be carrying those 'jew genes').
FWP.
(LEZ)

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] A Thomas Sowell Editorial

2000-05-24 Thread Tenorlove

--- William Shannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I simply lamented the fact that this fellow is posting TONS of info
and now he's posting right-wing editorials... 

There's always the Block Address feature

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Kick off your party with Yahoo! Invites.
http://invites.yahoo.com/

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Nealz Nuze Editorial

2000-05-24 Thread [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

In a message dated 05/24/2000 6:31:57 PM Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 It's Republican. The culprit is none other than
 Senator Orrin Hatch of Utah. 
_

His full name is Orrin Rodham Hatch..or it should be.
And the search for "meth labs" is the lame excuse the
BATF gave to then Texas Governor Ann Richards when
they requested and got Texas Air National Guard helicopters
for the raid on the Branch Davidians at Waco.
Hey...if it worked once...why not tell the same lie again and again?
The people never catch on.
 Regards to All
 Nakano

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] What it means to be an American

2000-05-24 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

From:

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/bluesky_smith/2524_xcsof_what_it_me.shtml


  What it means to be an American


  I once had the good fortune to interview Chinese
  dissident Harry Wu. Harry spent a good portion of his
  life inside the Laogai prison camps. The Chinese Laogai
  camps cannot be compared on an equal basis with
  American prisons or the Russian Gulag, since millions of
  Chinese are held in the political prisons every day.

  Harry's problem was a tendency to question authority
  and speak out freely. For that, he served over a decade
  in forced labor. In the end, the Chinese communists
  exiled him from his own country. He now lives in
  California.

  Yet, Harry has also struck back. Harry once managed
  to capture Chinese People's Armed Police officials
  trying to sell the body parts of executed dissidents.
  Harry got them on videotape while posing as a rich man
  with a kidney disease. The tape was aired on ABC,
  much to the embarrassment of Beijing.

  During my interview, Harry paused from his harrowing
  tale, and spotted a stack of documents I obtained from
  the U.S. Commerce Department. These documents
  cover some of the Chinese deals made by the Clinton
  administration. He expressed an interest in viewing some
  of them and making a few copies for his benefit. I, of
  course, obliged. My career as a writer started with
  documents obtained by the Freedom of Information
  Act. The Chinese espionage story is a military historian's
  dream. I must tip my hat to the officers of the People's
  Liberation Army on a job well done.

  I have followed the path of documents, tracing the
  technology to China and the money to the Clinton White
  House. In the course of discovery, I have also detailed
  the success of General Huai, General Shen and their
  brilliant leader, the now-retired General Ding Henggao.

  General Ding's incredible espionage success inside the
  Clinton administration brought a literal flood of
  advanced military equipment for the People's Liberation
  Army. The sudden upgrade of Chinese military
  technology also enriched Ding and his American
  counterpart, Dr. John Lewis, a personal consultant to
  Clinton's Secretary of Defense William Perry.

  The long list of advanced military equipment obtained by
  General Ding and his two subordinates includes secure
  fiber-optic communications, super computers for
  nuclear weapons research, missile nose cone design
  software, special missile manufacturing equipment and
  multiple nuclear warhead designs.

  Most of the top backers for permanent trade status for
  China are also under investigation for the same illegal
  trade with the Chinese Army. Motorola, Boeing, Loral
  and Hughes all are pushing hard with a cash-advertising
  blitz aimed at the public. Motorola, Boeing, Loral and
  Hughes are all under investigation for illegal transfers.

  The long list of documents also includes telling quotes
  from many of the key players. For example, Loral
  Defense President Jerald Lindfelt wrote Ron Brown,
  complaining that the U.S. military blocked his export of
  an advanced Synthetic Aperture Radar System to a
  research unit of the Chinese army.

  "We've worked hard trying to resolve these problems
  with the Department of State, the Department of
  Commerce and the Defense Technology Security
  Administration (DTSA), but someone in these
  organizations always manages to block our
  participation," wrote Lindfelt.

  Motorola's CEO Gary Tooker also wrote to Ron
  Brown. Tooker, however, expressed Motorola's thanks
  to Brown and President Clinton for helping out on a
  Chinese deal.

  "Dear Ron, I am writing to thank you and some key
  members of the Commerce Department for your
  assistance in obtaining the presidential waiver for
  encryption export 

[CTRL] The Terry Nichols Haircut Debacle

2000-05-24 Thread William Shannon

Vol. 6, No. 1338 - The American Reporter - May 24, 2000


 JAIL IN TURMOIL OVER NICHOLS' HAIR
by Bill Johnson
American Reporter Correspondent
Oklahoma City, Okla.
OKLAHOMA CITY -- There's a hair-raising problem concerning convicted bombing
conspirator Terry Nichols that is causing some fallout at the Oklahoma County
Jail.

Everyone agrees the 45-year-old Nichols needs a haircut. But they part over
who should do the cutting.

Nichols, citing concerns about his safety, wants his hair cut by the wife of
his lead attorney. County officials say that other inmates either hire a
barber to cut their hair or let another inmate give them a trim with electric
clippers and they don't want make an exception with Nichols.

Nichols, who is serving a life term for conspiracy in the federal building
bombing, and his attorneys took the matter to court. The judge said it would
be fine for the attorney's wife to give Nichols a trim.

"It's not going to happen," vowed Russell Dear, the jail administrator. "It
sets a precedent."

Sheriff John Whetsel said he is going to talk to county prosecutors about
appealing the decision.

"You start granting exceptions to one, then you have to give them for all,"
Whetsel said.

Nichols, a former farmer from Herington, Kan., was convicted by a federal
jury in Denver of helping plan the April 19, 1995, bombing that killed 165
people and injured more than 500 others and of involuntary manslaughter in
the deaths of eight federal special agents.


He was brought to Oklahoma City on Jan. 31 to face state first-degree murder
charges. According to jail records, Nichols has not had a haircut since his
arrival.


Brian Hermanson of Ponca City, Nichols' lead attorney, said his wife is not a
licensed barber but is experienced at cutting hair.

"She has cut my hair for 20 years, and my family's. I trust her with the
scissors near my client more than I would trust anyone else," Hermanson said.

It's the possibility of having a stranger armed with scissors near Nichols
that has defense attorneys concerned. And they don't want Nichols to end up
with a buzz cut given by another inmate wielding electric clippers.


"We think a buzz cut would look bad," W. Creekmire Wallace II argued before
Payne County Associate District Court Judge Robert M. Murphy Jr., who was
appointed to the Nichols case.

Murphy ruled that Nichols could have his hair cut by his attorney's wife, or
by a licensed barber at state expense.

"The defendant is a pretrial detainee and the law presumes him innocent and
this includes the right for him to have the appearance of innocence," Murphy
ruled.

Prosecutors had opposed the hair-cutting request on the ground that Nichols
should not receive any special treatment.

"If this court treats Mr. Nichols different, then every other defendant up
there is going to think they are entitled to have their mother or their
sister or brother come in and cut their hair," said Assistant District
Attorney Sandra Elliott.

The haircut plea isn't the only special request that Nichols has made. When
he was in federal custody, his lawyers said he required the fiber from whole
wheat bread because of a medical condition. At another point, Nichols
complained that he was not allowed to buy garlic and popcorn from the prison
commissary.

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] I TOO WOULD LIKE TO KNOW...

2000-05-24 Thread Ynr Chyldz Wyld

From: "William Shannon" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  So yes, Michael can posts more. If he oversteps his "power", this is an
  electronic jungle and the "club: will come out 'da sky. 

 I'd suggest that this power is being abused then...granted his posts are
 informative but c'mon!!!

I second Bill's opinion.  I feel Michael's been abusing the privilege.  There
are others on this list, myself included, who would like to send more than 7
'informative' posts a day, but are not allowed to do so.  If Michael was only
sending 8 to 12 posts, it wouldn't be so bad, but this 20+ a day has got to
stop, or else grant the same privilege to all of us.


June

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Was America Founded as a Christian Nation?

2000-05-24 Thread Nurev Ind Research

Franklin Wayne Poley wrote:

 On Wed, 24 May 2000, Nurev Ind Research wrote:

  Franklin Wayne Poley wrote:
  
   On Tue, 23 May 2000, Nurev Ind Research wrote:
  
How could this ever compare with my main rival Allan Greenspan whose economic
theories are based on those of yet another co-religionist of ours, Ayn Rand.
  
   Are all you co-religionists atheists or do you all have the same "genetic
   markers" for religion x?
   FWP.
  
 
  Poley, That is a very intelligent question.
 
 Thank you. Would it surprise you if there was a set of "jew genes" which
 determined who was entitled to aliyeh rights and who wasn't? It would
 change the Constitution of Israel of course since the documents on right
 of return say that those who convert to another religion may be denied
 aliyeh rights. (Though they would still be carrying those 'jew genes').
 FWP.
 (LEZ)

Poley my man. You throw out so much bullshit that you forget which areas
you have already flung upon.

We've had this conversation.

Joshua2

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] ANOTHER REASON MICHAEL SPITZER'S POSTS SHOULD BE LIMITED

2000-05-24 Thread Ynr Chyldz Wyld

This is the 2nd time in as many days that I've gotten the following message
back when trying to post to CTRL

Maybe if Michael didn't overwhelm the list with 20+ posts a day, some of the
rest of us could have a chance to get our rationed 7-a-day in..

Either restrict him to 7 posts a day like the rest of us, or increase the
daily post total from 100 to at least 150 or 200...or don't even have a
daily list total at all.  Why is this in place, when the rest of us are
limited to only 7 posts?


June

- Original Message -
From: "L-Soft list server at America Online (1.8d)" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2000 9:50 PM
Subject: Message ("The distribution of your message dated Wed, 24...")


 The distribution of your message dated Wed, 24 May 2000 20:44:10 -0400 with
 subject "Re:  I TOO WOULD LIKE  TO KNOW..." has been  postponed because the
 daily message limit for the CTRL list (100) has been exceeded. No action is
 required from you; your message  will be reprocessed automatically once the
 list owner releases the list.


A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Why America is fucked in one easy lesson

2000-05-24 Thread Edward Britton

Nakano:

Hey...if it worked once...why not tell the same lie again and again?

Precisely! The fat, lazy and, unfortunately, overwhelmingly large majority
of Americans couldn't care less as long as their trash is picked up three
times a week. They'll keep voting for the same pricks over and over again,
regardless of the rediculous labels we accept from/attach to each "party."

The move toward ever-increasing levels of tyranny will continue to
accelerate until Americans get off their useless, apathetic butts and do
something about it--and that's not likely to happen until Reno's goon
squads are driving up Main street.

The people never catch on.

They couldn't care less, and are getting/will get exactly what they
deserve. America is under attack by a conspiracy of stupidity and the
conspirators are us!

Edward   +
===
"In an age of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."
-- George Orwell
http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/5285/connector1.html
Reality Pump: http://www.egroups.com/group/reality_pump
===

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Fwd: Nuke the Moon

2000-05-24 Thread Kris Millegan





U.S. Considered A-Bomb on Moon

A secret U.S. project in the 1950s called for detonating an atom bomb on the
moon as a demonstration of the nation's Cold War might, according to a
physicist involved in the plan.

The project, innocuously titled ``A Study of Lunar Research Flights,'' was
never carried out. But its planning included calculations by the astronomer
Carl Sagan - then a young graduate student - of the behavior of the dust and
gas generated by the blast.

Viewing the nuclear flash from Earth might have intimidated the Soviet Union
and boosted Americans' confidence after the launch of Sputnik, physicist
Leonard Reiffel said Wednesday. He directed the project at the former Armour
Research Foundation, now part of the Illinois Institute of Technology.

``Now it seems ridiculous and unthinkable,'' said Reiffel, 72, who later
served as a deputy director at NASA during the Apollo program. ``But things
were remarkably tense back then.''

Sagan went on to become a worldwide celebrity for popularizing science on
television. He died in 1996.

Reiffel described the plan in a letter in the May 4 issue of the scientific
journal Nature.

Nature published a review of two new Sagan biographies. The author of one of
the books suggested that Sagan breached security in 1959 by revealing the
classified project in an application for an academic fellowship. Reiffel
concurred that Sagan probably released classified information.

The exchange in the scientific journal inadvertently shines a spotlight on a
period when science in the United States was greatly influenced by Cold War
politics.

The U.S. space program was sputtering while the Soviet Union had launched
Sputnik and a pair of lunar probes.

The Eisenhower administration considered the lunar blast as a way to reassure
Americans that the Soviet threat could be countered, while demonstrating to
the Kremlin that the United States had an effective nuclear deterrent.

Under the scenario, a missile carrying a small nuclear device was to be
launched from an undisclosed location and travel 238,000 miles to the moon,
where it would be detonated upon impact. The planners decided it would have
to be an atom bomb because a hydrogen bomb would have been too heavy for the
missile.

Reiffel said the nation's young space program probably could have carried out
the mission by 1959, when the Air Force deployed intercontinental ballistic
missiles.

Military officials apparently abandoned the idea because of the danger to
people on Earth in case of a failure. The scientists also registered concerns
about contaminating the moon with radioactive material, Reiffel said.

The Air Force has declined to comment on the project, pending a review of
historical records.

``There was lots of talk on the part of the Air Force about the moon being
`military high ground,''' Reiffel said.





[CTRL] Fwd: What it means to be an American

2000-05-24 Thread Kris Millegan





http://www.worldnetdaily.com/bluesky_smith/2524_xcsof_what_it_me.shtml

  What it means to
  be an American


  I once had the good fortune to interview Chinese
  dissident Harry Wu. Harry spent a good portion of his
  life inside the Laogai prison camps. The Chinese Laogai
  camps cannot be compared on an equal basis with
  American prisons or the Russian Gulag, since millions of
  Chinese are held in the political prisons every day.

  Harry's problem was a tendency to question authority
  and speak out freely. For that, he served over a decade
  in forced labor. In the end, the Chinese communists
  exiled him from his own country. He now lives in
  California.

  Yet, Harry has also struck back. Harry once managed
  to capture Chinese People's Armed Police officials
  trying to sell the body parts of executed dissidents.
  Harry got them on videotape while posing as a rich man
  with a kidney disease. The tape was aired on ABC,
  much to the embarrassment of Beijing.

  During my interview, Harry paused from his harrowing
  tale, and spotted a stack of documents I obtained from
  the U.S. Commerce Department. These documents
  cover some of the Chinese deals made by the Clinton
  administration. He expressed an interest in viewing some
  of them and making a few copies for his benefit. I, of
  course, obliged. My career as a writer started with
  documents obtained by the Freedom of Information
  Act. The Chinese espionage story is a military historian's
  dream. I must tip my hat to the officers of the People's
  Liberation Army on a job well done.

  I have followed the path of documents, tracing the
  technology to China and the money to the Clinton White
  House. In the course of discovery, I have also detailed
  the success of General Huai, General Shen and their
  brilliant leader, the now-retired General Ding Henggao.

  General Ding's incredible espionage success inside the
  Clinton administration brought a literal flood of
  advanced military equipment for the People's Liberation
  Army. The sudden upgrade of Chinese military
  technology also enriched Ding and his American
  counterpart, Dr. John Lewis, a personal consultant to
  Clinton's Secretary of Defense William Perry.

  The long list of advanced military equipment obtained by
  General Ding and his two subordinates includes secure
  fiber-optic communications, super computers for
  nuclear weapons research, missile nose cone design
  software, special missile manufacturing equipment and
  multiple nuclear warhead designs.

  Most of the top backers for permanent trade status for
  China are also under investigation for the same illegal
  trade with the Chinese Army. Motorola, Boeing, Loral
  and Hughes all are pushing hard with a cash-advertising
  blitz aimed at the public. Motorola, Boeing, Loral and
  Hughes are all under investigation for illegal transfers.

  The long list of documents also includes telling quotes
  from many of the key players. For example, Loral
  Defense President Jerald Lindfelt wrote Ron Brown,
  complaining that the U.S. military blocked his export of
  an advanced Synthetic Aperture Radar System to a
  research unit of the Chinese army.

  "We've worked hard trying to resolve these problems
  with the Department of State, the Department of
  Commerce and the Defense Technology Security
  Administration (DTSA), but someone in these
  organizations always manages to block our
  participation," wrote Lindfelt.

  Motorola's CEO Gary Tooker also wrote to Ron
  Brown. Tooker, however, expressed Motorola's thanks
  to Brown and President Clinton for helping out on a
  Chinese deal.

  "Dear Ron, I am writing to thank you and some key
  members of the Commerce Department for your
  assistance in obtaining the presidential waiver for
  

[CTRL] Fwd: Hereditary Politics

2000-05-24 Thread Kris Millegan





 "Nothing has changed since the feudal era,'' said Shigenori Okazaki, a
political analyst at Warburg Dillon Reed. ``Being born into a political
family, or getting into the national bureaucracy, is one of the only ways to
become a politician.''


Dynasties Vs. Democracy in Japan

By MARI YAMAGUCHI
.c The Associated Press

TOKYO (AP) - Yuko Obuchi is 26 years old, barely out of college, and has
never been elected to public office. But her father was prime minister - and
that's why many see her as the perfect parliamentary candidate.

In Japan, where elections are looming, being a politician's son, daughter,
widow or even cousin is often enough to wrap up voter support.

For Obuchi, who announced her candidacy Tuesday, inheriting office is
something of a family tradition. Her father - Keizo Obuchi, who died this
month - was first elected to Parliament at age 26 to fill a seat left vacant
by the death of his father.

``I'm running at the same age as my father,'' she said. ``I feel I am
standing at the same start line.''

Yuko Obuchi worked as an assistant director at a television station before
becoming her father's aide. At a news conference Tuesday, she did not talk
about her campaign platform.

``To me, my father was an ideal politician, and I want to emulate him,'' she
said.

But with many of Japan's top politicians and nearly one-third of the lower
house of Parliament born into political families, concerns are being raised
over whether this country's still young democracy is being smothered by
``inheritance politics.''

``Nothing has changed since the feudal era,'' said Shigenori Okazaki, a
political analyst at Warburg Dillon Reed. ``Being born into a political
family, or getting into the national bureaucracy, is one of the only ways to
become a politician.''

The phenomenon isn't new.

Before World War II, membership in the House of Peers was by appointment and
included adult males of the imperial family, heads of the hereditary peerage
and a few notable scholars and major taxpayers. That system was eliminated
under Japan's postwar Constitution and replaced by an upper and lower house
in which all members are elected.

With elections for the lower house of parliament to be held June 25, the
resurgence of political dynasties has become the focus of media attention.

The major parties generally refuse to confirm who they will endorse as
candidates until after campaigning officially begins on June 13. The trend
toward dynasty-building is unmistakable, however.

Some 140 of the lower house's 500 seats are held by descendants of former
lawmakers. In the less powerful 252-member upper house, the number is 30.

The number of such family-held seats in the lower house has risen steadily,
more than tripling from just 38 in the early 1960s, and the holders of those
seats have often proven to be the most influential politicians. Four of
Japan's seven most recent prime ministers are second- or third-generation
lawmakers.

Former Justice Minister Seiroku Kajiyama and former Prime Minister Noboru
Takeshita have announced they will not run next month. Instead, the party is
likely to endorse Kajiyama's son and Takeshita's younger brother. In Obuchi's
case, supporters are hoping to capitalize on an expected sympathy vote - the
election date coincides with her father's birthday.

Still, one of Japan's largest newspapers, the liberal-leaning Asahi, warned
voters not to choose candidates based on their family name.

``We need to decide who to vote for based on who the candidate is, not what
family they are from,'' it said in a commentary.

Some voters are also becoming more wary of the tradition.

``Inheritance politics has nothing to do with policies,'' said Satoko Kishi,
a Tokyo office worker. ``It's wrong for one family to monopolize a
constituency as if it's their private property.''




[CTRL] Castro's Water Boy?

2000-05-24 Thread lloyd

..

From the New Paradigms Project [Not Necessarily Endorsed]:
Conspiracy Shopping Cart: http://a-albionic.com/shopping.html

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Castro's Water Boy?
Date: Wednesday, May 17, 2000 9:12 PM

Daily, over a thousand illegal aliens stream across America's southern
border, many for no reason but to commit crimes. Douglas, Arizona has been a
favorite spot for such illegal crossings for well over a year. The town's
mayor has begged repeatedly for federal action to stop the tide of illegals
who trash the town, steal from ranchers and force locals to barricade their
homes for safety.  U.S. Border Patrol agents have even been fired upon from
Mexico. Bill Clinton could care less.

In fact, the latest approach of the Immigration and Naturalization Service is
essentially a "don't ask, don't tell" policy toward illegal aliens, unless
they are wanted criminals. And even that is a stretch, given the example of
the Mexican "Railroad Killer." That illegal alien was captured and released
at least nine times in 18 months as he crossed the US border during his
serial killing of 8 Americans. He was on the FBI's Ten Most Wanted list, yet
the Border Patrol still freed him one last time in 1999-allowing him to kill
his last four American victims. So, let's be clear: Regarding immigration,
Bill Clinton does not care about the "rule of law."

So, why did the president mobilize his entire Justice Department, spend
millions of dollars and launch a commando raid to seize one six year-old
Cuban refugee from his relatives? Because snatching Elian Gonzalez was good
for Fidel Castro. And what's good for Castro is apparently good for Clinton.

By the time Mr. Clinton launched his Holy Saturday invasion in Miami, many
Americans were sick of the Elian story. As always, television and the White
House worked together to squash any deep thought on the subject. "Send him
back, already" and "It's the law" seemed to be the conditioned responses of a
majority.

Yet the whole event was a truly shocking display of how far America has
slipped from her ideals under the Clinton regime. In the early 1960s,
thousands of loving Cuban parents sent their young children from Cuba to
freedom in America, where they were raised by relatives and church
organizations. Can anyone imagine then-President John F. Kennedy sending
those young orphans back to Cuba?

My, how America's soul has darkened since then. And how thuggish our
government has become. How did it come to the point where specialized INS
forces could grab little Elian at gunpoint? Elian's father, Juan Miguel
Gonzalez, could have simply taken a commercial flight from Washington to
Miami to see his son and family and meet the boy's rescuer. Was Bill Clinton
too stupid to grasp this simple idea?

Hardly, or Mr. Clinton, this custody case had special personal importance.
So he ordered INS assault goons to smash into the Miami home where Elian
stayed and take the boy, by government jet, to Washington. The boy's asylum
case was awaiting appeal in a US Court of Appeals, making Clinton's raid--in
addition to a revolting display of power--an apparent violation of the Fourth
Amendment's proscription against unreasonable search and seizure. Clearly,
the president desperately wants this particular boy back in Castro's Cuba,
court or no court. As Lloyd Bentsen might say, "I knew Jack Kennedy. Jack
Kennedy loathed Fidel Castro. Bill Clinton is no Jack Kennedy."

In fact, by using paramilitary forces against Americans, Bill Clinton was
simply carrying Fidel Castro's water. The Cuban dictator would not allow Juan
Miguel Gonzalez out of Cuban custody while on US soil. Elian's father
therefore had to stay in a Cuban diplomatic compound in Maryland, far from
his son. A Miami reunion was therefore impossible. But that decision was made
by a foreign tyrant. It had no bearing on legal proceedings here. This is
America, a land of laws and once a proudly free country. A real president
would have told Castro: "I am not a king. In America, the central government
does not outrank our states like a general outranks his field officers. Elian
is in Florida, and authorities there will handle things. Senor Gonzalez is
free to travel there if he wishes. If you won't permit him to do so--Tough."

But this president has perhaps never met a communist he wouldn't help.
Consider the strange case of Gregory Craig. Part of Mr. Clinton's legal
"attack pack," Mr. Craig was a defense lawyer for the president during his
impeachment trial last year. Craig now represents Juan Miguel Gonzalez, who
does nothing without Castro's permission. Surely it is no accident that one
of the president's lawyer pals travels to Cuba and ends up, in effect,
representing Fidel Castro. Who arranged that connection? Who's paying?

Let's connect the dots: Fifteen Cubans escape by boat for America. Two adults
and one little boy survive. Dictator wants him 

Re: [CTRL] state of CTRL list

2000-05-24 Thread Kris Millegan

Yes,  and with a national election escapade going on, I strongly suspect it
shall get worse before it gets better.

Excusa myself, I have been busy and haven't been able to input as much
material, but I shall.

The US [population is being subjected to huge amounts of blather and
propagnda designed to continue the "hardening of sides and continual firing
of gut isuues such as abortion,  homosexuality and other natural occurring
"freaks" of nature. Continual playing of the race cards. Continual divisive
factors are at play, The Mighty Wurlitzer is not broken but continues is
envelopment of the cultural within its cocoon of lies. But there are
discordant vibrations wrecking havoc on well laid plans of corruption and
sabotage against our beleagured republic and the light of the internet is
shining constantly upon new shores and minds.
Om
K
.

now is the time for all good men and women to come to the aid of their
countries.
Om
K.
In a message dated 5/24/00 1:55:35 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

hi,

I signed off the CTRL list a month or so ago - and have recently rejoined
to find that the nature of the conspiracy information coming through has
polarised itself into several basic sets.

1. the long running jews and nazis thing
2. NRA vs. the FEDS
3. pseudo skeptical denial of the existence of ET life
4. the american elections  assorted lion baiting

It was not so long ago that we were collectively dealing with the y2k stuff,
where various ex-military experts were talking about the end of the world,
roundups and the beast incarnate announcing the nwo.
I kept all of these posts.
I even urged my mom and dad to stock up short term on basic essentials.

I remember then posting words to the effect that nothing would happen -
and luckily for me - nothing did ... to me it seemed like nothing was going
to shift the wall of silence even if we wanted it to - the inexorable grind
of the mass cull goes on whether we're hotheaded or not - eg. chemtrails,
gm foods etc
I think that it will take cool reasoning and some sense of perspective
-
for it may be that the predominately american list has become unsettled.

I detect [from someone not exposed to the daily US political hype] that
this list has been seriously wound up.

Yes these are severe issues and a great deal is at stake - but so was Y2K
remember - committing too early to a course of action - hotheads being
flushed out of the moderates is my interpretation.

I think you guys have been got somehow.

I'm sorry if these comments offend anyone - I'm just trying to be helpful

andrew

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Alien Presence? Evidence. .

2000-05-24 Thread tenebroust

I don't think this issue is being singled out.  J2 merely points out that it is up to 
those who make claims to offer support of them and not up to those who assert the 
negative to prove the negative.  Of course you also have the option of proposing 
something and then decline further comment or to give proof.  This list is open to 
nearly all ideas (see disclaimer) for discussion and that includes UFO's and aliens.  
BUT one must not think that your ideas are beyond criticism, SO if you post then there 
will be people who disagree, and if you have a theory some may want proof in support 
of it.


On Tue, 23 May 2000, "Samantha L." wrote:


 In a message dated 5/23/00 10:37:32 PM Central Daylight Time,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  Firstly, We ( J2- made the original claim that there is no hard evidence of
   intelligent alien existence on Earth )are NOT required to prove that aliens
   don't exist. The more extraordinary the claim, the more solid the evidence
   needs to be. There is none. What there is plenty of, is 'stories'.
 

   Isn't this discussion moot on a conspiracy THEORY research list?  If we
 waited for hard evidence before discussing all the subjects on this list, it
 would be a VERY quiet list.  Plenty of us here, including you, J2, and the
 moderator, draw conclusions on subjects based on less than hard evidence.
 Why is the subject of UFOs being singled out?

 Samantha

 A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
 DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
 ==
 CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
 screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
 sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
 misdirections
 and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
 minor
 effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
 CTRL
 gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
 be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
 nazi's need not apply.

 Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
 
 Archives Available at:
 http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
 A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

 http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
  A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A
 
 To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
 SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
 SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Om

"Welcome to the desert of the real."  Morpheus, in The Matrix

"My God it's full of stars!"  Dave Bowman, in 2001: A Space
Odyssey
___

Why pay when you don't have to? Get AltaVista Free Internet Access now!
http://jump.altavista.com/freeaccess4.go

___

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Fwd: British envoy sent Pope bulletins on the Holocaust

2000-05-24 Thread Kris Millegan





Times of London
May 24 2000
EUROPE

British envoy sent Pope bulletins on the Holocaust
FROM RICHARD OWEN IN ROME

DOCUMENTS found by chance in a Rome flea market prove that Pope Pius XII,
accused of having turned a blind eye to the Holocaust, was given a daily
account of Nazi atrocities by the British envoy to the Holy See.
Defenders of Pius XII, who include the present Pope, insist that he could
not have known about the Nazi death camps, but Francis D'Arcy Godolphin
Osborne, the British Minister to the Holy See, gave the Pope a daily
typewritten report culled from Allied broadcasts after he took refuge in the
Vatican in 1940.
Fabrizio Coisson, a journalist and antiquarian book collector, came across
bound carbon copies of the reports at Porta Portese market in Rome. "I was
astonished to find a signed note in which the British diplomat describes how
every day he transcribed BBC broadcasts and passed them to the Pope," Signor
Coisson said. He did not know how the papers had found their way on to the
second-hand market, but Osborne died in Rome in 1964 and Signor Coisson
presumed that some of his effects were sold.
Professor Owen Chadwick of Cambridge University, author of Britain and the
Vatican During the Second World War, said that the find was remarkable.
Father Pierre Blet, the Jesuit historian whose recent book Pius XII and the
Second World War is seen as the Vatican's riposte to accusations that the
Pope turned a blind eye, said he was astonished by the discovery.
The reports, which Osborne hoped would counteract Italian and German
propaganda, give a detailed account of Jewish deportations, mass killings
and "inhuman experiments". The disclosure is bound to slow down further the
Vatican's much-criticised plans to beatify Pius XII. Rabbi Marvin Hier of
the Simon Wiesenthal Centre in Los Angeles said it would "desecrate the
memory of the Holocaust victims" to beatify a man "who sat in silence on the
throne of St Peter and watched the trains take Jews across Europe to the
death camps".
Last autumn the writer John Cornwell caused a furore by claiming in his book
Hitler's Pope that Pius XII not only failed to speak out against Nazi
persecution when he was Pope but, as Papal Nuncio (ambassador) in Berlin in
the 1920s and Secretary of State in the 1930s, helped Hitler to come to
power by suppressing German Catholic resistance to the Nazis. The book was
denounced by the Vatican as "trash".
Osborne, who arrived in Rome to represent Britain at the Holy See in 1936
and initially regarded Pius XII as "saintly", retreated inside the Vatican
walls when Fascist Italy entered the war on Hitler's side in June 1940. He
followed Allied broadcasts intently and began compiling what he called
"British wireless news" for the Pope, emphasising "the sufferings of
civilians in Nazi occupied Europe" and German "crimes against humanity".
Although it was known that he wrote the reports, scholars failed to find
them.
In October 1940 he warned the Pope that the Germans were "actively promoting
anti-Semitism in Hungary, Romania and Bulgaria". By 1941 the tone became
more dramatic, as the Nazis committed "atrocities in the name of the myth of
the superior race". He wrote: "They are conducting experiments on sick and
mentally deficient children in Germany."
Osborne, noting that Hitler had vowed to "liquidate the Jews for at least a
thousand years", told the Pope that Jews in Poland were being murdered and
deported en masse, adding - in words that carry poignancy with hindsight -
that some were being given "special permits" to travel by rail, "but only by
slow trains".
After Pius XII's Christmas Eve homily in 1942, in which he condemned
extermination "by reason of nationality or race" but failed to mention the
words Nazi or Jew, Osborne stepped up the campaign, informing the Pope in
1943: "In Slovakia, 77 per cent of the Jewish population has been deported
to an unknown destination, which probably signifies death." He added: "The
number of Jews in the Warsaw Ghetto has been reduced by 400,000 since last
July - there are barely 35,000 left."
However, Sir Martin Gilbert, the historian and biographer of Churchill, said
the Vatican had sheltered 4,000 Jews during the Gestapo raids in Rome in
1944. Sir Martin, whose latest book Never Again is a history of the
Holocaust, said many Christians had taken a stand against the Nazis, and
that "Christian anti-Semitism" should not be confused with the Holocaust,
which had been "carried out by people who were hostile to Christian values".











Re: [CTRL] I TOO WOULD LIKE TO KNOW...

2000-05-24 Thread Edward Britton

Oh, Jume:

If Michael was only
sending 8 to 12 posts, it wouldn't be so bad, but this 20+ a day has got to
stop, or else grant the same privilege to all of us.

Excuse me, but when did CTRL become YOUR list? I mean, it must be for you
to make such arrogant pronouncements. Start your own list and quit whining.

Edward   +

===
"In an age of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."
-- George Orwell
http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/5285/connector1.html
Reality Pump: http://www.egroups.com/group/reality_pump
===

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] state of CTRL list

2000-05-24 Thread tenebroust

Andrew, I don't understand exactly what it is that you are getting at here.  Are you 
saying you are disatisfied with the list because we are not discussing issues that you 
believe are important?  If that is the case then please post away, I would be happy to 
hear what you have to say.  However, the threads that run here are largely the domain 
of the list members.  I read and keep track of the posts and the threads in order to 
moderate and further discussion where necessary.  Kris, and more recently M. Spitzer 
provide content in an editorial context(others do this as well).  The list is driven 
by the members for the most part so please tell us what it is that you wish to discuss.



On Wed, 24 May 2000, Andrew Hennessey wrote:


 hi,

 I signed off the CTRL list a month or so ago - and have recently rejoined
 to find that the nature of the conspiracy information coming through has
 polarised itself into several basic sets.

 1. the long running jews and nazis thing
 2. NRA vs. the FEDS
 3. pseudo skeptical denial of the existence of ET life
 4. the american elections  assorted lion baiting

 It was not so long ago that we were collectively dealing with the y2k stuff,
 where various ex-military experts were talking about the end of the world,
 roundups and the beast incarnate announcing the nwo.
 I kept all of these posts.
 I even urged my mom and dad to stock up short term on basic essentials.

 I remember then posting words to the effect that nothing would happen -
 and luckily for me - nothing did ... to me it seemed like nothing was going
 to shift the wall of silence even if we wanted it to - the inexorable grind
 of the mass cull goes on whether we're hotheaded or not - eg. chemtrails,
 gm foods etc
 I think that it will take cool reasoning and some sense of perspective -
 for it may be that the predominately american list has become unsettled.

 I detect [from someone not exposed to the daily US political hype] that
 this list has been seriously wound up.

 Yes these are severe issues and a great deal is at stake - but so was Y2K
 remember - committing too early to a course of action - hotheads being
 flushed out of the moderates is my interpretation.

 I think you guys have been got somehow.

 I'm sorry if these comments offend anyone - I'm just trying to be helpful

 andrew

 A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
 DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
 ==
 CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
 screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
 sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
 misdirections
 and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
 minor
 effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
 CTRL
 gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
 be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
 nazi's need not apply.

 Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
 
 Archives Available at:
 http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
 A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

 http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
  A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A
 
 To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
 SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
 SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Om

"Welcome to the desert of the real."  Morpheus, in The Matrix

"My God it's full of stars!"  Dave Bowman, in 2001: A Space
Odyssey
___

Why pay when you don't have to? Get AltaVista Free Internet Access now!
http://jump.altavista.com/freeaccess4.go

___

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A 

Re: [CTRL] I TOO WOULD LIKE TO KNOW...

2000-05-24 Thread Alan Howard

but he has a point...  If there's a limit on postings per person, and a
limit on total emails per day, then by one person having the freedom to
break the personal limit means that other people's posts are delayed.  That
can get pretty annoying.  Isn't CTRL about the exchange of information and
ideas, and for the campaigning of freedom and all that?  And yet there is
one person on this list who has more freedom and liberties than the rest.
How can that be justified?  What happened to equality for all?



Alan Howard



 -Original Message-
 From: Conspiracy Theory Research List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
 Behalf Of Edward Britton
 Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2000 1:54 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [CTRL] I TOO WOULD LIKE TO KNOW...


 Oh, Jume:

 If Michael was only
 sending 8 to 12 posts, it wouldn't be so bad, but this 20+ a day
 has got to
 stop, or else grant the same privilege to all of us.

 Excuse me, but when did CTRL become YOUR list? I mean, it must be for you
 to make such arrogant pronouncements. Start your own list and
 quit whining.

 Edward   +

 ===
 "In an age of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."
 -- George Orwell
 http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/5285/connector1.html
 Reality Pump: http://www.egroups.com/group/reality_pump
 ===

 A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
 DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
 ==
 CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing
 propagandic
 screeds are unwelcomed. Substance not soap-boxing please!  These are
 sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory' with its many half-truths,
 misdirections
 and outright frauds is used politically by different groups with major and
 minor
 effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That
 being said,
 CTRL
 gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always
 suggests to readers;
 be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
 nazi's need not apply.

 Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
 
 Archives Available at:
 http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
 A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

 http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
  A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A
 
 To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
 SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
 SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Om


A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om